‘Muhammad’ is now the most popular
baby name in England
But remember: the Great Replacement of native populations in the UK and Western Europe by Muslim migrants is a “right-wing conspiracy theory.”
‘Muhammad’ becomes most popular baby name in England: Report
by Gabriel Hays, Fox News, December 5, 2024:
The United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) recently revealed that “Muhammad” has become the most popular name in England and Wales among newborn baby boys.
The ONS declared in a new data report on Thursday that the name – most prominently associated with Islam’s founder and most prominent figure, the Prophet Muhammad – finally claimed the top spot in 2023 and onward.
“Muhammad has overtaken Noah as the top name for baby boys in England and Wales, followed by Noah and Oliver,” the report stated.
It added, “Muhammad was the second most popular name in 2022 and has been in the top 10 most popular names for baby boys in England and Wales since 2016.”
The data revealed that 4,661 baby boys were given the name in 2023, just beating out the 4,382 boys named Noah that year. Oliver was third, with 3,556 babies given the name, followed by George, Leo, and Arthur.
In 2022, Oliver reigned supreme, with 4,586 infant males receiving the name, while Muhammad was second, being the name of 4,177 baby boys. George was in third place this year, while Oliver was actually fourth.
The ONS report also provided a map revealing that Muhammad was the most popular name among baby boys around the Manchester and Liverpool areas.
A spokesperson for the office spoke to Middle East news outlet The National, noting that the popularity of the name is clearly due to religious significance and the increasing Muslim population in the two countries – which has more than doubled since 2001….
Pew Research estimates Muslim population will double in about 20 years as a percentage of the whole. But Muslims in the UK on average are far younger than other demographics. As baby-boomers die off in the coming decade or two, Muslims will continue to flourish.
Nearly half of all Muslims were aged under 25 and 88% were aged under 50.
Birthrates in Britain have dropped to their lowest levels in nearly 50 years - 1.44 children per woman. However, Muslim birthrates are 2.9 children per woman, twice that of other English or Welsh women. When you consider that the overall birthrate of 1.44 includes Muslims, then you must realize that non-Muslim birthrates are well below 1.44. 2.2 is considered a sustainable birth rate.
According to the census figures, 4.8% of the 56.1 million resident population of England and Wales in 2011 were Muslim, and as stated above 9.1% of all under-fives in the population were Muslim.
When the under-fives grow up, they will be far more than the 9.1% that they currently represent because of the much higher death rates of aging, nonMuslim Brits.
Within about 15 years, those 9.1% will give birth to about 3 more children each while other Brits will barely exceed 1.0, about half of what is needed to sustain the population of nonMuslim Brits.
As that generation, which has already begun, reaches adulthood, I believe Muslims will make up about 30% of Britain's population. They will control governments at every level, Sharia will be widely practiced, and little British girls will be required to cover their hair, and be discouraged from education. And it will just get worse from there.
============================================================
UK: Criminalizing ‘Islamophobia’ will mean
‘the history of Britain will be judged
retrospectively and dismantled’
“If Starmer supports Tahir Ali’s view of criminalising Islamophobia, with the broad Labour Party, Pakistan and the United Nation’s Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s blessing, the entire history of Great Britain will be judged retrospectively and dismantled.”
That’s right. If shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain criminalizes “Islamophobia,” it will be turning its back on centuries of tradition and precedent establishing the freedom of speech and a society in which dissenting views are not treated as crimes. It will be the end of free Britain and the dawning of Britain as officially a dhimmi state, and ultimately an Islamic state. And it’s all well underway. We have been warning about it for years, only to be charged with “Islamophobia” for our pains.
Why we must resist demands for blasphemy laws spurred on by Islamophobia claims
by Alex Story, Express, December 4, 2024:
“This is very urgent business ladies and gentlemen. I beseech you. Resist it while you still can and before your right to complain is taken away from you, which will be the next thing,” said the late Christopher Hitchens in 2009. “You will be told you can’t complain because you are Islamophobic.”
Fifteen years later, on November 27, 2024, Tahir Ali, Labour MP for Birmingham Hall Green stood in Parliament and called for blasphemy laws to be introduced in the UK, placing specific emphasis on Islamophobia Awareness Month at Prime Minister’s Questions.
He referred to last year’s United Nations Human Rights Council resolution “condemning the desecration of religious texts, including the Koran”.
He later added on X that the Government should take “clear and measurable steps to prevent acts that fuel hatred in society”.
If they did that, they would have to eliminate Islam!
Keir Starmer agreed, replying: “We are, as I said before, Mr Speaker, committed to tackling all forms of hatred and division, including of course Islamophobia in all of its forms.”
It would seem that our Prime Minister, habitually putting the international order of the United Nations above the national one of the Crown in Parliament, supports the Pakistani-sponsored UN General Assembly resolution on “combating Islamophobia” on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.
As Starmer nodded in acquiescence to Tahir Ali MP’s suggestions, a Muslim school girl admitted in court to lying that her history teacher, Samuel Paty, was Islamophobic. This falsehood led him to being decapitated by an asylum-seeking jihadist.
She lied because she had been suspended from school for a couple of days for bad behaviour and feared her father’s wrath.
To avoid short-term unpleasantness, she made up a story about Samuel Paty ordering Muslim students to leave his classroom while he showed caricatures of Mohammed drawn by Charlie Hebdo, an anarchist French weekly.
Lest we forget, the French magazine became the focus of international news in 2015 when two French-born Muslim murdered 15 cartoonists and journalists, injuring 11 others, because of the publication’s perceived Islamophobia.
You see, mocking Mohammed, synonymous with Islamophobia, carries the death penalty, according to some interpretations of Islamic jurisprudence….
If Starmer supports Tahir Ali’s view of criminalising Islamophobia, with the broad Labour Party, Pakistan and the United Nation’s Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s blessing, the entire history of Great Britain will be judged retrospectively and dismantled.
Churchill, among others, will be an obvious target for the retrospective crime of Islamophobia. He wrote in The River War in 1899 that Islam “is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog.”
Another target will be the Cross of St George, thought to have been Richard the Lionheart’s crusader flag. Indeed, every institution and leaders from our past will be subjected to erasure for their perceived Islamophobia retrospectively, outlawing 1400 years of our island history, and us, in the process.
Anyone wishing to defend them or our inheritance will be branded and attacked in turn. The victim will become the aggressor and the aggressor the parliamentary-backed victim.
Further, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims points that way by referring to “British values” as a “nebulous concept”, with the Nation State contributing to “compartmentalising and ‘othering’ Muslims”.
The Nation State, a Christian concept, is problematic. As former peer and journalist Matt Ridley said when hearing our own Prime Minister backing blasphemy laws in the UK, this is a “truly black moment for Britain to hear a Prime Minister effectively endorse the idea that we should reintroduce blasphemy law”.
The curtain on our Sceptred Isles could fall very quickly, if it hasn’t already done so.
Forget it, Jake. It’s “Islamophobia.”
=============================================================================
Definitely not any acts of jihad here, just a whole lot of criminal activity including murders by a probable migrant
Suspect wanted for Milan arson that killed 3
caught after Dutch burglary spree
A man who started a fire in Milan, Italy, which resulted in the death of three people, was arrested in Middelburg on Tuesday, police reported. He was arrested after a string of burglaries and thefts in the Netherlands. Italian authorities identified the Middelburg suspect as Washi L.
The owner of the building where the blaze broke out allegedly owed 40,000 euros to at least one of the Chinese suspects, according to two prosecutors involved in the case. They believe L. first threatened the intended target with a knife, then accosted the man’s mother a day later. He allegedly set their business on fire the following day. They alleged that L. only fled Italy for the Netherlands after news outlets reported that three people sleeping inside the business died in the fire.
Police (Milan?) seized about a thousand ecstasy pills, and 1.3 kilograms of a synthetic stimulant when arresting one of the two (Chinese men?), as well as 45,000 euros in cash, and drug distribution materials.
This led to the Italian authorities putting out a European arrest warrant against L., who is suspected of arson, and two charges of extortion. According to the Dutch police, there are also other suspects in this case.
L. was arrested in his home in Middelburg on Tuesday after an investigation by the police into a string of burglaries and thefts in Zeeland and West Brabant led them to him.
I guess he didn't get paid very much for arson, extortion and murder.
He was brought in front of the examining magistrate on Friday, who ruled that he would spend two weeks in pre-trial detention. The Dutch case will be heard on January 2nd, in summary proceedings. A court in Amsterdam will soon review the extradition request from Italy.
No comments:
Post a Comment