Muslim Migrants Test the Limits of Denmark’s Tolerance
In Denmark, long famous for its easygoing tolerance, Muslim migrants have tested the limits of that tolerance. The Danes — both on the right and even more now, on the left — have put in place a series of measures to keep Muslim immigration to a minimum. Denmark’s example should serve as a model for other European countries. More on how Denmark has handled its Muslim problem can be found here:
Copenhagen: ‘We Have a Problem'
by James Zumwalt, American Thinker, July 16, 2026:
Hollywood used a misquote from an aborted 1975 moon landing—“Houston, we have a problem”—to make the movie “Apollo 13,” and in doing so, it became memorialized; the movie demonstrated NASA’s success in using teamwork to solve an issue that could have devastated the mission. It is an approach Denmark’s politicians adopted to tackle their own problem.
In 2018, Danish leaders had an “aha” moment, recognizing a major issue. In Apollo 13, the astronauts and NASA operated as a team from the outset; however, it would take a few years for the Danes to be able to mirror that dynamic on a political level to solve the issue about to devastate their own mission.
The problem Denmark faced was only recognized after its leaders analyzed what immigration data were telling them. A podcast by Dr. Steve Turley does an outstanding job of highlighting both Denmark’s problem and its solution.
Denmark opened its borders only to later discover that Muslim immigrants were taking advantage of that open door. By 2018, data revealed Muslims making up 14% of the country’s population accounted for over 30% of its violent crimes. Of interest too was that the conviction rate for Danish citizens was only twelve out of every one thousand while the conviction rate for Somalis alone was 114 per 1,000.
Additionally, non-Western immigrants and their children were costing the Danish government $4.2 billion annually. Shockingly, the data showed that Danish was no longer the primary language spoken on the street; Shariah-compliant social norms were enforced by Muslim communities; women leaving their homes unveiled were harassed; young men questioning the Islamic faith were threatened; Muslim school children told their infidel schoolmates their country, culture, and civilization was inferior; etc.
Turley explains “these were not parallel societies in the sense of harmless cultural diversity” but “enclaves operating under a different legal and moral framework than the Danish constitution.” Muslim immigration was creating “a state within a state.” The assumption Muslim immigrants would assimilate as other immigrants had done in Denmark was not playing out….
The Danes have now recognized that Muslims had no intention of assimilating into the larger Danish society. After all, Muslims know from the Qur’an that while they are “the best of people,” the native Danes, as non-Muslims, are “the most vile of created beings.” Why, in that case, would the former want to become like the latter?
Denmark also acted to educate children in these designated ghetto areas concerning Western society. It mandated they attend at least 25 hours weekly at state daycare centers. There they learned Danish values, Christmas traditions, democratic norms, gender equality, etc. Parents refusing to comply lost their welfare benefits.
The Danes now insist that children living in Muslim neighborhoods be required to take instruction for at least 25 hours in Danish values, including democracy and gender equality. Any parents not complying with this re-education of their children will lose their welfare benefits. Many Muslim parents, not wanting to subject their children to such an education in Infidel values, but unwilling to forgo those welfare benefits, will likely choose to settle in other European countries that are less determined than Denmark to replace Islamic values with Western ones.
The left in Denmark has not only accepted what the Danish right has done to discourage Muslim immigration, but has even gone beyond the left’s policy, acting against Muslim clerics, imams, and scholars who teach Islam not just as a religion but as a political ideology, which the Danish left decries.
The left in Denmark has always stood for an expanding welfare state. But now it realizes that the Muslim economic migrants, who are determined to enjoy all of the benefits that the generous welfare state provides — free or subsidized housing, free medical care, free education, family allowances, and more — are costing the Danish state many billions of dollars, and that is money that is no longer available to provide benefits to the indigenous Danish poor. The left is thus determined to slash to the bone the number of these Muslim recipients of welfare benefits.
The left in Denmark has thus chosen to keep funding its welfare program for native Danes by slashing the number of Muslim economic migrants to a rock-bottom level, in 2025, of fewer than 1,000.
Yet even if Denmark cuts way down on Muslim migrants, there will still be hordes of Muslims streaming into other European countries, some of whom will continually be trying to enter the Danish state which, as a member of Schengenland, may be forced to allow them in.
The example of Denmark shows that the political left and right can unite on the need to limit Muslim immigration, and that, furthermore, the left, once made aware of the supremacism and misogyny of Islam, and of the sums spent on welfare benefits for Muslims that are no longer available to support the Danish poor, can even go further than the right in stopping this demographic conquest from within.
Germany: Muslim migrant refuses to sit next to woman and strikes flight attendant in the face
It’s not at all surprising that he would hit the flight attendant. The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” — Sahih Muslim 2127
An another hadith states: “Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s Messenger came, Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!’” — Sahih Bukhari 7.77.5825
Integration ‘Success Story’: Turkish Man Refuses to Sit Next to Woman and Strikes Flight Attendant in the Face,”
translated from “Erfolgsstory“ Integration: Türke weigert sich neben Frau zu sitzen und schlägt Stewardess ins Gesicht,” Journalisten Watch, July 17, 2026 (thanks to Medforth):
Not a day goes by without the incompatibility of Islam—and its archaic tenets—with free Western societies becoming glaringly apparent. It has now emerged that on June 1, a 29-year-old man of Turkish background, traveling on a Turkish Airlines flight to Düsseldorf, first refused to sit next to a woman and then struck a flight attendant in the face when she addressed the issue. Federal police were summoned to the aircraft upon its arrival at Düsseldorf Airport to file a report for assault; the case has since been handed over to the Düsseldorf police.
A spokesperson stated that, according to initial witness accounts, the man cited Sharia law when refusing to sit next to a woman. According to the newspaper *Bild*, he admitted to federal police officers that he had struck the flight attendant. This incident reveals the explosive aggression of Muslims in two ways: first, the man refused to sit next to a woman by invoking Islamic Sharia law—a code belonging to the Stone Age—and then, unable to express himself in any other way, he struck a flight attendant in the face.
Germany and large parts of Europe are witnessing a regression to a pre-civilized state. Such incidents have long since become commonplace; in the worst cases, they prove fatal when Muslims either deliberately target “infidels” or resort to stabbing, punching, or shooting during altercations. Just this Wednesday, an Afghan man chased children and passersby with a drawn knife in Ruhpolding, Upper Bavaria. Miraculously, no one was killed.
Another Afghan man stabbed a student to death in Trier, and in Dresden, a Turkish man shouting “Allahu Akbar” opened fire on police officers before being shot down by them—all on a single day. In schools, Muslim students demand that everyone else observe their religious customs, insist on special privileges, and intimidate anyone who refuses to yield. The incident on the airplane fits seamlessly into this broader picture, illustrating the direction in which Europe is heading.
No comments:
Post a Comment