The Great Reset is no longer theory, it's fact
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths." Northwoods is a ministry dedicated to refreshing Christians and challenging them to search for the truth in Christianity, politics, sociology, and science
Government's own data shows a big hit to the Canadian economy due to carbon tax.
Data from Environment and Climate Change Canada that the Trudeau government kept secret for years details the hit to the Canadian economy.
The data was only released Thursday after its existence was revealed by Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux.
Giroux was speaking at the House of Commons Finance Committee earlier this month when he revealed that the government had data showing the economic impact of the carbon tax was negative. Liberal MP Ryan Turnbull was pushing Giroux on how he was so certain that his report on the economic impact was accurate given a recently discovered error.
Giroux’s answer was that his work was very similar to what he had seen from the federal government’s own work.
“The government has these numbers on the economic impact of carbon pricing,” Giroux said. “And that’s your government, sir. They have not published anything.”
*Turnbull must have been ducking under his desk by then. Yikes!
Giroux went on to say the Trudeau government had put a gag order on him, told him he couldn’t share the information publicly. That statement set off the Conservatives who rightly accused the government of trying to muzzle an officer of Parliament and hide information from the public.
The data released Thursday morning says that without the carbon tax, emissions would be 11% higher by 2030. It also shows that the carbon tax will be responsible for a multi-billion hit to Canada’s economy.
The data shows that without the carbon tax, Canada’s GDP would hit $2.68 trillion by 2030, about $25 billion higher than what it will be due to the impact on the carbon tax. The Conservatives say the impact is even worse due to inflation since the report was done in 2017.
“Trudeau has been hiding the fact that the carbon tax will cost Canadians $30.5 billion by 2030. This works out to $1,824 per family in extra annual costs,” the Conservatives said in a statement.
*And considerably more than that in provinces like BC which don't get the carbon tax rebate.
Speaking in the House, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said the government has been covering up what they knew to be the truth for years and it had to be pulled out of the government like a rotten tooth.
“Because of our relentless questioning and the pressure that is weighing heavily on Liberal MPs, the government has finally relented and released part of the information,” Poilievre said.
The Trudeau government has been trying to deny or downplay any negative impacts of the carbon tax, or the “price on pollution” as they like to call it. Now their own report shows a significant drop in GCP, meaning we will all be poorer, from this tax.
Of course, that’s the impact on the economy overall but doesn’t reflect your extra costs that you pay at the pump, the grocery store, or for anything shipped by truck, train or boat.
The Liberals will now try to claim that while this economic price can be measured, we can’t know the cost of inaction on climate change.
Why not? Can't we measure the difference in Canada's temperature to see how much of an effect the carbon tax has had? Of course not! Because there is almost nothing we can do in Canada to effectively change our climate to a measureable degree.
Most air masses that cover Canada originate in Asia or the Pacific Ocean. The best thing we can do to affect our climate is to sell LNG to China to replace the hundreds of coal-fed power plants they operate. That would have an almost immediate effect on our temperature and precipitation patterns.
The second best thing we can do is to improve our forestry practices in such a way as to reduce the spread of forest fires and make them easier to fight. This will improve air quality in North America but have little effect on its temperature because it's not really CO2 that is driving the rise in temperature. Historically, the opposite has always been true.
That argument presumes the only action that could be taken was to impose a carbon tax, which drives up costs for average citizens.
First off, a carbon tax isn’t the only option – the Biden administration in Washington hasn’t brought in a carbon tax, neither did the Trump or Obama administrations before him, and they’ve still had success at lowering emissions.
Secondly, Canada accounts for a minuscule amount of global GHGs – erase them all tomorrow and we would cover China’s annual increase and a little bit more.
What this now released data shows is the Trudeau government knew their carbon tax would hurt the Canadian economy. They knew that their plan would make life more expensive and that we would all be worse off due to their plan.
They did it anyway.
Their plan, your pain.
================================================================================================
Canada is a full-on One World Government committer. Justin Trudeau's super-ego probably sees him as replacing Klaus Schwab at the head of that government one day. King of the World!
Close interactions between Canadian cabinet ministers and the World Economic Forum are well-documented, but a newly revealed letter suggests forum staff may have been doing more work with the federal government than previously disclosed.
In an undated letter to a WEF official, former Finance Minister Bill Morneau praised the organization and its collaboration to achieve “common” objectives.
“I would also like to take this opportunity to express my sincere appreciation to the WEF staff, for the support provided to the Government of Canada,” wrote Mr. Morneau in the letter obtained through the access-to-information regime.
Neither the WEF nor the Canadian government typically advertise what support the forum provides. The finance department has not replied to a request for information about the date of the letter and details of how WEF staff helped the government.
The letter was addressed to Philipp Rösler, a former German politician who served as a WEF manager and head of its Centre for Regional Strategies.
The federal government is known to have been involved in at least two WEF policy initiatives: the Known Traveller Digital Identification (KTDI) project and the Agile Nations network.
KTDI was a pilot project between Canada, the Netherlands, and private sector interests to develop a system of digital credentials for airplane travel between countries. Agile Nations is a group of countries working to streamline regulations to usher in the WEF-promoted “Fourth Industrial Revolution” that includes gene editing and artificial intelligence.
Since both these projects fell outside of Mr. Morneau’s portfolio as finance minister, it seems to suggest that his letter of appreciation to the WEF was referring to other joint collaborations.
The WEF’s mission statement says it is dedicated to “improving the state of the world.” It gathers leaders in the fields of politics, business, and activism to promote progressive policies on issues like climate change and making capitalism more “inclusive.” As is routine with the organization, it did not respond to requests for comment.
Critics of the WEF, which gathers world elites to shape global policies, often disagree with its progressive agenda and warn about its influence on countries.
“I know that half of his cabinet or even more than half of his cabinet are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum,” Mr. Schwab told an audience at Harvard University.
“As a Steward of Economic Growth and Social Inclusion, I have had the privilege of observing first-hand and benefiting from the WEF’s important contributions to foster public and private collaboration towards developing concrete solutions for strong, broad-based economic growth,” he wrote, adding that WEF analysis of different topics such as “structural reform priorities” was “helpful to develop substantive policy measures.”
He wrote that “as we enter another ambitious year for the WEF, I look forward to a continued fruitful collaboration to pursue our common objective of achieving stronger, sustainable and more inclusive growth.”
Other department records relate to current Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and her involvement with the WEF. She is a board member of the forum and also an alumnus of the Young Global Leaders program that Mr. Schwab referenced.
During those years, the Finance Department’s media relations office wasn’t shy about advertising ministerial trips to Davos.
================================================
Published January 15, 2022
132,172 Views
Watch the woman behind van Meijeren. she's delightful!