Two Muslims Slash the Face of an American ‘Good Samaritan’ in Germany
And the German government tried to persuade him to keep quiet about it.
More on this attempt to prevent the people of Germany from learning about Muslim crimes can be found here:
German Government ‘tried to cover up Syrian migrant’s attack on Good Samaritan tourist'
by Oliver Rickwood, GB News, July 27, 2026:
An American tourist who was left disfigured after intervening in an assault on a woman aboard a German tram has claimed the country’s Government tried to cover up his attack.
John Rudat, a 21-year-old model, was slashed with a box cutter when he tried to protect two women from being “assaulted and harassed” in Dresden last August.
The attack left him with a scar stretching from beneath his eye, across his nose and through his upper lip, requiring extensive surgery.
Such facial wounds, and subsequent cicatrization, will make it impossible for John Rudat to continue his career as a model.
The 21-year-old Syrian national who inflicted the life-changing injuries was handed a three-year youth prison sentence, while his accomplice, who also assaulted Mr Rudat, was suspended on probation for a year and eight months.
Speaking exclusively to GB News, Mr Rudat claimed a minister ordered him to “keep quiet” about his ordeal while he was in hospital….
“What everybody was really confused about, including my lawyer when I went over there to testify, was why these grown men were being tried under juvenile law. It doesn’t make sense.”…
Why would the two attackers have been sentenced incorrectly, as John Rudat maintains, as juveniles, and thus given more lenient sentences? It is all part of the German government’s relentless effort to downgrade the seriousness of Muslim crime in the eyes of the public, by having some crimes incorrectly characterized as “committed “by juveniles,” with their sentences being similarly mild. In this case the main attacker was sentenced to only three years in a juvenile facility, while the other Muslim involved was given no jail time, but only 18 months on probation. Considering the violence of their attack, which was in effect an assault with a deadly weapon, these sentences were — are — an outrage.
It remains unclear whether they will be deported.
Why would they not be deported? They are violent criminals; even before their attack on John Rudat, they had been arrested many times for attacking police officers, and for drug trafficking. What is the likelihood that they will ever be productive and well-integrated members of German society? And what is the likelihood that they will revert to lives of violent crime? The people of Germany need not endure their presence.
Both defendants expressed remorse and apologised for their actions, claiming they had been drunk at the time of the attack.
Yes, of course, drunk people so often to take out their box cutters — doesn’t everyone carry them? — in order to slice up the face of anyone who gets in their way. These were two ordinarily peaceful Muslims; please don’t bring up their many previous convictions for attacking the police and for drug trafficking. It will only confuse people.
Clearly, John Rudat is both a Good Samaritan and a hero, who went immediately into action to prevent two men from attacking two women on a train in Dresden. He was horrified at the German government’s attempt to have him keep quiet about the attack by two Muslims; he may not have understood that such an attempt was part of that government’s deliberate attempt to limit popular alarm over Germany’s burgeoning Muslim population, and what that Muslim presence means both for Germany’s economic well-being and for its soaring crime rate.
There is, no doubt, also a political angle to this in that the government doesn't want the real dangers of violent migrants to make headlines because it will lead to an AfD government after the next election.
The government is happy to sacrifice a few hundred girls and a few heroic foreigners to stop the AfD from actually dealing with the problem.
After Jihad Attack on Gay Pride Parade, Germans Focus on the REAL Enemy
New in PJ Media:
Abdul Ballout, a Muslim who greatly admired the Islamic State (ISIS), on Saturday became a jihad warrior in his own right, plowing his car into a crowd of revelers at Berlin’s Christopher Street Day (CSD) parade, a popular and well-attended Gay Pride event.
In doing so, Ballout murdered one person and injured another 29, and engaged in a kind of jihad attack that his beloved ISIS and other jihadis have many times called upon Muslims in Western countries to undertake. As far back as September 2014, the Islamic State issued this call: “Strike their police, security, and intelligence members, as well as their treacherous agents. Destroy their beds. Embitter their lives for them and busy them with themselves. If you can kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French — or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be.” ISIS helpfully listed a number of these possible ways to commit murder, including “run him over with your car.”
Now, however, numerous Germans and others are making it clear that the worst outcome of this attack would be if anyone got the idea that there was any problem with the left’s favorite religion, Islam. As Ben Bartee noted Wednesday, the Queer Commissioner of the Berlin State Government (yes, that’s a real government position), Alfonso Pantisano (a Teutonic name for the ages), has zeroed in on Germany’s real problem: “The far right here in Germany is, of course, waiting for an attack like this one, to use it in order to highlight that the foreigners are the problem.”
Pantisano is not the only one sounding this warning. The organizers of the Christopher Street Day (CSD) parade themselves declared: “We don’t want this act to be exploited for political purposes or for people to be placed under general suspicion. Such violence is an attempt to divide our society and incite people against each other. We, as Berlin CSD, will not allow this.” That’s tellin’ em! If those nasty right-wingers come around, we know you’ll show ‘em who’s boss!
Meanwhile, before all the details about Abdul Ballout came to light, a singer at the parade declared that her hope that the murderer was “no Kanake, but a Christian white person.” “Kanake,” a word generally seen as offensive, refers to Muslims and Arabs.
There is more. Read the rest here.
It's not that LGBTQ people actually like Islam, it's that right-wing politicians have the common sense to see that both Islam and LGBTQ ideologies are bad for a sane society - and they (LGBTQs) don't like it. The enemy of my friend is my enemy, or something like that.
==============================================================================
Germany: Domestic intelligence agency says there are 9,110 ‘violent Islamist extremists’ nationwide
Many years ago, the Islamic State (ISIS) explained that its strategy was to overwhelm Western law enforcement and intelligence agencies with so many jihadis, so many cases, that the systems would collapse, paving the way for an Islamic takeover. However close that takeover may be, the overwhelming of the system is certainly happening now.
Meanwhile, the longer these people are called “Islamists” and “extremists,” and the longer that intelligence agencies ignore or deny the fact that the behavior of such people is rooted in Islam, the more it will proliferate. One cannot solve a problem when one refuses to understand its cause.

Germany Tracks 9,110 Violent Islamists After Deadly Berlin Attack
by Zoltán Kottász, European Conservative, July 27, 2026 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Following the terrorist attack on Berlin’s Christopher Street Day parade, questions are being raised over Germany’s legal system handling dangerous immigrants.
Germany’s domestic intelligence agency believes there are 9,110 violent Islamist extremists nationwide, according to security figures that have been newly highlighted by the German media following Saturday’s deadly attack in Berlin.
The figures, released amid the investigation into the attack on the city’s Christopher Street Day celebrations, show that German authorities identified 28,645 Islamists across the country in 2025. Of those, around 450 are classified as individuals considered capable of committing serious politically motivated crimes, including terrorist attacks.
Of course, the other 28,195 are capable of being radicalized on a moment's notice, or at the drop of a Quran, or a cartoon of Mohammed.
In Berlin, the city’s domestic intelligence service has identified almost 2,600 Islamists, with more than 900 classified as prone to violence. Among the largest groups are around 350 violent Salafists and approximately 500 supporters of Hamas and Hezbollah, while officials say no verified figure exists for supporters of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group….
================================================================================================
German Police Union Demands Changes to Citizenship, Deportation, and Asylum Laws
The latest Muslim atrocity in Germany — the Allahu-akbaring Abdul Ballout running his white van into the Pride Event crowd in Berlin, killing one person and wounding twenty-nine — has finally pushed the German Police Union to demand major changes to how immigrants are dealt with, how citizenship is conferred, and what conditions will lead to deportation of migrants. More on the police union’s demands can be found here:
German Police Union Calls for Tougher Migration Laws After Berlin Attack
by Zoltán Kottász, European Conservative, July 30, 2026:

Muslim migrants have little desire to be “fully integrated” into Germany society, since their values are so different from those of the Infidels whom they despise as “the most vile of created beings.” If the police union’s demand is met — citizenship provided only to those migrants who have fully integrated into German society — very few Muslim migrants will be eligible for citizenship. And without that citizenship, they will not be able to vote but will, however, as non-citizens be easier to deport.
The call comes after Saturday’s Islamist attack on Berlin’s Pride celebrations, in which one woman was killed and dozens of others were injured. The attacker, 21-year-old German-Lebanese Islamist Abdul Ballout, had been classified as a high-risk extremist and was under surveillance before carrying out the assault.
Investigations have since revealed that police monitored Ballout until shortly before the attack, but surveillance footage from a hidden camera outside his home was reviewed only once every 24 hours rather than in real time. Ballout had previously been convicted of preparing a serious act of violence but was released on probation after a court accepted that he had renounced extremism.
Good grief! Courts are so stupid! Why would they believe a murderous extremist?
It is maddening to the police that the German courts have proven to be so gullible. All that the Pride Event attacker, Abdul Ballout, had to do to be released from prison was to assure a court that he had “renounced extremism.”
Beyond citizenship law, the DPolG is calling for stricter deportation rules, arguing that courts too often block removals because they do not consider individuals to present a sufficient threat to public safety. The union also wants asylum legislation tightened, particularly the rules governing the withdrawal of protection status from refugees who voluntarily return to their countries of origin….
When those who have been granted asylum status in Germany return temporarily to their countries of origin, this is proof that they are no longer in danger in those countries, and therefore should have that asylum status removed.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has proven to be a milquetoast who is afraid to deport Syrians — there are now 960,000 Syrian citizens living in Germany — even though the fall of the Assad regime and the end of the Syrian civil war mean they need no longer need such asylum.
Syria itself has no intention in bringing home its citizens who fled the country after the outbreak of the civil war in 2011. Syrian foreign minister Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani recently said that “Syrians in exile are strategic national assets, not burdens.”
Al-Shaibani is right, of course. The millions of Syrians now living abroad are supporters of, and agents for, the regime now ruling in Damascus. That is why the Syrian government wants them to remain in place, and why, for the well-being of their European hosts, they must be deported back to Syria.
The Syrian soi-disant “refugees” in Germany who return to vacation in Syria thereby demonstrate they no longer fear persecution or worse from the new regime, and therefore, ought now to be deported. But that sensible measure will not be adopted until Chancellor Merz, so fearful of being accused of “racism” and “Islamophobia,” is replaced by the Alternative für Deutschland’s clear-headed leader, Alice Weidel. Her elevation, should it come, can’t come fast enough.

