Last week we told you about the Muslim MP in Ireland who demanded that Irish men clean up their sense of humour. Now, Scotland's Muslim First Minister wants Scottish men to be less masculine. This is just astonishing in its absurdity.
Humza Yousaf Wants Scottish Men
to Be Less Masculine
In a spectacular self-own (one of many) by Scotland’s First Minister Humza Yousaf, he calls for an end to toxic masculinity in Scotland. It’s curious that he knows what a man is but not what a woman is, given his party’s laws in regard to gender self-identification and the allowing of men to be housed in the women’s estate in Scottish prisons. The only toxic masculinity in Scotland today is witnessed among the trans community; females ingesting copious amounts of testosterone in order to be walking around looking like a caricature of a logger, which is a parody and an affront to men. It is also truly toxic because testosterone injections can cause high blood pressure, breathing problems, acne, fainting, and more.
Scots have a reputation around the world, alongside the Irish, as being ferocious in nature when it comes to protecting their land. If outnumbered, ill-equipped and on the verge of seeming defeat on the battlefield, they would resort to other tactics against their enemies, using whatever items they had at their disposal: “The local tribes, however, had learned not to face Rome in a pitched battle. They used guerrilla tactics to grind down the Roman army.” These ‘toxic’ gentlemen have given us the Scotland that Humza is presiding over today, and which he berates for being too white and now too toxic.
Humza took to X recently (formerly Twitter) to denounce Andrew Tate, and to urge young males not to follow in his example. Andrew Tate has recently converted to Islam, but perhaps Humza isn’t aware of this, otherwise he could be using him as a poster boy for conversion, since Yousaf has such close allegiances to the extremes of Islam. He doesn’t get too deep into what he thinks Tate is saying that is so toxic; he simply bleats on and on about male toxic behaviour. He goes so far as to call Tate a “hate preacher,” and he advocates looking for a “brave space” where men can talk (formerly a safe space). My opinion is that he is looking to sissify the nation, although it’s guaranteed that Muslim males won’t be taking his advice.
Let’s compare Andrew Tate and Islam. Tate has allegedly been running a sex-trafficking prostitution ring, a behaviour some might say is toxic but permissible if a female is willing to be a sex worker and is looking for a pimp, which is empowering to today’s feminists, with sex work being promoted on American university campuses as a legitimate career choice. Prostitution (zina) is forbidden in Islam (Qur’an 17:32 and Sahih al-Bukhari 6810). Islamic ingenuity finds a way to get around prostitution by having an imam conduct a temporary marriage. Nikah Mutah is a pleasure marriage, sanctioned by Muhammad himself, although Sunnis say he revoked this permission and Shi’ites insist that he did not. Such marriage is temporary; both parties agree to it, and an amount of money changes hands. In other words, it is religious Islamic prostitution.
Tate famously stated: “I ain’t having my chicks talking to other dudes, liking other dudes. My chicks don’t go to the club without me, they are at home.” Sound familiar? It’s because a vast portion of Muslim women aren’t allowed to leave the house without a guardian accompanying them. This person is known as a mahram, and is usually a male: “Mahram comes from the word ‘Haram’… In Islamic law, Mahram means a person who you are not allowed to marry, and it is permissible to see them without a headscarf and shake their hands and hug them if you like.” David Cameron was berated as far back as 2016 for pointing out that a portion of Muslim women in the UK were being held almost hostage in their homes by their husbands and forbidden to learn English, which would have helped their education, career, and social performances.
“I think the women belong to the man.” Uttered by Tate, and in accordance with Islamic theology that a man is the maintainer and keeper of his women.
Tate is gloating on Twitter about the benefits of having 4 wives, which must be a conundrum for Humza since Islam permits this even in the UK, and the government goes along with it by giving them financial support. Muslim marriages aren’t recognised in UK law unless the couple register themselves. Many Muslims believe that the nikah ceremony performed by the imam is enough. That itself is a loophole for polygamy, since many Muslim couples aren’t also having the required civil ceremony, which would protect the woman’s rights in the case of divorce, as well as preventing marriage to more than one woman.
Tate encourages violence against critics (see Muhammad’s assassination of the poetess Asma bint Marwan, for starters). He states that “the universe has always ensured that the weak were conquered… if you allow yourselves to be constantly mocked… You will be crushed and replaced by Islam.”
Tate is a kickboxer, and a pretty good one I’d assume, given that he won the world championship four times. He likes violence and trains for it. About converting to Islam, he stated: “I think it’s the last religion… It’s the last one, because no other religion has boundaries which they enforce. If you will tolerate everything, then you stand for nothing…” You can see the attraction – the jihad and the call to arms, the sword of Islam and the enforcement of laws.
Mostly everything about Tate sounds odious and toxic to me, but you can see why Islam is the perfect religious partner for him, his drives, his personality, and all of his traits. Humza’s call for less toxic masculinity in Scotland is actually Humza calling for less Islam, since the things he deems toxic about Tate are all Islamic, and are the things which drew Tate to becoming a Muslim. The very things Tate stands for and the ideas he espouses are the very fundamentals of Islamic masculinity. Tate, now that he’s a Muslim, is free to be more toxic than the West would allow by virtue of having religious protections that are encoded in law. He can participate in polygamy and his wives will be free to continue engaging in prostitution via the legal religious means of Islam. Humza, meanwhile, clearly means his call for non-Muslims, not for Muslims. Non-Muslims in Scotland should ponder that fact.
It took less than ten years for Mother Merkel's astonishingly stupid wide-open doors policy to result in 'no-go areas for Jews'. It took only a couple years for there to be 'no-go areas for girls'. In another ten years, Germany will find it easier to list the safe areas for girls and Jews.
Germany: Student who ‘represented pro-
Palestinian positions’ savagely beats
Jewish student, victim is hospitalized
Universities in Germany (and the U.S.) are becoming “no-go areas for Jews,” as the violence and thuggery that everyone excuses becomes increasingly emboldened and widespread.
Central Council President warns of 'no-go areas for Jews'
translated from “Zentralratspräsident warnt vor »No-go-Areas für Juden«,” Spiegel, February 6, 2024:
After an attack on a student at the Free University of Berlin in Berlin, the President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, Josef Schuster, demanded that universities should not become “no-go areas for Jews.” “At the latest when the verbal violence turns into physical violence, the threat situation should be clear to everyone,” Schuster told the “Bild” newspaper. “Jewish students are threatened and are also in danger outside the campus.”
Schuster continued: “It is all the more important that universities do not become no-go areas for Jews.” Rather, universities must “create a safe environment for Jewish students and not give any room to extremists.”
The 30-year-old Jewish student Lahav Shapira was beaten to the point of hospital on Saturday night in the Mitte district by a 23-year-old fellow student who is said to have represented pro-Palestinian positions. According to police, this was preceded by an argument between the two students.
However, a companion of Shapira told “Zeit Online” that there had been no argument between the two men. Accordingly, the fellow student recognized Shapira in a bar and followed him when she and Shapira left the bar. On the street, the later attacker asked Shapira about his commitment to Jewish students at the university and then struck. (Read more about the incident here)
Since Hamas’ terrorist attack on Israel and Israel’s counterattack in the Gaza Strip, a conflict has been simmering between pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel students at the FU Berlin. Lahav Shapira is the brother of satirist Shahak Shapira.
Why is the Jewish victim named in this article and the Muslim perpetrator not named? Was the perpetrator charged by police?
Berlin police are good at protecting Muslim criminals. Not so good at protecting Jewish victims.
Devout Muslims believe Europeans owe them a living. It's their right to avoid work and collect money from the state, according to the Quran.
Muslim migrant says he came to France ‘because of the money they give us’
Non-Muslims paying for the upkeep of Muslims is a Qur’anic dictate: “Fight against those do not believe in Allah or the last day, and do not forbid what Allah and his messenger have forbidden, and do not follow the religion of truth, even if they are among the people of the book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” (Qur’an 9:29)
The caliph Umar said the jizya payments from the dhimmis were the source of the Muslims’ livelihood: “Narrated Juwairiya bin Qudama at-Tamimi: We said to `Umar bin Al-Khattab, ‘O Chief of the believers! Advise us.’ He said, ‘I advise you to fulfill Allah’s Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)’” (Bukhari 4.53.388)
UK jihad preacher Anjem Choudary said in February 2013: “We are on Jihad Seekers Allowance, We take the Jizya (protection money paid to Muslims by non-Muslims) which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the Kafir (non-Muslim), isn’t it? So this is normal situation. They give us the money. You work, give us the money. Allah Akbar, we take the money. Hopefully there is no one from the DSS (Department of Social Security) listening. Ah, but you see people will say you are not working. But the normal situation is for you to take money from the Kuffar (non-Muslim) So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance.”
=============================================================================================
Radicalization in Islam is instant madness. Personally, I believe it is instant, demonic possession as his apparent, sudden desire to kill would suggest.
France: Recent convert to Islam causes panic
by threatening woman with knife
‘on the pretext of his Muslim faith’
It looks as if this new convert learned the tenets of his new faith quickly. French authorities, however, were ready, and have already classified him as “mentally ill,” their ever-present fallback. They refuse to admit that jihad exists, and routinely classify jihadis as mentally ill.
Opinel is a French knife manufacturer.
Draveil: Young Convert to Islam Arrested After
Threatening a Woman with a Knife
translated from “Draveil : Un Jeune Converti à l’Islam Interpellé Après Avoir Menacé une Femme avec un Couteau,” CNews, February 5, 2024 (thanks to Medforth):
Equipped with an opinel, a man threatened a person in one of the streets of Draveil, in Essonne, on Sunday morning, on the pretext of his Muslim faith.
Panic gripped the streets of Draveil, in Essonne, on Sunday morning. Converting to Islam barely a month ago, a 22-year-old man caused panic among passers-by before being apprehended by the police.
This individual threatened a person with a knife and approached a second man demanding money, CNEWS learned from a police source, confirming information from Europe 1.
The police acted quickly thanks to the victims’ testimonies as well as a photo provided by a witness, our colleagues report. This photo was a crucial element in identifying and locating the suspect.
The first victim was targeted while returning home around 10 a.m. The assailant, armed with an opinel, confronted the woman in the middle of the street, discussing her recent conversion to Islam.
The man then aggressively approached other people, demanding money under the pretext of his Muslim faith.
In keeping with the story immediately above. As a Muslim, he has a right to your money.
A search was immediately carried out at the individual’s home, his aunt’s house. Authorities discovered the man suffered from psychiatric disorders, which may have contributed to his alarming behavior.
More than likely, it contributed to his conversion to Islam. Some psychiatric disorders are demonically influenced and leave one vulnerable to demonic possession.
===============================================================================
UK: Muslim migrant jihadi allowed to stay in country,
referred to mental health team after each violent offense
Then he murdered three people, and became a case study of why classifying violent jihadis as “mentally ill” and ignoring their jihad sentiments for fear of charges of “Islamophobia” is unwise (at best).
Terrorist who killed three people allowed to stay in Britain
after series of ‘woeful’ errors
by George Bunn, GB News, February 6, 2024:
A terrorist who murdered three people was allowed to stay in the country after a series of “woeful” Home Office errors.
Khairi Saadallah murdered James Furlong, 36, Joseph Ritchie-Bennett, 39, and David Wails, 49, in Forbury Gardens, Reading, on Saturday June 20, 2020.
Now, an inquest has heard how Saadallah had wrongly been granted five years’ humanitarian leave to remain by the Home Office.
The department made a series of “woeful” errors in handling the case, which included allowing him to stay in the country even though he had served five prison sentences for violent offences….
The inquest was told that the Home Office had no record of Saadallah’s arrival in Britain on a multiple-entry tourist visa with his father in March 2012 and again in September 2012, reports The Times.
The department also had no record of his failure to depart by the visa expiry date on September 28 before he claimed asylum on October 16.
Six years later, Saadallah was still in the country. This is despite exhausting all his appeals, after launching a new legal challenge to his deportation.
He argued that Libya had become unsafe in the meantime due to a new round of conflict in the country. He was eventually granted five years’ leave to remain on a humanitarian protection basis and withdrew his legal appeal.
Saadallah admitted being a member of Ansar al-Sharia in Libya, a group which has been linked to Isis, during the uprising against Colonel Gaddafi in 2011, the year before he arrived in Britain and claimed asylum.
He was jailed five times for a string of violent offences and repeatedly referred to a mental health crisis team each time he was released.
Saadallah was also paid compensation due to the fact that there had been a delay in issuing him with a biometric card to allow him to claim benefits….
Good grief! There is absolutely no hope for Britain!
=================================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment