"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Another Ex-President Questioned About Possible Corruption

Corruption is Everywhere - South Korean President

Seoul court to decide arrest warrant for former President Lee Myung-bak
By Jennie Oh  

Former South Korean President Lee Myung-bak (R) arrives to the Seoul Central District Prosecution Office for questioning in Seoul, South Korea, 14 March 2018. Former South Korean President Lee Myung-bak was summoned by a prosecutor for questioning over accusations of bribery and embezzlement. Photo by EPA-EFE/Woohae Cho.

SEOUL, UPI -- A Seoul court will determine this week whether to issue an arrest warrant for former President Lee Myung-bak, who is currently under investigation for alleged bribery and other misconducts during his years in office.

The Seoul Central District Court said it will hold a hearing on Thursday at 10:30 a.m. to review the prosecution's request for an arrest warrant, JoongAng Ilbo reported.

Prosecutors on Monday sought a permit to detain the former president, citing the degree of the allegations against him -- some 18 charges including bribery, embezzlement, tax evasion and abuse of power.

They also said Lee could attempt to destroy evidence, judging from his denial of most of the charges made against him in a 21-hour long questioning session last week.

In the warrant request, investigators pointed to Lee as the real owner of an auto company named DAS, which he has long been suspected of owning and controlling to conceal his assets and create secret slush funds.

The former conservative leader is also believed to have taken money from Samsung Group to fund legal costs for his auto parts firm, along with other bribes from other corporations and the country's intelligence agency.

The prosecution says he took some 11 billion won ($10.3 million) in kickbacks and embezzled 35 billion won ($32.7 million).

Investigators say they discovered critical evidence that supports their suspicions including his connection to DAS, during a raid on his office in January.

The court's decision on issuing a warrant for arrest is expected early Friday, Yonhap reported.

Lee's secretariat says the 76-year-old will not attend the hearing as he has "fully explained himself to the prosecution."



Majority of Americans Fear Surveillance & ‘Deep State’ Power – Poll

© Damir Sagolj / Reuters

Over 70 percent of US citizens in the Republican and Democratic parties believe America is controlled by a “deep state” of unelected government officials, according to a new poll. They also fear state surveillance, it reveals.

Although most Americans interviewed are not familiar with the term ‘deep state’, when they heard the definition as a cadre of unelected government and military officials who secretly influence government policies, a majority expressed belief in its ‘probable existence’ according to the Monmouth University poll released Monday.



Additionally six in 10 of those polled think that these unelected government figures wield too much power when it comes to shaping federal policy.  

“We usually expect opinions on the operation of government to shift depending on which party is in charge. But there’s an ominous feeling by Democrats and Republicans alike that a ‘deep state’ of unelected operatives are pulling the levers of power,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.

Donald Trump has popularized the term ‘deep state’ over the course of his presidency. In January he blasted the ‘deep state’ Department of Justice for allegedly shielding a Hillary Clinton aide  who used a non-secure private email account while conducting government business. 

The poll also highlights widespread fears of state surveillance, with 80 percent of Americans believing that the US government currently spies on the activities of its citizens. 

“This is a worrisome finding. The strength of our government relies on public faith in protecting our freedoms, which is not particularly robust. And it’s not a Democratic or Republican issue. These concerns span the political spectrum,” Murray added.

In 2013 ex-CIA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed the existence of a massive surveillance programme by US and UK authorities. The leaks exposed that the US National Security Agency (NSA) was spying on tens of millions of Americans by collecting their telephone and internet records.

The Monmouth University Poll was conducted by telephone from March 2 to 5, 2018, with 803 adults in the United States.

Unfortunately, I believe that 'Deep State' is not restricted to American civil servants and military. I believe it goes higher into the US government and extends into many western governments including NATO. It is 'Deep State' that is pulling the strings on the Russia hysteria. And, I suspect, Deep State may possibly be involved in chemical weapons attacks in false flag operations in Syria.


Ex-French President Sarkozy in Police Custody Over ‘Libyan Aid’ for His 2007 Campaign

Corruption is Everywhere - French Presidential elections

Nicolas Sarkozy © Lionel Bonaventure / AFP

Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy has been placed in police custody for questioning over alleged Libyan aid to help fund his 2007 presidential election campaign, Reuters and local media report citing judicial sources.

According to Le Monde, this is the first time Sarkozy, 63, has been questioned in relation to the investigation, which was launched in April 2013. Sarkozy was placed in police custody in Nanterre, in the western suburbs of Paris. His detention could last up to 48 hours, L’Obs reported.

In 2014, France’s second-largest public television channel, France-3, made waves after airing an audio excerpt from an interview with Muammar Gaddafi. The late Libyan leader claimed that he financed Nicolas Sarkozy’s presidential campaign in 2007.

“It’s me who made him president,” Gaddafi said in an interview recorded in 2011. Gaddafi was speaking in Tripoli in mid-March, just a few days before the first Western strikes that led to his downfall and killing by militias in October, 2011. 

I'm sure that was just a coincidence!!!?? At any rate, it doesn't seem to have been a very good investment for Gadaffi.

Claims that Sarkozy allegedly received backing from Gaddafi first surfaced in 2012, when Mediapart news agency accused him of accepting €50 million from the Libyan leader to fund his 2007 campaign.

The agency published a statement signed by former Libyan Foreign Minister Moussa Koussa asserting that the claim was true. Sarkozy accused the organization of slander, dismissing the claims as “grotesque.”

The former president’s alleged ties with Gaddafi came under the spotlight again in November 2016. In an interview with Mediapart, Ziad Takieddine, the man who introduced Nicolas Sarkozy to Muammar Gaddafi, confessed to having brought several suitcases containing €5 million prepared for the Libyan regime to the Ministry of the Interior in late 2006 and early 2007.

“It was a case like that. It opened like this. And the money was inside,” Takieddine said in a film released by Mediapart.



Monday, March 19, 2018

Unlikely Bedfellows: Corbyn Finds a Fan in Mail Columnist Peter Hitchens Over His Russia Stance

And not just Hitchens

Peter Hitchens(C), Jeremy Corbyn(R) © Facebook / AFP


As unlikely as these two are for bedfellows, add my name to the list, and, I think, the Chancellor of Austria. There is reason to suspect any operation that casts a country or its leader into a bad light. False flag operations are an easy way to manipulate governments, media, and gullible people into demonizing players on the international stage. The race to condemn leads to actions that are premature, may be completely in error and extremely dangerous. 

I don't believe for a minute that Syria's Assad had anything to do with chemical weapons being used in Khan Sheikhoun. Not that he is not capable of such evil, but that it would have been colossally stupid of him to do so. Assad is many things, but stupid is not one of them. It was easily a false flag operation to turn the US against Assad, but that aspect has never been investigated because nobody wants to know the truth. It doesn't fit with western ambitions.


As the Russian spy poisoning saga rages on, Jeremy Corbyn has found an unlikely ally amongst the media establishment... Mail columnist Peter Hitchens, who leapt to defend Corbyn’s cautious approach.

Corbyn has copped considerable flak from both sides of the House over his unwillingness to blame Russia in the poisoning that left ex-Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in intensive care. At least 16 Labour MPs have signed a motion backing PM Theresa May’s hard-line stance against the Kremlin, in defiance of their own party leader.

In an op-ed for Mail on Sunday, Hitchens backed Corbyn’s position that the UK should go through the appropriate avenues of international law before proportioning blame. He reminded readers of the danger of rushing into conflict – just as the UK has done in the past.  

“The treatment of Jeremy Corbyn, both by politicians and many in the media, for doing what he is paid for and leading the Opposition, seems to me to be downright shocking,” Hitchens wrote.

“Mr Corbyn has earned the right to be listened to, and those who now try to smear him are not just doing something morally wrong. They are hurting the country. Look at our repeated rushes into foolish conflict in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Afghanistan. All have done us lasting damage.”

Hitchens also called into question the UK’s infatuation with hating Russia, pondering if it is the fear – or mystery – of the unknown that fuels the negativity. Or perhaps Brexit has something to do with it?

“I sense an even deeper and more thoughtless frenzy over Russia, a country many seem to enjoy loathing because they know so little about it,” he wrote. “I have already been accused, on a public stage, of justifying Moscow’s crime in Salisbury. This false charge was the penalty I paid for trying to explain the historical and political background to these events. I wonder if the bitterness also has something to do with the extraordinarily deep division over the EU, which has made opponents into enemies in a way not seen since the Suez Crisis.”

Over the weekend, Corbyn addressed Labour’s regional conference at Newcastle University on Saturday. He reiterated his call for a de-escalation of tensions with Moscow as the spiraling diplomatic disaster enters its second week.



Evidence before accusations:
Austria asks for full-fledged Skripal investigation

Police officers get dressed in protective suiting at a car recovery depot in Norton Enterprise Park,
where Sergei Skripal's car was originally transported, in Salisbury, Britain, March 13, 2018.
© Henry Nicholls / Reuters

It’s premature to pin the blame in the Skripal poisoning case without first conducting a proper investigation, Austria’s foreign minister has said. The UK has already picked Russia as a boogey man in the incident.

Speaking in Brussels on Monday, Karin Kneissl said that she viewed the poisoning of former double-agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury, England, as “abhorrent.” However, unlike its British counterparts, Austria wants to have the full picture before casting blame on someone specifically.

"Our position is: First there is the need to establish a full picture of events in joint cooperation with the Chemical agency [Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)] and all those involved” the foreign minister said.

Kneissl’s cautionary remarks come less than a week after a French government spokesperson said it was too early to discuss retaliatory measures against Russia, as its involvement in the case has yet to be established.

“We don't do fantasy politics. Once the elements are proven, then the time will come for decisions to be made,” the spokesperson told a press conference shortly after British Prime Minister Theresa May announced she would be expelling 23 Russian diplomats over the poisoning.

The French government's position on the matter quickly took a U-turn, however, with the Elysee Palace releasing a follow-up statement declaring Russia’s culpability in the attack. "France shares Britain's assessment that there is no other plausible explanation and reiterates its solidarity with his ally," the statement said.

One wonder what kind of arm-twisting went on for that to happen so quickly?

On Monday, the EU’s Foreign Affairs Council released a statement hailing the UK’s “commitment” to work closely with the OPCW, and calling on Russia to “provide immediate, full and complete disclosure of its Novichok program” to the organization.

Novichok is a Soviet-era nerve agent allegedly used in the March 4 incident. The UK has so far failed to send a formal inquiry to Moscow about the case, although Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said that London will soon provide the OPCW with samples of the nerve agent used in the case. Johnson had earlier accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of personally ordering the attack.

Moscow has countered that view. “The fact, that they [UK officials] categorically reject to file an official request and deliberately and arrogantly fan anti-Russian rhetoric in the public sphere bordering on hysteria, indicates that they clearly understand they have no formal pretext to go down a legal road,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Friday.

On Monday, Johnson doubled down on his inflammatory rhetoric, describing Russian denials of responsibility in the nerve agent attack as "increasingly absurd."

This absurd anti-Russia hysteria has one goal and one only - to sell weapons! And, perhaps, to give NATO a raison d'être. NATO has forgotten its mandate to ensure peace with Russia and has instead become the aggressor causing a spectacular arms build-up and threatening peace the likes of which we haven't seen in more than half a century.


Sunday, March 18, 2018

'I Didn’t Fight Against French Algeria to Accept an Algerian France': Bardot Slams Modern-Day France

Beauty gives way to wisdom

© Eric Feferberg / AFP

French actress Brigitte Bardot has spoken out against the state of her country, saying that Islamists are "practically everywhere" and that France should not resemble Algeria.

Speaking to the French weekly Valeurs Actuelles, Bardot said that France is not what it once was. "I have been brought up in honor, patriotism, love and respect for my country, and when I see what it has become, I feel desperate," she said.

The 83-year-old also said that it is "unacceptable” to see burqas become commonplace in France, and Islamists are "practically everywhere."

"I did not fight against French Algeria to accept an Algerian France, I do not touch the culture, the identity and the customs of others, let's not touch mine," Bardot said.

The former actress didn't mince her words when it came to her thoughts on the European Union either. "We have to get out of it,” she said. Bardot added that she is a supporter of right-wing National Front politician Marine Le Pen, who has also spoken out against France's membership in the EU. She went on to note her affinity for former French Prime Minister Francois Fillon, who she described as a "good guy."


Born in 1934, Bardot was one of the best-known sex symbols of the 1950s and 1960s. She retired from the entertainment industry in 1973, after starring in 47 films. She has established herself as an animal rights activist in recent years. She recently wrote a book, 'Répliques et Piques,' embracing a collection of quotations and aphorisms.



Saturday, March 17, 2018

China's Xi Jinping Re-Elected with VP Ally, No Term Limits

By Sommer Brokaw  

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and Premier Li Keqiang applaud during the National People's Congress (NPC) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Saturday. Chinese President Xi Jinping has secured another five years as China's leader. Photo by Stephen Shaver/UPI | License Photo

UPI -- The Chinese legislature formally endorsed President Xi Jinping for another five years on Saturday, and appointed his ally, Wang Qishan, as vice president.

The National People's Congress ballot unanimously approved Xi for a second term. Wang had a total of 2,969 votes in his favor and only one against.

The election of the two allies as China's top chiefs comes just a week after the Chinese parliament removed term limits on both positions. It also comes on the heels of China planning to formalize rules for its new anti-corruption agency, the National Supervisory Commission, or NSC.

So, Xi will still have to win the election in the National People's Congress every 5 years to remain as president. He can run indefinitely.

On Saturday morning, the Chinese parliament also approved Xi's plan to reduce the cabinet by 15 positions at ministerial or vice-ministerial levels to make government "better structured," and "more efficient." State Council Wang Yong said the plan would also "strengthen the government's role in economic management," and "environmental protection."

It, in all probability, will allow Xi to remove some people who may not see eye-to-eye with him. In Communist countries this is how leaders establish control. In Communist Russia, many a politician would simply disappear.

Wang, 69, a close friend of Xi's, had served as head of corruption investigations in China since October, after stepping down from the ruling Communist Party's top echelon, the South China Morning Post reported.

Now, as vice president, Wang is expected to cover global affairs, including addressing China's tumultuous relationship with the United States in light of an expected trade war, the South China Morning Post report stated. Xi is considered the most powerful Chinese leader since Mao Zedong, who chaired the Communist Party until 1976.

"Clearly Xi is shoring up his power, but I would suggest what China also wants to do more than anything else is define a mode of government which is not liberal and at the same time ... is predictable, reliable, which is safe for businesses to invest in," director of the University China Center at Oxford Rana Mitter told CNN.

Meanwhile, Amnesty International and the Brookings Institute have been critical of the new NSC. Amnesty International told CNN it had concerns about the agency's "far-reaching powers." Brookings Institute said citizens would have "little or no legal recourse" to challenge corruption allegations.




Friday, March 16, 2018

Costco Under Investigation by Ontario Forensic Team Over Drug Company Payments

Corruption is Everywhere - But in Canada??? and Costco???

Rebates not allowed in Ontario in bid to drive down overall price of generics

By Timothy Sawa, Lisa Ellenwood, Mark Kelley, CBC News 

Retail giant Costco collected $1.2 million in potentially illegal payments from the generic drug company Ranbaxy. (CBC)

Costco is under investigation by an Ontario government forensic team that specializes in "allegations of wrongdoing against government" after the retail giant received $1.2 million in potentially illegal payments from a generic drug-maker, The Fifth Estate has learned.

The revelation follows guilty pleas of professional misconduct in front of the Ontario College of Pharmacists from two pharmacy executives with the company (Costco) known for its bulk deals and rock bottom pharmacy dispensing fees.

The college accused Joseph Hanna and Lawrence Varga of demanding illegal payments from the generic drug company Ranbaxy.

Hanna and Varga said the demands could "reasonably be regarded by members of the profession as unprofessional," according to statements from them that were included in the college's decision.

Each pharmacist was fined $20,000 and ordered to pay $30,000 in costs.

At the time of the fine, in January 2018, Costco had collected $1.2 million in potentially illegal payments from the drug company and so far has been allowed to keep that money.

Tony Gagliese was a salesman with Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals. (CBC)

Tony Gagliese, a salesman with Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals at the time, blew the whistle on the company by filing a complaint with the Ontario College of Pharmacists.

"I basically said: 'I don't understand what's going on,' " Gagliese told The Fifth Estate in an exclusive television interview.

"Costco always followed the law and suddenly you're breaking the law from my understanding and no one is here to help me."

'I prefer to call it a kickback'

The allegations stem from a questionable industry-wide practice that inflates the price of generic drugs, known as pharmacy rebates.

"You call it a rebate. I prefer to call it a kickback," says Amir Attaran, a professor of medicine and law at the University of Ottawa. Pharmacy chains sometimes demand a payment from a generic drug company to stock its brand of drugs.

Most provinces allow rebates, but Ontario made them entirely illegal in 2013 in an effort to drive down the overall price of generic drugs.

'Canadians are really seriously gouged
on the price of generic drugs.'
- Amir Attaran

If pharmacy chains stopped demanding rebates, the province argued, then generic drug companies could afford to lower the price of drugs for Canadians.

Canadians pay some of the highest generic drug prices in the world, with last year's spending estimated at nearly $6 billion. A large percentage of that — likely billions of dollars — went directly to pharmacy chains in the form of rebate payments.

"Canadians are really seriously gouged on the price of generic drugs," says Attaran. "That's largely because in the price of a drug in Canada there's not just the drug. There's a portion of the price that goes to the pharmacy in the form of a rebate or a kickback."

Law upheld

Various players in the industry launched challenges to Ontario's law.

In upholding the law in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada called rebates a "tenacious problem" and said manufacturers have been "charging exceptionally high prices for generic drugs flowing not from the actual cost of the drugs, but from the manufacturers' cost in providing financial incentives to pharmacies to induce them to purchase their products."

The Fifth Estate has learned Ontario's Forensic Investigation Team, or FIT, launched its investigation into Costco in the fall of 2017.

Costco says its lower dispensing fees saved its customers in Ontario more than $16.4 million in 2014. (David Donnelly/CBC)

That came after Gagliese turned his evidence over to the province. Then the Forensic Investigation Team called him for a meeting.

"What I was told, and I quote: 'Help us Tony to put together a ... case against Costco,' " says Gagliese.

FIT is a provincial team independent of Ontario's Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care that investigates financial issues and "allegations of wrongdoing against government," according to the head of the team in a speech.

It conducts civil investigations and can pass its findings on to law enforcement for followup criminal investigations.

Practice stopped

The Fifth Estate has seen emails confirming FIT's involvement.

"The ministry has engaged the Forensic Investigation Team to conduct a second phase of investigation," wrote David Schachow, director for the Drug Programs Delivery Branch with Ontario's Ministry of Health.

When asked about FIT's involvement, the Health Ministry says it "is unable to provide further information about ongoing inspection or investigation activities."

Costco CEO Craig Jelinek and its top Canadian executive, Andrée Brien, both declined to be interviewed by The Fifth Estate.

In a statement, Brien says it didn't believe any of the payments were illegal at the time, that it stopped the practice after its own internal investigation and the payments it demanded were ultimately good for consumers because it could use the money to lower their prices.

And did that actually happen? Can you account for that money?

Secret tapes

At the heart of the Costco case is a phone call Gagliese secretly recorded between himself and Hanna, Costco's national director of drug buying. The Fifth Estate has obtained a copy of that recording.

Hanna began the conversation, recorded in February 2014, by telling Gagliese that Ranbaxy wasn't paying Costco enough money to keep his products on its shelves. He wants a higher percentage of Ranbaxy's generic drug sales in what would be considered a rebate.

"My analysis essentially shows that your support is approximately, and I might be off by a couple per cent or I might be off by a lot more if you tell me differently, around 46-ish per cent," Hanna said.

"Here's sort of what I'm going to kind of tell you, if you want to compete, it's going to have to be sort of 60 [per cent] plus," Hanna told Gagliese.

'It was obvious to me that they weren't interested in following the law.'
- Tony Gagliese

Gagliese says the request raised an alarm for him.

"They asked for a 60 per cent rebate retroactive to April [2013] and I pointed out to them it's illegal [in Ontario] what you're asking for," Gagliese told The Fifth Estate.

"It was obvious to me that they weren't interested in following the law."

Costco says Gagliese "used the recordings and the threat of proceedings as leverage to try and force Costco to purchase additional generic drugs from the company he represented."

The University of Ottawa's Amir Attaran calls Gagliese a hero. "I think he's behaved in a selfless and heroic way," he says. "He has shed light on one of the murkier sides of the pharmaceutical business. Costco has been caught with its hand in the till. Clearly."

'Marketing support'

Costco wanted Ranbaxy to pay $3.6 million in total, in exchange for $6 million in Canadian sales.

In Ontario, Costco wanted Ranbaxy to make the payments by investing in what Costco called its "advertising and customer education programs."

On the secret tapes, Hanna lays out how Ranbaxy can make the payments for its sales in the rest of Canada, where rebates are legal, versus Ontario, where they aren't.

In Ontario, instead of using the term rebate, Hanna says Ranbaxy can pay up to $1.3 million for what he calls "marketing support."

The remaining $2.3 million can be paid as a straight rebate. If Ranbaxy refused to pay, Costco's Hanna says the company could lose its business with the retail giant.

"This is what I would like to see and this is a minimum to ensure that, not ensure but a minimum to greatly reduce the likelihood of somebody eating your business," Hanna said.

No guidance, Costco says

Hanna also declined an interview request from The Fifth Estate.

In an email to The Fifth Estate, he says he had no idea the payments he was asking for would be considered an illegal rebate in Ontario and that neither the Ontario College of Pharmacists  nor the province had provided any guidance on the issue.

'Neither I, nor Costco, would ever knowingly
accept a payment that was prohibited.'
- Joseph Hanna

"I genuinely believed at the time Ranbaxy made the payments in question that they were permissible," he says. "Neither I, nor Costco, would ever knowingly accept a payment that was prohibited."

Hanna says that the secretly recorded phone call does not appear to be "complete" and that "a number of other conversations that provide context … have not been provided."

Amir Attaran, a professor of medicine and law at the University of Ottawa, says Gagliese has 'shed light on one of the murkier sides of the pharmaceutical business.' (CBC)

In one of those conversations, Hanna says he told Gagliese that he "did not believe the payment was a rebate."

Hanna also says he personally did not receive any of the funds in question.

In her email, Brien, Costco's top Canadian executive, says the company stopped the payment scheme in Ontario immediately after it did its own internal investigation and not because of any "finding of wrongdoing" on its part but because it wants "further clarification from the Ontario government."

Brien also points out that in its decision, the College of Pharmacists says the Costco executives were "operating in a legal environment that was not crystal clear" and that the payments were not "rebates on their face."

Funds not used to 'line our pockets'

"We acknowledge that the advertising payment received from Ranbaxy was considered to be a rebate by the college in the particular circumstances of the case," she says.

"However, where advertising fees are charged, we have not used these funds to 'line our pockets' while we continue to charge high fees. To the contrary, payments received for advertising are used to defray our operating costs to allow us to pass the savings on to our customers."

Costco says its lower dispensing fees saved its customers in Ontario more than $16.4 million in 2014.  

Both Costco pharmacy executives who pleaded guilty to professional misconduct continue to act in their senior roles with the company.

Consequently, they were clearly acting in company policy. The real question here is did the money genuinely go to reducing the price of the drugs, and can Costco prove it? 60% kick-back is an astonishing amount of money, and yet it's presumable that the pharmaceutical company would still be making a significant profit on the 40% left. Amazing!

Costco pharmacy executive Joseph Hanna says he 'genuinely believed' at the time Ranbaxy made the
payments that they were legal. (CBC)

Gagliese, on the other hand, has been unable to find work as a drug salesperson since going public.

Without the secretly record audio tape, he believes Costco would not be under scrutiny right now.

"I think without the tape, nothing would've happened. I think that the tape is the only reason why Costco decided to plead guilty," he says.

"You can't debate the tape. I didn't ask him, I didn't set him up, he told me how to pay him, so Costco's story is in that tape."