Latin America Rising > Cuban crisis looming; Costa Rica elects new President; Argentina privatizes LNG imports

 

Trump issues ultimatum to Cuba as humanitarian crisis looms

Things are looking “very bad” for the Caribbean nation now that it has lost access to Venezuelan oil, the US president has said

US President Donald Trump speaking to members of the media aboard Air Force One. © Getty Images / Al Drago

The Cuban authorities would have to reach an agreement with Washington if they want to avoid a humanitarian crisis, US President Donald Trump has warned.

Earlier this week, Trump signed an executive order to impose tariffs on goods from any countries that sell oil to Cuba, further strengthening an embargo against the Caribbean nation which dates back to the 1960s.

The move comes after last month’s kidnapping by Washington of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro; his country had served as Havana’s primary source of oil.

Mexico had increased oil deliveries to Cuba in recent weeks; Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned on Friday that the US president’s order could “trigger a large-scale humanitarian crisis, directly affecting hospitals, food supplies, and other basic services for the Cuban people.”

When asked about Sheinbaum’s comment by journalists aboard Air Force One on Saturday, Trump said: “Well, it doesn’t have to be a humanitarian crisis. I think they probably would come to us and want to make a deal. So Cuba would be free again.”

     Read more

 US choking Cuba’s economy – Moscow

“We have a situation that’s very bad for Cuba. They have no money. They have no oil... They lived off Venezuelan money and oil, and none of that’s coming now,” he said.

The US President has expressed confidence that the sides will work out a deal and that Washington would be “kind” to Havana.

Trump did not explain which specific concessions he wants from the Cuban government, only saying that “we have a lot of people in the US right now that would love to go back to Cuba and we’d like to work that out.”

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova accused Washington of the “economic suffocation” of Cuba on Saturday. She reiterated Moscow’s opposition to unilateral sanctions not endorsed by the UN, expressing confidence that Havana would be able to overcome its economic difficulties.

The Cuban authorities have declared an “international emergency” over Trump’s pressure campaign, which they are describing as an “extraordinary threat” originating in “the US anti-Cuban neo-fascist right wing.”

READ MORE: Dmitry Trenin: America First goes global

The Financial Times claimed earlier that Cuba only has enough oil to last 15 to 20 days at the current level of demand and domestic production.

Costa Rica elects Laura Fernandez president

in first round

By Macarena Hermosilla

   

Laura Fernandez Delgado of the Sovereign People (Pueblo Soberano) party celebrates after winning the presidential elections in San Jose, Costa Rica, on Sunday. Costa Ricans also elected 57 members of the Legislative Assembly for the 2026–2030 term. Photo by Jeffrey Arguedas/EPA

Feb. 2 (UPI) -- Laura Fernandez Delgado was elected president of Costa Rica after winning the first round of the country's presidential election. Fernandez will take office May 8 and will become the second woman to lead the Central American nation.

The candidate of the Pueblo Soberano Party, the ruling party of outgoing President Rodrigo Chaves, won about 49% of valid votes Sunday, which that allowed her to avoid a runoff and secure continuity of the current administration's political project.

According to Costa Rica's Supreme Electoral Tribunal, voter turnout reached about 69% of the electoral rolls.

With more than 93% of polling stations counted, Fernandez built a clear lead over her rivals. National Liberation Party candidate Alvaro Ramos placed second with just over 32% of the vote. Claudia Dobles of the Agenda Ciudadana Coalition followed with about 4.7%.

Related

• Costa Rica wraps up election campaign as ruling party leads polls
• Montevideo, Uruguay, posts highest cost of living in Latin America
• El Salvador's Bukele visit to Costa Rica stirs political controversy

Fernandez, a 39-year-old political scientist and former minister of the presidency, built her political career within Chaves' inner circle after holding key posts in the executive branch.

The ruling party framed her candidacy as a bid for continuity during a campaign marked by political polarization and a fragmented opposition.

In Congress, the results fell short of the ruling party's goals. The Pueblo Soberano Party did not reach its target of winning 40 seats in the 57-member Legislative Assembly.

That threshold was described at different points as necessary to advance major reforms, including changes to the functioning of institutions and the justice system, according to public statements by ruling party leaders and academic analysis cited by local daily El Observador.

In her victory speech, Fernandez said her election opens the way to a "Third Republic" in Costa Rica.

"The change will be deep and irreversible," Fernandez said, pledging reforms to the state and a push for free enterprise, trade and expanded opportunities for young people and women, digital outlet CR Hoy reported.

Economic policy featured prominently in her remarks and proposals. During 2024 and 2025, Costa Rica recorded stronger growth, falling unemployment and lower public debt, achievements Fernandez has credited to the outgoing administration.

According to the 2025 State of the Nation report, known as PEN, those figures made Costa Rica the fastest-growing economy among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Fernandez called on the opposition to play a watchdog role without obstructing governance. She defended press freedom and urged newly elected lawmakers to act with prudence and responsibility in the new political landscape.

Her administration will face immediate challenges, including rising violence linked to drug trafficking and organized crime. Costa Rica closed 2025 with 873 homicides, one of the highest figures in its recent history, with a reported rate of 16.7 per 100,000 people, according to judicial authorities.

Several opposition figures have warned that an officialist victory could lead to an "authoritarian path," Infobae reported, citing concerns fueled by Chaves' repeated clashes with other branches of government, including Congress, the judiciary, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and critical media outlets.

In her first statements after the win, Fernandez said she plans to follow her predecessor's legacy over the next four years and rejected proposals for a sharp political break.

Argentina privatizes natural gas imports,

ends government role

By Banyeliz Muñoz

   

Argentina has authorized private companies to import and sell liquefied natural gas -- a move that removes the state from those operations. File Photo by Olivier Hoslet/EPA

BUENO AIRES, Jan. 30 (UPI) -- The Argentine government authorized private companies to import and sell liquefied natural gas -- a move that removes the state from those operations and accelerates the privatization of Enarsa, the country's public energy company.

The decision was formalized through a decree signed by President Javier Milei and published in the Official Gazette this week. The decree also extends through December 2027 a state of emergency in natural gas transportation and distribution, underscoring continued strain on the system.

Enarsa has historically handled production, transportation and marketing of oil, natural gas and electricity in Argentina. With the new policy, the government begins dismantling that role and shifting functions long overseen by the state to the private sector.

The decision addresses a long-standing structural problem. According to the Secretariat of Energy, Argentina lacks sufficient pipeline capacity to move all gas from producing areas to major urban centers.

That limitation becomes acute in winter. As heating demand rises, domestic supply falls short and the country must import liquefied natural gas by ship.

Until now, the state managed that process. Enarsa bought LNG on the international market at high prices and sold it domestically at well below cost, with the gap covered by taxpayer-funded subsidies.

"This change is part of the decision to move forward with privatizing Enarsa's assets and activities and to remove the state from its role as an entrepreneur and intermediary in the energy market," the Energy Secretariat said.

Officials said the state should focus on regulating the market, ensuring clear rules, promoting competition and guaranteeing supply rather than directly buying and selling gas.

Under the new framework, Enarsa will stop importing and marketing LNG, and private operators will take over under a competitive scheme.

The system eliminates the implicit subsidy that existed until now and transfers the entire operation to the private sector, subject to competition rules and state oversight.

To implement the plan, the government will sell access to the Escobar terminal on the outskirts of Buenos Aires. It is the country's only operational facility where imported LNG is regasified for distribution.

The Secretariat of Energy will set the tender conditions. If no bids are received or the process fails, Enarsa may intervene temporarily to avoid supply disruptions.

Because only one terminal is operating, the government also said it will set a maximum gas price for the upcoming winter to prevent abuse of a dominant position.

Juan José Carbajales, a former undersecretary of hydrocarbons, told UPI that privatization basically means giving a private company the job of buying LNG shipments and then selling that gas inside Argentina.

He said the operation is purely commercial and does not include physical management of the Escobar terminal.

"The scheme will be based on requests the awardee receives from power generators and gas distributors, and sales will be capped by a maximum price set by the Energy Secretariat at least for the next two periods," Carbajales said.

He said the decision reflects the government's view that the function failed under state management -- a stance rooted in broader distrust of public-sector economic activity, in this case Enarsa.

He said the position is ideological and supported by the so-called Bases Law, which prioritizes private initiative in the economy.

The former official added that large budget allocations to Enarsa did not prove a system failure, but rather a political decision by successive administrations to channel residential gas subsidies by buying fuel at international prices and selling it domestically at far lower levels.

He said the measure also aligns with reforms in the electricity market aimed at gradually returning to a system of free contracting between supply and demand.

Carbajales warned gas prices in Argentina could rise if international conditions push LNG costs higher.

"Although the government will cap that value for two years, uncertainty will remain about what happens once the ceiling is lifted," he said.

The authorization for private companies to import natural gas is part of a broader privatization agenda promoted by Milei. Since taking office in December 2023, his administration has moved to sell or prepare for sale several state-owned companies.

Read More

• Temu faces legal dispute with Argentine e-commerce giant
• The cost of debt in Latin America's emerging markets
• Public debt in Latin America returns to center of fiscal debate

Military Madness > Switzerland abandoning neutrality for military upgrade

Will the hit to the economy be worth it? Are they really afraid of Russia? There are several large countries and several more smaller countries, and 2000 kms between Switzerland and Russia.  

Switzerland plans tax hike to revamp military

Europe’s only internationally recognized neutral state claims it needs stronger security amid a “deteriorating geopolitical situation”

©  Sean Gallup/Getty Images

Switzerland plans to raise value-added tax to fund a major military expansion and modernization, the government has announced, citing growing security threats. The money would be earmarked for upgrading the armed forces, missile defenses, cybersecurity, and border protection.

Long Europe’s only formally neutral state, Switzerland has traditionally avoided foreign wars, stayed out of military blocs, and relied on a militia-based army. In recent years, however, Bern has abandoned strict neutrality, expanding security cooperation with NATO, forging closer defense ties with the EU, backing Kiev in the Ukraine conflict, and taking part in the sanctions on Russia.

In a statement on Wednesday, the Swiss government said the “deteriorating geopolitical situation” in Europe requires “substantially strengthening Switzerland’s security and defense capabilities,” citing cyberattacks, disinformation, and insufficient military readiness.

Bern said it needs 31 billion Swiss francs ($40.4 billion) for the move. It plans to raise the money by hiking VAT by 0.8 percentage points from the current 8.1% for ten years starting in 2028, depositing the proceeds into an armaments fund. Upgrades will focus on short-range missile defense, anti-drone systems, IT, intelligence, early warning, and civilian security.

READ MORE: Von der Leyen vows to turn EU into ‘military powerhouse’ – media

Switzerland currently spends around 0.7% of GDP on defense – less than half the European average – and had planned to reach 1% by 2032. Rising costs and high demand for weapons now make this insufficient, Bern said, estimating that the VAT hike would push spending to 1.5% of GDP.

Under Swiss law, the hike requires parliamentary approval and a national referendum. The government plans to draft the law by March, submit it to parliament in the autumn, and hold a vote in summer 2027. Analysts, however, warn that support could be limited. A recent IPSOS survey found that only 31% of Swiss people favor higher military spending – the lowest in Europe, compared with 60% in Germany and 53% in France.

Western leaders have increasingly invoked the perceived ‘Russian threat’ to justify major defense spending hikes in recent months, including pledges by European NATO members to reach 5% of GDP.

READ MORE: Switzerland drifting towards NATO – largest party

Russia has dismissed claims that it plans to attack Europe as baseless fearmongering, warning that “rabid militarization” risks a broader conflict on the continent. Commenting on Switzerland’s growing military alignment with the EU and its stance on the Ukraine conflict, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov earlier accused it of “forfeiting” its neutrality, calling it “an openly hostile state.”

Islamization of France - The Great Replacement is not a theory, but a fact, in France

 

The Great Replacement in France

Jan 29, 2026 10:00 am By Hugh Fitzgerald9 Comments

France is being swamped with new immigrants. In 2025, nearly 400,000 new residence permits were issued to these migrants who are, overwhelmingly, Muslims from North Africa. And many French people, who for a long time averted their eyes from the phenomenon, are no longer afraid to speak out and to call for a great reduction, or even for a complete halt, to immigration. More on the French alarm over what has been called the “Great Replacement” can be found here:

France: Record 384,000 first-time residence permits granted in 2025 as immigration keeps soaring higher

Remix News, January 27, 2026:

In 2025, France is seeing a significant shift in its non-EU immigration landscape, with first-time residence permits projected to reach 384,000 — an 11.2 percent increase from the previous year. This growth is uniquely defined by a massive 65 percent surge in permits granted on humanitarian grounds, primarily to refugees and those seeking subsidiary protection.

The legal foreign population in France is expected to hit approximately 4.5 million by the end of 2025, a 3.2 percent annual increase. However, previous reports have put the total population of foreigners at much higher levels, already reaching 6 million in 2024. While humanitarian reasons are the primary driver for new arrivals, the “stock” of residents remains heavily influenced by family ties and labor needs.

The purpose of residency varies drastically depending on the country of origin, reflecting France’s diverse historical and geopolitical ties. As French news outlet Fdesouche notes, “Nationals of the three Maghreb countries are more often issued with residence permits granted for family reunification reasons.” These countries consist of Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia. However, these groups are also now being granted work permits, with the government arguing they can be used to fill labor shortages….

Contrary to the French government’s expectations, many of the Muslim maghrebins who are granted work permits do not, in fact, end up working. They prefer to take advantage of all of the benefits that the generous French welfare state lavishes upon them, that put them in as good a position economically as they would be doing the kind of menial jobs for which, given their lack of advanced education, they are qualified.

Meanwhile, Afghans receive residence permits almost entirely based on humanitarian reasons….

The Afghans who flee from the Taliban’s rule in Afghanistan ought not to be taken in by France, a country alien to them in every respect. Instead, it would be far better for their fellow Muslims next door in Pakistan, or the Arab oil states of the Gulf, especially Saudi Arabia, that have a need for manual labor, given all of the trillion-dollar construction projects now underway in those countries, to take in those Afghans.

That 1.2 billion euros paid for migrant housing, including 50,000 hotel rooms, is the total for only one city — Paris. How many more billions of euros does the French government spend on housing for migrants outside the capital? Five billion euros? Ten?

Last year, demographic researcher and data analyst Marc Vanguard reported that “the foreign population in France is growing FOUR times faster than the population of French nationality.”…

That “foreign population” consists overwhelmingly of Muslims from North Africa. They arrive to take advantage of the cornucopia of benefits that are lavished on migrants, including free housing, free medical care, free education (including language tuition and vocational training), unemployment benefits, family allowances, and more. Many are in no hurry to be gainfully employed; they have calculated they can receive more benefits if they remain unemployed. Besides, the Infidels owe them all those benefits, which Muslims interpret as a kind of proleptic jizyah.

In 2022, famed French author Michel Houellebecq came out and said the Great Replacement is a “fact” during a wide-ranging discussion with influential French philosopher Michel Onfray.

“The Great Replacement, I was shocked it’s called a theory. It’s not a theory, it’s a fact,” said Houellebecq. “When it comes to immigration, nobody controls anything; that’s the whole problem. Europe will be swept away by this cataclysm.”…

Those who, like Michel Houllebecq, have taken note of the ever-increasing numbers of Muslim migrants, are the most alarmed. They no longer conceal their anxiety about the changes in the population of France. If either Jordan Bardella or Marine Le Pen of the anti-immigrant National Rally party is swept into office as president, we can expect the spigot of migrants from Third-World countries (which is to say, from Muslim countries) to be turned down, or turned off entirely.

Notably, the vast majority of the French want serious immigration restrictions put in place, while a tremendous 53 percent of women want zero immigration into the country, according to polling.

More women than men in France want zero immigration because it is the women who have to endure the unwanted attentions, and even sexual assaults, of Muslim migrants who misinterpret the dress of French women, so immodest by Muslim standards, as expressing a come-hither attitude.

To put a stop to the “Great Replacement” in France — as in other countries in Western Europe — calling a halt to migration will not be sufficient. Fertility rates for French women are currently 1.7, far below the replacement level of 2.1. But the fertility rate for Muslim women already in France is 2.9. Policies need to be put in place to bring down the fertility rates of Muslim women. One possibility is to deny families on welfare — most of them Muslim migrants — any additional benefits for a third child, and to decrease by half the amount of support provided for a second child. At the same time, pro-natalist policies for French women could be introduced, by providing to women whose grandparents were French citizens extra state support for every child beyond the second. Aren’t these policies worth a try?

================================================================================================