American Politics > Obama weaponized the FBI as Soros contributed to Russiagate

 

This is not only Deep State but Dark State, only capable by powerful godless entities

FBI was ‘weaponized’ in Obama-Clinton conspiracy to ‘stop Trump’ – top US senator

The newly declassified Russiagate document exposes a deep state coverup, Chuck Grassley says

FILE PHOTO. Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, arrives for the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. ©  Getty Images / CQ-Roll Call, Inc / Bill Clark

The newly released annex to John Durham’s 2023 Special Counsel report exposes the “weaponization” of the FBI under the Obama administration and the agency’s involvement in an attempt to ruin Donald Trump's presidency in 2016, US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has said.

The senator, a key figure behind the release of the 29-page document, made the remarks to Fox News on Thursday shortly after the annex was published. The file outlines the alleged effort by the Hillary Clinton campaign to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with Russia, and the FBI’s failure to properly investigate the activities despite having solid intelligence.

“[The Durham annex] gives us information that the FBI had eight to ten years ago that they never followed up on. It actually brings attention to the fact that there was either a Clinton conspiracy to make this happen, or Russian disinformation. Either way, it was an attempt to stop Trump, and it proves that the FBI had a hand in it,” Grassley stated.

Declassified Durham Annex Released by Chairman Grassley

The annex provides “evidence of the great depth that the deep state will go to cover up weaponization that was going on in the FBI and the executive branch of government, generally, under the Obama administration,” the senator suggested. America needs “maximum transparency” on the 2016 presidential race “schemes” that were hatched “to either stop Trump from being elected or… to ruin his presidency,” he added.

READ MORE: Declassified document links Russiagate hoax to Soros

According to the document, the FBI obtained intelligence on “confidential conversations” between then-Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and individuals at George Soros’ Open Society Foundations in early 2016, yet did not take any action. The conversations reportedly detailed a plan to discredit the then-Republican candidate by preparing “scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the Russian Mafia.”

The agency allegedly obtained further evidence on the matter in mid-2016, including several “likely authentic” emails sent by Leonard Benardo, senior vice president of the Open Society Foundations. The emails further detailed the plot to “disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated ‘attic-based’ technical structures,” and appeared to predict a future FBI probe into Russiagate, suggesting the agency “will put more oil into the fire” later on.

========================================================================

Deep State > Ukrainian War, Trump, CIA, MI6, Jeffrey Sachs

 

If you think for one minute that Trump is in control in the world, think again. You are underestimating the power and reach of America's Deep State.

Trump would like to end Deep State's powerful commitment to keeping the war industry's inventory moving, but if he threatens them, they will just kill him. That's why he insists on raising NATO budget commitments to 5% of GDP, when he has no use for NATO.

Ukrainian attacks on Russian planes

‘Western’ intel op – Jeffrey Sachs

Kiev’s Operation Spider’s Web was jointly planned by 

the CIA and MI6, the public policy analyst has claimed

FILE PHOTO: Jeffrey Sachs. ©  Horacio Villalobos / Corbis via Getty Images

Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian military airfields earlier this month were a “Western intelligence operation” orchestrated by the CIA and MI6, American public policy analyst Jeffrey Sachs has claimed.

In an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson released on Wednesday, Sachs accused Western intelligence services of covertly working to undermine peace efforts aimed at resolving the Ukraine conflict, acting on orders from the US “deep state.”

On June 1, Ukrainian drones struck several Russian airbases in a coordinated assault across five regions – from Murmansk in the north to Irkutsk in Siberia – which Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky later called Operation Spider’s Web.

Kiev claimed that around 40 Russian military aircraft were damaged or destroyed, including long-range bombers. Moscow has dismissed the numbers and extent of damage, saying some of the aircraft were damaged, but that it was minimal and will be repaired. It added that most of the drones were intercepted.

US intel behind Ukrainian attack on Russian planes – ex-French spy

The attacks were reportedly carried out using commercial trucks rigged with explosive-laden drones smuggled into Russia.

Asked whether the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) could have executed such a large-scale attack on its own, Sachs replied, “of course not.”

“This was a Western intelligence operation. Without question,” he said, adding that the plan was likely prepared in secret by the CIA with help from the British.

Sachs was also asked whether US President Donald Trump, who has been actively mediating peace efforts, could have been unaware. He replied that the CIA is “self-operating” and “out of control,” and has not been held accountable by Trump or previous presidents for over 50 years. He believes the agency answers to the “deep state” and military companies that fund its operations.

I so totally agree!

Sachs called the attacks a “reckless” escalation that risked a direct confrontation between the two nuclear superpowers. “Whether or not the White House knew, the operation itself is completely reckless and alarming, because attacking part of the nuclear triad in this way is a step towards nuclear Armageddon.”

Ukraine’s most reckless attack: Was NATO behind it?

Sachs argued that to prevent the Ukraine conflict from escalating further, the US must cut funding for the “desperate” Kiev regime and negotiate directly with Russia.

“In the end, we can’t control Ukraine, but they can’t fight without the US,” he said, noting that Trump has the constitutional authority to end the conflict by changing US foreign policy.

Western officials have denied involvement in the attacks. Russian investigators have launched a probe, and the Russian military has since targeted strategic military sites across Ukraine, including weapon design bureaus, repair facilities, and airfields used by Ukraine’s tactical aircraft.

Corruption is Everywhere > Covid quarantines - crimes against humanity; The CIA - ANNALS OF THE DEEP STATE; The CIA's idea of fun - JFK files

 

Covid quarantines - crimes against humanity > Milei

Jim Ferguson

@JimFergusonUK

BREAKING: JAVIER MILEI DROPS A TRUTH BOMB AT THE UN! President of Argentina Javier Milei just exposed it all on the world stage: “The global quarantines of 2020 should be considered a crime against humanity.”“This very institution allowed bloody dictatorships like Cuba and Venezuela to join the Human Rights Council without the slightest reproach.” Milei just called out the UN to its face. He accused them of violating the very freedoms they were created to protect. And millions of us agree — they used fear to destroy liberty. This is no longer about health. It’s about history, justice, and holding the globalists to account.

0:05

2:51 AM · Mar 25, 2025

·

859K

Views

JFK - Files

ANNALS OF THE DEEP STATE

Everyone who reads a few newspapers has learned that the U.S. National Archives are belatedly — but legitimately — following through on a Donald Trump campaign promise left half-executed in his first term as president: namely, the full declassification of old intelligence-agency and executive-branch records relating to the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy. At last, researchers are being given access to full uncensored records from the ’60s and ’70s, ones covered by the 1992 Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act, that were being held back or smeared with concealing black-ink bars for national security reasons.    The material is so copious that it will take months for journalists, academics and historians to search for nuggets of conspiracy gold — and then decades for everyone to integrate the new material into the public record of U.S. intelligence activities. Nobody has yet spotted anything that is likely to change the mainstream narrative of Kennedy’s slaying. (Maybe I should put “yet” in bold face?)    But for historians of the Central Intelligence Agency and American foreign policy, and for those interested in particular events like the Bay of Pigs disaster, the document release will certainly serve to fill important gaps in the record. The thumbprint of the CIA on the Cold War and the Western Hemisphere will be clarified, with dates and names intact, and we will better understand just how far the agency spiralled out of control in the 1950s and 1960s.    If you’re interested in all this, you will want to keep a close eye on the National Security Archive, an American non-governmental non-profit watchdog that is the go-to source for declassified U.S. records of all kinds. Their initial briefing book on the JFK records describes the context and offers a few key documents that were previously only half-legible. The most extraordinary of these is a memo sent to Kennedy in June 1961 by Arthur Schlesinger Jr., today best remembered as a devoted “court historian” of Kennedy’s “Camelot.”    Schlesinger had served in the Office of Strategic Services, the predecessor of the CIA, and had retained close ties to the agency as it flourished in the postwar years. He was thus able to advise Kennedy frankly, in the wake of the Bay of Pigs, of how the CIA had escaped State Department control and became what he explicitly called “a state within a state” executing its own Cold War agenda. The traditional foreign service started out suspicious of and hostile to the CIA, Schlesinger writes; “some ambassadors frankly preferred not to know what the CIA was up to in their countries.”    This practically led to a reverse takeover of American diplomacy by enterprising spymasters who, in turn, were often at the mercy of scheming and ambitious foreign villains: the tail, as they say, quickly came to wag the dog. (President Dwight D. Eisenhower inadvertently made the problem worse in 1953 by making John Foster Dulles his Secretary of State — and his younger brother Allen the Director of Central Intelligence.) Schlesinger emphasizes that the CIA had big recruiting advantages over the State Department, and over a period of years simply got the better, more ambitious people. The result was the creation of, essentially, a parallel State Department with its own private military and diplomatic apparatus.    CIA dirty tricks in the Western Hemisphere, in particular, are still a millstone on the reputation of the United States 64 years after Schlesinger’s letter. Schlesinger discusses presciently, and artfully, how using conspiratorial and violent methods against the Communist threat was likely to pan out for America in the long run. American spies gained a lot of power over the liberal civilians who were supposed to manage foreign policy, the historian argues, through pure vibes and intimidation.    “The advocate of clandestine activities seems ‘tough’ and realistic; the opponent has to invoke such intangibles and the reputation of the U.S., world public opinion, ‘What do we say in the United Nations?’, etc., and seems hopelessly idealistic, legalistic, and ‘soft.’” His analysis still offers incredible insights to the democracies of the 21st century; the memo ought to be considered a Magna Carta for the relationship between an open society and its covert state apparatus. (Let me add that no professional reporter who works an intelligence/espionage beat should fail to read it — now that it’s fully available.)    — Colby Cosh

=============================================================================================

JFK files: CIA contaminated sugar destined for USSR

The American spy agency’s operation aimed to ruin the taste of food for consumers and inflict financial losses on the Soviet Union

FILE PHOTO. ©  Global Look Press / Creativ Studio Heinemann

American spies contaminated 800 bags of sugar sent on a cargo ship from Cuba to the USSR in the 1960s, the newly released files on the assassination of John F. Kennedy have revealed.

One of the files analyzed by journalist and blogger Ben Norton and the Washington Post documents a “clandestine operation” by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) just months before the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.

In August of that year, the CIA learned about a cargo vessel transporting 80,000 200-pound (90 kilograms) bags of brown sugar to the USSR, according to a declassified paper sent to General Edward Lansdale, who was the Pentagon’s deputy assistant secretary for special operations at that time and had a long history of working with the CIA.

The American spies then decided to launch a special operation to contaminate the shipment. They learned that the ship in question would briefly dock at Puerto Rico for minor hull repairs and would have to offload a part of its cargo.

“Through a clandestine operation, which was not detected and is not traceable, we were able to contaminate 800 of these bags of sugar,” the paper reported. According to the CIA, the contaminated bags would then spoil the entire shipment, making it “unfit for human or animal consumption in any form.”

White House releases JFK assassination files

The plan, however, was not to poison the Soviet people but merely to sour their taste for life.

“The contaminate we used will give the sugar an ineradicable sickly bitter taste, which no process will remove,” the spies said, maintaining that it was “not in any sense dangerous to health.” Those behind the operation still believed that it would “ruin the taste of the consumer for any food or drink for a considerable time.”

If successful, the operation was expected to inflict financial losses upon the Soviet Union amounting to between $350,000 and $400,000 at that time, according to the document. The fate of the shipment remains unclear as RT could not find any relevant Soviet data related to the case.

In 1960, the US imposed its first serious embargo against Cuba, halting all sugar purchases from the country among other measures. The move came in response to the Cuban Revolution, which put an end to the rule of the US-backed dictator, Fulgencio Batista.

Washington also made its NATO allies abandon Cuban sugar imports as well. The USSR then stepped in, becoming one of Cuba’s major sugar importers.