"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label Kerry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kerry. Show all posts

Friday, April 3, 2015

The Absurdity of Making a Nuclear Deal with Iran

Iran Accuses U.S. of Lying About New Nuke Agreement

Says White House misleading Congress, American people with fact sheet
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif
The Washington Free Beacon
BY: Adam Kredo  
April 2, 2015 5:40 pm

LAUSANNE, Switzerland Just hours after the announcement of what the United States characterized as a historic agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the country’s leading negotiator lashed out at the Obama administration for lying about the details of a tentative framework.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif accused the Obama administration of misleading the American people and Congress in a fact sheet it released following the culmination of negotiations with the Islamic Republic.

Zarif bragged in an earlier press conference with reporters that the United States had tentatively agreed to let it continue the enrichment of uranium, the key component in a nuclear bomb, as well as key nuclear research.


I have to admit that when I first saw this chart I was fairly impressed. It looked like a good deal, almost too good to be true. Turns out it is too good to be true. 

How often have you seen international agreements negotiated and then, within hours, one side is saying, "we didn't say that!"? How can that happen on some of the most significant aspects of the deal?  Whether or not Iran can continue to enrich uranium is the most urgent and pressing need in the negotiations and neither side seemed to clarify what they agreed to before they agreed to it.

Of course, there is the possibility that Iran did agree to what's on the fact sheet, but doesn't want to admit it to their own people. While that is possible, I don't think it's probable.

Even if Iran did agree to stop enriching uranium, they wouldn't! They are as trustworthy as Iraq when Sadam Hussein was president. Iran is very ambitious with its expansionism and will not give up on its obsession with obliterating Israel with nuclear bombs.

Zarif additionally said Iran would have all nuclear-related sanctions lifted once a final deal is signed and that the country would not be forced to shut down any of its currently operating nuclear installations.

Following a subsequent press conference by Secretary of State John Kerry—and release of a administration fact sheet on Iranian concessions—Zarif lashed out on Twitter over what he dubbed lies.

“The solutions are good for all, as they stand,” he tweeted. “There is no need to spin using ‘fact sheets’ so early on.”

Zarif went on to push back against claims by Kerry that the sanctions relief would be implemented in a phased fashion—and only after Iran verifies that it is not conducting any work on the nuclear weapons front.

Zarif, echoing previous comments, said the United States has promised an immediate termination of sanctions.

“Iran/5+1 Statement: ‘US will cease the application of ALL nuclear-related secondary economic and financial sanctions.’ Is this gradual?” he wrote on Twitter.

He then suggested a correction: “Iran/P5+1 Statement: ‘The EU will TERMINATE the implementation of ALL nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions’. How about this?”

The pushback from Iran’s chief diplomat follows a pattern of similar accusations by senior Iranian political figures after the announcement of previous agreements.

Following the signing of an interim agreement with Iran aimed at scaling back its nuclear work, Iran accused the United States of lying about details of the agreement.

On Thursday evening, Zarif told reporters the latest agreement allows Iran to keep operating its nuclear program.

Bushehr Nuclear Facility, Iran
“None of those measures” that will move to scale back Iran’s program “include closing any of our facilities,” Zarif said. “We will continue enriching; we will continue research and development.”

“Our heavy water reactor will be modernized and we will continue the Fordow facility,” Zarif said. “We will have centrifuges installed in Fordow, but not enriching.”

The move to allow Iran to keep centrifuges at Fordow, a controversial onetime military site, has elicited concern that Tehran could ramp up its nuclear work with ease.

Zarif said that once a final agreement is made, “all U.S. nuclear related secondary sanctions will be terminated,” he said. “This, I think, would be a major step forward.”

Zarif also revealed that Iran will be allowed to sell “enriched uranium” in the international market place and will be “hopefully making some money” from it.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Anti-Israeli Sentiments Growing in Germany with New Generation

Israel targets rising critical opinion in Germany

As celebrations kick off marking 50 years of diplomacy, an increasing number of Germans is expressing negative views.

Yermi Brenner War & Conflict, Human Rights, Politics, Europe, Middle East, Al Jezeera

Germany's Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Israel's
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speak at a press conference
Berlin, Germany - It is called "Israel Day" and it features lectures, cultural performances, open discussions in schools and universities, and even dance lessons with Israeli music.

Israel Day has taken place in more than 20 cities throughout Germany since 2006.

It is part of the Foreign Ministry's efforts to increase familiarity with the country and try to reverse what it sees as a worrying trend: growing criticism of Israel in German society - particularly its policies in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Sixty-two percent of Germans have a negative opinion of the Israeli government, according to a recent study by the non-profit Bertelsmann Foundation.

"Yes, we can say that among the [German] public opinion there is some withdrawal in the attitudes towards Israel," said Yakov Hadas-Handelsman, Israel's ambassador to Germany.

Yakov Hadas-Handelsman Israel's
ambassador to Germany
"It is not necessarily because of Israel. It's connected to many other things that concern the average German. We are trying to work on this, and change it."

While the ambassador implied Israel's policies were not to blame for growing negative attitudes towards Israel, the results of the Bertelsmann study and other polls suggest otherwise.

Is it really Israel's policies that are to blame or is it the perception of those policies as put forward by a largely anti-Semitic media in Europe? Liberal (left leaning) media in any country tends to side with the Palestinian people against the Israelis. Consequently, people who listen to that media have their opinions coloured by biased reporting that is sympathetic to Palestinians and condemning of Israel.

I hope to present a discussion soon on why it is that left-leaning people are almost always at least somewhat anti-Semitic and pro-Palestinian, and right-leaning people are almost invariably the opposite.

Germany remains Israel's main trading partner in the European Union and has delivered highly sophisticated attack submarines at subsidised prices, according to Der Spiegel.

But more than ever before, there seems to be a wide gap between the warm economic and diplomatic relations the two countries share, and the German people's views of Israel.

This year, the two countries mark a half a century of diplomatic relations, which began in 1965 - two decades after the Nazi regime was toppled and the Holocaust ended after millions of Jews were killed.

To celebrate the anniversary, the Israeli embassy in Berlin, in collaboration with the German foreign ministry, is organising a series of cultural events and ceremonies aimed at strengthening the connection between the nations. The Israeli Foreign Ministry has allocated US$1 million to its German embassy for celebrations.

Hadas-Handelsman said Germany is an economic superpower that is gaining weight when it comes to international diplomacy, and maintaining good relations with Berlin is essential for a state such as Israel.

"Germany is committed to its special responsibility towards the Jews and towards the state of Israel because of the past," said Hadas-Handelsman.

To some extent, this is not something that is specific to Israel. I think that liberal people are against any kind of occupation.

Stephan Vopel, Bertelsmann Stiftung
"But Germany is an ally of Israel not only because of the past. Germany and Israel share a lot when it comes to values, when it comes to the way we analyse the world, and especially the situation in the Middle East. We see many things eye-to-eye, or almost eye-to-eye."

'Critical perception'
The perception Germans have of Israel is based on a combination of both Germans trying to come to terms with their own past, and the way Israel is often portrayed in the media, which is mainly through the Middle East conflict, according to Stephan Vopel, programme director at the civil society group Bertelsmann Stiftung.

Germans feel historically responsibility for the plight of Jewish people during World War II, Vopel explained, but at the same time a main lesson learned was the need to preserve and protect universal human rights.

"I think these two things put together make it very difficult for Germans to understand Israel today, and I think this is probably one of the core reasons why Germans have a very critical perception of Israel," he said.

It's actually pretty simple: Israel wants to survive! The tiny country of a few million Jews is surrounded by hundreds of millions of Arabs and/or Muslims, all of whom want to see Israel disappear, and several of whom have stated that fact emphatically and often. Other countries are less obvious but fund anti-Israeli terrorists with many millions of dollars. Can you blame Israel for being a little insecure?

So the most basic of all rights, the right to life, should be high on the German psyche but it is not, and I think the media is to blame. They paint the Palestinians as victims, when they are the aggressors as far as terrorism is concerned, and anything that Israel does to protect its very existence is universally condemned in the media. 

"To some extent, this is not something that is specific to Israel," Vopel added.

"I think that liberal people are against any kind of occupation. It is the same as being against apartheid, or the mistreatment of migrants in Germany. I think this is a general part of liberalism."

I think he is right in that last statement, but not right in the previous. The fact is Palestinians who live in Israel would never willingly move to Gaza or the West Bank. Life is infinitely better in Israel. They have free health care - some of the best in the world, they have pensions when they retire, they have jobs and access to great schools. They will admit that they are treated much better by the Jews than by Palestinian authorities.

Nor would they willingly go to Jordan or Syria or one of the other countries where many Palestinians are warehoused without work, medical care or education. Arabs treat their own far worse than the Israelis. Why are Germans not up in arms about those Palestinians? They are far worse off than those on the West Bank or Gaza, yet you never hear a word of complaint about them in the media. Did you even know about them? That's anti-Semitism!

In Pew Research's 2013 Global Attitudes survey, Germany and France were the only Western countries in which a significant majority expressed unfavourable views of Israel.

Among Germans, negative attitudes were higher for 18 to 29-year olds, who are more detached from the Holocaust, said Vopel.

"I don't feel there is a contradiction between feeling historically responsibility to Israel, and criticising Israel's right-wing government," said Jan Lichtwitz, a 27-year-old law student in Berlin, who is active in the youth branch of the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD), a party that is part of the coalition governing Germany since 2013.

"We, as left-wing, have very close partners in Israel that are not part of the government and we stand with them when we criticise the settlement policy for example."

Lichtwitz said he is convinced of the necessity of Israel as a country where Jewish people can live securely, but building more Jewish settlements in the West Bank, he said, is an obstacle towards peace.

The concept of peace in the middle east is simply absurd. If it ever happens it will never last more than a few years. How can there be peace when very large, wealthy, Muslim countries want only the complete and utter destruction of Israel? Both sides of a conflict have to want peace and only Israel wants peace in the middle east.

In 2007, Lichtwitz spent a year in Jerusalem working with both Israelis and Palestinians at the Willy Brandt centre, a place for cross-cultural encounters and cooperation named after the SPD leader who served as West Germany's chancellor for more than two decades.

Conflict of values
SPD's current deputy chairman, Ralf Stegner, ignited public debate when he said last September - following the conflict between Israel and Hamas - that Germany should halt its arms exports to Israel.

Jan Lichtwitz says Israeli policies are
not conducive to the peace process
Stegner told the Die Welt newspaper he is not anti-Israel, but believes sending weapons to the Middle East does not contribute to resolving the conflict with the Palestinians.

He's right, of course. Not sending arms to Israel would insure it's complete destruction and the Palestinian conflict would be solved.

SPD's chairman, Sigmar Gabriel, responded by voicing his support for weapon deliveries to Israel - reflecting the conflict that exists here.

In the Bertelsmann study, more than 80 percent of German participants expressed negative views on Berlin supplying arms to Israel.

German law stipulates that the government must ensure German weapons do not end up being used in wars around the world.

Now this is a stupid law. If it were upheld, then Germany should not be able to sell arms anywhere in the world for they will surely end up being used in a conflict - that's what arms are for!

Nevertheless, Germany has been providing Israel with weaponry since the 1950s, according to a report by the Berlin-based Information Centre for Transatlantic Security, a non-governmental organisation focusing on security issues.

In the collision between two values enshrined in post-WWII German society - disinvolvement in wars and ensuring the security of Jews - the latter has, so far, decisively prevailed.

Larger mediator role
But Germany has also repeatedly criticised Israel's policies in the West Bank. Chancellor Angela Merkel was quoted as saying the building of settlements on Palestinian territory is a "grave concern".

After Sweden recognised Palestinian statehood, Merkel opposed the unilateral move, placing a significant diplomatic obstacle on the potential domino-effect recognition of Palestine in Europe.

This may change soon, according to Professor Hajo Funke of the Otto Suhr Institute of Political Science at Berlin Freie Universität.

"Yes, that can happen," Funke said. "As long as there is no [Israeli] will for a peace compromise with the Palestinians, it can be that the German public and the German parliament says we'll make a symbolic decision to acknowledge the Palestinians."

Here is an example of the misinformation and errant blaming that affects the German people. Israel wants peace, Gaza does not want peace they want the end of Israel and nothing else. Israel will not achieve peace by narrowing its borders to a 7 mile wide strip of land in the middle of the country which is completely and utterly indefensible. Such an agreement, as John Kerry is proposing will not bring peace, only destruction. Israel has to be defensible before there can be any peace whatsoever.

"This is symbolic but it may be important to give a signal to the Israeli public, to the Israeli discourse, to rethink the legitimacy of the current government," he told Al Jazeera.

Funke said he expected Germany to play a bigger role in future peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. He said after the failure of US-led negotiations after years, it is now more than ever time for Europeans to try to mediate peace.

For now, the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians is mostly dead. But the battle for the German public's support is alive and kicking.

The next "Israel Day" festivities are scheduled to take place this week in the German town of Celle.