"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label NGOs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NGOs. Show all posts

Saturday, August 2, 2025

Latin America Rising > Bukele could be President for Life in El Salvador; Guatemala updates money laundering laws; Ecuador's bill to regulate NGOs introduced

 

El Salvador abolishes presidential term limits,

extends term length

   
MP Claudia Ortiz, the lone elected representative of the Let's Go party in the 60-seat Salvadoran legislative assembly holds a placard Thursday protesting changes to the constitution that will allow the president to run an unlimited number of times. The sign reads "Only the People Can Save the People." Photo by Rodrigo Sura/EPA
MP Claudia Ortiz, the lone elected representative of the Let's Go party in the 60-seat Salvadoran legislative assembly holds a placard Thursday protesting changes to the constitution that will allow the president to run an unlimited number of times. The sign reads "Only the People Can Save the People." Photo by Rodrigo Sura/EPA

Aug. 1 (UPI) -- El Salvadoran lawmakers voted to abolish presidential term limits as part of constitutional reforms that could allow the country's populist president, Nayib Bukele, to remain in power indefinitely.

Under the reformed electoral system, the previous five-year term is increased to six years and a restriction limiting presidents to a single term is removed, allowing El Salvador's executive to run for office an unlimited number of times.

Members of Bukele's New Ideas Party in the Legislative Assembly voted through the reform on Thursday, 18 months after Bukele won a second term in a landslide victory, despite a constitutional prohibition on consecutive terms. The Supreme Court, packed with pro-Bukele justices, waived the ban on grounds that it infringed Bukele's human rights.

Opposition politicians and human rights organizations condemned the move, saying it removed one of the last remaining checks on power and brought the country a step closer to becoming a one-party state.

"Today, democracy has died in El Salvador," said opposition Republican National Alliance MP Marcela Villatoro.

Human Rights Watch said it was a power grab by Bukele aimed at ushering in a dictatorship.

"He's very clearly following the path of leaders who use their popularity to concentrate power to undermine the rule of law and eventually to establish a dictatorship," said HRW Americas deputy director Juan Pappier.

Cristosal, El Salvador's leading human rights organization, which fled the country for Guatemala two weeks ago citing threats and intimidation against its staff, criticized the lack of process and the way the change was rushed through.

"The day before vacation, without debate, without informing the public, in a single legislative vote, they changed the political system to allow the president to perpetuate himself in power indefinitely and we continue to follow the well-travelled path of autocrats," said Cristosal executive Noah Bullock.

Bukele's popularity mainly stems from a crime crackdown, targeting gangs in particular, that has seen El Salvador transformed from one of the most violent nations in the world to one of the safest in the region.

However, he is a divisive figure among Salvadorans.

His policies, including the use of emergency powers to detain as many as 75,000 people without due process, have drawn fire from human rights groups such as Amnesty International, which has said El Salvador was engaged in a "gradual replacement of gang violence with state violence."

The United States got pulled into questions around El Salvador after Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an undocumented Salvadoran migrant, was detained in one of Bukele's notorious 'mega prisons' after being wrongly deported to El Salvador in violation of a 2019 court order that said he could not be deported there.

He was among a group of 261 inmates imprisoned in one of the huge penal facilities after being deported by the Trump administration, who it said were either members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang or the Salvadoran-dominated MS-13.

Abrego Garcia, who was accused of being a member of the MS-13, was returned to the United States in June at the request of the Justice Department to face federal migrant smuggling charges in Tennessee.



Guatemala pushes money laundering bill to avoid international sanctions

By Macarena Hermosilla
   
Guatemalan President Bernardo Arevalo, who formally submitted the money-laundering bill to Congress on Tuesday, speaks a day earlier at a press conference in Guatemala City. Photo by Alex Cruz/EPA
Guatemalan President Bernardo Arevalo, who formally submitted the money-laundering bill to Congress on Tuesday, speaks a day earlier at a press conference in Guatemala City. Photo by Alex Cruz/EPA

July 31 (UPI) -- The Guatemalan government has introduced key legislation to modernize its money laundering laws and prevent the country from being added to the international financial system's "gray list" -- a designation that could raise borrowing costs and limit access to credit.

President Bernardo Arévalo formally submitted the bill to Congress on Tuesday, calling it a strategic tool to strike at the "heart" of organized crime and drug trafficking.  

During the launch of a program aimed at integrating Guatemalan companies into Walmart's supply chain in Central America, U.S. Ambassador Tobin Bradley stated that "the new anti-money laundering law is a platform for transparency and for attracting more investment to Guatemala."

The proposal updates laws from 2001 and 2005 that officials say are outdated and inadequate for confronting modern money laundering and illicit financing schemes.

It expands the range of entities required to implement controls, report suspicious transactions and appoint compliance officers. The bill also includes reforms to the Penal Code, Commercial Code, Law Against Organized Crime and private security regulations.

If the reform is not approved and implemented this year, Guatemala risks being placed on the "gray list" of the Financial Action Task Force, an intergovernmental organization created in 1989 by the G7.

The list includes jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing systems. Countries on the list are under increased monitoring and must address shortcomings within set timeframes.

"Being added to this list would significantly restrict international transactions, raise the cost of external financing and, in turn, limit access to credit. It could also lead to local banks losing the ability to work with international banks, making it harder to carry out essential operations for the people of Guatemala -- such as remittances, international payments or letters of credit for exporters," Arévalo said.

The initiative's legislative prospects depend on the political support the government can secure among various blocs in Congress, where it holds a minority.

The executive branch said it has begun informal talks with congressional blocs and plans to make formal presentations to committees and party groups once Congress returns from recess.

Guatemala has faced warnings from Financial Action Task Force Latin America since 2022 for failing to pass key reforms. The Inter-American Development Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have warned the country that without new legislation, a poor assessment will be inevitable at the next task force plenary meeting, which is likely in October.

The Arévalo administration views the reform as one of its most significant efforts to modernize the country's institutional framework.



Ecuador joins regional push to control

NGO funding

By Macarena Hermosilla
   
Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa's proposal would create a mandatory registry for nonprofit entities, require regular financial reporting and allow the government to suspend or revoke operating permits if NGOs engage in “activities incompatible with the national interest.” Photo by MARXCINE/Pixabay
Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa's proposal would create a mandatory registry for nonprofit entities, require regular financial reporting and allow the government to suspend or revoke operating permits if NGOs engage in “activities incompatible with the national interest.” Photo by MARXCINE/Pixabay

Aug. 1 (UPI) -- Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa has introduced a bill in the National Assembly to regulate the funding and activities of non-governmental organizations, particularly those that receive money from abroad.

The proposal would create a mandatory registry for nonprofit entities, require regular financial reporting and allow the government to suspend or revoke operating permits if NGOs engage in "activities incompatible with the national interest."

If approved, Ecuador would join a regional push that has taken shape over the past year in countries such as Peru, El Salvador and Paraguay.

According to the Ecuadorian government, the bill aims to bring greater transparency to the operations of NGOs, many of which it says operate without clearly disclosing their funding sources, international ties or true objectives.

"I'm not attacking NGOs. Some of them do honorable work and help people in Ecuador. Those organizations won't have problems because they'll be able to explain where their money comes from," Noboa said.

Although the bill does not yet specify penalties, it would require organizations to disclose their donors, provide documentation for expenses and avoid political activities not explicitly authorized in their charters.

Civil society groups in Ecuador have voiced concern, warning the measure could open the door to arbitrary restrictions and potential censorship.

In March, Peru's Congress passed a law expanding the powers of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation to audit foreign-funded projects. The law allows fines of up to $500,000 and authorizes the suspension of organizations that use those funds to bring legal action against the state -- a common practice in human rights and Indigenous advocacy.

Despite opposition from more than 70 domestic NGOs and international groups, including the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and Human Rights Watch, President Dina Boluarte's government defended the law as a way to "organize" international cooperation.

In El Salvador, the ruling-party-controlled legislature approved the Foreign Agents Law in May. The law imposes a 30% tax on foreign donations, requires registration in a special government registry and gives the executive branch authority to sanction or shut down organizations it accuses of meddling in domestic affairs.

Human rights groups have condemned the Salvadoran law, saying it restricts the work of humanitarian organizations and independent media.

In Paraguay, a regulation enacted in November 2024 requires all nonprofit organizations to register with the Ministry of Economy and Finance, file biannual reports on income and expenses and disclose any ties to international agencies.

The measure prohibits unregistered NGOs from signing agreements with the state and includes penalties ranging from suspension of activities to the permanent revocation of legal status.

Paraguayan and regional organizations have warned that the law criminalizes international cooperation and could seriously undermine human rights advocacy.

Critics say these measures echo laws previously adopted in Venezuela and Nicaragua, where "foreign agent" and "sovereignty defense" legislation has been used to shut down organizations that report human rights violations or criticize the government, under the pretext of foreign interference.

Governments backing these laws argue they aim to strengthen transparency, prevent illicit financing and block foreign influence.

But organizations including Amnesty International, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights and the IACHR warn the measures are part of a broader pattern of shrinking democratic space in the region, where state control is prioritized over civic participation.

Thursday, February 6, 2025

Colonialism, Hypocrisy, Palestine > Biafra wants out of Nigeria again; Dutch defund some pro-Palestinian NGOs

 

After suffering 57 years of violent persecution of Christians, Biafra again declares independence from Nigeria


All nations with a Christian heritage and indeed, all free nations should be supporting Biafra and taking measures against the Nigerian government for its support of the jihad genocide of Christians in that country.


Biafra Declares Independence: A Renewed Quest for Freedom

by Michael Rubin, AEI, December 1, 2024:

On November 29, 2024, the United States of Biafra once again declared their independence from Nigeria. The move comes more than 57 years after the long persecuted and overwhelmingly Christian region first asserted their independence from Nigeria.  After that declaration, Nigeria reacted with seeking genocide against Igbo of Biafra, killing more than 100,000 outright and then starving two million more in a land and sea blockade. Muhammadu Buhari, one of its perpetrators, used his legacy in Biafra to propel himself twice into the presidency; both times, he unleashed Islamist militias into the region to slaughter Christians.

Biafra deserves independence. It was an ancient kingdom. Travelers and cartographers spoke of Biafra beginning in the 15th century through the 19th century, though the British creation of Nigeria in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries incorporated and forcibly subjugated the Igbo people into the new British colonial project. While Nigerian leaders often embrace the rhetoric of decolonization, they remain oblivious to the fact that many of Nigeria’s peoples—and especially the Igbo who seek Biafra’s restoration—see Nigeria as a colonial project.

Not surprisingly, Nigerian authorities reacted with fury to the reassertion of Biafra’s independence. Nigerian diplomats lobbied to compel Finland to arrest Simon Ekpa. Inside Nigeria, a country whose media freedom falls below Qatar, Serbia, or Haiti, journalists pillory Ekpa’s legitimacy and compel the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to denounce him while ignoring the IPOB’s demands for a UN-organized referendum for Biafran secession inside Nigeria.

The Nigerian government should not campaign, however. After all, on May 10, 2024, it voted at the United Nations to unilaterally recognize Palestine, a country that never existed and whose territory remains under dispute. The UN vote undermined diplomacy and the rule-of-law as, under the Oslo Accords, Palestinian leaders previously based their autonomy in the Gaza Strip and West Bank on an agreement to negotiate their status and territory with Israel directly, rather than through resource to international bodies.

The same holds true with Spain. In 2017, Spain used force to crush Catalonia’s democratic and peaceful aspirations for independence. Authorities in Barcelona, not without reason, see Madrid as a colonial power forcibly subjugating a region with its own language and culture and ignoring its democratic aspiration for freedom. Yet, Spain also pushed aside the Oslo Accords to recognize Palestine.

Perhaps no country has been as vociferous as Turkey in its recognition and material support for Palestinian statehood, yet Turkey has killed more Kurds than it alleges Israel has killed Palestinians. Advocating for Kurdistan, a region with a distinct language, culture, and long aspirations for autonomy if not independence, will land Turkish Kurds in prison for decades. While Israeli Arabs win elections and serve as mayors (amongst many other positions), the Turkish government repeatedly replaces elected Kurds in order to appoint municipal leaders willing to rubber stamp the Turkish leader’s pronouncement….


Dutch Decide to Cut Off Aid to Palestinian NGOs That Don’t Recognize Israel’s Right to Exist


It has been a long time coming, but it’s been worth the wait. Now the Dutch will no longer be funding Palestinian NGOs, including all those linked to Hamas, that do not explicitly recognize Israel’s right to exist. More on this welcome news can be found here: 


Dutch Parliament Conditions Palestinian NGO Funding on Recognition of Israel

by Ailin Vilches Arguello, Algemeiner, January 30, 2025:

The Dutch Parliament passed a resolution on Tuesday to make funding for Palestinian NGOs depend on their recognition of Israel’s right to exist.

The Dutch House of Representatives passed a resolution by a margin of 70-67…

The resolution passed by the thinnest of margins, but it did pass, and for that we should be grateful.

The motion also addresses terror ties, citing the Netherlands’ decision to halt subsidies to the Ramallah-based Union of Agricultural Work Committee (UAWC) following a terror attack by employees with ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), an internationally designated terrorist organization.

If the Netherlands was willing to halt subsidies to the UAWC because some of its employees had ties to the PFLP, why doesn’t the Netherlands do the same for UNRWA, cutting off funding to that organization now that the Israelis have provided proof that nine UNRWA members took part in the October 7 atrocities, that dozens of UNRWA schools were used by Hamas to hide fighters and weapons, and that several hundred employees of UNRWA in Gaza were members of Hamas?

Last year, Dutch lawmakers discovered that the previous government had continued funding a terror-linked NGO, despite knowing they[the NGO] had subsidized the salaries of two Palestinians convicted in the 2019 murder of a 17-year-old Israeli girl….

Unsuspecting Dutch taxpayers were giving money to an NGO that had been linked to the Palestinian terror group Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. That money was used to pay for increases in the salaries of two men who had been convicted of the murder of an Israeli girl, Rina Schnerb.

Olga Deutsch, vice president of NGO Monitor, an independent Jerusalem-based research organization, explained that the lack of vetting and oversight mechanisms has allowed billions of euros to be diverted to antisemitic, anti-Israel, and terror-affiliated organizations….

Think about the amounts of money that so many Western governments, not just the Netherlands, have been giving to Palestinian terror organizations, or to groups — such as UNRWA — that employ terrorists or members of terrorist groups. Olga Deutsch believes that the “billions of euros” have gone to those organizations, money which then is used to support terrorist attacks.

Deutsch pointed out that the Dutch government supported numerous organizations that misused aid funds, with a large portion being directed toward political warfare against Israel and the global Jewish community….

It’s not only anti-Israel terrorist groups that the Dutch government has been supporting. It also supports many organizations that are engaged in political warfare against both the Jewish state and Jews worldwide. Think of all the “Justice-For-Palestine” groups on campuses throughout the Western world that receive support to carry on their campaigns to delegitimize Israel and create pressure on the Jewish state to stop defending itself in Gaza and Lebanon — those “ceasefires” that may become permanent, and thus allow Hamas and Hezbollah to survive, and regroup, rearm, and recruit new members. Such pressure could also create an atmosphere that might lead Israel to agree to be squeezed back within the indefensible 1949 armistice lines, with a nine-mile-wide waist from Qalqilya to the sea.

The Dutch government is being asked by NGO Monitor to do one thing: follow the money you donate to Palestinian groups, to make sure it does not end up being used to support terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Make sure, too, that none of the money supplied by the Netherlands is going to support those who, while they may not be terrorists, are working to support groups that delegitimize, and undermine, the Jewish state.

The government of the Netherlands needs to carefully rethink and restructure the aid it gives to the Palestinians, to make sure it is humanitarian in nature, and does not support those who work to end the Jewish state’s existence. It should not, for example, give aid to the Palestinian Authority as long as Mahmoud Abbas insists on continuing the “Pay-For-Slay” program that provides generous monthly amounts to both imprisoned terrorists and to the families of terrorists who died while committing their attacks.

During this legislative session, the Dutch Parliament also adopted a motion urging the government to support Gaza reconstruction plans and fundraising efforts.

This motion is a mistake. Do the Dutch taxpayers really want to pour money into the rebuilding of Gaza? Why? The Western world should not assume any responsibility for paying any part of the cost of that rebuilding. That rebuilding is estimated to cost $80 billion. This should be accomplished not with more money going from non-Muslims to Muslims, but with funds given by the fabulously rich Sunni states of the Gulf — Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait — to pay for their Muslim Arab brothers in Gaza.

However, lawmakers rejected several proposals related to Israel and the Palestinians, including one to tighten labeling and tariff enforcement on Israeli settlements. They also denied motions to link Dutch aid for Gaza’s reconstruction to Dutch companies and restrict it to civilian infrastructure, as well as to provide January funding to UNRWA, the controversial UN agency for Palestinian refugees that has come under fire for several links to Hamas.

The Dutch lawmakers don’t want to limit their aid to paying for “civilian infrastructure” in Gaza. That apparently means that they are willing for Hamas to again build up its now-demolished military infrastructure. Why would they want that? But even more important, those lawmakers in The Hague should stop thinking that the Dutch have some kind of duty to contribute anything to the rebuilding of Gaza. The Palestinians must instead go hat in hand to their fellow Muslim Arabs in the Gulf, with their near-trillion-dollar sovereign wealth funds. The Dutch are already paying out billions of euros annually in benefits to the Muslim economic migrants, chiefly Moroccans and Turks, who have been admitted in great numbers to the Netherlands, where they batten on every benefit the generous Dutch welfare state provides. The enormous transfer of wealth from Infidels to Muslims, now taking place all over Western Europe, has gone on far too long. To make Dutch taxpayers pay for any part of Gaza’s rebuilding would be too much to bear.

============================================================================================