Covid_19 > First trimester pregnant women lost 82% of pregnancies after vaccine - as effective as abortion drugs

 

Doctor confirms: Number of deaths of unborn after COVID shots mirrors ‘effects of chemical abort drugs’

Jun 5, 2025 11:00 am By Christine Douglass-Williams6 Comments

Thank the Marxist left for this catastrophic outcome, as it was they who forced an experimental vaccine on trusting citizens, even as leftists also paraded their “my body, my choice” slogan in their abortion activism.

'Haunting’: Number of deaths of unborn after COVID shots ‘mirrors the effects of chemical abort drugs'

by Bob Unruh, World Net Daily, June 2, 2025:

An obstetrician and gynecologist has confirmed in testimony to the U.S. Senate that the figure for the miscarriage deaths following COVID-19 shots, demanded by Biden administration officials for pregnant women, “mirrors the effects of chemical abort drugs.”

The stunning news of the threat from the drugs pushed by Joe Biden onto the American public during the China virus pandemic came from Dr. James Thorp, who delivered a “haunting” moment in testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs.

Thorp explained that women vaccinated during their first trimester suffered an 82% miscarriage rate.

He said, too, that the government knew what it was doing.

He cited an “infamous” Shimabukuro study from the New England Journal of Medicine that claimed a 12.6% miscarriage rate.

“But when you isolate the data for women vaccinated in the first trimester, the miscarriage rate rises to 82%," Dr. Thorp said. This 82% claim remains a topic of debate within the scientific community. If true, ‘This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abort drugs,’ Dr. Thorp lamented,” reports confirmed….

=====================================================================================

Covid-19 > Citigroup set to fire unvaccinated employees; Another possible side-effect from shots; Pregnancy issues; Millions of doses destroyed

..

Citigroup Bank First Major Financial Institution to Start

Firing Unvaccinated Employees

January 13, 2022

Elizabeth Johnston

Photo by Mikel Parera on Unsplash

Citigroup announced last week they are set to start firing employees who do not comply with the company’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement.

On Friday, the bank issued a memo to workers informing them that they must prove their vaccine status by the end of this week, The New York Post reported.

The deadline for employees to get fully vaccinated was set in October, although they did not indicate that employees who refused would be fired at that time.

As Citigroup services the federal government, its employees are subject to the Biden administration’s vaccine requirement for workers at institutions that fulfill federal contracts.

Currently, the Biden administration’s directive by the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to private businesses with 100 or more employees is being argued before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Last week’s memo warned that those who do not comply will be placed on unpaid leave and ultimately terminated on Jan. 31.

The bank has said in the past they would consider issuing exemptions on a case-by-case basis, and employees who do not comply might still be eligible for year-end bonuses — if they agree not to pursue legal action against the financial group over the vaccine requirement.

The Post noted that other banks have taken a softer approach to vaccines. While JPMorgan told employees it would no longer hire unvaccinated workers, unvaccinated workers have been allowed to work at home while a solution is reached.

Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have also been requesting that unvaccinated employees work from home.

===========================================================================================

Rare condition listed as possible side effect of COVID-19 shots

The EU’s drug watchdog is warning of a ‘very rare’ spinal cord inflammation possibly related to AstraZeneca and J&J vaccines

A medical worker administers a shot of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to a man, at makeshift vaccination center in Belgrade, Serbia, Thursday, Dec. 30, 2021. © AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic

The European Medicines Agency wants to put warning labels on Covid-19 jabs made by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, saying there was a “reasonable possibility” they may have caused a spinal inflammation on rare occasions.

Following three days of meetings and discussions, the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) said Friday it wants to include a warning for “very rare cases of transverse myelitis (TM) reported following vaccination” with Vaxzevria and Janssen jabs. It is also adding the condition as an “adverse reaction of unknown frequency” to the vaccine profile.

The EMA describes TM as a rare neurological condition characterized by an “inflammation of one or both sides of the spinal cord,” which can cause weakness in arms or legs, tingling, numbness, pain – or loss of pain sensation – and problems with bowel and bladder function.

The recommendation comes after PRAC reviewed available information on reported cases worldwide and scientific literature,  concluding that “a causal relationship between these two vaccines and transverse myelitis is at least a reasonable possibility.” However, it said the “benefit-risk profile of both vaccines remains unchanged.”

The warning is intended to “raise awareness among healthcare professionals and people receiving the vaccines.” Doctors were told to be on alert for signs and symptoms of TM, while recipients were urged to “seek immediate medical attention” if they develop the symptoms.

Last month, EMA approved the Janssen jab as a booster for people 18 and older, to be given at least two months after previous vaccinations.

PRAC also revised the product information for AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria, to reflect that far fewer cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS) – blood clotting with a low platelet count – have been recorded after the second dose of the jab, compared to the first. 

The use of AstraZeneca’s vaccine, developed with Oxford University, has already been scaled back due to the “ultra rare” side effect, which UK government statistics last summer estimated at around 14.9 per million doses of the jab. A study published in December blamed a very specific issue with Vaxzevria’s adenovirus vector.

=============================================================================================

Dangers of Covid-19 during pregnancy revealed

Even mild cases of the coronavirus could lead to severe complications for the woman and the fetus, US scientists have warned

© Getty Images / Oscar Wong

Women who got Covid-19 during pregnancy have an increased chance of poor birth outcomes, including babies being born small, low birth weights, and stillbirths, a new study has found.

Research spearheaded by the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle was based on the health records of 18,000 women who delivered babies in the US between March 2020 and July 2021. 

Some 880 of them had tested positive for the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) during pregnancy, and their data was compared to that of other mothers who were never infected with the virus.

The results of the team’s work have been shared in the prestigious Lancet Digital Health journal on Thursday.

“We found that SARS-CoV-2 infection indicated increased rates of preterm delivery and stillbirth, largely driven by first and second trimester infections,” Dr. Samantha Piekos, the first author of the paper, pointed out.

The females in the study had mild or moderate cases of Covid-19. And the paper revealed that poor birth outcomes were possible even if the mother didn’t encounter any respiratory problems due to the disease.

However, the severity of maternal infection wasn’t correlated with gestational age at delivery, according to the study.

“The single greatest predictor of gestational age at delivery is gestational age at infection, with earlier age at infection associated with earlier age at delivery,” Piekos explained.

The paper’s corresponding author Dr. Jennifer Hadlock also stressed that “both maternal and fetal health are at increased risk with Covid-19” regardless of the severity of the disease.

The study asserted that pregnant women “would benefit from increased monitoring and enhanced prenatal care after first or second trimester SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of acute Covid-19 severity.”

The data used in the survey was from the period when vaccines weren’t so widely available in the US. Now, when more that 60% of Americans have received two shots of Covid-19 vaccines, further studies can be carried out to find out if vaccination helps to reduce poor birth outcomes, the authors suggested.

Poorer nations reject millions of expiring Covid vaccine doses – UN

Just last month over 100 million doses offered through the Covax program were not accepted

FILE PHOTO. A freezer with vials of vaccines against Covid-19.

©Camilo Erasso / Universal Images Group via Getty Images

The program to help poorer nations to vaccinate their populations against Covid-19 is facing a problem, as many donations have a remaining shelf life too short to be properly distributed, a UN official has revealed.

In December alone, over 100 million doses offered to the UN’s COVAX program had to be rejected by aid recipients, most of them due to the looming expiration dates of the vaccines, Etleva Kadilli told the European Parliament on Thursday. The official heads the Supply Division of UNICEF, the UN’s agency for the betterment of children’s lives worldwide.

The agency later in the day said some 15.5 million of the doses rejected last month were reportedly destroyed. Some of the shipments were rejected by multiple countries.

Poorer nations have a number of issues with accepting the vaccines donated to them. Many lack storage capacity to receive shipments and have problems with rolling out vaccination campaigns due to factors like domestic instability and strained healthcare infrastructure.

But the short expiration dates of vaccines donated to the sharing program is also a major problem, Kadilli told EU lawmakers.

“Until we have a better shelf life, this is going to be a pressure point for the countries, specifically when countries want to reach populations in hard-to-reach areas,” she said.

COVAX is currently approaching the delivery of its billionth dose, its management reported. The EU accounts for about a third of the doses delivered to it so far, Kadilli said.

The World Health Organization (WHO), which co-manages COVAX, has repeatedly described the lackluster assistance it received from donors amid the hoarding of vaccines by rich nations as a moral failure.

Some 92 member states missed the WHO’s 40% vaccination goal in 2021 “due to a combination of limited supply going to low-income countries for most of the year and then subsequent vaccines arriving close to expiry and without key parts – like the syringes,” WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus said during an end-of-year conference in December.

Some critics say the program was flawed from the start because it relies on the generosity of the wealthy instead of pushing for wider availability of vaccines to developing nations through the eradication of legal barriers like patent protection. Billionaire Bill Gates, who is an influential figure in global healthcare, has been a vocal opponent of stripping patent protections for medicines, though his foundation seemed to buckle on Covid-19 vaccines after facing criticism over the position.

Alternatives designed for the needs and capabilities of poor nations, like the open-source, patent-free Corbevax vaccine, have been suffering from lack of funding. The vaccine developed by two Texas scientists received more money from the charity arm of spirits maker Tito’s Vodka, which is based in their home state, than from the US government, the project’s co-director Elena Bottazzi told Vice.

Of course, Big Pharma will not let the government invest in a cheap product that works, it would cut into their profits.

No doubt, Big Pharma got paid in full for those destroyed doses; that would be in the billions of dollars.

===========================================================================================

Dated Story Reveals Astonishing, Alleged Plot by WHO & UNICEF to Reduce Population of Kenya

‘A mass sterilization exercise’:

Kenyan doctors find anti-fertility agent in UN tetanus vaccine

'This WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine.'

Thu Nov 6, 2014

By Steve Weatherbe, Lifesite News

UPDATE (Nov. 12): Kenya's government has launched an investigation into the Catholic Church's allegations. 

Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”

Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”

But the government says the vaccine is safe. Health Minister James Macharia even told the BBC, “I would recommend my own daughter and wife to take it because I entirely 100% agree with it and have confidence it has no adverse health effects.” 

And Dr. Collins Tabu, head of the Health Ministry’s immunization branch, told the Kenyan Nation, that “there is no other additive in the vaccine other than the tetanus antigen.”

Tabu said the same vaccine has been used for 30 years in Kenya. Moreover, “there are women who were vaccinated in October 2013 and March this year who are expectant. Therefore we deny that the vaccines are laced with contraceptives.”

Newspaper stories also report women getting pregnant after being vaccinated.

Responds Dr. Ngare: “Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’” Dr. Ngare added: “The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.”

Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare. “If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.”

But it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.”

It is HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors warn that injecting women with HCG, which mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage.

“We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,” said Dr. Ngare. “It didn’t cause miscarriages till three years later,” which is why, he added, the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got pregnant are meaningless.

Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the 1990s. “We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time they haven’t done so.”

Ngare also contrasted the secrecy of this campaign with the usual fanfare accompanying national vaccination efforts. “They usually bring all the stakeholders together three months before the campaign, like they did with polio a little while ago. And they use staff in all the centres to give out the vaccine.” But with this anti-tetanus campaign, “only a few operatives from the government are allowed to give it out. They come with a police escort. They take it away with them when they are finished. Why not leave it with the local medical staff to administer?”

Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News that WHO was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns. “They try to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work.”

In the previous cases, said Clowes, the vaccinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.

LifeSiteNews has obtained a UN report on an August 1992 meeting at its world headquarters in Geneva of 10 scientists from “Australia, Europe, India and the U.S.A” and 10 “women’s health advocates” from around the world, to discuss the use of “fertility regulating vaccines.” It describes the “anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine” as the most advanced.  

One million Kenyan women and girls have been vaccinated so far with another 1.3 million to go. The vaccination is targeting women, according to the government, in order to inoculate their children in the womb against tetanus as well. The government says 550 children die of tetanus yearly.

In covering the contest of words the pro-government Nation found plenty of women who had been vaccinated and were now pregnant, even one who was the wife of a former Catholic priest who left the Church to marry. The paper ignored Kenya’s reliance on the Catholic medical system, while setting the bishops’ stand in a questionable historical context of irrational responses “largely based on religious beliefs,” the more recent murder of vaccination teams in Nigeria, and even of CIA conspiracy theories.

Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries? “Racism,” is Brian Clowes’ first explanation.  “Also, the developed countries want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole bogus global warming thing.”

Dr. Ngare said it was the Catholic Church’s hope that the government could have resolved the matter quietly by testing the vaccine. “But the government has chosen to be combative,” forcing Kenya’s bishops and Catholic doctors to go public.

WHO’s Kenyan office and several WHO media contacts in Washington, D.C. failed to respond to LifeSiteNews enquiries over a 24-hour period.  

Northern Irish Assembly Rejects Abortion Law Change

Betrayal of women or faithful to sanctity of life?

© Regis Duvignau / Reuters

My subtitle above is a most unfortunate reality - we should never have come to a place where we have to choose a child's right to live over its mother's right to not be pregnant. It's an absurd argument since women have any number of ways to not get pregnant and that's really it, isn't it? If you don't want to have a baby, don't get pregnant! I know there are many situations where that is not a choice for a girl, but most abortions are not performed on women who had no choice in whether or not they get pregnant. That is a disgrace and is morally repugnant at best.

Members of the Northern Irish Assembly have voted against proposals to relax strict abortion laws. Human rights groups said the decision has “betrayed women and girls.”

The Stormont assembly voted 59 to 40 against the legislation, which proposed to allow abortions in the case of fatal fetal abnormality and sexual crime. 

Not sure I agree with preventing abortions of fatally abnormal fetuses, however, I suspect that could be misused. I don't know if that was their reasoning for rejecting it or not.

Amnesty International said the decision will allow Northern Ireland to maintain its “Victorian” and “restrictive” laws, and called on the devolved authority to bring its legislation in line with the rest of the UK.

Despite a debate which lasted until nearly midnight, the outcome of the vote was predictable, after the Democratic Unionists and the SDLP announced they would not support amendments to the law.

Abortion is permitted in the rest of the UK under the 1967 Abortion Act, but in Northern Ireland terminations are only allowed if the mental health or life of the mother is in danger.

The rejection of abortions for reason of sexual crimes, ie rape, is not a real issue since that can be covered under the 'mental health' exception. If a girl is able to carry the child while receiving counselling for the rape, she should do that. She can then give the child up for adoption if she doesn't want to keep it. 

She should also have the option of keeping the child and continuing counselling for a period afterward.

The change to legislation was proposed by Alliance Party members Trevor Lunn and Stewart Dickson. Lunn told the assembly his decision was sparked by the “painful” decision to access an abortion many years ago due to a fatal fetal condition.

In December last year, Belfast’s High Court ruled that abortion law in Northern Ireland breaches the European Convention on Human Rights.

Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland program director, said the laws are draconian and in need of urgent change.

“Northern Ireland’s abortion law dates from Victorian times, is among the most restrictive in the world and is in urgent need of reform. A vote to stymie change today is a further betrayal of women and girls who will continue to be forced to travel outside Northern Ireland to seek the healthcare they are denied at home.”

He said between 1,000 and 2,000 women are forced to travel abroad each year to find abortions, and “are made to feel like criminals for having done so.”

They would have felt that way even if they received their abortions in Belfast. Guilt is inevitable when you take the life of a child that God has blessed you with, as it should be.

“An extensive consultation on this issue was already conducted by the Department of Justice in 2014/2015 – it recommended a change to the law with regard to access to abortion on fatal fetal abnormality. The DUP and other Executive Ministers have had eight months to get behind the proposal from the Justice Minister and have failed to do so. More talk will tell us nothing we do not already know – that the law on abortion in Northern Ireland is unfit for purpose.”