The Islamization of the UK > Egypt Accuses Keir Starmer of Lying over Violent Terrorist

 

Egypt Accuses Keir Starmer of Lying

Dec 30, 2025 4:00 pm By Hugh Fitzgerald18 Comments

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was “delighted” to welcome Alaa Abd el-Fattah “back” to the UK after he was released from his decade-long prison term in Egypt. Then the news came out about el-Fattah’s social media posts, in which he called for “killing all the Jews” and “white people,” and for good measure, every member of the British police. Starmer then insisted he had not known any of this, and he certainly was not any longer “delighted” with Abd el-Fattah’s return to the UK. But he did not say, as the Tories have demanded, that he would strip el-Fattah of his British citizenship, that had been given to him in 2021 in the hope that it would cause the Egyptian government to go lightly on his sentence for “spreading false news” and agitating against the state. Nor would Starmer, as the Tories also now demand, deport Abd el-Fattah either back to Egypt or to any Muslim state — Iran? Afghanistan? — ready to take him. But now the plot thickens: the government of Egypt claims that Starmer is lying, that all along Cairo had kept him informed of Abd el-Fattah’s “extremism,” including the contents of his social media posts. More on the Egyptian charge against Starmer can be found here: 

Egypt says U.K. PM Starmer is lying

— and knew all about Abd El-Fattah’s extremism

by Monica Showalter, American Thinker, December 29, 2025:

A few days ago, U.K., Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer triumphantly announced that he had ‘rescued’ an Islamist ‘democracy activist’ and ‘political prisoner‘ with a gargantuan hatred for Jews and the West from an Egyptian prison where he was serving time for inciting violence on social media.

I’m delighted that Alaa Abd El-Fattah is back in the UK and has been reunited with his loved ones, who must be feeling profound relief.

I want to pay tribute to Alaa’s family, and to all those that have worked and campaigned for this moment.

Alaa’s case has been a top priority…

— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) December 26, 2025

When news of just what was in Alaa Abd El-Fattah’s social media posts got out — about killing Jews, raping white women, calling for more terror attacks on the West, calling for burning down No. 10 Downing Street, declaring white people ‘not human,’ and other horrible stuff, Starmer claimed he had no idea about the posts and primly called them ‘abhorrent.’

Now Egypt says he was lying:

Important update: Cairo has outright rejected Starmer’s reported assertion that he was unaware of Alaa’s record of incitement to violence, maintaining that British officials were explicitly briefed on the matter.

Late tonight, I received a message from a well-connected… https://t.co/KP7L4NEhPF

— Khaled Hassan (@Khaledhzakariah) December 29, 2025

It seems credible that Egypt would have told them all about it as the Brits made their pleas to let this extremist out. They did, after all, put him in jail for a reason. And they undoubtedly resented the backstory here, that Britain would be holding up Egypt as a bad guy on the human rights front over this innocent guy who only wanted to rape white women and kill every Jew….

Making a bad situation even worse is the fact that Abd el-Fattah had never even lived in the UK.

Isn’t it clear that the Egyptian government would of course have kept the British government well-informed about Abd el-Fattah’s extremism, including his posts on Jews, white people, and the police. The Egyptians had a vested interest in proving to the British that there was good reason to imprison him, and his series of tweets were evidence enough to make their case. Starmer has been caught in a lie. He is the most unpopular prime minister in the last century, and this business about Abd el-Fattah — “what did Starmer know and when did he know it?” — may be enough to sink his already listing ship of state, the S.S. Naufragium, now just barely bobbing above its Plimsoll line.

===============================================================================================

Ozzone 11-29 > Does the Spirit of Truth glorify God through you?

 

This Week's Islamic Massacres > Mosque bombings take 13 lives and wound ~53 in Syria and Nigeria

 

Syria: Muslims murder eight people in jihad attack

at Alawite mosque

Dec 30, 2025 3:00 pm By Robert Spencer6 Comments

The Qur’an forbids Muslims to kill other Muslims (4:92), but Sunni jihadis consider Alawites to be hypocrites or apostates.

Islamist militant group claims deadly bombing of Alawite mosque in Syria’s Homs

France 24, December 26, 2025:

At least eight people were killed in an explosion at the Imam Ali Bin Abi Talib Mosque, an Alawite-majority site in Homs, on Friday, Syrian state news agency SANA reported.

SANA cited Syrian Health Ministry official Najib al-Naasan as saying at least 18 others were wounded, noting that the figures were preliminary and could rise.

Homs city’s press office said security forces had cordoned off the area following the blast.

Local official Issam Naameh said the blast took place during Friday noon prayers, typically the busiest time for mosques.

An Islamist militant group, Saraya Ansar al-Sunna, later claimed responsibility for the attack via a statement on Telegram, saying its fighters “detonated a number of explosive devices” inside the mosque.

The group, formed after the ouster of Bashar al-Assad, had previously claimed a Damascus church attack in June….

Nigeria: Jihad suicide bomber murders five people at mosque for being the wrong kind of Muslim

Dec 30, 2025 9:00 am By Robert Spencer2 Comments

If you’re the wrong kind of Muslim, watch out: Allah guarantees Paradise to those who “kill and are killed” for him (Qur’an 9:111).

Blast at Nigeria mosque kills 5, injures 35 in apparent suicide attack

CBS News, December 25, 2025:

A bomb exploded during prayers at a mosque in Nigeria’s northeastern city of Maiduguri on Wednesday night, killing five people in what police described as a likely suicide attack.

Police said 35 people were also injured in the attack.

Nahum Daso, spokesperson for police command in the surrounding state of Borno, said in a statement that fragments of a suspected suicide vest were found at the site.

Borno State Governor Babagana Zulum condemned the attack, calling it “barbaric and inhumane,” the Reuters news agency reports. In a statement, he urged heightened vigilance in places of worship and public spaces during the festive season.

The bombing is the latest in a series of attacks in Nigeria’s troubled northern region, where the country is battling multiple armed groups, including Boko Haram and its splinter group, Islamic State West Africa Province.

Several thousand people have been killed, with millions displaced from their homes since 2009, according to the United Nations.

No group has claimed responsibility for the latest attack, but the use of suicide bombers has been heavily attributed to Boko Haram, the Islamic militant group that has claimed responsibility for many such attacks across the northeastern region….

Stanford study > At least 20,000 deaths from Covid Vax

 

Stanford led study: at least 20,000 global deaths from COVID jabs

New COVID Vax Paper Breaks with the Narrative

Dr. Robert W. Malone

Dec 23, 2025

By trialsitenews , republished by permission

TrialSite Staff | Making Biomedical Research Evidence Accessible to All

Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Dec. 23, 2025, 5:30 a.m.

In a high-profile analysis published in JAMA Health Forum, a team from Stanford University, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore and the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS led by John P. A. Ioannidis set out to answer one of the most contested questions of the pandemic era: How many lives did COVID-19 vaccination actually save worldwide? The study estimates that COVID-19 vaccination averted approximately 2.5 million deaths globally between 2020 and 2024, with a wide uncertainty range of 1.4 to 4.0 million, and saved about 15 million life-years, though results depend heavily on modeling assumptions. Nearly 90% of deaths averted occurred in adults aged 60 years and older, while children, adolescents, and young adults contributed a negligible share of the total benefit. Compared with earlier pandemic models, these findings suggest a far more limited, age-concentrated mortality benefit, particularly during the Omicron period and among those vaccinated before first infection.

A Quiet but Explosive Admission

Dr. Ioannidis and colleagues make an unusually candid concession for a high-profile vaccine-benefit paper: they do not separate deaths averted by vaccine effectiveness from deaths caused by vaccine-related harms. In fact they explicitly acknowledge that randomized trial data are insufficient to quantify vaccine-associated mortality and that estimates derived from registries and observational sources carry “substantial uncertainty.”

This is not a minor caveat—it is a structural limitation of the analysis. The authors further note that, depending on ethical framing and risk aversion, a death caused by an intervention may not be considered equivalent to a death averted by it, particularly when harms cluster in specific subpopulations.

To put bounds around this uncertainty, the authors turn to eAppendix 2 (Supplement 1), where they restrict analysis to widely recognized and accepted fatal adverse events: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after adenovirus-vector vaccines, myocarditis following mRNA vaccines (primarily in younger males), and deaths temporally associated with vaccination in highly debilitated nursing-home residents.

Using global administration data (~13.64 billion doses) and conservative risk assumptions, they estimate roughly 20,000 vaccine-associated deaths worldwide, while an independent extrapolation from Qatar’s national mortality review suggests a broader range of approximately 16,000 to 48,000 deaths.

Compared with the study’s central estimate of ~2.5 million lives saved, this supports the authors’ statement that vaccine-related deaths were “probably” about two orders of magnitude lower than benefits at the population level.

The critical word is “probably.” The authors explicitly state that these adverse-event death estimates carry “very large uncertainty” and emphasize that the margin between benefit and harm may be substantially smaller—or even reversed—in specific subgroups where risks are concentrated and benefits are limited, such as younger males or frail elderly residents.

In effect, the paper concedes that while COVID-19 vaccination likely reduced mortality overall, net benefit was neither uniform nor guaranteed across populations. A bombshell acknowledgment—confined to the supplement rather than the abstract—directly challenges any absolutist claim that vaccine harms were negligible or irrelevant and represents a rare moment of methodological and ethical candor in the COVID-19 vaccine literature.

Please continue reading on Dr Malone's substack at:

What the Study Did—and Did Not—Do

=============================================================================================