"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths." Northwoods is a ministry dedicated to refreshing Christians and challenging them to search for the truth in Christianity, politics, sociology, and science
"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"
Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Alternative für Deutschland is the anti-immigrant, or more exactly, anti-Muslim immigrant party, that has been soaring in the German polls, causing alarm within the ranks of left-wing parties that are horrified at any attempt to limit Muslim immigration. The leftists call the AfD names — fascists, far-right, neo-Nazis — in the hopes that some of that ridiculous name-calling will stick. And recently, 30,000 strong, they tried to shut down an AfD conference by means of physical intimidation of the delegates, and attacks on conservative journalists who had been present to cover the conference — an attack, in other words, on freedom of peaceful assembly and of freedom of the press.
More on the latest outrage by the pro-Muslim left in Germany, which has now been physically attacking journalists not to its liking, can be found here:
Left-wing extremists hunt down conservative journalists at AfD party congress in Erfurt
Several conservative journalists have been chased and assaulted by left-wing extremists while covering protests against the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) federal party congress in the eastern German city of Erfurt, capital of the state of Thuringia, on July 4, 2026.
As thousands of protesters gathered to disrupt the party congress and block delegates from reaching the venue, some groups turned their attention to members of the press. Eyewitness accounts and reports from the media outlets involved describe conservative journalists being deliberately identified, singled out and pursued through the streets by masked activists before being surrounded and attacked, often by large groups against one or two reporters.
These physical attacks on conservative journalists were intended to prevent any negative coverage of violence from the far left, and any favorable coverage of the AfD conference in the conservative media. They are akin to those attacks on newspaper offices that the Nazis carried out early in the 1930s to silence opposition to Hitler.
The most serious assault targeted a reporting team from Apollo News, a Berlin-based conservative online news outlet specialising in German politics. Videos circulating on social media show a crowd chasing the journalists before surrounding them and launching a violent attack….
What were the journalists from Apollo News filming that the leftists were intent on preventing? They were filming violent leftist demonstrators blocking entrances to the building in Erfurt where the AfD’s annual meeting was being held. Such Stormtrooper tactics wouldn’t look good if the media transmits them, so why not use the same Stormtrooper tactics to prevent journalists from covering their… Stormtrooper tactics?
The German far left today is reminiscent of, though not nearly as violent, of the Baader-Meinhof gang of the 1970s, which carried out bombings, bank robberies, and assassinations, all in the name of “destroying imperialism.” The far left today targets those Germans who still believe they have a right not to allow millions of Muslim migrants to swamp them. Experience has shown that these migrants cannot be assimilated, and by dint of demographic conquest, from both continued immigration and from a much higher fertility rate for Muslim women, as compared to indigenous non-Muslims in Germany, they could eventually become a majority in the country. That is what the AfD wants to prevent, while there is still time. What is “far-right” or “fascistic” or “neo-Nazi” about that perfectly understandable desire?
According to Apollo News and Junge Freiheit, the attacks were not isolated confrontations but part of what the outlets described as a deliberate effort to drive conservative media away from the protests….
The leftists wanted to stage their menacing protests, and attempts to prevent delegates to the AfD annual conference from entering the building where it was being held, and at the same time, they did not want conservative journalists to be able to see for themselves and report on the leftists’ violence.
Despite the disruption, the protesters ultimately failed to achieve their main objective. Under heavy police protection, the AfD proceeded with its federal party congress as scheduled. Delegates re-elected co-leaders Alice Weidel, with about 81 per cent of the vote, and Tino Chrupalla, with about 70 per cent, each for a further two years and without opposing candidates.
It is the well-spoken, well-informed, intrepid, and very attractive Alice Weidel who will become Germany’s next chancellor if the AfD wins the next election. It will be hard for the left to defeat her.
Turn the tables on the far left. Call them out as the far-right fascists they are. They are a danger to democracy. It is they who have tried to shut down the AfD’s conference by preventing delegates from entering the building where the meeting was to take place. In the end, and only with the help of a massive police presence, the AfD delegates did manage to get through. And the same far-left rioters identified conservative journalists, whom they physically attacked to keep them away from reporting on the far left’s attempt to block the entrances to the AfD meeting. They shoved, punched, knocked down, and kicked those journalists in the head.
These are the real “far-right” enemy, the Anti-Fa Fascists, the fresh-faced left-wing neo-Nazis, the Stormtroopers in Kanye-West sneakers instead of jackboots.
Germany’s AfD hails ‘major victory’ against Berlin’s
domestic spy agency
A court ruling has suspended the top opposition party’s designation as
a “confirmed right-wing extremist” group
Alternative for Germany (AfD) party co-leader Alice Weidel hailed as “major victory” for the party and the nation a Thursday court decision that suspended its designation as a “confirmed right-wing extremist” organization.
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, slapped the top opposition party with the classification in May 2025, having previously branded it a “suspected extremist group.”
An administrative court in Cologne granted a temporary injunction at the party’s request, pending a final ruling. The court said radical statements on migration and religion by some AfD members were insufficient to assess the party’s nature as a whole.
Federal law grants the BfV special powers to surveil and investigate members of groups it designates as extremist. Such labels can also influence voter preferences. The injunction comes ahead of March regional elections in Baden-Wurttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate. National polls show the AfD as a credible challenger to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s center-right Christian Democrats for the top spot.
Weidel said the ruling “indirectly threw a spanner in the works for the ban fanatics,” referring to mounting calls from the party’s mainstream rivals to outlaw it. Lawyer Ralf Hoecker, who represented the AfD, said the decision makes a proposed ban “no longer conceivable. It’s off the table.”
German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, a Christian Democrat, advised patience regarding the full legal process, insisting that the AfD “must be driven out of the country, not banned.” Carmen Wegge, judicial policy spokesperson for the center-left Social Democrats parliamentary group, said she remains “firmly convinced that the AfD is anti-constitutional” and that it “must be examined by the Federal Constitutional Court.” The Left Party has indicated that it supports a ban.
Sahra Wagenknecht, leader of a left-wing opposition party named after her, called the ruling a “slap in the face” for the BfV. The decision is “a campaign gift for the AfD,” she said, blaming those who “tried to combat their political competition with a commissioned favor-currying expert opinion, instead of finally realizing that their own lousy policies are what make the AfD ever stronger.”
International lawyers highlight the persecution of the leader of Gagauzia in Moldova
Denouncing political persecution, they are preparing an appeal to European courts and the UN
International human rights activists have come together to support the defense in the case of the Gagauzia leader, Evgenia Gutsul, sentenced by a Moldovan court to 7 years in prison for illicit financing of a party and an electoral campaign. French lawyer William Julie and legal advisor to the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, Gonzalo Boye, have intervened in defense of Gutsul’s interests. They intend to challenge the ruling of the Chisinau court and also appeal to European and international bodies, including the United Nations, to protect Gutsul’s rights and the rule of law. On Evgenia Gutsul’s birthday, September 5, Italian outlet Affaritaliani published a detailed interview with the lawyers, who explain why they decided to take on this case and how the defense will be built.
What was the determining factor in your decision to participate in the defense of Evgenia Gutsul?
Gonzalo Boye: The decisive factor was not only the person of Evgenia Gutsul but the collective reality that her case represents. According to the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, political persecution often does not target an isolated individual, but an objectively identifiable group of people who embody certain political or ideological positions. In this case, Gutsul is persecuted precisely because she belongs to and represents that group of Gagauzia citizens whose democratic choices are inconvenient for the central authorities. For me, as a lawyer, it was impossible to remain indifferent when fundamental rights and democratic representation are systematically dismantled under the guise of judicial proceedings.
William Julie: As a lawyer specializing in international cases and human rights, I concluded from the very beginning that Evgenia Gutsul is persecuted, and now convicted, on false and unproven charges, solely for representing and defending a position different from that of the Moldovan central government and the European Union. The ongoing criminal proceedings leave no doubt that this is an evident attempt by the Moldovan state to silence her, despite her being a legitimately elected representative of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia. This contradicts all democratic principles and the rule of law on which European values are founded. Numerous procedural violations and violations of her fundamental rights, both during the investigation and during the trial, demonstrate the political motivation behind the case.
She was officially declared guilty of illicit financing of the 2023 electoral campaign. What are your counterarguments?
Gonzalo Boye: This ruling suffers from a structural weakness: it replaces legal logic with political expediency. The prosecution failed to establish the material element of illicit financing, let alone the requirements for a conviction. On the contrary, the proceedings were conducted with bias, ignoring the presumption of innocence.
Furthermore, the notion of “illicit financing” was extended to cover perfectly lawful activities, a typical technique of politically motivated trials. Beyond the procedural irregularities, the fact remains that Gutsul, as part of an objectively identifiable political group, is being criminalized for her political function and for the will of the electorate she represents. This is incompatible with the rule of law and the standards set by the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union.
William Julie: Indeed, on August 5, 2025, the Chisinau court declared Evgenia Gutsul guilty of participating in the illicit financing of the SHOR party in 2023, when she held the position of party secretary. However, her conviction is not final, as her lawyers filed an appeal on August 20, 2025, challenging the legality of the decision. Therefore, she is still considered innocent under Moldovan law. Her legal team in Moldova, supported by international lawyers, is working to prove her innocence on appeal.
Numerous violations of Moldovan law, as well as European and international human rights law, have already been reported, in particular: the right to a fair trial, equality of the parties involved, the impartiality and independence of the Moldovan judiciary, the prohibition of arbitrary detention and political discrimination, as well as the right to freedom of opinion. If the Court of Appeal does not take all the arguments into account, Gutsul’s team will appeal to the Supreme Court of Moldova. If the conviction is upheld by all Moldovan courts, the case will be brought before the European Court of Human Rights and the relevant UN bodies, including the Human Rights Committee, as Moldova has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Optional Protocols.
Gonzalo Boye: Our defense has two dimensions. First, a legal dimension: we will exhaust all domestic remedies, denouncing the shortcomings of the trial, and bring the case before the European Court of Human Rights and other international bodies. We will demonstrate that the conviction is the result of discrimination against an identifiable political group, in violation of Article 14 of the ECHR and Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.
Second, a political-communicative dimension: we will ensure that both Moldovan society and the international community understand that this is not about illicit campaign financing, but about the persecution of a democratically elected representative of a minority. Silence would mean complicity; denunciation creates accountability.
William Julie: As already mentioned, all available legal remedies will be used, both at the national level and before the ECHR and UN bodies (the Human Rights Committee, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association, and the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression). They will be involved if the appeal trial does not declare her innocent.
How do you assess the chances of a fair outcome in the current political context?
Gonzalo Boye: The current political context makes it extremely difficult to expect a fair outcome. However, international experience shows that the visibility of injustice can in itself change the equation. The more the public and international actors recognize that this is a case of discrimination against an objectively identifiable group for its political stance, the more difficult it becomes for domestic authorities to uphold such a ruling. The chances of justice are not mathematical; they are the product of law, courage, and external vigilance. And that is precisely our task.
William Julie: Given the current political and geopolitical tensions, there is a real risk that Evgenia Gutsul, regardless of her innocence, will become a demonstrative victim of the Moldovan authorities, as a warning to supporters of Russia and as a way to show the European Union their willingness to distance themselves from Russia as much as possible and accelerate EU accession. Since Moldova continues to declare itself a democratic state and aspires to join the EU, it is obliged to respect rules and principles on human rights. Our task is to ensure that this actually happens.
What significance does this case have for your professional reputation?
Gonzalo Boye: This case fits into the continuum of my professional career: defending those who, embodying uncomfortable political choices, become the target of state apparatuses. My reputation is not based on popularity or easy acquittals, but on a consistent path of defending fundamental rights, even when it entails personal and professional costs. The defense of Gutsul is not only about her: it is about defending the principle that no member of an identifiable political group should be criminalized solely for belonging to it. Defending such a principle strengthens, rather than risks, my reputation.
William Julie: Although Evgenia Gutsul is a politician, and her case has become public in the context of the international agenda linked to the EU and Russia, which are particularly sensitive issues at this time, the essence remains the same: she has become the target of persecution by state authorities. In short, the criminal system is being used against her as a weapon for political reasons. Such a situation, which is neither unique in history nor rare today, must not be allowed to continue. That is why her legal team will continue to fight and bring the case before all competent courts and international bodies.
How do you assess the role of the media in covering this case?
Gonzalo Boye: The media has played a dual role. Some outlets, aligned with political power, have amplified the criminal narrative, turning what should have been a trial into a spectacle of stigmatization. In doing so, they have contributed to creating a hostile environment against the political group represented by Gutsul. Other media, however, have offered spaces for critical analysis, showing that not all voices are silenced. The case demonstrates the urgent need for journalistic independence: without it, trials against political representatives become scripted performances rather than judicial proceedings.
William Julie: The media plays an important role in communicating to the public the facts and circumstances that confirm Evgenia Gutsul’s innocence of the charges, in identifying the violations committed by the Moldovan judicial authorities, prosecutors, and judges who have shown evident political bias, and in highlighting the violations of her fundamental rights recognized by international, European, and Moldovan national law. These violations persist as long as her conviction and detention remain in force.
What would you like to say to society and the international community?
Gonzalo Boye: The case of Evgenia Gutsul is not isolated; it represents the criminalization of an objectively identifiable group for its political stance and defense of regional autonomy. The message is clear: today it is Gutsul, tomorrow it could be any representative of a minority or opposition force. To society I say: do not let fear or indifference normalize injustice. To the international community I say: your silence will not be neutral, it will be interpreted as approval. Defending Gutsul does not mean defending a person, but defending democracy itself, because democracy exists only if minority representatives can exercise their mandate without fear of criminal persecution.
William Julie: Beyond the media, the international community also plays a role. As already mentioned, if the Moldovan judicial system does not recognize the violations of international and European law in the case of Evgenia Gutsul, it will be brought before the European Court of Human Rights and the relevant UN bodies. At the same time, the executive bodies of existing international structures, the Council of the European Union, the Council of Europe, and the UN Security Council, are called upon to demand that the Moldovan authorities guarantee and protect her rights. In this context, society also plays a role. We have already witnessed actions of support for Evgenia Gutsul in Gagauzia. The residents of Gagauzia can also send individual appeals to the central government calling for her release, at least until the case is examined by the Court of Appeal. Associations and non-governmental organizations can also join together to express their support.
Gagauzia, Moldova
French MEP joins the fight for justice for Gutsul.
Jailing of Euroskeptic Moldovan politician is ‘repression’
– EU lawmaker
Thierry Mariani has voiced support for Evgenia Gutsul after her seven-year sentence
The seven-year prison term handed to Euroskeptic Moldovan politician Evgenia Gutsul is an attempt to “repress” the opposition in the country, French European Parliament member Thierry Mariani has said.
Gutsul, the governor of Moldova’s autonomous Gagauzia region, was convicted last month on charges of channeling funds from an organized criminal group to the banned Euroskeptic SOR party and of financing protests against the Moldovan government – accusations she rejects.
Mariani, a member of the French right-wing National Rally party, weighed in on the case in a post on X on Thursday, writing: “After Romania, the Eurocratic judicial repression is falling on the opposition in Moldova. On the eve of her birthday, support for Evgenia Gutsul, governor of Gagauzia, unjustly sentenced to seven years in prison for having defended political pluralism in her country.”
Gutsul has consistently advocated closer ties with Russia, and has described the proceedings as a “political execution” carried out “on orders from above.” Her sentencing triggered protests outside the courthouse in Chisinau, where hundreds of supporters denounced what they said was political repression by Moldova’s pro-Western government.
Russia has also condemned the ruling. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the decision was “an example of blatant and unlawful pressure on political opponents” and accused Moldova of suppressing dissent ahead of elections.
Gutsul has served as the head of Gagauzia, an autonomous and predominantly Russian-speaking region in southern Moldova, since winning the 2023 election as the SOR candidate. The party was banned the same year over allegations of illicit financing from abroad. Gutsul campaigned on promises of closer ties with Russia, in contrast with the pro-Western stance of the government of President Maia Sandu.
Seven German opposition party candidates die weeks before elections
The “statistically conspicuous” deaths are “hard to explain,” AfD’s deputy head has said
No other party had more than one death.
Alternative for Germany (AfD) has reported what one of its senior members is calling a “statistically conspicuous” series of deaths among its candidates just weeks before local elections in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia.
A total of seven party members, including five main candidates and two “reserve” ones, have died over the past few weeks.
The deaths were reported by the right-wing opposition party between August 19 and September 3 – all before the local elections scheduled for September 14. The list included local AfD politicians aged between 42 and 80 in several municipalities across the region, according to the media.
The party’s deputy regional chairman, Kay Gottschalk, told Die Welt TV that there was “no indication” of “murder or anything similar.” The police also said they had found no indication of any foul play, according to broadcaster ARD. The news has still prompted speculation on the internet.
The regional election committee has stated that it cannot find anything out of the ordinary. The committee is aware of a total of 16 deaths of candidates for the local elections, including members of a dozen political parties and associations, it said, adding that the numbers had “not significantly increased” in comparison to other election cycles.
AfD candidates still account for some 43% of all deaths reported by the committee, with all other affected political groups each confirming just one candidate death. An AfD deputy head and a Bundestag MP, Stephan Brandner, called the numbers “statistically conspicuous,” adding that they are “hard to explain.”
Some 20,000 seats will be up for grabs in the upcoming elections, according to Die Welt.
The party has steadily been gaining popularity in Germany. A poll conducted in mid-August suggested that it had overtaken Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s conservative bloc to become the country’s most popular.
The German domestic security service designated it a “confirmed far-right extremist” group in May, prompting the AfD to challenge the label in court. The country’s justice minister considered banning the party altogether later the same month.
