"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Sunday, September 27, 2026

Will Trump Invade Canada? Carney studied possibility, but media doesn't want to know results

 

If Pierre Poilievre were Prime Minister and this story came out, Canada media would have jumped all over him with both feet. But not their left-wing, globalist darling Carney; he gets a free ride wherever he goes.


Canada studied ‘extreme’ US military scenario – Carney


Ottawa planned for the possibility despite Donald Trump explicitly ruling out force as Canada moves to deepen defense ties with Europe

Published 24 Sep, 2026 15:04 | Updated 24 Sep, 2026 16:05

Canada studied ‘extreme’ US military scenario – Carney











Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has revealed that his government carefully examined the possibility of US-led military action against his country, despite President Donald Trump having ruled out using force against America’s northern neighbor.

In an interview with the New York Times published on Wednesday, Carney described such a scenario as an “extreme tail risk” – an event considered highly unlikely but serious enough to warrant contingency planning.

“That’s just risk management,” he said, adding that “it would be irresponsible not to [prepare].” Carney declined to discuss what that preparation involved.

And what did we do to prepare? Reactivate the Snowbirds? Threaten to burn down the White House again? Unbelievably, Canada's hapless media isn't asking!

Trump has repeatedly floated making Canada the 51st US state but explicitly ruled out using military force to achieve it, stating in January 2025 that he would apply “economic force” instead.

Has the American military drawn up contingency plans for a possible invasion of Canada. Does the media want to know the answer?

The US president has long accused Ottawa of unfair trade practices, particularly on dairy and automobiles, and has imposed a series of tariffs on Canadian goods since early 2025. Washington escalated the dispute in August 2026 with additional 50% duties on a range of Canadian products.

Carney’s disclosure comes just days after he traveled to the EU to deepen ties with the bloc.

Addressing the European Parliament last week, Carney argued that economic integration was increasingly being “weaponized,” with tariffs used as leverage and supply-chain dependencies exploited as vulnerabilities – remarks widely seen as an implicit reference to Washington’s economic pressure on Ottawa.

Defense was also part of Carney’s talks in Strasbourg, where he and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen discussed expanding Canada-EU military cooperation and joint procurement to strengthen what Carney called their “strategic autonomy.”

That cooperation is already taking shape through the EU’s €150 billion ($170 billion) SAFE defense procurement program, in which Canada has become the first non-European country to participate. The initiative is part of Brussels’ wider militarization under its Readiness 2030 strategy, aimed at countering an alleged threat from Russia – something Moscow has repeatedly denied.

Ottawa is also seeking closer ties with European military structures beyond the EU. Last week, it formally applied to join the UK-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF), a ten-nation rapid-response military grouping that complements NATO and operates primarily across the Arctic, North Atlantic, and Baltic regions – key parts of the bloc’s northern flank, which stretches toward Russia’s borders.





Politics in Europe > Serbian President resigns to go after the PM position; Ukraine paid American veterans for propaganda videos (with American money)

 

Serbian president resigns


Aleksander Vucic has officially announced his departure months after saying he will leave

Published 27 Sep, 2026 18:14 | Updated 27 Sep, 2026 19:48

Serbian president resigns










Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic resigned from office on Sunday ahead of snap parliamentary elections. The outgoing president is set to run for re-election as the candidate for the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), seeking the prime minister office instead.

Vucic announced the move from the presidential palace, stating that his address would be the last in his current capacity. He is stepping down during his second presidential term and, under the Serbian constitution, cannot seek another one. A new election must be held within three months of the president’s resignation.

Vucic first announced his intent to leave his post at a rally in June.

The impending snap presidential vote means Serbs will have to go to the polls twice this year. The snap parliamentary election is set to be held on October 25, with Vucic expected to run as the head of his SNS party, potentially taking the prime minister post should it emerge victorious.

A large crowd of Vucic supporters gathered outside the presidential palace to bid him farewell. Some carried banners reading “Thank you,” as well as hailing Vucic as a “political genius.” The outgoing president joined his supporters in person after wrapping up his address and signing his resignation letter on camera, footage from the scene shows.

“This evening marks my last chance, the final time I am here in this beautiful building as president. I have held the office of president longer than anyone else in Serbia’s history since the establishment of multi-party democracy. I am proud to have achieved this thanks to your votes and support,” Vucic said in his address.

Vucic’s second term, originally set to run until May 2027, has been overshadowed over the past two years by recurring anti-government protests and sporadic clashes between demonstrators and police. The unrest was sparked by the 2024 railway station disaster in Novi Sad, where the collapse of a concrete canopy killed 16 people.

The tragedy gave rise to a broader anti-government movement that has accused the authorities of negligence and misuse of public funds, allegedly leaving Yugoslav-era infrastructure to deteriorate. Vucic has consistently denied the allegations, arguing instead that the unrest was incited by Brussels as part of a pressure campaign aimed at pushing Belgrade to align its foreign policy more closely with the EU.




Inside Ukraine’s propaganda operation targeting Americans


Ben Swann and Elizabeth Lane examine how a Ukrainian government-backed project offered US veterans $10,000 per video to push pro-Kiev messages

Published 24 Sep, 2026 15:38 | Updated 24 Sep, 2026 16:40

Inside Ukraine’s propaganda operation targeting Americans









Ukraine’s government-backed United24 project offered former US service members thousands of dollars to produce pro-Ukraine videos for American audiences, RT’s America Now has found. The offers targeted veterans whose military backgrounds could make the message seem more credible to viewers.

Host Ben Swann and investigative journalist Elizabeth Lane examined how the project, launched by Vladimir Zelensky in 2022 to raise support for Ukraine, approached former personnel, including special operations veterans with YouTube channels and other media platforms.

According to veterans who reached out to Lane, United24 offered around $10,000 for each video, plus $40,000 in advertising support. There was no stated limit on the number of videos they could make. The project would also provide scripts and guidance, while the veterans would ultimately deliver praise for Ukraine and Zelensky in their own words.

Some creators who agreed to the deal were reportedly creating up to five or six videos a week, making nearly a quarter of a million dollars a month, Lane found.

The men who spoke with Lane said they themselves had turned down the money, recognizing that they were being asked to present paid propaganda as their own views.

However, for some, the refusal came with consequences beyond lost income. One veteran, who turned down the offer and later criticized Ukraine for wasting US money on his channel, had people contacting his employer, calling him a Russian agent, and trying to get him fired.

The effort ultimately failed, Lane learned, noting that it is still “crazy that some foreign government is allowed to reach out to an employer of a former veteran and tell them that ‘you should fire this guy because he’s a Russian propagandist.’”

United24 has since tried to deny making such offers, despite Lane’s recorded Zoom calls with multiple veterans that testify to the contrary.

The choice of former service members is central to the Ukrainian propaganda operation, Swann noted, pointing out that many Americans are inclined to trust someone who had served in the US military, unless they find out that the veteran had been offered thousands of dollars by a foreign government to deliver the message.

Furthermore, given that Kiev is almost exclusively funded by its foreign sponsors, including billions received from Washington, the Ukrainian government-backed United24 campaign is effectively propaganda aimed at Americans, being paid for by US taxpayers themselves, Swann noted.

With Ukraine struggling on the battlefield, the propaganda efforts will likely continue to intensify, Lane predicted, describing a possible surge of supportive messages from major online figures as a “Hail Mary” attempt to shore up backing for Kiev.



Ozzone 1-21 > Do you remember the extravagance of your love for Jesus in your youth? Jesus does!

 




Friday, September 25, 2026

MAiD - Medical Assistance in Dying > In Canada, MAiD is akin to waterboarding to death - Dr. Jordan Peterson

 


https://www.facebook.com/reel/801626345827818




Politics in Germany > Hapless Merz on his way out? Merz government forming "Stasi 2.0"?

 

It's time for Germany's government to start representing the people instead of expecting the people to honour the left-wing, godless government.


Merz faces pension mutiny after election disaster


The German chancellor is under pressure to soften plans to scrap early retirement as his SPD coalition partners demand a change of course
Published 25 Sep, 2026 15:12 | Updated 25 Sep, 2026 16:15
Merz faces pension mutiny after election disaster










German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s humiliating run of regional election defeats has reignited a bitter fight over his unpopular pension reform, with his Social Democratic coalition partners pushing back against plans that could make Germans work longer, national media have reported.


Merz’s Christian Democrats suffered a historic drubbing this month, culminating in what the chancellor himself called a “disaster” in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. The CDU failed to clear the 5% threshold for the state parliament, while the right-wing, anti-immigration and Euroskeptic Alternative for Germany (AfD) came first. The AfD also topped the vote in Saxony-Anhalt, while in Berlin the CDU was pushed into second place behind the left-wing Die Linke. The SPD also suffered significant losses.

The defeats have complicated Merz’s already contentious reform drive. At the center of the fight is the so-called “pension at 63,” which allows people with 45 qualifying years to retire early without deductions. A government commission recommended scrapping the scheme, citing Germany’s aging population straining pension finances and the workforce. Merz, who has repeatedly urged Germans to work more, backs the reform.

Opponents, however, have argued abolition would punish people who started work young and paid into the system for decades. The issue is particularly sensitive in eastern Germany, where incomes and private savings tend to be lower. An INSA poll published last month found 68% of Germans opposed scrapping the scheme.

The election rout has given those opponents fresh leverage, including within Merz’s conservative camp, German media has reported. An SPD strategy document circulated this week argued there are “open questions” on proposed early retirement changes. SPD parliamentary group leader Matthias Miersch has called the entitlement after 45 years a “fundamental issue of justice,” while Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania’s Minister-President Manuela Schwesig argued that people who have worked and paid contributions throughout their careers should retain the right to retire early without deductions.

The coalition is now scrambling for a compromise. According to Bild and Spiegel reports on Thursday, options include preserving deduction-free early retirement for physically demanding jobs, such as roofing, or raising the qualifying period from 45 years to 46 or 47. Hardship exemptions and transition periods for workers nearing retirement are also under discussion.

Alexander Hoffmann, parliamentary group leader of the CSU, the CDU’s sister party, argued there could be no pension reform without scrapping the early retirement scheme, telling Bild: “We have a clear agreement in the coalition: hardship cases yes, standard cases no.” However, nearly four hours of coalition talks this week reportedly failed to produce an agreement.

The clash threatens more than the pension scheme. Merz came to power promising sweeping reforms to revive Europe’s largest economy after years of stagnation, but the election defeats have sharply narrowed his room for maneuver. Analysts say SPD lawmakers whose votes he needs have less incentive to embrace unpopular measures after the governing parties were punished at the ballot box, while resistance is also reportedly growing within the CDU itself, particularly in the east. Merz, however, has responded to the election defeats by insisting that “the reforms must come.”

The chancellor’s own standing has plunged amid economic weakness and dissatisfaction with his government. Earlier this month, just 10% of respondents told pollster Forsa they were satisfied with his performance, against 88% who were dissatisfied. A YouGov poll published ahead of the latest elections found 48% of Germans expected him to be out of office by year-end. German media have also discussed the possibility of a Kanzlertausch, or “chancellor swap,” if the CDU suffers further setbacks.




Merz government wants ‘secret police’ – opposition


German lawmakers have warned that sweeping new powers for intelligence agencies would undermine fundamental rights

Published 24 Sep, 2026 18:46 | Updated 24 Sep, 2026 19:50

The HQ of the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND) is seen in Berlin, Germany, on July 19, 2026.











Germany’s opposition lawmakers have accused Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s government of seeking to create a “secret police” by dramatically expanding the powers of the country’s intelligence agencies.

The accusations came during the first parliamentary debate on the reform on Thursday, with lawmakers from the Alternative for Germany (AfD), the Left and the Greens raising concerns over surveillance and fundamental rights. The government argues that the changes are needed to counter growing security threats.

Under a reform approved by the cabinet last month, the BND foreign intelligence agency and the BfV domestic security service would gain broader operational powers, allowing them to move beyond primarily gathering and analyzing information.

Among the proposed changes, the BND could sabotage foreign companies, penetrate foreign IT systems and disable weapons deemed a threat to Germany. The BfV, meanwhile, could secretly enter homes and access computers and mobile phones under certain circumstances.

Sounds like a threat to the AfD.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the reform would usher in a “new era” by turning the country’s intelligence services into “genuine intelligence agencies” capable of actively countering threats. He said Germany must bring its services to the level of its European partners.

AfD MP Gottfried Curio branded the proposed overhaul of the BfV “Stasi 2.0,” referring to East Germany’s notorious secret police, and called the reform a “coup against the rule of law.” The AfD, however, supports granting the BND greater operational powers.

Even though it will most likely be used against them before the next federal elections? Go figure!

The BfV has itself been locked in a legal battle with the AfD. In 2025, the agency designated Germany’s most popular party a “confirmed right-wing extremist” organization, but a Cologne court in February barred it from applying that classification while the case proceeds.

The ruling came months before the AfD scored major gains in regional elections. It won 43.8% in Saxony-Anhalt earlier this month and 38.3% in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania on Sunday.

Green MP Konstantin von Notz said granting the BfV such extensive powers would be a “grave mistake” and questioned whether parts of the reform would survive scrutiny by the Constitutional Court. He nevertheless backed giving the BND greater powers.

Left Party MP Clara Buenger went further, warning that the BfV could become a “new German secret police.”

“Fundamental rights are being trampled on here,” she said, arguing that the agency would gain powers traditionally reserved for police.

The debate comes as Merz’s government braces for growing AfD influence at the regional level. The Telegraph and Die Welt reported in July that Berlin was developing a “secret plan” to counter potential “obstructionism” by regional authorities, allowing the federal government to bypass them in a crisis.

The German government wants the intelligence reform to take effect at the beginning of 2027. It still requires approval from both the Bundestag and Bundesrat.

=====================================================================