"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label treason. Show all posts
Showing posts with label treason. Show all posts

Friday, August 1, 2025

American Politics > Obama weaponized the FBI as Soros contributed to Russiagate

 

This is not only Deep State but Dark State, only capable by powerful godless entities


FBI was ‘weaponized’ in Obama-Clinton conspiracy to ‘stop Trump’ – top US senator

The newly declassified Russiagate document exposes a deep state coverup, Chuck Grassley says
FBI was ‘weaponized’ in Obama-Clinton conspiracy to ‘stop Trump’ – top US senator











The newly released annex to John Durham’s 2023 Special Counsel report exposes the “weaponization” of the FBI under the Obama administration and the agency’s involvement in an attempt to ruin Donald Trump's presidency in 2016, US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has said.

The senator, a key figure behind the release of the 29-page document, made the remarks to Fox News on Thursday shortly after the annex was published. The file outlines the alleged effort by the Hillary Clinton campaign to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with Russia, and the FBI’s failure to properly investigate the activities despite having solid intelligence.

“[The Durham annex] gives us information that the FBI had eight to ten years ago that they never followed up on. It actually brings attention to the fact that there was either a Clinton conspiracy to make this happen, or Russian disinformation. Either way, it was an attempt to stop Trump, and it proves that the FBI had a hand in it,” Grassley stated.

The annex provides “evidence of the great depth that the deep state will go to cover up weaponization that was going on in the FBI and the executive branch of government, generally, under the Obama administration,” the senator suggested. America needs “maximum transparency” on the 2016 presidential race “schemes” that were hatched “to either stop Trump from being elected or… to ruin his presidency,” he added.

According to the document, the FBI obtained intelligence on “confidential conversations” between then-Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and individuals at George Soros’ Open Society Foundations in early 2016, yet did not take any action. The conversations reportedly detailed a plan to discredit the then-Republican candidate by preparing “scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the Russian Mafia.”

The agency allegedly obtained further evidence on the matter in mid-2016, including several “likely authentic” emails sent by Leonard Benardo, senior vice president of the Open Society Foundations. The emails further detailed the plot to “disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated ‘attic-based’ technical structures,” and appeared to predict a future FBI probe into Russiagate, suggesting the agency “will put more oil into the fire” later on.

========================================================================


Saturday, July 12, 2025

Military Madness > NATO to sell millions of landmines to northern European countries bordering Russia; Two Russians arrested for treason; Draft-related tortures and deaths in Ukraine

 

The Finnish border with Russia is approximately 1,340 kilometers (830 miles) long. How many landmines do you need to protect that? How do landmines work in the snow? How many civilians will die needlessly if the mines are actually deployed? Probably a lot more than any number of Russian soldiers who have not threatened Finland in the least. This is NATO-induced hysteria intended to sell weapons for Western  War Industries.


Another NATO member pulls out of landmine treaty

The move will allow Finland to reintroduce anti-personnel mines into its weaponry stockpile as soon as January
Another NATO member pulls out of landmine treaty











Finland has formally withdrawn from an international treaty that bans the use of anti-personnel landmines (APLs), the country’s Foreign Ministry announced on Thursday. It said the United Nations has been notified of the decision, which will enable the Nordic country to reintroduce landmines into its military stockpile in six months.

Drafted in 1997, the Ottawa Treaty prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of APLs due to their long-term threat to civilians. While 164 nations have ratified the treaty, major military powers such as the US, China, and Russia have not joined.

Finland acceded to the treaty in 2012, but its government began preparing to withdraw earlier this year, citing a growing security threat from Russia. Last month, the Finnish parliament overwhelmingly approved the decision.

“The decision to withdraw from the Convention is based on Finland’s defense needs in the deteriorated security environment,” the Finnish Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

Finland’s withdrawal comes shortly after four other NATO members – Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland – announced similar decisions earlier this year. In a joint statement issued in late March, the countries cited heightened military threats from Russia as justification for the move.

The Kremlin has consistently denied any aggressive intentions toward NATO, claiming that the Ukraine conflict was provoked by the military bloc’s eastward expansion.

At the same time, Moscow has stated that it shares the goals and principles of the Ottawa Convention, but considers joining it impractical. According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, “anti-personnel mines remain an effective and low-cost means of securing Russia’s borders.”




‘Bombmakers’ for Ukraine busted in Russia – FSB

Agents of a “terrorist organization” working for Kiev were arrested in the border Bryansk Region, the security agency has reported


Two Russian residents have been arrested for allegedly conducting covert missions on behalf of Ukraine’s intelligence services, including assembling improvised explosive devices from components delivered by drone, Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) said on Friday.

Kiev is reportedly operating a clandestine network to smuggle contraband into Russian territory in support of sabotage acts and targeted killings. The operational structure is understood to be compartmentalized, with individuals often unaware of one another’s roles, and equipment passed through hidden caches.

Russian authorities said they identified two operatives affiliated with what they termed a “Ukrainian terrorist organization,” both residing in the western Bryansk Region near the Ukrainian border. The suspects were allegedly tasked with recovering drone-delivered equipment, constructing explosive devices, and inspecting recovered firearms for operational readiness.

The FSB did not name the suspects, but said one is in his late 20s and the other approximately 30 years old. According to the agency, the individuals began cooperating with Ukrainian authorities in April 2024 and now face charges of treason.


Video footage released by the FSB showed evidence allegedly seized during the operation, including several unassembled short-range drones, what appeared to be packaged C4 explosives, a pistol, and a suppressor.

The firearm, described by one suspect as a “suppressed Makarov,” may in fact be a PB pistol – a Soviet-designed silenced handgun from the 1960s. Though based heavily on the Makarov PM, the PB was developed by gunsmith Aleksey Deryagin, not Nikolay Makarov.

The FSB further accused the suspects of conducting reconnaissance on sensitive facilities on behalf of Kiev. The agency said a radio scanner was found in their possession, allegedly used to detect electronic jamming signals and to calibrate drone systems to avoid interference.

Russian officials have accused Ukraine of organizing numerous sabotage and assassination attempts in recent years. In one such incident in late May, an alleged explosive attack beneath railway tracks derailed a passenger train in Bryansk Region, killing seven civilians and injuring more than 100 others.




Council of Europe ‘alarmed’ by reports of draft-related Ukrainian deaths and torture

Kiev should investigate these incidents and prevent further violations, the human rights commissioner said
Council of Europe ‘alarmed’ by reports of draft-related Ukrainian deaths and torture











The Council of Europe’s commissioner for human rights, Michael O’Flaherty, has expressed concerns about “systematic and widespread” abuse committed by Ukrainian draft officials.

In his latest update on the situation in the country, published this week, the official says he's seen “alarming” reports that include “allegations of torture and death during military recruitment.”

He urged Ukraine’s authorities to promptly investigate all alleged instances of abuse and take measures to prevent similar violations, including independent oversight of recruitment officials’ behavior, he said.

O’Flaherty cited a statement by Ukraine’s Parliamentary Commissioner for Human Rights, Dmitry Lubinets, who also noted that human rights abuse committed by draft officials was “systematic and widespread.” The list of these violations includes “beatings, brutal arrests, denial of access to a lawyer, incommunicado detention, mobilization of people with disabilities and other unacceptable acts,” the report stated.

In an April interview with political commentator Ben Shapiro, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky denied that abuse is “massive,” insisting that it was limited to “singular cases.” He asserted that the main problem was people evading mobilization through bribes, while neglecting to touch upon allegations of beatings and torture.

Ukraine expanded its conscription criteria last year amid heavy battlefield losses, lowering the legal draft age from 27 to 25, while increasing the power of military recruiters. The mobilization campaign, which is overseen by Ukraine’s Territorial Centers of Recruitment and Social Support (TCR), has drawn widespread public criticism.

Numerous videos circulating online show enlistment officers chasing would-be recruits in the streets, commonly backed by civilian police. Reluctant draftees are sometimes threatened with military-grade weaponry and often beaten, along with any bystanders who attempt to intervene.

Earlier this week, a video surfaced online showing an elderly woman trying to prevent military recruiters from detaining her son. The woman was seen clinging to the windshield of a van and screaming. A witness filming the scene claimed the vehicle belonged to military recruiters and that her son was inside. According to Strana.UA, the woman soon felt unwell and died in an ambulance.

A February report by Strana.UA suggested that 80% of Ukrainians had a negative view of the TCR. Meanwhile, the head of Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation, Andrey Kovalenko stated this week that ordinary citizens were providing the coordinates of local TCR offices to the Russian military.

=======================================================================

Monday, April 17, 2023

Putin Critic, who was poisoned twice, jailed 25 years for treason

..

Russian journalist Vladimir Kara-Murza given 25-year sentence for treason


Kara-Murza, 41, condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine and was arrested last year


Briar Stewart · CBC News · 
Posted: Apr 17, 2023 2:43 AM PDT | 

Vladimir Kara-Murza Jr., a prominent Kremlin critic described by Canada's ambassador to Russia as a man of 'honour and conscience,' has been sentenced to 25 years in prison on charges of treason and denigrating the Russian military.

In the moments after Vladimir Kara-Murza was sentenced on Monday to 25 years behind bars in a Russian prison, the vocal Kremlin critic remained defiant and told the court that one day "Russia would be free."

Kara-Murza was handed one of Russia's harshest punishments in recent years at a court hearing that his supporters and members of the media were blocked from attending. The 41-year-old father of three was convicted of treason and other offences for speaking out against the Ukraine invasion during speeches he gave in the U.S. and in Europe.

Last week, Kara-Murza said that he remains proud of standing up to Russian President Vladimir Putin's "dictatorship" and his decision to send troops into Ukraine.

"I know that the day will come when the darkness engulfing our country will clear," Kara-Murza said in remarks last week that were posted on social networks and Russian opposition media. "And then our society will open its eyes and shudder when it realizes what terrible crimes were committed in its name."



He has been in custody in Russia since April 2022, after he chose to return despite the fact that the Kremlin's unrelenting crackdown on its critics left him at great risk.

"It is an act of cynical revenge," said Evgenia Kara-Murza, his wife, in an interview with CBC News before the sentence was handed down.

She told CBC that both she and her husband knew the judge would sign off on the 25-year sentence the prosecutor was demanding.

"They are so afraid of him, afraid of the effectiveness of his work, and they hate him so much that they want to lock him up," she said.

"Three decades ago, a free and democratic Russia struggled to come into being. Today's verdict is a sad testament to the dark turn this struggle has come to," said Alison LeClaire, Canada's ambassador to Russia. "Regardless of this verdict, freedom-minded people in this country and all over the world recognize Vladimir Kara-Murza as a man of honour and conscience, a resolute defender of civil and political rights, and an ally of the people in their struggle for a free and democratic Russia."

Prominent Russian activist Vladimir Kara-Murza says many Russians oppose military action against Ukraine but dissent is being crushed by the state.

LeClaire was outside the court alongside the ambassadors from the U.K. and U.S.. — where the Kara-Murzas have resided in recent years — as well as a large crowd of media and supporters. Canada and the U.S. have previously sanctioned Russian justice and other officials involved in Kara-Murza's arrest and prosecution.

The 25-year sentence is absurd and one wonders if it was ordered from the Kremlin. Russia's justice system is very political. But one also wonders how much of a western slant Kara-Murza employed in his writing and speaking? Did he write about the Nazi AZOV Battalion that inflicted years of terror upon the Russian-speaking people of Donbas? Did he write about the dozens of bio-labs sponsored by the Pentagon, in Ukraine? Or, the CIA funding and assistance with the Maidan coup? Or, the broken promise by the west to not drag Russia's neighbours into NATO? He encouraged the west to adopt sanctions against Russia. Is that treason?


The British government summoned its Russian ambassador over the sentencing of Kara-Murza, who also holds a U.K. passport.

"Russia's lack of commitment to protecting fundamental human rights, including freedom of expression, is alarming," British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said in a statement. "We continue to urge Russia to adhere to its international obligations including Vladimir Kara-Murza's entitlement to proper health care."

Russia adopted a law criminalizing spreading "false information" about its military days after it sent troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Authorities have used the law to stifle criticism of what the Kremlin calls "a special military operation."

Another prominent opposition figure, Ilya Yashin, was sentenced to 8½ years in prison late last year on charges of discrediting the military.

Mysterious poisonings

Kara-Murza, a journalist for several years, was an associate of Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, who was killed near the Kremlin in 2015 in mysterious circumstances.

The charges Kara-Murza was convicted of in Russia concern a speech he gave to Arizona lawmakers, as well as talks he held in Lisbon, Washington and Helsinki. He had forged a relationship with Arizona Sen. John McCain, and was chosen to be a pallbearer at his funeral in 2018.

Kara-Murza, left, is shown with then-Arizona Sen. John McCain on Capitol Hill in Washington on
March 29, 2017. 
Kara-Murza's speech to Arizona lawmakers in 2022 was cited by Russian authorities in their prosecution. 
(Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

Kara-Murza survived poisonings in 2015 and 2017 that he blamed on the Kremlin. Russian officials have denied responsibility.

Kara-Murza's lawyers say that as a result of the poisonings, he suffers from a serious nerve disorder called polyneuropathy.

Evgenia Kara-Murz told CBC News that she fears for her husband's health as he has lost 40 pounds in the past year.

"The Russian prison system is never good for anyone's health, but for someone who nearly died twice — those conditions are absolutely impossible," she said. "They will try to create such conditions in which his health will deteriorate [and] result in his death."

Yulia Galyamina, a political activist and former Moscow city councillor, wrote to Kara-Murza while he was in prison to tell him that the 25-year sentence the prosecution was demanding was preposterous.

"Do you really think that this regime will last 25 years," she recounted to CBC News in an interview from Moscow. "That can never be."

For years, Kara-Murza has been sounding the alarm and lobbying Western nations to adopt sanctions against purported human rights violators in Russia. He has visited Canada multiple times and urged countries, including in a 2019 visit to CBC News studios, to implement sanctions that are named after Sergei Magnitsky, a Russian tax lawyer who helped uncover widespread fraud and later died in a Russian prison in 2009.

Evgenia Kara-Murza says she and others at the Washington, D.C.-based Free Russia Foundation are carrying on his work. While she knew her husband's return to Moscow could prove to a be a hardship for the family, she understands why he chose to go back.

"He might have stayed, [but] then today he would have been broken as a man," she said. "He had to be there and share the risks and challenges faced by Russians back home."

=============================================================================================

Monday, September 5, 2022

The Media is the Message > Russian Journo Jailed 22 Years; IDF Admits Shooting Palestinian Journo; Media Outlet shut down in Russia

..

Russian ex-journalist Ivan Safronov jailed 22 years on treason charges


EU denounces 'systematic repressions of the regime against independent journalism'


Thomson Reuters · 
Posted: Sep 05, 2022 1:07 PM ET |

Ivan Safronov stands in a courtroom prior to the reading of the verdict and sentencing in Moscow on Monday.
(Moscow City Court/The Associated Press)


A Russian court on Monday sentenced a former journalist to 22 years in prison for treason after prosecutors said he disclosed state secrets, a ruling his supporters said was a harsh punishment that showed the absence of media freedom in Russia.

Ivan Safronov, 32, who was a defence and space reporter for the Kommersant and Vedomosti newspapers before becoming adviser to the head of Russia's space agency, was arrested in 2020 and accused of disclosing classified information. He has been in custody since his arrest in Moscow.

Safronov's father also worked for Kommersant, covering military issues after retiring from the armed forces. In 2007, he died after falling from a window of his apartment building in Moscow.

Investigators concluded that he killed himself, but some Russian media outlets questioned the official version, pointing to his intent to publish a sensitive report about secret arms deliveries to Iran and Syria.

Safronov's lawyers told the RIA Novosti news agency they will appeal the verdict. His supporters say the case is retribution for his reporting, which exposed details of Russia's international arms deals.

'Charge of treason is absurd'


"Everybody who is close to Safronov believes the charge of treason is absurd," journalist Katerina Gordeeva said after interviewing his mother, sister and former colleagues for a documentary about the case.

Hours before the ruling was announced by the Moscow City Court, 15 independent Russian media outlets issued a joint statement demanding Safronov's release.

"It is obvious to us that the reason for persecuting Ivan Safronov is not 'treason,' which hasn't been substantiated ... but his work as a journalist and stories he published without any regard for what the Defence Ministry or Russian authorities think," the statement read.


Included in the statement was media outlet Novaya Gazeta. Separately on Monday, a Moscow court revoked the publishing licence for the media outlet, a flagship independent newspaper that ceased publishing days after Russia sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine and imposed strict new controls over media outlets.

The European Union on Monday also urged Russian authorities to drop all charges against Safronov and "release him without any conditions," denouncing "systematic repressions of the regime against independent journalism."


Speaking outside the courtoom, Safronov's lawyer, Dmitry Katchev, said he was almost lost for words at the ruling.

"Safronov was given 22 years for his journalistic activity. I want each of you, who are looking at me now, to think whether it is worth staying in this profession if somebody was given 22 years for doing his job," he told reporters.

'Cruel punishment'


Human rights lawyer Pavel Chikov said the sentence was a "savage, demonstratively cruel punishment, corresponding to the current state of Russia."

He said he could not find any examples of any treason cases leading to such a lengthy sentence, let alone against a journalist.

Prosecutors said Safronov shared state secrets about Russia's arms sales in the Middle East to the Czech Republic's foreign intelligence arm. He has denied the charges and last month rejected a plea deal that would have seen him serve a 12-year prison sentence.

Information was not secret, defence says


Safronov said the information he is alleged to have passed to the Czech Republic was all open source public information.

During the trial, his legal team published links to 19 published articles and government statements that prosecutors claim constitute the "state secrets" Safronov is alleged to have passed to Czech foreign intelligence.

"Ivan never sent any secret information anywhere — for money or for free.... He was an ordinary journalist, honestly doing his job," his lawyers said in a statement.

Following his arrest, the Kremlin called Safronov a "talented journalist," while it has repeatedly denied involvement with the case.

His defence team believes the trial is retribution for Safronov revealing Russia's plans to sell fighter jets to Egypt. The estimated $2-billion US deal was scrapped soon after when the U.S. threatened sanctions on Cairo if it went ahead.




IDF admits to 'high possibility' Palestinian journalist shot by their forces


By Clyde Hughes
   
Palestinian journalist holds a portrait of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who was killed by gunfire in Jenin, during a protest in the West Bank city of Hebron, on May 11. Israel Defense Forces said on Monday there was a "high possibility" she was killed by Israeli military gunfire. File Photo by Abed Al Hashlamoun/EPA-EFE


Sept. 5 (UPI) -- Israel Defense Forces on Monday for the first time admitted there is a "high possibility" Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was shot and killed by their service members accidentally in May but will not pursue criminal charges.

Abu Akleh, who was working for Al Jazeera, was killed and her colleague Ali Sammoudi was injured on May 11 while the IDF was conducting an operation in the area.

In its own investigation, the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights said in June that Abu Akleh was killed by shots fired by Israeli Security Forces and not by indiscriminate fire from armed Palestinians.

An IDF spokesperson said, according to the Jerusalem Post, while it is still unclear where who fired the shots that killed the journalist, "there is a high possibility that Shireen was accidentally hit by IDF gunfire that was fired toward suspects identified as armed Palestinian gunmen, during an exchange of fire in which life-risking, widespread an indiscriminate shots were fired toward IDF soldiers."

Al Jazeera has complained that Abu Akleh was intentionally targeted by Israeli forces. Witnesses told CNN, which was supported by security video at the time of the shooting, that there was no combat activity or Palestinian militants in Abu Akleh's location at the time of the shooting.

Abu Akleh was wearing a protective vest that is labeled "PRESS" on the front and back at the time she was shot.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Aviv Kohavi, who ordered the investigation, said he has found no evidence that Abu Akleh was intentionally fired upon.

"Our family is not surprised by this outcome since it's obvious to anyone that Israeli war criminals cannot investigate their own crimes," Abu Akleh's family said in a statement, according to the Times of Israel. "However, we remain deeply hurt, frustrated and disappointed.

Since Abu Akleh also had U.S. citizenship, the family called on the Biden administration and the International Criminal Court to hold their own investigations.





Court shuts down one of Russia's last independent media


Novaya Gazeta editor in chief says revoking licence amounts to 'political hit job'


Thomson Reuters · 
Posted: Sep 05, 2022 11:28 AM ET | 

Nobel Peace Prize-awarded journalist Dmitry Muratov, editor in chief of the influential Russian newspaper 
Novaya Gazeta, sits in a Moscow courtroom prior to hearing that the court had upheld a motion from Russian 
authorities to revoke the media outlet's licence. (Alexander Zemlianichenko/The Associated Press)

Novaya Gazeta, one of Russia's few remaining independent news outlets, was stripped of its media licence on Monday, and in effect banned from operating.

The country's media watchdog, Rozkomnadzor, had accused it of failing to provide documents related to a change of ownership in 2006.

Speaking outside court, editor in chief Dmitry Muratov, a Nobel Peace laureate for his efforts to uphold critical news reporting in Russia, said the ruling was "a political hit job, without the slightest legal basis." He said the paper would appeal.

In a statement, Novaya Gazeta said the decision by Moscow's Basmanny District Court, which often handles politically charged cases, had "killed the newspaper, stolen 30 years of life from its workers, and deprived readers of the right to information."

The United Nations Human Rights office called the judgment "yet another blow to the independence of Russian media," and urged Moscow to protect media freedom.

Novaya Gazeta has been a stalwart of Russia's media scene since its foundation in 1993 with money from the Nobel Peace Prize of late Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. It had carved out a niche as Russia's leading investigative news outlet, even as media freedoms were gradually rolled back.


Muratov carries a portrait of the late Mikhail Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union, out of the House of Unions
after a memorial service for the former president in Moscow on Saturday. (Shamil Zhumatov/Reuters)


In March, it suspended operations in Russia after being cautioned for violating new laws imposing strict censorship on coverage of the conflict in Ukraine.

Staff have since set up a new spinoff online outlet in Europe, whose publications have also been blocked in Russia.

Muratov himself remains in Russia, and on Saturday led the funeral procession of Gorbachev, his financial backer and friend.

===========================================================================================


Monday, January 17, 2022

European Politics > How Ukrainians do Politics; How the French do Politics (2); Can Germany Normalize Relations with Russia?

..

Poroshenko returns to Ukraine, faces prosecution for ‘treason’


How Ukrainians play politics


Poroshenko returns to Ukraine, faces prosecution for ‘treason’
FILE PHOTO. © Sputnik / Stringer


Former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, declared wanted last month for a number of serious crimes, including high treason, has flown back to Kiev in time for a court hearing that could see him remanded in custody.

Poroshenko, who led Ukraine from 2014 to 2019, left the country last month around the same time a summons was issued for his interrogation. He is being investigated over his alleged involvement in the funding of separatist fighters in the Donbass, in eastern Ukraine, through the illegal sale of coal. This, according to the law, is illegal, and he is subsequently accused of treason and promoting terrorism.

Another suspect in the treason case is Viktor Medvedchuk, head of the political council of the Opposition Platform – For Life party, the country’s largest opposition group in Parliament. Poroshenko and Medvedchuk are the two main opposition leaders and the most significant political threats to current President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to Poroshenko, he is being persecuted for purely political reasons. His arrival is thought by many to be a precursor to a showdown between the former president and Zelensky, who faced off in the 2019 election.

After landing in Kiev, on a budget flight from Warsaw, and successfully passing through passport control, Poroshenko left the capital’s Zhuliany Airport and spoke to gathered supporters. He told the assembled thousands that he was not arrested at the airport due to the masses of people who came to support him, as well as the number of journalists present.

“In front of the whole world, [the security forces] showed cynical and irresponsible behavior,” Poroshenko said and dubbed the case against him a “challenge” to the whole of Ukraine.

Following his speech to the crowd, Poroshenko headed for Kiev’s Pechersky District Court, where he could be remanded in custody after officially being charged.




Louvre threatens to sue Marine Le Pen


How the French play politics


A tv grab taken on January 15, 2022 from the Facebook page of the Rassemblement National shows France's far-right party Rassemblement National candidate for the 2022 French presidential election Marine Le Pen delivering a speech by the Louvre Pyramid in Paris. © AFP / facebook Rassemblement National


The Louvre Museum in Paris has hit out at right-wing presidential candidate Marine Le Pen after she claimed the landmark ‘as her own’ in a campaign video. The museum has asked her to remove the advertisement.

On Sunday, the Louvre said that Marine Le Pen, the National Rally party leader, did not have permission to film her presidential campaign video in front of its infamous glass pyramid, which sits at the heart of the building’s courtyard. 

In the video, filmed on January 11, Le Pen claimed the Paris landmark “as her own,” the museum said. In the three-and-a-half minute ad, Le Pen attacks incumbent President Emmanuel Macron for his “interlude of a Macronism that’s been toxic for the country and that began here.” Macron had made his victory speech after the 2017 election from the Louvre pyramid. 

I wonder if he had permission?

Philippe Olivier, one of Le Pen’s campaign advisors, told the New York Times that the campaign video was made to show that “Macron is the opponent” and “that’s what the symbolic act of being at the Louvre is about.”

“We belong to the entire French population,” a museum spokesperson told Le Parisien, adding that “in her video clip, Le Pen claims the Louvre as her own.” 

The museum said they did not want to be part of tit-for-tat politics.

Le Pen’s campaign team said their video was in line with the museum’s official rules, which says permission is not needed when the filming isn’t for commercial purposes. The video remains online. 

The Louvre added that they were “considering what action may be taken regarding the conditions under which the video was filmed and broadcast.” 

While Macron is yet to announce his candidacy for the election in April, he remains the favorite. Le Pen faces stiff competition from other right-wing candidates who may pip her to second place in the first round of the election, thereby preventing her from reaching the run-off.

I have been watching Marine Le Pen for several years now, and there has never been a federal French election where Marine wasn't accused of something, charged with something, in court over something, that seems to disappear after the next election. This is the French way of doing politics. At least, she hasn't been charged with treason yet.





Presidential hopeful fined for inciting hatred


It's not just Marine Le Pen who is abused, but anyone on France's far right

 
Eric Zemmour at a campaign event in Villepinte, France, December 2021. © AP/Rafael Yaghobzadeh


Journalist and essayist Eric Zemmour, who is running in the 2022 French presidential election, was fined €10,000 ($11,400) on Monday for inciting hatred against migrants on TV. 

A Paris court tried Zemmour for the remarks he made on a TV show in September 2020. 

While speaking about unaccompanied minors entering the country, the journalist said: “They’ve got no reason being here, they are thieves, they are killers, they are rapists, that’s all they do, they should be sent back.”

The broadcast took place days after a Pakistani-born Islamist went on a stabbing spree outside the former office of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris, wounding two people. 

The prosecution argued that Zemmour “crossed the limits of the freedom of expression.”  

Zemmour’s lawyer Olivier Pardo said his client will appeal Monday’s verdict. He added that Zemmour was voicing his political views and describing “the reality,” sometimes “in a brutal way.” 

The presidential candidate himself dismissed the ruling as “ideological and stupid.” 

Zemmour, known for his anti-migrant and anti-Islam statements, is a highly divisive figure in France. He was prosecuted around 15 times and convicted of incitement of hatred in 2011 and 2019. An appeal of the 2019 ruling will be decided on Thursday.

The French will vote for their president in April. 

=======================================================================================



Kremlin identifies ‘red line’ in NATO-Russia relations


NATO created a situation Russia “couldn’t tolerate any more,” Putin's spokesman claims


©  Sputnik / Stringer


NATO’s “gradual invasion” into Ukraine has brought the US-led bloc right up to Moscow’s “red line,” the Kremlin has told CNN. President Vladimir Putin's spokesman says the situation poses an imminent threat to European security.

In an interview aired on Sunday, Dmitry Peskov cited documented Western promises, which, he noted, have never been “fixed in a legally binding way,” that NATO would not expand further eastwards into the former Soviet bloc. In contrast to these pledges, over the past few years, NATO has used its ‘open door policy’ to absorb several former Warsaw Pact countries.

Moscow has drawn the line at Ukraine, Peskov told the American broadcaster.

“First, there were just words but with time we have seen the gradual invasion of NATO into Ukrainian territory, with its infrastructure, with its instructors, with supplies of defensive and offensive weapons, teaching [the] Ukrainian military and so on,” Peskov said. 

Putin's long time spokesman went on to say that these moves have brought NATO directly “to the red line,” creating a situation which constitutes a “real threat” both for Russia and for the whole “European [security] architecture.” Russia has a 3,000-km border with Ukraine, which, until the Ukrainian war broke out in 2014, was almost completely unfortified. 

These circumstances, which Moscow “couldn’t tolerate anymore,” prompted Putin's team to come up with a set of proposals to improve collective security, Peskov said.

The proposals include guarantees that NATO will not expand eastwards and that no former Soviet country bordering Russia would be permitted to join the alliance. The US, as well as NATO – which Peskov called “a weapon of confrontation” on Sunday – have already rejected these particular proposals. Unless a compromise is found, Peskov said tensions will only escalate further.

Peskov also said during the interview that Moscow “will be ready to take counter-actions” should NATO deployments to Ukraine continue, though he stressed that this does not mean all-out military action. 

At the start of the interview, Zakaria told Peskov that, according to “some people,” Russia has “created this crisis” itself. Kiev and Washington have insisted for months that Russia has been amassing troops at the Ukrainian border, in preparation for an invasion. Moscow has repeatedly denied having plans to invade its neighbor. Peskov once again dismissed the idea on Sunday, pointing the finger at NATO instead for threatening Russia’s security over the past two decades.

========================================================================================



Germany wants to 'normalize' relations with Russia – Baerbock


Berlin’s foreign minister emphasized that there is a “long list” of issues to resolve


Annalena Baerbock © Riccardo De Luca / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images


Germany is still intent on normalizing relations with Russia, the country’s top diplomat has said before a planned visit to Moscow, insisting that recent bilateral talks can’t be expected to solve every problem at once.

Speaking to reporters on Friday, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock downplayed the breakdown of talks between Russia and the West, arguing that productive diplomacy between the two sides is still very much possible.

“There have been no joint talks with Russia within the framework of NATO for two years,” she explained. “I don’t think anyone came to the negotiating table and thought: ‘We haven’t talked to each other for two years, now we’ll solve in a few hours everything that hasn’t been discussed in the last few years.’”

The foreign minister, who will be traveling to Moscow and Kiev this week for negotiations, emphasized that solving problems diplomatically is rarely easy. “Diplomacy, especially in times of crisis, is characterized by the fact that it requires a lot of perseverance, a lot of patience, and strong nerves,” she said. “We are doing everything we can to ensure that there is no further escalation.”

On Monday, Baerbock indicated that she will be arriving in Moscow with a “long list” of issues to discuss, and said that she will make clear Germany’s position. She named science, culture, trade, renewable energy, and climate issues as possible subjects.

No technology security? 

“Cooperation between civic communities is particularly important to us,” she went on. “I also want to talk to my Russian colleague about these opportunities and how we can create the conditions to use them more effectively,” she added, saying that she will also listen attentively to her interlocutors in both Moscow and Kiev.

Baerbock’s comments come after a series of talks held last week between diplomats from Russia, the US, and NATO on the subject of security in Europe. Moscow has requested written guarantees that the US-led military bloc will not expand into Ukraine, an agreement that Western leaders have said is off the table. Meanwhile, American intelligence services have been warning for months that they fear an imminent Russian invasion of Ukraine, which the Kremlin has dismissed as misinformation.

On Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov announced that he expected the Western powers to make a written reply to Moscow’s security proposals within a week.

In an exclusive television interview with RT in December, Lavrov said Russia was eager for diplomacy with Germany, but that some factions in Berlin were more interested in lecturing Moscow than finding common ground. “The approach they have that one side is doing everything perfectly, and the other side should change its behavior altogether – well, you understand that that cannot happen,” he commented.

Pride and arrogance have no place in negotiations.