"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label UNHRC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNHRC. Show all posts

Thursday, February 6, 2025

UN Disintegration > Trump targets three UN Agencies; Israel Quits UNHRC; Argentina begins procedures to pull out of the WHO

 

Trump targets ‘anti-American’ UN agencies

The US president has ordered the withdrawal of the US from the Human Rights Council and suspended financial support for the Palestinian refugee agency
Trump targets ‘anti-American’ UN agencies











US President Donald Trump has taken action against UN agencies that his administration claims exhibit anti-American bias and propagate “anti-Semitism,” in an executive order signed on Tuesday. Trump's initiative comes after meeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the White House. 

The US president has ordered the country's withdrawal from the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and prohibited funding the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). He has also ordered a State department review of US participation in the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

The three bodies have drifted from the UN’s core mission of promoting peace, and instead “act contrary to the interests of the United States while attacking our allies and propagating anti-Semitism, the document claimed.

West Jerusalem has accused the UNHRC and UNESCO of anti-Israeli bias when handling cases related to Palestinian rights and cultural heritage. It also alleged that UNRWA employees took part in the October 2023 surprise attack by the Palestinian group Hamas, which resulted in Israel responding with a 15-month military campaign – currently paused under a UN-brokered ceasefire.

The UNRWA, established in 1949 to assist Palestinians displaced in the Arab-Israeli conflict, has denied these allegations. Trump’s order insists that the UNRWA has been “infiltrated” by terrorists and echoes Israeli claims that the group was involved in the Hamas incursion.

During a signing ceremony in the Oval Office, Trump said the UN has “tremendous potential” that merits continued US support, provided that its leaders “get their act together.” He stressed that the UN must be “fair to countries that deserve fairness,” without naming any nations. Trump also suggested that the US makes a disproportionate contribution to the UN budget. The UN system is primarily funded by member states based on their gross national incomes.

The first Trump administration pulled the US out of the UNHRC and defunded the UNRWA in 2018. In 2021, President Joe Biden reversed these actions during his term in office.

Speaking alongside Netanyahu on Tuesday, Trump announced that the US will “take over” and “own” Gaza and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” He reiterated his position that the Palestinians should be permanently resettled elsewhere, which critics argue would amount to the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian enclave.

The UN estimates that over 90% of homes in Gaza have been destroyed or seriously damaged in the latest escalation of violence, resulting in the displacement of an overwhelming majority of the local population, or around 1.9 million people. On Monday, the local authorities updated the death toll in the enclave to over 61,700, saying they now presume thousands of missing individuals to be dead.

===============================================================================================



Israel quits UN human rights council over ‘discrimination’

The move follows Washington’s withdrawal from the UNHRC
Israel quits UN human rights council over ‘discrimination’











Israel has pledged to withdraw from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), hours after the departure of the United States from the body. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has accused the council of attacking a democratic country and propagating anti-Semitism.

In a statement posted on X, the top diplomat criticized the UNHRC for allegedly disproportionately targeting Israel while paying less attention to human rights violations in other countries.

The council “obsessively demonizes the one democracy in the Middle East—Israel, Saar wrote, adding that “Israel will not accept this discrimination any longer!”

Israel is the only nation with a permanent agenda item in the council and has faced over 100 condemnatory resolutions, more than 20% of all resolutions passed, surpassing those against Iran, Cuba, North Korea, and Venezuela combined, he said.

Israel’s announcement follows Washington’s withdrawal from the UNHRC on Tuesday. US President Donald Trump also left the body during his first term in 2018. Announcing the move, Trump also pledged to reevaluate Washington’s relationship with other UN agencies over their stance on Israel and alleged anti-American bias.

=======================================================================


Argentina to exit WHO membership after Trump again withdraws U.S.

By Chris Benson
On Wednesday, a government spokesman stated that Argentine President Javier Milei (seen in New York City in Sept. 2024) directed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to initiate steps "to withdraw Argentina’s participation" in WHO. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI
On Wednesday, a government spokesman stated that Argentine President Javier Milei (seen in New York City in Sept. 2024) directed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to initiate steps "to withdraw Argentina’s participation" in WHO. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo

Feb. 5 (UPI) -- Argentina will follow the United States by pulling out of the World Health Organization.

A government spokesman said Wednesday that Argentine President Javier Milei directed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to initiate steps "to withdraw Argentina's participation" in WHO.

He claimed it was over "deep differences regarding health management especially during the [COVID-19] pandemic."

Reports say Milei is expected to sign an executive order for the withdrawal in the coming days.

"We Argentinians will not allow an international organization to intervene in our sovereignty, much less in our health," presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni said at a news conference.

Milei, a far-right libertarian often compared to U.S. President Donald Trump, is a known friend and ally of his American counterpart.

Trump originally cut ties with the U.N.-backed WHO in May 2020 while the United States was in the throes of COVID-19, which killed an estimated 7 million people globally.

WHO works in more than 150 locations around the world and has directed international responses to health emergencies from Ebola to yellow fever and cholera.

"Today, evidence suggests that the WHO's prescriptions don't work because they are the result of political influence rather than being based on science," a statement by Milei's office in Bueno Aires read.

Trump, meanwhile, cited a perceived "mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently needed reforms and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states" for why he once more pulled the United States out.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus wrote in an email to staff members how the United States leaving "has made our financial situation more acute." He said he regrets Trump's decision, adding that the United States gained from its membership.

Milei was the first world leader to meet with Trump at his Florida estate after November's election, and he attended the Jan. 20 inauguration in Washington -- the same day Trump announced the United States will withdraw from WHO.

According to Adorni, WHO membership costs Argentina about $10 million annually. He claimed that leaving it behind will provide the South American country a greater flexibility to better serve its own interests.

WHO was created in 1948 by the global community "to coordinate the response to global health emergencies, but it failed during the biggest challenge," the statement read in part. "It advocated eternal lockdowns without scientific backing during its battle against the COVID-19 pandemic."

Meanwhile, Milei's spokesman did not rule out Argentina possibly exiting other treaties or international agreements, such as the Paris climate accord.

"The president is very determined when it comes to making Argentina freer," Adorni added Wednesday. "So any link that Argentina has with bodies that go against its freedoms, we're going to do our utmost to prevent them from interfering in the lives of Argentines."

Sunday, November 8, 2020

Islam - Current Day - UAE Goes Liberal; Imam Rebukes Blasphemy Excuse; Sharia Court Overrules Dad; Pakistan and the UNHRC; Terror in Iraq; Jihad Cleric on the Temple Mount

..
Now, this is shocking. Will it be allowed to stand?


UAE relaxes Islamic laws to allow alcohol consumption, sex outside marriage & criminalizes ‘honor killings’ – state media
7 Nov, 2020 15:30


Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest building, in Dubai. © Reuters / Tarek Fahmy

The UAE has moved to revise its Islamic personal laws, loosening restrictions on alcohol and cohabitation of unmarried couples as well as scrapping lenient penalties for “honor killings,” the state media said.

The changes, which were announced on Saturday by the government-run WAM news agency, are intended to “consolidate the UAE’s principles of tolerance” and improve the Gulf nation’s economic and social profile. However, the agency didn’t specify when the new relaxed rules will go into force.

Penalties for alcohol consumption, possession and sales for those 21 and over will be eliminated in the Muslim country, which positions itself as a more Westernized tourist hotspot than other areas in the region. UAE citizens previously required a special license to drink beer and other liquors at bars or at home.

The reform will also allow “cohabitation of unmarried couples.” Such behavior has been considered criminal in UAE for a long time, though the law was rarely enforced against expats living in the financial hub of Dubai and other emirates.

The legal clause which allowed the judges to issue merciful sentences to men who commit a so-called “honor killing” has also been removed. Those crimes will from now be treated as a regular murder.

That's not great, but it's progress. 

According to human rights groups, every year thousands of females in the Middle East and South Asia become victims of “honor killings,” which are carried out by relatives against women and girls who somehow violate Islamic laws and bring ‘shame’ on the family.

But murdering your daughters, strangling them, setting them on fire - that brings honor!!!! What madness!

The reform comes amid the US-brokered normalization of ties between longtime regional foes UAE and Israel, which is expected to bring investment and numerous Israeli tourists to the Gulf country.

Dubai is also hosting the World Expo in 2021-22. It’s planned that some 25 million people will visit the country for the major international event, greatly boosting economic activity in the UAE. The expo was initially scheduled to take place this year, but was moved due to the Covid-19 pandemic.




Imam stands against the excuse of blasphemy for murder, this time, at least...


Pakistan: Imam defends family of assassinated bank manager
accused of blasphemy
Published:  November 07, 2020 18:21
Zubair Qureshi, Correspondent, Gulf News
  
A local imam is being seen as the savior of an assassinated bank manager’s family after he came to their defence and rubbished allegations of blasphemy. Image Credit: Pixabay

Islamabad: A local imam is being seen as the savior of an assassinated bank manager’s family after he came to their defence and rubbished allegations of the accused murderer, a security guard working in the same bank, that the manager had committed blasphemy.

A court of Khushab sent the accused, security guard Ahmed Nawaz to 14-day judicial remand. Nawaz had shot bank manager Malik Imran Hanif dead inside the bank on charges of blasphemy.

In his short speech after the funeral prayers, Maulana Izhar Hussain the local prayer leader in Punjab’s district Khushab where the incident took place on November 4, made it clear the allegations were baseless and the act of killing could never be justified.

The netizens have also condemned the incident calling it a barbaric act. TV anchor Zarrar Khuhro called it a sad and tragic act and at the same time something ‘inevitable.’

The role of the imam however has been the subject of debate and a number of newspapers have even written editorials on him calling a savior and defender of the poor family.

Maulana Hussain who also led the funeral prayers for the bank manager termed his murder unjust and the act of the security guard unfair having no legal or moral basis.

In his sermon, Maulana Hussain told people to seek God’s forgiveness because the bank manager was an innocent man.

“I have seen him a number of times offering prayers and I have been told by other prayer leaders and common Muslims that they too had seen Hanif offering prayers in mosques and he was a good-natured man,” said Maulana Hussain in his sermon.

And even if he weren't, even if he did blaspheme Mohammed, does that give the security guard the right to kill him? it seems like a step toward civilization for someone to stand up against the spontaneous murder of a man accused of blasphemy.




Unfortunately, this is an exception, not a precedent...


Saudi Sharia Court helps woman to get married without father’s consent
..
Saudi women cannot marry without a male guardian’s permission

Published:  November 08, 2020 16:30
Khitam Al Amir, Senior Staff Writer, Gulf News
  
The Saudi Sharia Court has helped a woman to get married without her father’s permission.
Image Credit: iStockphoto

Dubai: The Saudi Sharia Court helped a woman get married without her father’s permission after it found that he refused all men proposed to her.

The court ordered the transfer of the father’s guardianship to a Sharia guardian after she filed a complaint against him for refusing all her marriage proposals.

The woman, and the man who proposed to her, attended the court hearing where he told the judge that he wanted to marry her. The father, who was called to attend the hearing, failed to show up.

The Saudi Ministry of Justice announced that the court issued its judgment in five days as per regulations by the Supreme Judiciary Council to speed up the Sharia Court’s rulings on such cases.

Male guardian 

Under Saudi customary law, every Saudi woman is required to have a male guardian, often her father. The guardian has the power to make a range of critical decisions for a Saudi woman.

Because in devout Islam, women are not capable of making critical decisions for themselves.

In May, the Judicial Committee of the Saudi Shura Council turned down a proposal submitted by a female council member to allow women to marry without the permission of a male guardian.

According to a Saturday report by Al Riyadh, Eqbal Darandari’s proposal called on the Ministry of Justice to work with the Supreme Judicial Council to amend the necessary laws and permit adult women to marry a partner on their own.

The council, which is the formal advisory body of the kingdom, rejected the proposal, saying a male guardian’s presence is a key condition to legislate a marriage.




Pakistani presence in rights council ‘intolerable’,
says UN-accredited NGO

The NGO’s, that monitors the performance of the United Nations, condemnation comes after Pakistan government defended the beheading of a French teacher in Paris.

Updated: Nov 08, 2020, 16:15 IST
Asian News International | Posted by Deepali Sharma

The NGO had pointed out Pakistan ranks in the bottom 20 per cent of the Reporters Sans Frontiers (RSF)
world press freedom index. (REUTERS)
 
Pakistan’s presence in the United Nations Human Rights Council is “intolerable” given its rights record, said Geneva-based NGO UN Watch, adding that religious minorities in the south Asian country suffer from discrimination, sectarian violence and forced conversions.

The NGO’s, that monitor the performance of the United Nations, condemnation comes after Pakistan government defended the beheading of a French teacher in Paris by an Islamic terrorist by claiming that the blasphemy in the garb of freedom of expression is ‘intolerable’.

French President Emmanuel Macron has been facing criticism from various Muslim-majority countries after he took a tough stand on radical Islam and defended cartoons of Prophet Muhammad.

Macron’s remarks did not go well with Pakistan Prime Minister Khan who slammed the French President, saying that he has “chosen to deliberately provoke Muslims”.

In a reply to Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s remark ‘Blasphemy in the garb of freedom of expression is intolerable’, the UN watch said: “Your presence on the U.N. Human Rights Council is intolerable.”

In another tweet, the UN Watch shared a statement dated September 28 where it has presented its views against the election of Pakistan in the rights council. In October, Pakistan was re-elected to the United Nations Human Rights Council despite opposition from activist groups over its abysmal human rights records.

Blasphemy laws are exploited to attack and persecute members of religious minorities, particularly Christians, the document stated.

“Religious minorities in Pakistan suffer from discrimination, sectarian violence and forced conversions. A Christian mother of five, Asia Bibi spent eight years on death row in Pakistan for blasphemy after she got into a dispute with local Muslim women over a cup of water. Two Pakistani politicians were killed for supporting her,” read the document.

The NGO had pointed out Pakistan ranks in the bottom 20 percent of the Reporters Sans Frontiers (RSF) world press freedom index.

Pakistani children are subjected to multiple forms of violence and abuse including exploitative labour practices, sexual abuse and child marriage, the NGO had stated in the document.

“According to the United Nations Children’s Fund, Pakistan has the sixth-highest number of child brides in the world. Human Rights Watch (HRW) reports that “an average of 11 cases of child sexual abuse are reported daily across Pakistan,” including of girls as young as 5. Furthermore, child labour remains a serious problem, including the sale of children into domestic servitude and kidnapping,” the NGO stated.

And that's on a good day. Don't forget the frequent gang-rapes and murders of little children, honour killings, and so many other horrible stories that make Pakistan one of the worst places in the world to be a child.

Returning Pakistan to the Human Rights Council is just another example of how ridiculous and absurd the UN has become.




At least 11, including civilians, killed in reported ISIS attack on security post west of Baghdad - report
8 Nov, 2020 22:52 

FILE PHOTO © REUTERS/Thaier Al-Sudani

Five members of a tribal militia and six locals were reportedly killed in an attack on an outpost outside of the Iraqi capital, Baghdad. The assault was launched by the ISIS terror group, AFP reported, citing security sources.

The attack took place in the area of al-Radhwaniya late Sunday, as militants attempted to take control over a monitoring outpost, overlooking the outskirts west of Baghdad, the agency reported, citing security sources.

The militants who descended on the tower in four vehicles targeted the outpost with grenades and rained down fire on the members of tribal Hashed forces, affiliated with the Iraqi government. The showdown apparently prompted locals to come to help fend off the onslaught.

"ISIS attacked the monitoring tower, killing five members of the tribal Hashed and six local people who had come to help repel the attack," it cited a security source as saying.

Apart from 11 people that were killed in the assault, eight others were injured and taken to hospital, according to health officials. The Iraqi army and police have launched a manhunt for the attackers, Reuters reported, citing sources.

The site of the attack is located some 22 km (14 mi) to the south of the Baghdad International Airport.

The Iraqi government declared a victory over the Islamic State as far back as in December 2017 after three years of fierce fighting with the self-proclaimed “caliphate,” which seized around a third of the Iraqi territory in 2014.

While by the end of 2017 the Iraqi government managed to recapture the swathes of territory once held by the militants, the occupation by the militants and the bombing campaign by the US-led coalition has left a trail of destruction, with the northern city of Mosul, once home to about 1,8 million people, turning into a pile of ruins and a symbol of devastation suffered by the Iraqi people after it was “liberated” by the international coalition together with the Iraqi military in July 2017.




Israel Bars Terror-Praising Muslim Cleric From Temple Mount

Top Palestinian imam called terrorist beheading of French teacher a “great honor” for all Muslims

November 8, 2020 | TPS

Palestinian Muslims atop the Temple Mount  Sliman Khader/Flash90

Islamic scholar Sheikh Issam Amira was issued a ban from the Temple Mount on Saturday after he called the beheading of French teacher Samuel Paty last month by a Muslim terrorist a "great honor for all Muslims" during his weekly sermon at the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

"When a Muslim of Chechen origin beheaded an infidel who slandered the Prophet Muhammad, people called this 'terrorism'… Well, it is a great honor for him and all Muslims that there was such a young man to defend the Prophet Muhammad. He is like the men and women who, throughout history, defended the Prophet Muhammad, his sanctity, and his honor. All these terms will be re-engineered, once the word of Allah reigns supreme over the word of the infidels," Amira declared.

The Jerusalem Police summoned Amira for investigation after he praised the terrorist who beheaded the French teacher. He was released at the end of the interrogation and was banned from the Temple Mount.

The police summoned the cleric following an official complaint submitted on Friday by the Arab Desk of the Zionist watchdog Im Tirtzu, which learned of Amira's remarks from the Middle East Media Research Institute that publicized a translation of the sermon the previous day.

Im Tirtzu also noted in its police complaint that Amira's presence on the Temple Mount was in violation of a six-month ban that was issued to him by the police in September.

Amira has a long history of inciting violence during his sermons at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which have included praise for the Islamic State (ISIS), encouragement of honor killings, and urging Jihad, Islamic holy war, against the Jews.

Why is he even allowed in the country?

Amira is a leader of the extreme Tahrir movement which espouses ISIS-like ideas and has black ISIS-styled flags hanging in his office.

Amira has called for the establishment of a caliphate, a Muslim state ruled according to Sharia law, which would "deliver the call for Islam to the whole world," and said that the enemies of Islam are America and Europe.

ie Christian countries.

The establishment of an Islamic state "requires destroying all the [foreign] entities in the Islamic world. Make no exception. Show no mercy or compassion to any of those entities," he stated during a sermon at the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem in July 2015.

Amira has called for the killing of "anyone who is not Muslim and also a Muslim who does not adopt such an approach," and those who are not Muslim "do not deserve a comfortable life and we must kill them."

Im Tirtzu's Arab Desk called the cleric a "radical and dangerous person who regularly incites against Israel and against the free world."

"We welcome the response of the police and expect that this sheikh will be prosecuted and held accountable for his radical and illegal actions. The blood of the citizens of Israel is not cheap," added Im Tirtzu.

Do the Israelis have the courage to prosecute this war-monger? I doubt it.



Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Israel Appoints Its 1st-ever Female Muslim Diplomatic Envoy

© Rasha Atamny / Facebook

Rasha Atamny, a 31-year-old Palestinian born in a small Arab town, has been appointed Israel’s first secretary at its Turkish embassy in Ankara, the first time the country has sent a Muslim woman to represent it abroad.

Atamny will occupy a senior post at a mission responsible for nurturing one of the country’s most fragile relationships. Last year, Israel and Turkey signed a reconciliation agreement that tentatively ended a six-year diplomatic breakdown caused by the IDF’s military operation against a Turkish-sponsored humanitarian flotilla destined for Gaza.

Born in Baqa al-Gharbiya, a town of fewer than 30,000 on Israeli side of the West Bank border, Atamny studied psychology at Hebrew University, before being accepted on the hyper-competitive three-year Foreign Ministry cadet course alongside 21 of her contemporaries.

In a blog written while she was still completing her course, Atamny said that her decision to become a diplomat came from a three-month internship at the Israeli mission at the UN.

“One turning point will always stay with me: one day, I sat down in my usual seat in the human rights committee, and listened with great interest to a discussion taking place on women's rights violations,” Atamny wrote in Hebrew.

"At this point, I had gotten used to the continuous barrage of accusations leveled against Israel by many countries on the council... The discrimination against Israel in the UN is very obvious and disappointing. But this time it was different. This time I listened to speeches by Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq and Egypt, all decrying the 'systematic women's rights violations' by Israel, while I, an Arab, Muslim Palestinian origin, represent Israel at the UN Human Rights Council."

“That day at the UN made me desperately disappointed and pushed me to take matters into my own hands, to try and at least object in thought to the systemic conduct carried out in the international arena against Israel.”

Atamny’s Twitter account, which has recently been closed but remains cached, strikes a similar pro-government tone, attacking supporters of the BDS campaign, which she says is about “eliminating Israel” and defending the controversial lemonade-making machine manufacturer Sodastream.

Israel has previously appointed Christians and male Muslims to foreign roles, as well as female Muslims to Foreign Ministry jobs inside the country, but never abroad.

Well this must be a dreadful embarrassment to Israel's many critics. There is little doubt that Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, and Egypt do not have Jewish envoys. And the number of female envoys representing those countries is probably minuscule. Of course, Muslim countries would have to appoint 2 women to do one man's job because otherwise you can't believe anything they say.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

UN Human Rights Council's Antisemitic Abuse Silenced

Hillel Neuer just silenced the room with this booming speech

Hillel Neuer of UN Watch just destroyed all those Muslim countries who claim Israel is an apartheid state. Bringing the facts, he silences the entire room.

How can Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other human rights abusing countries say Israel is an apartheid state? How does the UN allow this? Countries which kill their own people are speaking out against the ONE DEMOCRACY in the Middle East. Doesn’t that sound twisted?

Israel has 1.5 million Arabs living a life with full rights, being doctors and lawyers, being part of the knesset, and yet the countries speaking out against Israel have persecuted and expelled whatever Jews used to be living there. As Neuer calls them out, he says “Where are your Jews?” He asks where the REAL apartheid is.


Surely it is time for the UNHRC to stop the hate-speech. It makes absurd the name of 'Human Rights'. 

Monday, February 13, 2017

Human Rights Watch: Pakistan Forcing Return of Afghan Refugees

There is a strong dose of irony in this report beginning with the surprising, to me at least, fact that more than a million Afghans thought that going to Pakistan would improve their lives. At the same time, Pakistanis are leaving Pakistan to look for better lives in Europe. 

Now, Pakistanis, who make the worst refugees in Europe, just ask anyone in Rochdale, or Rotherham, or any of several other cities in the UK, find Afghans unacceptable. I wonder how many complaints there will be when the UK starts deporting Pakistani child rapists back to Pakistan?

By Ed Adamczyk  UPI

Afghan children play outside a religious school at Afghan Refugees Camp in Karachi on February 26, 2015. Human Rights Watch released a report Monday saying the United Nations was complicit in Pakistan's practice of forcing Afghan refugees to return to their country through coercion. File Photo by Zafar Ahmed Khan/News Lens Pakistan

Pakistan forced the repatriation of nearly 600,000 Afghan refugees through coercion and abuse since July, Human Rights Watch said Monday.

The New York-based humanitarian organization released a 76-page report Monday saying Pakistani authorities have forced hundreds of thousands of Afghan refugees fleeing poverty, war and unemployment in Afghanistan to return to their homeland. It adds that the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees' office is complicit in Pakistan's efforts to remove the refugees by "failing to call for an end to the coercive practices."

The returnees to Afghanistan include 365,000 registered refugees. Pakistan has about 1.1 million Afghan refugees, about 750,000 of whom are unregistered, Human Rights Watch said.

"After decades of hosting Afghan refugees, Pakistan in mid-2016 unleashed the world's largest recent anti-refugee crackdowns to coerce their mass return," said Gerry Simpson, author of the report. "Because the U.N. refugee agency didn't stand up publicly to Pakistan's bullying and abuses, international donors should step in to press the government and U.N. to protect the remaining Afghan refugees in Pakistan."

Many returning Afghan refugees were persuaded to leave Pakistan by a doubling, to $400, of cash support from the United Nations, the report said, although the refugees typically had no home to which to return. Many reported they felt threatened by a wave of anti-Afghan hostility in Pakistan.

video 2:19

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Saudi Arabia - Leading the World in Human Rights!!!!!!???

Saudi prince flogged by police after court ruling

© Reuters
© Reuters

A Saudi Prince from the kingdom’s ruling royal Al Saud family has been flogged in prison as part of a court-ordered punishment just weeks after another prince was executed for murder, according to local reports.

Okayz Daily, a Saudi Arabian daily newspaper located in the port city of Jeddah, reported Wednesday that the unidentified prince was given lashes in a prison in the city on Monday.

It comes less than a month after Prince Turki bin Saud al-Kabir was put to death in Riyadh for shooting dead another man, identified as Adel al-Mahemid, in a brawl. It was the first execution of a member of the Saudi royal family in more than four decades.

Kabir was the 134th person to be put to death in the country in 2016, according to an AFP tally of ministry statements confirming executions.

The legal system of Saudi Arabia is based on Sharia law, under which murder, drug trafficking, armed robbery, rape and apostasy are all punishable by death.

The oil rich country and close ally of the US had the third highest number of executions in 2015 after Iran and Pakistan, according to Amnesty International.

China is not included in the ranking as the data is treated as a state secret but the human rights organization believes China remains the world’s top executioner.




‘Like asking if you’ll stop beating your wife’

Saudi ambassador dodges Yemen cluster bomb question

 © Zaid Jilani / YouTube

The Saudi ambassador to the US has dodged a journalist’s question on the use of cluster bombs in Yemen, saying it’s like asking, “Will you stop beating your wife?” He also said the Saudi-led coalition will continue bombing Yemen, “no matter what.”

Prince Abdullah Al-Saud, Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States, was confronted by a reporter from the Intercept, the publication said on Tuesday.

“Will you continue to use cluster weapons in Yemen?” the reporter asked the diplomat.

Al-Saud laughed before answering: “This is like the question, ‘Will you stop beating your wife?’”

After the reporter repeated the question, the ambassador again dismissed it, saying “You are political operators. I’m not a politician.”

Speaking at the Annual Arab-US Policymakers Conference last week, al-Saud insisted that the Saudi-led coalition will continue its bombing campaign in Yemen, the Intercept reported. “If anyone attacks human lives and disturbs the border, in whatever region, we’re going to continue hitting them, no matter what,” said al-Saud.

On Monday, the US envoy to the UN, Samantha Power, called on the Saudi-led coalition to “refrain from taking steps that escalate violence” in Yemen. However, her appeal contradicts Washington’s actions, with the Pentagon continuing to supply arms and provide military support to Riyadh.

Earlier, Human Rights Watch (HRW) accused the Saudi-led coalition of war crimes following an airstrike on a funeral in Yemen on October 8. In that incident, at least two air-dropped munitions penetrated the roof of a hall containing over 1,000 mourners during the funeral ceremony of Ali al-Rawishan, the father of the Sanaa-based administration’s interior minister, Jalal al-Rawishan. At least 140 people were killed and 610 wounded.

Despite calls by US officials to review its support for its Middle Eastern ally, Washington continues to sell arms to Saudi Arabia, approving more than $20 billion in military sales in 2015 alone, HRW reports.


According to UN data from August this year, the Saudi intervention in Yemen has claimed the lives of at least 10,000 people, including almost 4,000 civilians. The UN and HRW have repeatedly accused the Saudi military of dropping cluster bombs in Yemeni residential areas.


Saudi Arabia leading the world in human rights!!!!!!???

So, in spite of bombing funerals in a foreign country, in spite of wife-beating being a standing joke, in spite of beheadings and floggings, often for what would not even be crimes in a civilized country - Saudi Arabia just got re-elected to the UN Human Rights Council. To make matters worse, the head of that council is also a Saudi. 

Saudi Arabia exercises Sharia law which is founded in 7th century, barbarian, madness and has no place in the 21st century. Yet, there will be no complaints about human rights from the UN.

Saudi Arabia is flexing its muscles in many corners of the world and is becoming more dangerous by the hour. The low price of oil is causing considerable financial stress in Riyadh, the consequences of which could be global in extent. The Saudis have loaned billions, if not trillions of dollars to western countries and the fear of them recalling those loans may explain why western countries keep selling mountains of military weapons to the kingdom. Or, maybe it is just greed.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

UN Fails to Launch Independent Probe into Yemen War Crimes

Or, why the UN is rapidly making itself
obsolete and redundant


Abduljabbar Zeyad / Reuters

An EU-backed resolution demanding an independent inquiry into human rights violations during the Yemeni war has been withdrawn at the UN Human Rights Council. Instead, to activists’ discontent, a weakened “reasonable compromise” text has been adopted.

A “strong” resolution submitted by Slovenia and backed by 21 other EU states failed at the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Tuesday, September 27. EU members had requested an “independent” international inquiry “to monitor and report on the situation of human rights in Yemen, on violations and abuses thereof since September 2014.”

 As a result of days of behind-the-scenes talks, an updated and far milder “compromise” version of the resolution drawn up by Sudan on behalf of African Group was adopted without a vote on Thursday.

The resolution now calls for the allocation of “additional international human rights experts to its Yemen programme in coordination with the Government of Yemen” and the assurance that “the National Commission investigates allegations of violation and abuse committed by all parties to the conflict.”

Abduljabbar Zeyad‘Utter disregard for civilian life’: MSF slams Saudi airstrikes on Yemen hospitals
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, who has long been calling for an independent investigation, will also have to prepare an oral report on the situation in Yemen for the human rights council’s next meeting, the text of the resolution says.

Some welcomed the resolution, calling it “a step in the right direction,” as John Fisher of Human Rights Watch in Geneva described it, according to AFP. Vojislav Suc, Slovenia’s representative to the UN in Geneva, said the text is a “good and reasonable compromise.”

The proposed increase in the number of international experts was also welcomed by the Save the Children group, that, however, noted that “they [experts] need to establish all the facts around reported violations of international human rights and humanitarian law, which are destroying the lives of Yemeni children and their families.”

However, other rights groups such as Amnesty International have described the Yemeni National Commission as one-sided and lacking impartiality. Another fact that adds to concerns over the matter is that the Yemeni government has now basically been put in the position of investigating itself. The group called the compromise a “shameful” deal designed to please Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia leads a military coalition of nine Arab states participating in the Yemeni conflict, and has often been accused of bombing civilian targets. It has been staunchly against the international probe, with some human right groups saying the decision to decline the bid for an independent inquiry could have been made under pressure.

The approved resolution “puts Saudi Arabia’s desire for impunity above the need to protect the people of Yemen,” said Salma Amer, the UN advocacy officer at the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, as cited by AFP.

This is not the first decision UN has made that seemingly plays into the hands of Saudi Arabia. In June the kingdom was surprisingly removed from the UN’s blacklist of counties violating children’s rights in armed conflicts. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon later admitted that his arm was twisted and he received threats from a number of countries. Ban did not specifically mention Saudi Arabia, but admitted his decision was made under pressure. 

Is the UN becoming a puppet of Saudi Arabia? How else could they get away with bombing hospitals, killing children and MSF doctors. The same thing is happening in Syria with Assad and, apparently, Russians doing some of the bombing. There should be zero tolerance for such heinous crimes and those responsible should be arrested to face crimes against humanity charges, or, just bombed to Hell.