Thousands of people deliberately blinded during Iranian protests

According to Grok:
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths." Northwoods is a ministry dedicated to refreshing Christians and challenging them to search for the truth in Christianity, politics, sociology, and science

According to Grok:
A Houthi spokesman on Saturday said the Yemeni militia launched missile and drone strikes on "sensitive sites" in Saudi Arabia, including the kingdom's port city of Yanbu and the capital Riyadh. The statement came hours after residents and journalists said they saw a thick plume of black smoke and flames rising from the area near the Riyadh King Khalid International Airport.
Yemen's Houthis said on Saturday that they launched strikes targeting "sensitive sites" in Saudi Arabia's Riyadh and oil facilities in the kingdom's port city of Yanbu, hours after residents reported blasts in the Saudi capital.
"In response to the Saudi enemy's criminal attempts to target the capital Sana'a... the Yemeni Armed Forces carried out two successful military operations using a large number of ballistic and cruise missiles and drones," Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree said, in a statement on Telegram.
"The first targeted sensitive sites in the Saudi capital, Riyadh, and the second targeted Aramco facilities in Yanbu."
The Houthi statement came after firefighters extinguished a blaze on a fuel tank emblazoned with the logo of the Saudi oil giant Aramco at a fuel depot near Riyadh's international airport on Saturday, according to an AFP journalist.
Two residents of the Saudi capital said they saw black smoke and flames emanating from the area near the Riyadh King Khalid International Airport, while other people in the city reported hearing explosions.
"In the direction of the airport we saw black smoke and fire," one of the residents told AFP.
Meanwhile aircraft tracking website FlightRadar24 reported major issues at the airport, including cancellations and delays.
The Riyadh King Khalid International Airport was listed under the site's maximum disruption index of 5.0, meaning the airport was seeing "major problems with long delays and several cancelled flights".
The disruption followed an overnight air raid alert issued by Saudi authorities.
Hours after the early morning alert, residents told AFP on condition of anonymity that they heard what sounded like another round of explosions echoing through parts of the Saudi capital.
The alert in Riyadh was the first for the Saudi capital since the latest escalation with Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels.
Yemen's Houthis have staged a lightning offensive this month, seizing swathes of territory in one of the world's poorest countries, leaving the internationally recognised government, which is backed by Saudi Arabia, scrambling to respond.
Saudi Arabia itself, one of the region's powerhouses, has conducted scores of air strikes on Houthi-held areas but failed to stop the advance. It has also sought help from its ally the US, that has not materialised.
Watch moreHas Trump Left MBS hanging over Yemen?
A Riyadh resident on Saturday described the attack as "terrifying".
"I was extremely anxious – especially because, unlike previous times, the 'all-clear' signal didn't come right away," the central Riyadh resident said.
"I heard the alarm, then my windows shook," said another Riyadh resident, 27, living in the city's north. "It was definitely scary. I was not expecting this."
Saudi Arabia has not commented on the threat mentioned in the warnings sent overnight to residents of several regions and has not identified where it originated from.
The incident comes days after Riyadh accused the Houthis of targeting Mecca on Wednesday, denouncing it as a "cowardly terrorist attack" on Islam's holy city, which welcomes millions of pilgrims each year, both Sunnis and Shias.
The Iran-backed Houthis strongly denied the accusation, calling it a "worn-out lie".
Watch moreSaudi Arabia accuses Houthis of targeting Mecca, warns of 'red line'
The group has reported scores of retaliatory strikes carried out daily by Riyadh since their offensive this month to take over the country's entire Red Sea coast, giving them control over the vital Bab al-Mandab strait.
Riyadh was targeted with waves of attacks during an earlier period of the war, including a drone strike on the US embassy in the capital's diplomatic quarter in March.
While the US, according to news platform Axios, last week refused a Saudi request to strike the Houthis, Washington on Thursday approved a $24.3 billion sale of 48 F-35 fighter jets to the kingdom to help Riyadh "deter current and future threats", the US State Department said.
The United Nations said on Friday that the renewed fighting had displaced more than 112,000 people while nearly 3,000 others had fled across the sea to Djibouti.
War in Yemen broke out in 2014 when the Houthis seized control of the capital Sanaa and other regions, triggering a military intervention led by Saudi Arabia in March 2015.
The fragile truce reached in 2022 between the warring parties collapsed in July, when the Houthis defied Riyadh's control of Yemeni airspace by allowing an Iranian aircraft to land in Yemen.
Their recent takeover of the coastline has sparked global concern, with international maritime trade already impacted by Iran's imposition of a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz since the Middle East war erupted in late February.
The Houthis insist there is no threat to shipping in the sea lane – except for ships from Saudi Arabia, the world's leading crude exporter.
The attack targeting Riyadh came as the Houthis improve their defences in newly conquered territory along Yemen's Red Sea coastline, with members of the group telling AFP they have been installing radar and digging tunnels.
(FRANCE 24 with AFP, AP and Reuters)
France24
Pro-Houthi demonstrations erupted in Yemen after Saudi Arabia accused the military group of targeting the Muslim holy site of Mecca.
Story by Elitsa Gadeva.
The United States on Thursday said it had approved a $24.3 billion sale of 48 F-35 stealth warplanes to Saudi Arabia. Israel has previously voiced concerns about Riyadh buying F-35s, despite a push to normalise relations.
The United States has approved a $24.3 billion sale of 48 F-35 stealth warplanes to Saudi Arabia, the State Department said Thursday, the kingdom's latest major arms purchase since the start of the Iran war.
Saudi Arabia has long sought to buy F-35s, but officials from Israel – currently the only country in the Middle East to operate the jets – have voiced concern about their sale to Riyadh despite a push for the kingdom to normalise relations.
READ MORETrump says Saudi nuclear deal contingent on Riyadh normalising relations with Israel
"The proposed sale will improve Saudi Arabia's capability to deter current and future threats by strengthening its homeland defence, and improving interoperability with US forces," the State Department said in a statement.
It "will also augment Saudi Arabia's operational aircraft and enhance its air-to-air, and air-to-ground self-defence capability", the statement said.
The Saudi embassy in Washington praised the transaction, saying it "reflects the strength and enduring nature" of the relationship with the United States.
It added that the security cooperation between the two countries "has contributed to regional stability, strengthened our collective defence capabilities, and advanced our shared security interests".
Saudi Arabia has been repeatedly targeted with drone and missile strikes by Tehran's forces since the United States and Israel launched their war against Iran in February, and has also been hit by Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels.
Yemen's civil war had been dormant for years, but fighting between Houthis and the internationally recognised, Riyadh-backed government reignited in July, with the rebels declaring a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia and targeting its ships in the Red Sea.
Washington has not directly entered the conflict, but a US official said earlier this week that an American military task force is working to enhance intelligence sharing and planning assistance for Saudi forces.
The State Department has notified Congress about the proposed sale, which would require the approval of US lawmakers. It did not provide a time frame for the delivery of the jets.
The F-35 sale "will not alter the military balance in the region", the State Department said, in keeping with longstanding US policy that Israel must have a military edge over potential regional adversaries.
The United States has so far only allowed the sales of F-35s to its closest allies, including a number of European NATO allies and Israel.
Washington kicked NATO member Turkey out of the F-35 programme in 2019 because Ankara's purchase of a Russian air defence system sparked fears that Moscow could acquire the plane's technology.
Washington also has concerns about potential Chinese espionage related to the jets.
The New York Times reported this week that US intelligence analysts have raised the possibility that Beijing could acquire F-35 technology through its partnerships with Riyadh.
US Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, expressed opposition to the sale on those grounds.
It should not go ahead "when our own intelligence community is warning that it could put the crown jewels of American military technology within reach of the Chinese Communist Party", Krishnamoorthi said in a statement.
The F-35 sale is the latest in a series of major arms buys by Saudi Arabia this year.
The State Department announced the approval of a $5 billion sale of more than 10,000 bombs – including highly destructive 2,000-pound weapons – to Riyadh earlier in September.
Washington also signed off on the sale of 60 tank engines and related equipment to Saudi Arabia at a cost of $750 million this month, and a $1.96 billion deal in July for the kingdom to buy guidance sections that can convert rockets into precision weapons.
(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
This is yet more indication that the “Palestinian” conflict with Israel is an Islamic jihad that all those whom jihad targets should oppose. Many Westerners will continue to ignore this and to buy into the propaganda line that it’s all about “occupation” and “stolen land.”
Called for Jihad | Terrorist turned Instagram into channel for terror incitement
Israel National News, September 6, 2026:
The State Attorney’s Office filed an indictment with the Beersheba District Court against Ahmad Abu Mahareb, 20, from Lakiya, after he posted content on his Instagram account inciting terrorism and expressing identification with terrorist organizations….
According to the indictment, Abu Mahareb had approximately 1,300 followers on his private Instagram account…
Among other things, Abu Mahareb recently shared a video containing an excerpt from a speech by Mohammed Deif on the morning of October 7, 2023, in which he announced the launch of the terrorist attack against Israel and called for participation in jihad and the “liberation of the Al-Aqsa Mosque.”
In another post, he shared a video showing terrorist Uday Tamimi carrying out a shooting attack, accompanied by a description of the attacks he had perpetrated and the words: “They searched for him, and he came out to them inside their own home.”
In additional posts, Abu Mahareb shared content featuring Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar alongside a speech in which he praised martyrdom, photographs of senior Hamas officials bearing the caption “Jihad – victory or martyrdom,” as well as a video containing calls for jihad and the destruction of Tel Aviv….
==============================================================================================
Godly Jews are wonderful, beautiful people. Godless Jews, on the other hand, are something else entirely.
Ed Miliband, millionaire Marxist and “proud Jew,” has just announced a new policy, designed to weaken Israel’s hold in Judea and Samaria. From now on, the UK will ban all agricultural products and manufactured goods produced in Judea and Samaria from entering the country. The aim is to weaken economically those whom Miliband calls “the settlers.” In fact, there are 750,000 Israeli “settlers” in Judea, Samaria, and east Jerusalem, and their economy is deeply intertwined with that of the people who live in Israel behind the Green Line. It will be very difficult for the UK enforcers of this new policy to know which oranges, or batteries, come from, say, Ma’ale Adumim in Judea and those that come from a town a few miles away that is in Israel. In any case, many goods from Judea and Samaria can easily be relabelled. And when products produced in Judea and Samaria are identified, that can lead to consequences that Miliband apparently does not comprehend. When, a few years ago, some BDS-minded importers of Israeli goods decided to refuse to accept Sodastream products because they were built in a factory in Judea, SodaStream’s owners decided to move the factory inside Israel. As a consequence, hundreds of Palestinian workers lost their jobs. How many more Palestinian workers will lose their jobs because of Ed Miliband’s policy, that will cause some manufacturing plants to move out of Judea and Samaria?
While there are many reasons to deplore Ed Miliband’s policy, and his ridiculous accusation that Israel may have committed “ethnic cleaning” and that its settlements in Judea and Samaria constitute a “violation of international law,” here’s one more: Hamas is delighted with his remarks. That’s right: the mass-murdering terror group responsible for the atrocities on October 7. 2023 is well pleased with Ed Miliband. More on his Hamas admirers can be found here:
Hamas terrorists praise Ed Miliband over sanctions on Israel but tell Labour ‘they’re not enough'
by Ed Griffiths, GB News, September 10, 2026:
Hamas has welcomed the sanctions imposed on Israel by Ed Miliband and described the Foreign Secretary’s description of “ethnic cleansing” as a positive development.
The proscribed terrorist organisation, responsible for the October 7 attacks that killed 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, also demanded that Israeli leaders face war crimes prosecution.
Basem Naim, a senior figure in Hamas’s political bureau, said: “The imposition of sanctions by Britain and other European countries and Canada on goods imported from the settlements of the occupied West Bank, and the London foreign minister’s use of the term ‘ethnic cleansing’ to describe the crimes of the settlers, are important steps in the right direction but they are not enough.”
Mr Naim also demanded “the prosecution of war criminals in Israel in a manner similar to the Nazi trials at Nuremberg in Germany”.
Speaking in the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Miliband declared the occupation of Palestinian territory “unlawful” and accused Israel of undermining the viability of a two-state solution.
Ed Miliband is wrong. Judea and Samaria are not “Palestinian territory,” but belong by right — see the League of Nations’ Mandate for Palestine, and the territory to which it applied — to Israel.
Or does Miliband not know about the Mandate, or about the UN’s commitment, in Article 80 of the UN Charter, to bring that Mandate to its intended end — a Jewish state?
He told MPs: “The British Government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank, perpetrated by settler terrorists.
“And all too often, the Israeli Government has turned a blind eye to this.”…
Ethnic cleansing in the “West Bank”? What is Basem Naim thinking of? In 1967, when Israel won by force of arms Judea and Samaria, the Arab population of the area was 600,000. Today, there are two million Arabs in the area, which is more than a tripling of the 1967 population. If Israel is carrying on ethnic cleansing in Judea and Samaria, it’s doing a terrible job of it.
Israel responded by denounThe first “outrageous lie” is that Judea and Samaria are “Palestinian territory.” They are not. Instead they form part of the territory allocated to the Mandate for Palestine by the League of Nations, which was then eventually intended to become the Jewish nation-state, the state of Israel.
There are two ways that Palestinians in Judea and Samaria will suffer from Miliband’s policy. First, those who work for Israeli businesses in those territories may lose their jobs if plants are moved back to Israel behind the Green Line. Secondly, the UK consulate’s closure in Jerusalem will make it harder for the UK to monitor the situation of Palestinians in Judea and Samaria, to provide humanitarian aid, to arrange for transfers to the UK for medical reasons, even to make it possible for some Palestinians to migrate to the UK. Did Ed Miliband really think that Israel would not retaliate in this fashion?
And finally, is Ed Miliband the least bit ashamed by the praise that Hamas has just lavished upon him?cing what it termed “outrageous lies” from Mr Miliband and swiftly enacted a series of retaliatory measures against Britain.