"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label X. Show all posts
Showing posts with label X. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2026

You want Transparency, You'll get Transparency > Elon Musk

 

Léa | Bourse & Stratégies
LeaBourseFR

Translated from French

Elon Musk just gave a cheeky middle finger to the EU. The EU fined X €120 million for a lack of transparency on its algorithm. X is now publishing its algorithm on GitHub, with an update every 4 weeks. But that's not all: X will also make public ALL censorship requests from governments, including those from the EU (which clearly seems to be abusing them). European regulatory pressure may have produced more transparency than expected... Just not exactly in the way Brussels imagined it. 

Elon Musk says all government censorship requests are now publicly visible in the open-source X algorithm.

Image


According to Grok

The post by  @LeaBourseFR
  • highlights Elon Musk's announcement making all government censorship requests publicly visible in X's open-source algorithm on GitHub, updated every four weeks, as a direct response to the EU's €120 million fine for insufficient algorithmic transparency.
  • It portrays the action as an ironic outcome of European regulatory pressure, increasing overall platform openness while exposing specific government takedown demands, including those from the EU.
  • The thread contrasts this with pre-Musk Twitter's secret collaborations with agencies like the FBI and DHS on shadowbans and content suppression, as detailed in the 2022 Twitter Files.

    ==============================================================================================

  • Thursday, August 13, 2026

    Free Speech > Alberta refuses to go down the road to policing hate speech, but are police onside?

     

    Alberta Says It’s Committed to Free Speech After Edmonton Police Releases Controversial Hate Speech Video


    Alberta Deputy Premier and Minister of Public Safety Mike Ellis answers media questions as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith looks on at an availability in Calgary on Aug. 25, 2023. The Canadian Press/Dave Chidley


    Alberta’s Deputy Premier and Public Safety Minister Mike Ellis says the province is committed to upholding freedom of speech after the Edmonton Police Service released a controversial video encouraging the public to report online hate.

    The video was posted on social media on Aug. 2 but was removed from the police force’s X account later that day after drawing criticism from free speech advocates and some MPs, who argued that some or all of the examples shown did not meet the legal threshold for criminal hate speech.

    However, the video remains available on the police force’s Facebook and Instagram accounts as of publication time.
    “We are committed to supporting and respecting everyone’s right to free speech. We have duty to uphold these rights and freedoms, regardless of an individual’s religious or political beliefs,” Ellis said in a social media statement on Aug. 4, without directly mentioning the Edmonton police video.

    “Alberta’s government does not condone hate speech or violence, but we believe law enforcement should be focused on stopping violent crime, not policing opinions or ‘hurt feelings.’”

    Ellis, whose public safety department oversees security agencies, said the province will be in touch with provincial and municipal police agencies to ensure that “Albertans’ policing priorities continue to be cracking down on violent crime, theft, illegal drugs and vandalism.”

    Alberta Premier Danielle Smith also said that the province will ensure police forces remain focused on violent and other crimes, not “people’s free speech.”

    “Free Speech is a foundational Alberta value. We don’t believe in policing unpopular or religious-based statements even if they are controversial. That’s a slippery slope other countries have fallen into and we can’t go down that road,” Smith said.
    The Epoch Times contacted the Edmonton police for comment but did not hear back.

    Video

    Edmonton police’s now-deleted Aug. 2 X post said: “Online hate isn’t ‘just a comment.’ It hurts real people and harms real communities. Hate has no home here.” It went on to say “If you see hate, report hate” and offered a dedicated link for people to do so online.

    The backlash centred on video examples offered by police—such as comments regarding deportation and telling some immigrants to “go back home.”

    Free speech advocates argued the police service failed to distinguish between constitutionally protected political expression that some may find offensive and criminal hate speech. They argued the campaign appeared to target hurt feelings and controversial opinions rather than conduct amounting to a criminal offence.

    Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) interim litigation director Josh Dehaas described the police force’s post as “very disturbing to me as a free speech lawyer.”

    “Nothing referenced below comes anywhere close to being illegal speech and you have no business reporting it to police,” he said in an Aug. 1 X post. “More importantly, police have no business taking reports on it.”
    Two Tory MPs weighed in on the Edmonton Police Service’s online hate speech campaign, which also includes advertising on city buses that encourage the public to call the police with online hate speech tips.

    Ontario MP and lawyer Roman Baber posted a screen shot of the police video along with his thoughts on the campaign.

    “No Edmonton police, you have no jurisdiction to limit online speech unless a criminal law is broken,” he wrote on X. “The criminal offence of ‘Hate Speech’ is limited to the definition articulated by the Supreme Court almost 40 years ago. Not what others find offensive!”

    Fellow Conservative MP Andrew Lawton expressed similar criticism.

    “Some of these posts call for violence and could meet criminal threshold, but I struggle to see how most of these sample hate posts would be illegal (which is different from offensive, hurtful, uncivil, etc.),” Lawton wrote. “This is precisely the chilling effect I warned about with Bill C-9.”

    As if the Edmonton Police don't have enough to do. This appears to be a witch-hunting tactic, or some far left cop's project.

    Combatting Hate Act

    Bill C-9, known as the Combatting Hate Act, came into force on July 18, amending the Criminal Code to strengthen protections against hate-motivated crimes.

    Justice Minister Sean Fraser said the new legislation was required to handle a rising wave of hate crimes, citing police data indicating Jewish, Muslim, and other communities were increasingly being targeted.

    “We’ve seen synagogues struck by gunfire, places of worship vandalized or burned, and people being targeted in their own communities. That is unacceptable,” he said in a June press release. “We cannot allow that kind of hate to become normal in Canada. These changes will help people worship and gather safely in their own communities, while supporting law enforcement with clearer tools to respond.”

    Critics, however, have characterized the law as overly broad and a threat to constitutional freedoms.

    Rights groups such as the CCF argued Bill C-9 would expand state control over speech and could suppress unpopular but legally protected expression.

    The Conservative Party had also voiced concern about the legislation. Baber was one of the MPs to lead opposition to the bill, and commented extensively on the legislation during its parliamentary debate.

    He repeatedly criticized Bill C-9, saying it could be used by the government to restrict free speech and criminalize everyday expression, rather than effectively stopping violence.
    Premier Smith has also expressed opposition to the legislation, calling it “terrifying and chilling” during a speech in March.

    Smith said Alberta would not enforce laws targeting lawful speech and suggested provincial authorities would not be allowed to use policing resources to monitor or prosecute Albertans under the federal Combatting Hate Act.



    Wednesday, July 22, 2026

    Free speech > Small Texas town arrests woman for complaining about water quality

     

    TRINIDAD, Texas—The police chief has resigned, a municipal judge has been ousted, city workers have been fired, and lawsuits are piling up after police arrested a local woman on felony charges over a Facebook post questioning the safety of the town’s tap water.


    Drivers might miss Trinidad if they blink. This small East Texas town of about 800 souls sits at the intersection of state highways 274 and 31—about one-and-a-half hours southeast of Dallas.

    It’s a quiet town of weathered ’70s homes with big shade trees where folks can sip iced tea in the summer.

    ​The busiest spot in town is Zippy J’s deli and market at the intersection of the town’s only traffic light. There, the clerk calls customers “honey” and the loudspeakers outside at the gas pumps blare songs about Jesus and good lovin’ gone bad.

    But now this sleepy town finds itself in the spotlight over its water and claims that police and city officials want to silence public criticism.

    On April 6, Jennifer Combs, who lives in nearby Kerens, in Navarro County, posted concerns about Trinidad’s murky water on her Facebook page, Southern Belle Watch.

    “We are receiving reports of possible water quality issues, including concerns about bacteria and unsafe conditions. We take these reports very seriously and are currently verifying the information,” the post reads.

    ​“If your water is discolored, has sediment, odor, or if you or your family have experienced illness you believe may be related, please reach out.”



    ‘A Tornado of Craziness’

    At the local Dairy Queen across from Trinidad City Hall, Combs sat down with The Epoch Times at the end of June to discuss how that post turned her life into a twilight zone.

    She said the whole thing started when an elderly Trinidad resident who had already spent $200 on bottled water asked for help getting more.

    After publishing her Facebook post asking for information to turn over to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the Texas Department of State Health Services, and the Environmental Protection Agency, Combs said Kerens police knocked on her door on May 8.

    ​“I mean, we all know each other, so I was like, ‘OK, well, they want help doing something,’” she said.

    ​But when the officer told her that she had a felony warrant out of neighboring Henderson County, stemming from a case in Trinidad, she was dumbfounded.

    ​The officer said the arrest warrant had something to do with the water post and causing a panic.

    Combs, who had never even received so much as a traffic ticket, wrestled with disbelief.

    The officers allowed her to change clothes and then booked her into the Navarro County Jail, where she was held without bail for 23 hours, she said.

    ​When her husband found out that she would have to spend the night in jail because no bail was set, he put money on a card for her to call him.

    ​“I think I called him 70 times. I was freaking out,” she said. “It was an extremely scary situation.”



    While in jail, something happened in the men’s cell, and the police maced them, she said. The chemicals drifted through the vent to the women’s cell.

    ​“It was a bunch of coughing and choking, and when I got out the next afternoon, my eyes were swollen shut,” she said. “That’s jail, and I’m sure it was a mixture of crying. I was very upset.”

    ​To make things worse, her grown children tracked her location on an app, which showed that she was in jail.

    A flashlight illuminates a sample of Trinidad water in a photo provided by attorneys for Jennifer Combs, in this file photo. Courtesy of CJ Grisham

    ​“Then my phone just starts going off. They’re calling their dad, freaking out, and he’s like, ‘Your mom is in jail,’ and they’re like, ‘There’s no way—my mom’s a goody-goody,’” she recalled.

    ​After she was released, journalists came knocking on her door wanting an interview. Reporters also sought out family members and residents.

    ​She estimated that about 200 reporters came to town, and even her friends as far away as Australia and the UK said they saw her on the news.

    “It’s just been like a tornado of craziness,” she said.

    ‘Political Retaliation’

    Then-Trinidad Police Chief Charles Gregory doubled down on his assertion that Combs broke the law by “spreading false information” on Facebook.

    On May 10, Gregory took to Facebook himself, stating on the Trinidad Police Department’s site: “A thorough investigation was done in regards to the arrest made. It was a very cut and dry case.”



    However, charges against Combs were later dropped after a Henderson County grand jury declined to indict her later in May.

    Combs then filed a civil lawsuit against Gregory, the city, and others for alleged civil rights violations, including violations of free speech, false arrest, and retaliation.

    ​“Trinidad has a lot of issues,” Combs said. “It’s [not just] the water.”

    One of her attorneys, CJ Grisham, who specializes in First and Second Amendment cases, told The Epoch Times that it is a quintessential First Amendment case involving protected speech.

    ​“I really hope not only that I get justice for Jennifer in this case, but that this sends a chilling effect to other government agents who think that they can throw people in a cage just because they exercise their First Amendment rights and their opinions that the government might not like,” he said.

    “We have plenty of evidence that this was all a concerted effort to silence my client for uncovering and talking about the water problems there that they were trying to cover up.”

    Combs’s lawsuit accuses the city and its agents of weaponizing the law to silence a journalist “who dared to inform her community about serious and credible public safety concerns regarding the municipal water supply.”

    ​The complaint, filed in the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, states that those concerns were validated when the city of Trinidad issued a boil water notice in April, after Combs wrote the Facebook post.

    “Rather than address the water quality crisis, defendants manufactured criminal charges against Mrs. Combs under a statute that, on its plain face, does not apply to her conduct,” the lawsuit alleges.


    According to the complaint, Combs was charged under a law that makes it illegal to knowingly initiate a false emergency, such as reporting a fire in a theater or an explosion that requires an emergency response.

    ​“It has no application whatsoever to the act of a journalist sharing community safety information with the public through social media,” the lawsuit states.

    ​Combs did not fabricate an emergency or summon emergency responders or trigger evacuations, the lawsuit states. It further alleges that Combs’s arrest was an act of “deliberate political retaliation.”

    Avalanche of Lawsuits

    More lawsuits followed Combs’s arrest.

    A local citizen, Winston Noles, known as Otto the Watchdog, was arrested for municipal disorder conduct after protesting Combs’s arrest outside city hall with a sign containing an obscenity. He, too, filed a civil lawsuit against the police and the city.

    Colby Reyes, former city water clerk, was fired after she allegedly declined to file a complaint about being offended by Noles at the behest of the police chief. Reyes refused, saying that she was not offended.

    Grisham and attorney Ryan Franceschina filed a civil rights lawsuit on behalf of her and her brother, Alex Estrada, who was also fired from his city job.

    Municipal Judge Shellena Bivens dropped the disorderly conduct charge against Noles, finding no evidence that the water clerk had been offended by his protest sign. Bivens was then fired by the city.

    Grisham and Franceschina sought an injunction to prevent the city from installing another municipal judge, but that effort failed. Franceschina told The Epoch Times on July 7 that an amended complaint had been filed over Bivens’s firing, claiming the city had denied her due process and violated her First and Fourteenth amendment rights.

    When The Epoch Times visited Trinidad City Hall in June, the clerk said city officials had no comment on the case. The police chief did not respond to a request for comment before he resigned on June 19.

    ‘Fix the Water’

    She said the entire incident has upended her life, cost her time and money, and hurt her standing in the community.

    ​Dealing with the fallout of the arrest and lawsuit has been a full-time job, she said.

    ​Combs said the arrest led to her removal from the local veterans group board, which she said especially hurt, since she has been an active member of her community and was a past Chamber of Commerce president.

    “Nobody wants to have you on their board if you have a mug shot,” she said.

    Combs hopes her lawsuit will help right the wrongs in her case. But most of all, she wants the residents of Trinidad to have decent water.

    ​“I want them to fix the damn water,” Combs said.

    The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality confirmed to The Epoch Times via email that it had received complaints regarding Trinidad’s water and that investigations into the allegations are ongoing.

    Commission records showed that violations had been issued regarding the city’s water supply, prompting the April 21 boil water notice.

    Other violations included failure to conduct chloramine effectiveness sampling and failure to design the distribution system to ensure effective water circulation with a minimum of dead-end pipes. The report found discolored water at those endpoints.

    Several violations were resolved, including one regarding total chlorine, according to commission documents.

    Water Woes

    ​Retiree Marvin Lorance said he does not think that it was right for police to put Combs behind bars for reporting on the quality of the water that residents “don’t drink.”

    ​“It’s free speech,” he said. “They shouldn’t have arrested her.”

    ​Roxi Lorance, his wife, said that when she called the water department four years ago, they told her that the water was “just dirty” but safe.

    ​The couple said they have been buying bottled water for four years and do not like using the tap water unless it is boiled.

    ​Other residents also told The Epoch Times that they don’t drink the water.

    ​“I buy water,” Donna Stovall, 76, told The Epoch Times.

    She has been paying for bottled water for 30 years, she said. She said she thinks that the state needs to come in and thoroughly test the water, noting that her pets have to drink it because she cannot afford bottled water for them.

    ​Stovall said that the water was not bad at the moment, but that when it rains heavily, it tends to turn brownish.

    ​Her adult granddaughter, Lana Stovall, said her grandmother and the entire family use bottled water when cooking.

    She hopes her lawsuit will make it easier for others in town to voice their concerns. ​Like others, she said she does not think that Combs should have been punished for reporting on the situation. “The lawsuit really isn’t just about me. The lawsuit is about all the other people,” she said. “We live in America; that’s the craziest part about all of this.” Combs said she’s not against the government or the police, but that officers shouldn’t be allowed to arrest someone for speaking out about a municipal water system. As for the path ahead, Combs trusts that her own arrow will lead her “wherever God shoots it.”