John Cleese on the Muslim Desire to Dominate
When a politician in the West says something critical about Islam, he gets a week’s worth of attention, at best, too often quite hostile attention, and then the brief contretemps between supporters of the message and defenders of the faith (the faith being Islam) is soon forgotten. But this time, the broadside against Islam was delivered by John Cleese, he of Monty Python and Fawlty Towers fame.
The background to Cleese’s remark is this: during Ramadan, 3,000 Muslims swarmed into Trafalgar Square to say their prayers, bums in the air, heads bumping on the pavement so as to raise even higher the worshippers’ forehead zebibahs. They took over a public space, so that no others could enter. There was no need to hold the mass prayer service there; the Muslims could have chosen a place less central to London life, or instead have attended their own mosques to say those prayers and have their Iftar dinners. But this mass gathering was a political statement: we are here, we are many, we cannot be moved, we choose wherever we wish to say our prayers, no matter what the inconvenience may be to non-Muslims, or the outright alarm that such a spectacle may cause. This was not a quiet prayer service, a silent communing with God, but a noisy declaration of Muslim power and might.
There were protests about the Muslim muscle-flexing takeover of Trafalgar Square. And there was a defense of the massive attendance at the evening prayer-cum-iftar dinner from London’s Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan. One of the on-line protests came from John Cleese, who was having none of Khan’s defense of his fellow Muslims. More on his statement can be found here:
John Cleese hits out at ‘silly little man’ Sadiq Khan over Trafalgar Square iftar defence
by Lydia Davies, GB News, March 24, 2026:
John Cleese has intensified his criticism of London Mayor Sadiq Khan, launching a fresh attack on social media amid the ongoing row over mass Muslim prayer events in Trafalgar Square.
The Monty Python star initially took aim at Mr Khan after the Mayor defended a large-scale iftar gathering in central London, insisting public spaces should remain open, insisting the mass event was a celebration of the capital’s diversity.
In a social media clip, Mr Khan said: “Nobody wants to dominate… British people love having diversity… and as long as I’m mayor, Trafalgar Square… will be open to everyone.”
Do British people love diversity? Where is the evidence for Sadiq Khan’s claim? They may accept a certain amount of diversity, but they are no longer willing to suffer in silence the kind of domineering “diversity” that Muslims provide. Millions of Muslims have moved to the U.K. to take advantage of every benefit the generous British welfare state provides. Some of them supplement these benefits with crimes of property, including shoplifting, robberies, and house burglaries. The incidence of Muslims committing crimes of every kind, including crimes of violence, is many times that of non-Muslims.
In dozens of cities in the U.K., Muslims — overwhelmingly Pakistanis — have participated in grooming gangs. Their members, using drugs and drink and sweet talk, seduce young English girls from vulnerable backgrounds, turn them into sex slaves, subject them to mass rape, and then continue to pass them around for the sexual enjoyment of other Muslims, sometimes for years. There are no Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, or Sikh grooming gangs, a fact that deserves to be pondered. Tens of thousands of English girls have had their lives ruined by these grooming gangs.
Mr Cleese responded with a strongly worded post on X, writing: “Sorry to have to say this… The British do not like the kind of diversity that intends to take over Britain and kill any infidel who does not convert to Islam.
Let me repeat that bit from John Cleese: “Sorry to have to say this… The British do not like the kind of diversity that intends to take over Britain and kill any infidel who does not convert to Islam.”
It sounds as if John Cleese has been reading the Qur’an and hadith, which is something Keir Starmer has not done, for Cleese understands perfectly that Muslims believe they have a right to take over not just the U.K., but the whole world, and that Infidels — the “most vile of created beings” — must not be allowed to stand in their way.
He does err, however, in his claim that Muslims will “kill any infidel who does not convert to Islam.” Any Infidel who stands in the way of the spread of Islam deserves death. But an Infidel who is either a Christian or a Jew, and thus considered to be among the People of the Book, and who is willing to live as a dhimmi, need not be killed if he accepts a host of social, economic, and political disabilities. The most onerous of these obligations is the payment of the jizyah, a capitation tax imposed on non-Muslims, in return for which they are permitted to remain alive and even to practice their faith.
You never know with celebrities: which ones reveal themselves to be politically idiotic, and which ones pass with flying colors the intelligence and moral tests that arise, in considering the nature and menace of Islam. John Cleese turns out to be one of the latter, giving Mayor Sadiq Khan, and Muslims, a well-deserved verbal thrashing. Who would have thought that the Minister of Silly Walks would someday be an exemplar of good sense? A statesman, forsooth. Moving from the ridiculous to the sublime. As they say in Strine, Good On You, Mr. Cleese.
Welsh Government Spends $1,600,000 to Extirpate ‘White Privilege’
Wales, that gave us Dylan Thomas, David Jones, Richard Burton, and the Mabinogion, has now given us something much less appealing, by spending more than 1.2 million pounds ($1.6 million) on teaching students about that will-o’-the-wisp, “white privilege.” Although all over the Western world, and especially in academic centers, affirmative action rules the roost, and white candidates have learned, to their dismay, that they are now the victims of affirmative action, there are people who still believe that it is not affirmative action, but “white privilege” that needs to be ended if we are to have an “anti-racist” society.
More on this subject being taught in Welsh schools can be found in this February article that unfortunately remains relevant:
Teenagers taught about ‘white privilege’ in ‘anti-racist’ virtual reality metaverse
by Marcus Donaldson, GB News, February 8, 2026:
The Welsh Government has invested more than £1.2million in a virtual reality educational platform designed to lecture students about “white privilege”.
Described as the “world’s first anti-racist virtual world,” the immersive 3D environment has been deployed in colleges across Wales for pupils aged 16 and above since 2024.
Students navigate through a digital space featuring a central atrium decorated with portraits of civil rights figures, including Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela and Betty Campbell.
The platform contains interactive lessons covering “black feminism” and “decolonising politics,” with one section examining “sociology through an anti-racist lens.”
It also explores how “whiteness” manifests in language, policies and research, and how privilege affects social, educational and workplace settings.
Among the key terms students are encouraged to learn are “patriarchy” and “imperialism,” alongside the concept of “white privilege”, which the platform defines as “inherent advantages possessed by a white person, which means that during their day-to-day life, they do not have to consider their race.”…
But of course white people, constantly bombarded with the need to fight “white privilege,” and facing discrimination through affirmative action, do have to “ consider their race” at every turn.
“During the famine of 1770 the agricultural tax was increased from 10 per cent under the Mughals to 50 per cent under the British East India Company, leading to the loss of 10 million lives in Bengal, equivalent to the Black Death in Europe or the Holocaust,” the platform preaches.
It was the British who replaced the Muslim Mughals as the rulers of India. And it was during the Mughal rule that Muslims murdered 70-80 million Hindus. But apparently this is not to be mentioned; only the white Europeans are to be held accountable for mass deaths in India.
The metaverse also presents various strands of feminist thought, including psychoanalytical feminism, a 1970s theory which draws on the work of Sigmund Freud.
The Viennese witch-doctor is still molding dimwits from beyond the grave.
The platform describes this as a “theory of oppression that asserts that men have an inherent psychological need to subjugate women.”
It adds: “This branch of feminism seeks to gain insight into how our psychic lives develop in order to better understand and change women’s oppression.”…
There is oppression of women, but it’s not to be found any longer among the non-Muslims in Europe and North America. In those places, feminism has swept the board. But women continue to be oppressed in Muslim lands. It is the Qur’an that instructs husbands to “beat their wives” if they so much as suspect them of “disobedience.” It is Muslims who consider a female witness’ testimony to be worth half that of a man. It is Muslims who believe that a daughter should inherit only half that of a son. It is Muslim men who can divorce their wives merely by uttering — or even faxing — the triple-talaq, while a Muslim wife must go through a lengthy and expensive process to obtain a divorce. But don’t expect those Welsh people hoping to raise “awareness” of feminism to mention any of that. It would only encourage “Islamophobia,” and of course we can’t have that.
You can hardly open a history or literature textbook these days, from junior high through college, that doesn’t mention “feminism” and the need to pull down the soi-disant “patriarchy” that is supposedly destroying girls’ sense of self-worth. That may have once been true, but it is true no longer, and hasn’t been since the 1960s, when Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, and Ms. magazine first entered the feminist lists, and demanded equal rights, equal pay, equal everything — and what’s more, they got it.
Not enough “feminism” is being taught in schools? Oh dear, we can’t let that happen. Ladle out more of that feminism, please, lest society backslides on this most important of subjects.
Here’s glory for you: Wales aims to be “the world’s first anti-racist country by 2030.” And of course, the only kind of racism that the Welsh need to suppress is that of their indigenous citizens, still enjoying their “white privilege.” But how better to end “white privilege” than to practice “anti-white privilege,” which we know by another name — “affirmative action”?
Is it possible that “racism” does not explain differences in outcomes? Which ethnic groups place an emphasis on academic achievement? Is “white racism” to be blamed for the superior performance of Chinese students, as compared to the performances of black Africans? Is white racism what explains the poor performance of Muslims as compared to non-Muslims, or isn’t it, rather, the fact that Islam itself discourages free and skeptical inquiry, and instead encourages slavish acceptance of what is in the Qur’an and hadith?
“This pioneering project has delivered overwhelmingly positive outcomes and reflects our commitments to an anti-racist Wales, as well as reflecting similar offers within English institutions.”
What were those “overwhelmingly positive outcomes”? Have white people in Wales now learned to despise themselves for the “white privilege” they have enjoyed, and are now determined to make up for that condition by instead promoting “black and brown privilege”? And how long would that compensating privilege have to last before “racism” in Wales has been extirpated? Who will decide?
And what if the Welsh government were to decide to stop talking about “racism” and “anti-racism” and “white privilege” altogether, and instead have the schools in Wales teach English, and mathematics, and history, as they once did, in the days some now deem benighted, but we should now call enlightened.
No comments:
Post a Comment