"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label resignation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label resignation. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Canadian Convulsions > Rachel Marsden Nails Trudeau Right-on

 

Trudeau’s term as PM was a boon for Canada, but not the way he expected


The outgoing leader managed to unite his nation, most of which now hates him
Trudeau’s term as PM was a boon for Canada, but not the way he expected











Another one bites the dust. Before he can get pushed into it. 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau came back from a rough Christmas break and promptly resigned. During his holiday downtime, he headed over to the westernmost province of British Columbia for some skiing, where he was caught on camera being welcomed by a local, who said as he went over to shake her hand, “Mr. Prime Minister, please get the f**k out of BC. You suck!” A growing chorus of homegrown profanity has followed Trudeau wherever he ends up going.

Merely days later, on January 6, he stood in front of the press at his Rideau Cottage residence and announced that he was stepping down, citing the desire to offer Canadians a “real choice.” Like he was sacrificing himself for the greater good of the country. In reality, he was just battering himself up and tossing himself on the barbecue before his own party did – which they were expected to do just two days later at a caucus meeting.

During his announcement, Trudeau demonstrated that he’s suffering from an incurable case of woke mind virus. He underscored his commitment to Ukraine, to “truth and reconciliation” with natives, and to climate change. Meanwhile, Canadians of all political stripes and backgrounds are more focused now on how to save their own behinds from impending economic doom, exacerbated by the carbon tax imposed by Trudeau, than they are with the abstract notion that by slitting their fiscal wrists for the planet, they can control its temperature.

Immigration has exploded under Trudeau to the point where it’s affecting housing and jobs, while also treating Canadians to a taste of various global conflicts right at home. You used to have to actually go abroad for that, but now you can have it Ubered right to your door. Literally. “Why do so many ‘skilled’ Indian migrants work as drivers in Canada?” someone asked on Quora, for instance.

There’s also the ongoing traveling roadshow of gunplay between Khalistani Sikh separatists and their opponents. And the Israel-Palestine protests and counterprotests, one of which saw a participant threaten her opponents with another Holocaust, then asking if they needed clarification on what that was because she’d gladly explain it. Canadians – always polite and helpful.

The NATO-backed Ukrainian conflict with Russia also culminated at home in Team Trudeau celebrating an honored Canadian guest during a visit from Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky – who also happened to be a bona fide World War II-era Ukrainian Nazi who had served in Heinrich Himmler’s Waffen-SS.

If Trudeau wanted to bring the country together, he’s finally succeeded. Not through any contrived “truth and reconciliation” initiatives, but rather organically by virtue of the fact that Canadians now overwhelmingly agree that he sucks. All but 20 percent of the population, according to the latest polling. If that still seems like a lot, it is. Like, who are these people?

It’s worth remembering that there’s a significant chunk of the Canadian electorate that would reflexively vote for the self-styled “natural governing party” of Liberals even if they were lobotomized. Which they might be. After all, when Trudeau marginalized those who opted to pass on the Covid shots, they willingly fell into line and picked fights with friends and family.

“When people see that we are in lockdowns or serious public health restrictions right now because of the risk posed to all of us by unvaccinated people, people get angry,” Trudeau said three years ago, blaming the pro-choice for his own government’s draconian diktats.  And when Trudeau blamed Russian disinformation for the fact that everyone was laughing at him applauding a Nazi, some Canadians actually listened and complied, with all the power that their remaining functional neurons could muster.

But one could also say that these credulous Canadians are victims, too. After all, under Team Trudeau during the Covid fiasco, the military used social media to deploy weapons-grade propaganda honed on the battlefield of Afghanistan to enforce establishment narratives, as the Ottawa Citizen reported in 2021.

Then there are Canadians who fear the so-called scary “fascist” (but actually frustratingly centrist) Conservatives more than they do the guy whose party actually blocked bank accounts of honking Covid-era anti-mandate Freedom Convoy Protesters, and actually have to be told in a ruling by a federal judge that he overshot his authority.

But in announcing his exit, Trudeau has also joined the many other Western establishment leaders trying to save their shared establishment agenda from voter wrath, particularly of the populist kind, as they seek to purge their national leadership of anyone considered even remotely involved with the mess made.

Romania simply cancelled an election when a populist won the first round. Austria has tried (and failed) to form a coalition without the winning populist party. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, is impossibly trying to govern the country to the total exclusion from government of the right-wing populist party that won the most votes and the left-wing populists that won the most seats, even after colluding openly with the latter in a desperate attempt to block a right-win parliamentary victory.

Trudeau’s gambit now involves suspending the Canadian parliament rather than dissolving it in favor of an immediate election. With parliament prorogued until March 24, it gives the Liberals time to find a new leader and then simply plop him into Trudeau’s role when parliament resumes with a new throne speech and a new direction. Like nothing ever happened.

Hardly the “real choice” that Trudeau just said that “Canadians deserve.” That would require an election. Which has to be held sometime before the Fall anyway, but a new Liberal leader might buy the party some time to try clawing back some of that 24-point lead that the Conservatives now enjoy. A lead that could result in a landslide victory and a long odyssey across the political desert for the establishment Liberals who’ve long thought that they own the place.

The Western establishment has repeatedly proven that when faced with a democratic reckoning that risks rendering a verdict against their status quo, they’ll pull any and every lever they can in an attempt to prevent it. US President-elect Trump reacted to Trudeau’s announcement by suggesting yet again that Canada merge with the US.  No doubt in jest, but the Trudeau-led Canadian establishment trying to subvert democracy by sprinkling glitter on a dumpster fire in a last-ditch effort to cling to power sounds more like a typical justification for the kind of full-blown Western regime change that they love.

================================================================================================


Sunday, September 22, 2024

The Tale of Two Justins who just don't know they should have quit long ago

 

Once again, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has proven that his reign at the helm of the Church of England should have been terminated years ago. But, like Canada's Justin Trudeau, he seems to think he's doing a great job. I doubt that God will agree with either Justin.


A most ungodly church


Silent in the face of evil, the Church of England once again

defames its Jewish victim



Sep 22, 2024

Replica of Ecclesia et Synagoga, Strasbourg cathedral; exhibit at Diaspora museum,
Tel Aviv

Last night, Hezbollah attacked northern Israel with long range missiles, one of which hit Nazareth.


Since Christians believe that Nazareth is where Jesus spent his childhood it is an important, even sacred town for them. One might therefore expect that the Church of England’s clergy would voice horrified condemnation of Hezbollah. 


You think? I haven’t been able to find a single such utterance. From the Archbishop of Canterbury: nothing. From the bishops of Gloucester, Chelmsford, Norwich and Southwark: nothing. Instead, they have expressed horrified condemnation of … how did you guess? And as ever from the Church of England hierarchy, this condemnation is based on venomous and ignorant bigotry.


Today’s Observer carries a letter from four church prelates. It accuses the Israelis of the “forceful dispossession of the Kisiya family from their ancestral land in the al-Makhrour valley outside Bethlehem”. 


The clerics wrote: 

The Israeli authorities have demolished their home and restaurant many times over the last 12 years and allowed an illegal settlement to be established on their land, but until now the family have continued to find ways to farm there.

This is a very human tragedy but, as the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion (22 July 2024) recognised, Israel’s ongoing occupation and its associated policies of settlement construction and the forcible transfer of Palestinians from their lands and their homes are, despite Israel’s protestations, in violation of international law and must end immediately.The Israeli government must stop acting as if it is above the law.

The four who signed this letter were Rachel Treweek, bishop of Gloucester; Dr Guli Francis-Dehqani, bishop of Chelmsford; Graham Usher, bishop of Norwich and Christopher Chessun, bishop of Southwark. Today the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, wrote on X: 

This is an urgent and important intervention by my fellow bishops and I support them in it. The oppression, violence and discrimination against Palestinians in the West Bank, including Christians, must cease. The Israeli government is not above the law and must stop acting otherwise. 

Steadfast Christian families such as the Kisiya family, whose ancestral land has been forcibly stolen from them, remain especially in my prayers. We continue to stand in prayerful solidarity with our Palestinian Christian sisters and brothers as they resist the injustice of occupation.

The story of this family has long been taken up by anti-Israel activists. But there’s a very different story about this. On Israel National News last month, Sheri Oz wrote:

If what I am reading in the court protocols from 2014 to the present day provides the true story, we have here an amazing fairy tale put forth by a stubborn and dedicated liar who refuses to let the truth get in his way. And sharing in his delusional disorder are Jewish leftist activists who do not let even the last court verdict sway them. But don’t just believe me — I provide links to the court documents (Hebrew) and you can read them yourselves.  

Almost every day, the Israeli NGOs, Rabbis for Human Rights (RHR) and Combatants for Peace (CfP), are out there demonstrating, backing the claims of Ramzi Qasiyeh and his wife. In an email to supporters, CfP writes: "As you read this, a Palestinian family in the 'West Bank', in Beit Jala, is facing violent settler land theft as Israeli soldiers back the settlers. CfP activists are on the ground, putting their bodies on the line to stop this injustice. 

And: “This Palestinian [Arab] family holds a deep connection to their land and its necessity for their livelihood. In 2012, they built a home and restaurant on their property. However, in 2019, the Israeli army arbitrarily demolished both. In 2023, settlers challenged the family’s ownership and the family overcame them by obtaining their land deed through the Israeli court. The family has remained steadfast since and continues to farm their fields.”  

In court, Qasiyeh claims that he inherited the plot from his father who bought it from its former owners.

Let us unpack this:

  • In 2005, Ramzi Qasiyeh got a stop-work order from the Israeli Civil Administration (המנכל האזרחי - haminhal ha’ezrahi or Haminhal) regarding illegal construction on the land.

 

  • By 2012, Qasiyeh had built a home and a restaurant he called al-Makhrur after the valley in which the land is situated. He challenged a new demolition order in Israel’s Supreme Court (SC) in 2014 (case 5874/14) and his petition was rejected. In other words, he lost.

 

  • That did not stop him from rebuilding without even requesting a permit (the restaurant was last reviewed on Tripadvisor in 2019). In fact, Qasiyeh had petitioned the SC in 2016 and 2018 to vacate subsequent demolition orders (cases 6667/16 and 2088/18) and both petitions were rejected. Therefore, the demolition in 2019 was not arbitrary, as CfP writes in their email.

 

  • The judgments to demolish were based on evidence that the land was privately owned by Hemnutah and reversing this requires going to the lower court, Therefore, Qasiyeh filed a suit in the Jerusalem court (not settlers as CfP says), saying that he had inherited the land and it was his.

 

  • In May 2023, the final judgment came down (63103-07-19 ת”א ). It clearly stated that the property claimed by Qasiyeh is not owned by Qasiyeh and he is forbidden from even entering the plot. One year later, illegal construction was again found and it was taken down on July 30, 2024.

I read the court protocol in which Qasiyeh’s claim to land ownership was decided. He did not submit a bill of sale transferring the land from the previous owner to his father or a will bequeathing the land to him. The document Qasiyeh put into evidence to support his claim of ownership was, in fact, simply a document saying he paid taxes. Here it is held up proudly in misleading campaign photos such as this CfP “X” post as if it proves ownership.

The NGOs claim this is a deed for the property even after the court decided this is not proof of anything other than paying taxes. Perhaps it can be compared to someone saying that because they paid arnona (municipal taxes) on a rental property they own it.

On the other hand, Hemnutah (a subsidiary of the Jewish National Fund aka Keren Kayemet L’Yisrael) did provide proof of officially having registered their ownership of the property in 1969. Hemnutah won their countersuit against Qasiyeh and the latter has to pay the former rental fees of NIS 18,000 for having used the land since 2012 plus NIS 20,000 in court costs.

In a post entitled, URGENT: UNITED FRONT TO RECLAIM STOLEN LAND, RHR wrote on Facebook:

"On August 5, we discovered that the military’s justification for enforcing the eviction is based on a civil administration order that is not related to the Kisiya family’s plot in Al-Makhrour. The order actually applies to another area entirely—Wadi Heletz. Accordingly, the eviction of the Kisiya family and the forceful actions taken by the army against them and against activists offering support are illegal. [emphasis added]"

Maybe someone should tell them that Wadi Makhrur and Wadi Heletz are one and the same.(!) Middle East botany expert, Prof. Avi Shmida wrote: “Suddenly (2021), after 2000 years, during which the river valley was called Wadi Heletz, it became ‘Wadi Makhrur’.”

Neither RHR nor CfP have responded to requests to support their belief that the land actually belongs to Ramzi Qasiyeh and why the court decision that it belongs to Hemnutah is wrong.

Did Welby and his four clerics make the slightest attempt to discover the truth of this story? Did they consult the Israeli court records? Did they even ask the Israelis for their side of the story? Of course not. As usual, they believed the claims of those who routinely defame Israel in order to destroy it — just as the International Court of Justice’s opinion was based on exactly the same kind of lies and distortions. 


The church hierarchy’s venom towards Israel — as in secular liberal circles — goes beyond reason. For years, clerics have blamed Israel for the flight of Christians from the once-Christian majority town of Bethlehem, even though a) the town is run by Muslims who are actually responsible for oppressing and terrorising the town’s Christians; b) not even Israel’s worst enemies claim that Israel has a particular animus against Christians anywhere, so why should Christians flee Bethlehem while the Muslims remain? c) Israel is in fact the only country in the Middle East where Christians are safe and thriving.


The deranged nature of the church’s attitude has been illustrated by the bishop of Gloucester, Rachel Treweek — one of the four signatories to the Guardian letter. In July, she called Israel an “apartheid state” and said she stood “boldly” with people who compared the Israeli treatment of Palestinians to how black people were treated in apartheid South Africa.


Since Treweek doesn’t even appear to understand that the Palestinian Arabs of the disputed territories of Judea and Samaria aren’t Israeli citizens because these areas aren’t part of Israel — which means that the situation of these Palestinian Arabs is entirely different from the black citizens of South Africa who were disempowered and denied their citizens’ rights under apartheid — she clearly doesn’t even understand what apartheid was. The depths of her ignorance thus exceed even her bigotry. 


And on that last point, as I have written on many occasions the church’s bigotry towards Israel is underpinned by theological antisemitism — the revival of the ancient, murderous Christian heresy of supersessionism, now turbo-charged by cynically substituting the Palestinian Arabs for the Christians who, according this heresy, inherited all God’s promises to the Jews who were accordingly denounced as the party of the Devil. 


This heresy caused the murder of hundreds  of thousands of Jews in pre-modern Europe. Now it has been re-purposed and re-weaponised to incite murderous hatred of the Jews of Israel. 


This most ungodly church has long horrified and embarrassed Christians of integrity who are faithful to the Bible and to the truth. The falsehoods about Israel that the church has has been promoting have played a key role in knocking the west off its moral compass.

In Britain and elsewhere in the world, decent Christians should now rise up and publicly denounce the antisemitism of the church hierarchy and the lies about Israel that it is constantly promoting, and demand that it immediately stop perpetrating such murderous evil.


================================================================================================