"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Politics in Europe > Marine Le Pen to run for President after all; Starmers gone, Burnhams in - will it make any difference?

 

Marine Le Pen and the Future of France


Marine Le Pen is the leader of the Rassemblement National, or National Rally (RN) political party, who several years ago used EU Parliament funds for her party’s benefit. For that, she was barred for three years from running in any European election. Now that sentence has been reduced, and she will be able to stand in the French presidential election to be held in April 2027. And what’s more according to the latest polls, she would win handily against any conceivable opponent. More on this good news can be found here: 


Marine Le Pen Would Comfortably Beat Any Opponent in French Presidential Election: Poll

by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, July 12, 2026:

National Rally leader Marine Le Pen would win next year’s French presidential election against any opponent, according to a survey conducted after it was revealed this week that she would be eligible to campaign to replace Emmanuel Macron in the Élysée Palace.

This week, the Paris Court of Appeals reduced the sentence against three-time presidential candidate Marine Le Pen over alleged misuse of EU Parliament funds. Critically, the court cut the time barring her from standing in any European election to allow for the National Rally (RN) leader to stand in the French presidential election next April….

While the two-round system has traditionally enabled neo-liberal forces to sideline populist candidates, including Le Pen on multiple occasions, with no transcendent figure such as Emmanuel Macron to unite the left and centrist wings, it appears the system may play into the National Rally’s hand….

Despite some arguing that the National Rally would fare better if Le Pen were banned from running, given the rising popularity of her 30-year-old deputy Jordan Bardella, the RN leaders put on a unified front, pitching themselves as a joint ticket.

Marine Le Pen, Vox España, Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedication


There is no rivalry between Le Pen and Bardella. Had her original three-year ban been upheld, Bardella would have run as the RN’s candidate, but he has willingly stepped back to let Le Pen reassume her role as undisputed leader of the party, and its only presidential candidate. They are trying to rescue their countrymen, and their country, from what could become an inexorable Muslim demographic takeover. This task is too important to allow, as Le Pen and Bardella both recognize, for a split in the party.

Le Pen does not say in that interview that Muslim immigration is one of the subjects — really, the main subject — that she wants to talk to the French about. She does not have to. Everyone in France knows that the subject of Muslims in the country has always been central to her political life. When she mentions she wants to talk to the people of France “about their lives, their security, their purchasing power,” she is alluding to how the Muslim presence had made life so much more unpleasant and physically dangerous because of the skyrocketing number of crimes committed by Muslims, including street robberies, home burglaries, sexual assaults and rapes, and expensive, due to the tens of billions of euros spent on all the benefits that the state lavishes on migrants, most of them maghrébins from Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia.

Le Pen’s skyrocketing support is a result of Macron’s failure, and that of other centrist politicians, to discuss publicly, and to confront head on, the problem of Muslim immigration. That is what she has made the focus of her public life. And that is why the French electorate is ready to have her become the leader of their country. After years of surviving everything the establishment parties could throw at her, she is at long last way ahead in the opinion polls. It is hard to see any way to stop her now. The Muslims in France have guaranteed, by their behavior, her election. And then, buoyed by her support, she will take on the tasks both of ending Muslim immigration, and deporting many of those who are already in France, including those convicted of crimes and those who, in refusing to work, will be deemed “parasites of the Republic.”

Le Pen is not alone. There are candidates, and parties, similar to Le Pen and the RN, in every country of Europe. Think of Rupert Lowe of the Restore Britain Party in the UK, Alice Weidel of Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, Giorgia Meloni of Fratelli d’Italia in Italy, Santiago Abascal of the Vox party in Spain, Geert Wilders of the Party for Freedom, Jimmie Akesson of the Sweden Democrats. Most of these parties, some of which were regarded as “pariah parties” not so long ago, have now risen to first or second place in their nation’s polls.

Europeans have now learned from their unhappy experience with large-scale Muslim migration. They want no more of it, and want too, to undo as much of that Muslim presence in their countries as they can.

What is now happening in France, as elsewhere in Europe, could be called, borrowing a term from American history, the Great Awakening.

================================================================================================



UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham unveils new government, replacing Starmer era

EUROPE

Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham took office on Monday, reshuffling the cabinet to remove allies of predecessor Keir Starmer and appointing John Healey as finance minister, Ed Miliband as foreign minister and Wes Streeting as defence minister. Burnham pledged a 10-year plan to tackle cost-of-living pressures and signalled a leftward shift.


New UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham took power Monday, purging the cabinet of his predecessor's loyalists as he promised a 10-year plan to ease cost-of-living pressures and signalled a tilt to the left.

He immediately got to work after replacing Keir Starmer in Downing Street, holding separate calls with US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky before appointing his ministerial team.

Burnham, 56, pledged to re-industrialise Britain and decentralise power as well as end sleeping rough on the streets after he met King Charles III at Buckingham Palace to become the head of government following Starmer's departure.

The monarch's fourth prime minister since he acceded to the throne in 2022, and Britain's seventh in just over a decade, Burnham said the country needed to show the world it could "regain stability".

Accompanied by his wife Marie-France van Heel, Burnham was greeted in Downing Street by resounding applause from supporters, including his mother.

Standing outside his new official residence at Number 10, he vowed to create "a new political model" and "build a new economy".

In his first call with Trump, Burnham underlined his "commitment to defence and security", a UK government spokesperson said.

Trump said he had a "very good conversation" with Burnham and that the two leaders would meet "in the not too distant future". 

Burnham "has got a big job ahead of him, but he will be able to do it and, of course, the U.S.A. will be there to help!" Trump posted on Truth Social, noting they discussed trade, military cooperation and demining the Strait of Hormuz.

To Zelensky, Burnham reaffirmed Britain's "resolute commitment" to Ukraine in its defence of Russia's invasion, according to Downing Street.

He also moved swiftly to stamp his authority on the new government by sacking several Starmer loyalists from his cabinet, including Rachel Reeves and David Lammy, while moving some ministers to other jobs and promoting allies.

Ex-defence secretary John Healey replaced Reeves as finance minister, Ed Miliband became foreign minister and left-wing figurehead Angela Rayner returned to government.

Wes Streeting, who abandoned plans to run against Burnham for the Labour leadership, is now defence minister. 

Shabana Mahmood was reappointed interior minister to see through her hardline reforms of Britain's asylum system.

In his brief speech, Burnham said he would "bring forward a new plan for Britain, a 10-year plan", without giving specifics.

Starmer had similarly talked of his intention to lead a "decade of national renewal" before Labour MPs ditched him last month in favour of Burnham, who only returned to parliament four weeks ago.

Burnham promised to "give people some breathing space now, some help with the cost of living", which he said he would start to announce Tuesday.

He also said his first instruction would be a pledge to "end rough sleeping", a measure he attempted to implement as a regional mayor in northern England, although it was not fully successful.

Other announcements included a vague promise to re-industrialise Britain through public procurement and to build more public housing.

He repeated his belief that "in the 1980s Britain took some wrong turns", as he pledged to decentralise power away from Westminster and "put life's essentials back under stronger public control to make them affordable".

Starmer departed Downing Street with his wife earlier, insisting his two years in office had made Britain "stronger and fairer".

Starmer led Labour to a landslide election victory in July 2024 after 14 years of Conservative rule, but his premiership became characterised by scandals, missteps and policy U-turns.

Burnham, the ex-mayor of Greater Manchester nicknamed the "King of the North", was parachuted in by Labour after Starmer resigned, with MPs viewing him as the party's best chance of reining in Reform, led by Nigel Farage.

But his swift "coronation" without a contest as Labour leader and now prime minister, by virtue of Labour's huge parliamentary majority, has raised questions about how he will achieve his aims.

Opposition politicians have questioned his mandate and called for a snap election.

French President Emmanuel Macron sent congratulations, urging Burnham to "give new momentum to the partnership" with the European Union.

=============================================================================

Ozzone 1-5 > Peter had to reach the end of himself before the Holy Spirit could come to him. Are you there yet?

 



Antisemitism > Colombia's new right wing government about to flip antisemitism on its head

 

Colombia Will Renew Ties With Israel and Move Its Embassy to Jerusalem


By
2 Comments

Under its previous leftist regime, headed by a former Marxist guerrilla, Gustavo Petro, Colombia turned resolutely against the Jewish state. It supported South Africa’s attempt at the International Court of Justice to have Israel found guilty of “genocide.” It cut off diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. It voted against Israel at the UN. It recognized the state of “Palestine.” But the left lost the election in June to the conservative candidate. And now that incoming government promises to embrace the country its predecessor shunned. More on this reversal of fortune can be found here: 


Colombia to Withdraw Support for South Africa’s ICJ Genocide Case Against Israel as Ties with Jerusalem Are Restored

by Ailin Vilches Arguello, Algemeiner, July 17, 2026:

Abelardo de la Espriella, Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedication

Colombia’s incoming government has pledged to withdraw the country’s support for South Africa’s contentious genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as Bogotá moves to restore diplomatic ties with Jerusalem and deepen bilateral cooperation.

According to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, the office of Colombia’s president-elect, Abelardo de la Espriella — who won last month’s runoff and is due to take office on Aug. 7 — said his administration would “return to a responsible position in the international arena,” including by ending the country’s involvement in the ICJ proceedings once he assumes office.

The announcement followed a meeting in Washington on Wednesday between Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and Colombia’s incoming foreign minister, Omar Bula, where the two sides agreed to fully restore diplomatic and economic ties, exchange ambassadors, and scrap mutual visa requirements after years of strained relations.

Colombia’s incoming administration also intends to open an embassy in Jerusalem — a move recognizing the city as Israel’s capital — according to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, marking a significant shift in Bogotá’s foreign policy toward the Jewish state.

Saar wrote that he and Bula had “outlined a detailed roadmap for the full and immediate restoration of diplomatic and economic relations between our two countries.”

Historically, Colombia has been among Israel’s closest partners in Latin America, maintaining strong security, economic, and diplomatic cooperation for decades. Relations deteriorated sharply under outgoing leftist President Gustavo Petro, who filed a declaration of intervention in South Africa’s case in April 2024 and severed diplomatic ties with Israel the following month over the war in Gaza.

Since Dec. 2023, South Africa has pursued its case at the ICJ, accusing Israel of committing “state-led genocide” in its war against Hamas in Gaza….

Israel has strongly rejected all allegations of genocide, calling South Africa’s case “baseless” and “politically motivated.”

Let’s say it again, ad nauseam: “Genocide” requires “intent.” The IDF has ever shown the intent to deliberately mass murder Gazans. The IDF has made tremendous efforts, by dropping millions oof leaflets, sending millions of text messages, and making millions of robocalls, to war civilians away from sites about to be targeted. It is Hamas that, by embedding its fighters and weapons in with Gazan civilians, increases the number of their casualties. As John Spencer, a West Point professor of urban warfare, has said, “Israel has implemented more precautionary measures to prevent civilian casualties in urban combat than any military in history.”

Just as soon as the newly-elected government in Colombia takes power, everything connected to Israel will change. Historically, Colombia always had good relations with Israel. But under the previous president, the left-wing Gustavo Petro (a former FARC guerilla), all that changed. Diplomatic relations with Israel were cut. Colombia consistently voted at the U.N. to condemn the Jewish state. Colombia supported South Africa’s attempt at the International Court of Justice to have Israel found guilty of “genocide.” And finally, Gustavo Petro’s regime recognized the state of “Palestine.”

The new Colombian President, Abelardo de la Espriella, has already announced that his government will immediately restore diplomatic relations with Israel and re-establish bilateral agreements on trade, technology, and security. It will withdraw its previous support of South Africa’s attempt to have Israel condemned at the ICJ. It will cease to vote against Israel at the UN. But most satisfying of all, Colombia’s next foreign minister, Omar Bola Escobar, in a meeting on July 15 with Israel’s foreign secretary, Gideon Sa’ar, has pledged that his government will move its embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, the ninth country to do so. That followed a declaration by President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella that Colombia would establish relations “like never before” with Israel once he takes the oath of office on August 7. Colombia is an important country; with 54 million people, it is the second-most populous Spanish-speaking country. This return to sanity in Bogotá is a big win for Israel.



Monday, July 20, 2026

Iran > Did Mojtaba Khamenei flee Iran?

 

According to World Israel News, he has. Buy why? Who is he afraid of: Americans, Israelis, or the IRGC?


Iran’s supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei has fled the country – report

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is reportedly issuing statements in the name of Iran’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, after he left the country.

By World Israel News Staff

Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is no longer inside the country and recent statements attributed to him were written by senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials, according to an Israeli security official cited Sunday by the Saudi broadcaster Al Hadath.

The official provided no evidence for the claim and did not identify the country where Khamenei was purportedly staying. Iran did not immediately confirm or respond to the report, which could not be independently verified.

According to the Israeli official, Khamenei has become completely disconnected from developments inside Iran, leaving IRGC commander Ahmad Vahidi and other senior officers to compose statements in his name and present an appearance of leadership continuity.

The allegation would represent a significant escalation from previous reports describing Khamenei as isolated in a secret location with extremely restricted communications. Earlier American intelligence reporting said messages reached him through what officials described as “a labyrinth of couriers,” but did not indicate that he had left Iran.

Questions surrounding Khamenei’s whereabouts, health and authority have persisted since he succeeded his father, Ali Khamenei, following the previous supreme leader’s death in US-Israeli strikes on Feb. 28.

The younger Khamenei was reportedly injured in the same attack and has not made a confirmed public appearance since his appointment on March 8. He was also absent from the extensive funeral ceremonies held for his father earlier this month, despite reports that he had sought permission to attend.

Iranian officials attributed his absence to injuries and the danger that a public appearance could allow Israel to locate or assassinate him. President Masoud Pezeshkian said in May that he had met Khamenei and that the supreme leader’s condition was improving.

The IRGC published what it described as a new photograph of Khamenei on July 11 and said he was in “complete health.” The image did not resolve doubts over his location or the extent to which he was personally directing government decisions.

Iranian state media have instead issued a succession of written messages attributed to the supreme leader. In a statement released Saturday, Khamenei purportedly said repeated American violations of a memorandum signed with Tehran had shown that President Donald Trump’s signature was “utterly worthless and devoid of credibility.”

The statement also warned that Iran and the regional “resistance front” had “unforgettable lessons” for the United States as fighting between the two countries intensified.

The Israeli official cited by Al Hadath claimed those and other messages were not written by Khamenei, but by Vahidi and members of the Revolutionary Guard seeking to conceal the leader’s absence and maintain the appearance of a functioning command structure.

No independent evidence has emerged establishing who prepared or approved the written statements. Reuters reported earlier this month that senior Iranian sources believed Khamenei was continuing to make decisions while recovering, even though he was not well enough to appear publicly.

His prolonged absence has nevertheless become an increasingly serious political problem for the Islamic Republic. Iran’s supreme leader is constitutionally the country’s highest authority, with control over the armed forces, intelligence apparatus, judiciary and major elements of foreign and domestic policy.

Khamenei entered the office without the public political history or senior religious standing possessed by his predecessors. His influence before becoming supreme leader was largely exercised behind the scenes through his father’s office and his close relationships with Revolutionary Guard commanders.

Those ties have fueled speculation that the IRGC is exercising unprecedented control over the state while the supreme leader remains hidden.

“The internal divisions in Iran are deep and threaten the very existence of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps,” the Israeli official told Al Hadath.

The official also claimed that Iranian operatives had prepared a sophisticated plan to assassinate senior Israeli figures in central Tel Aviv in retaliation for Ali Khamenei’s death.

No details were provided about the intended targets, the alleged method of attack or whether any suspects had been arrested. Israeli authorities have not publicly announced the disruption of such a plot.

Iran and its allied organizations have repeatedly threatened to avenge the elder Khamenei’s killing. Vahidi said earlier this month that pursuing those responsible for the US-Israeli operation would remain a permanent Iranian priority.

The Israeli source separately claimed that Washington does not want Israel participating in offensive operations against Iran, even in response to an Iranian attack.

The United States has not publicly confirmed such a restriction.