UK: Police say ‘art’ exhibit showing Jews eating babies is not ‘abusive or insulting’
Of course it isn’t. To say that it is would insult Muslims, and the British authorities would never, ever dare to do that. If this “art” exhibit had depicted Muslims eating babies, which it would not and should not, it would already have been shut down. But in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain today, only Muslims have that kind of clout.
An update on this story.
Exhibition showing ‘Jews’ eating babies not abusive or insulting, police claim,”
by Charles Hymas, Telegraph, March 23, 2026:
Force rules artwork condemned as ‘anti-Semitic’ does not meet threshold for hate crime or non-crime hate incident
One of the drawings depicted two auctioneers at Sotheby’s – which is owned by Patrick Drahi, a French-Israeli businessman – eating babies
Drawings at an “anti-Semitic” art exhibition allegedly showing Jewish people eating babies are not “directly abusive or insulting” to Jews, a police force has decided…
UK Home Office covers up number of local authorities wanting to put illegal migrants in new council houses
Keir Starmer is the most unpopular British prime minister ever, and that record-breaking title is well deserved. From persecuting patriots to Muslim rape gang coverups and failing to keep out illegals (mostly from Africa and the Middle East), he has gained the contempt and resentment of his countrymen. And now, another cover-up has come to the surface. This time it’s the cover-up of the number of local authorities who want to put illegals in newly revamped council house houses, at the expense of taxpayers and at great risk to them.
Why the secrecy? Because the Labour Party knows how corrupt it is, and how much it is putting national security at risk and depleting Britain’s economy, but it just doesn’t care.
The Labour Party is trying to hide truth as a desperate means to hold on to power.
Migrant crisis: Home Office ‘covers up’ number of local authorities wanting to put asylum seekers in new council houses
by Jack Walters, GB News, March 24, 2026:
The Home Office has been accused of “covering up” the number of local authorities wanting to put asylum seekers in newly revamped council houses.
Shabana Mahmood’s department rejected a Freedom of Information request from GB News that was looking for confirmation on the local authorities which had expressed an interest in the £500million Home Office Asylum Fund.
The People’s Channel also requested information on local authorities that had been shortlisted, invited to participate, or confirmed as part of the controversial programme.
GB News can now reveal that the Home Office holds the requested information.
The department cited Section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to exempt its disclosure on the grounds it “would or would be likely to prejudice the commercial interests of any persons”.
Responding to GB News’s request, the Home Office said: “If we were to disclose the information to you, this would be likely to prejudice the commercial interests of both the Home Office and those companies with whom the Home Office enters contracts.”
As part of its considerations, the department admitted there would be public interest in the “immediate disclosure” of the information due to concerns about “value for money in terms of its contracts”.
However, the Home Office added: “We have therefore concluded that the balance of public interests identified lies in favour of maintaining the exemption….
================================================================================================
UK: Muslim student insults pro-Israel student, he insults her in response, he is suspended, she is not
The double standard here should surprise precisely no one. After all, this took place in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain.
University embroiled in legal battle after student, 20, suspended for making a ‘tea-towel’ joke about Pro-Palestine activist’s headscarf
by Matt Strudwick, Daily Mail, March 22, 2026:
A university is embroiled in a legal battle with a student after he was suspended for making a joke about a Pro-Palestine activist’s headscarf.
‘Non-Jewish Zionist’ Brodie Mitchell, 20, was reprimanded by Royal Holloway, University of London, for likening Huda El-Jamal’s keffiyeh scarf to a tea towel.
The second-year student made the barb after Ms El-Jamal, the president of the Friends of Palestine Society, dubbed him a ‘wannabe Jew’ during an ill-tempered ‘spat’ at the university’s Freshers’ Fair last September.
Within 24 hours, Mr Mitchell was handed a nine-week suspension while Royal Holloway conducted an investigation ‘for alleged conduct that could be considered hate speech’.
Surrey Police is investigating Mr Mitchell for the same allegations of hate speech, reports The Telegraph….
Mr Mitchell told a pre-trial hearing last December he reacted when Ms El-Jamal, who is of Palestinian origin, had ‘smirked and pointed at me, saying something like ‘here’s the wannabe Jew” before remarking that he was not wearing a kippah.
‘I began filming the interaction as I realised I didn’t have any witnesses and said ‘You’re wearing a tea towel over your head’, referring to her Yasser Arafat inspired keffiyeh, which I considered at the time to be a fitting off-the-cuff retort to her pre-emptive racist and antisemitic attack on me and reference to her jibe about my lack of kippah,’ Mr Mitchell said in a statement.
He has described his comment as ‘poorly expressed and inappropriate’ in an email to the university but argued ‘it was only about politics, not about race or religion’.
Mr Mitchell says he is prepared to apologise to Ms El-Jamal, who he claims was not interviewed during the university’s probe.
Gemma White KC, representing Royal Holloway, stated in written submissions for a November hearing: ‘The university’s overarching position is that it plainly acted reasonably, proportionately and fairly in responding to the claimant’s conduct in the way that it did.
‘The claimant’s right to free speech did not require it to treat his “tea towel” comment any less seriously than it did.’…
Woke madness! If it wasn't, she wouldn't have felt the need to say so.
No comments:
Post a Comment