Mainstream Media > ABC interviews Hamas operative as Gaza civil spokesperson; ZDF veteran journalist also a Hamas terrorist

 

ABC News Doesn’t Mention Its Interviewee in Gaza Belongs to Hamas

Nov 3, 2025 4:00 pm By Hugh Fitzgerald6 Comments

Amazing, isn’t it, how little due diligence our major networks perform when it comes to reporting on the war in Gaza. They accept, without questioning, Hamas-supplied figures on the numbers of killed and wounded, and on how many are women and children. They show photographs of “children killed in Gaza” who turn out to have been children killed in Yemen. They show “starving children in Gaza” who turn out to be children “starving” far from Gaza, and some who are not starving at all but have congenital diseases that make them appear to be starving. They conduct interviews with “journalists” who turn out to be members of Hamas; some of those “journalists” have even taken part in the atrocities carried out on October 7, 2023.

Take, for example, ABC’s latest interview with someone in Gaza, a certain Mahmoud Bassal, described by ABC only as an “emergency responder searching for Gazan civilians.” More on Bassal, and ABC’s failure to properly identify him, can be found here: 

ABC News Fails to Acknowledge Interviewee Is Hamas Spokesperson

by Sharon Levy, Algemeiner, October 30, 2025:

In Gaza, every public institution falls under the direct supervision of Hamas-affiliated terrorists. From journalists to the health ministry and civil defense, Hamas has embedded itself in every aspect of life.

In yet another textbook example of terrorists embedded in Gaza’s institutions, the IDF revealed in June 2025 that the “Gaza Civil Spokesperson,” Mahmoud Bassal, is an active Hamas operative.

His words are frequently echoed throughout the media, shaping and distorting the narrative of Israel’s war against Hamas — often without attribution to his Hamas affiliation.

ABC News took that one step further, interviewing Bassal as an emergency responder searching for missing Gazan civilians.

Not once did it cross the interviewers’ minds to do the most basic due diligence a journalist can — a background check on those being interviewed.

ABC News has a responsibility to acknowledge the affiliation of an interviewee, particularly if it is relevant to the story they are covering.

This would have been the case had ABC noted that those searching in the rubble were members of Gaza’s Civil Defense: a Hamas front organization. But ABC didn’t even do that….

How difficult would it have been for the ABC journalists to check with Israeli authorities on the background of Mahmoud Bassal before interviewing him? A phone call would have done the trick. Or they might in two seconds flat have done an internet search for Bassal’s name and found right here that he is a member of Hamas. Why didn’t the ABC interviewer do this?

ABC News owes its audience an explanation and a public clarification.

Amen, sister, amen.

===============================================================================================

German Media Giant ZDF: Our Man in Gaza Was Hamas Terrorist

Nov 2, 2025 10:00 am By Hugh Fitzgerald2 Comments

As is well known, many of the so-called “journalists” in Gaza, reporting for the Western media, have turned out to be members of Hamas, supplying their employers with stories that emphasize the IDF’s “wanton barbarity” and “war crimes,” and present Hamas as the brave face of the “resistance” to Israeli oppression and “occupation” (a curious word to use, given that Israel pulled out entirely from Gaza in 2005). Now, the German media giant ZDF has admitted that one of its key journalists in Gaza, killed last week in an Israeli airstrike, was a member of Hamas. More on that admission, and ZDF’s response, can be found here: 

German broadcaster admits killed partner org. employee was Hamas terrorist,

suspends cooperation

Jerusalem Post, October 29, 2025:

The German public broadcaster Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF) announced on Monday that an employee of its Palestinian partner organization, who was killed last week, was a Hamas terrorist.

Israel provided the television network with evidence proving 37-year-old Ahmed Abu Mutair’s involvement in the terrorist group, the ZDF confirmed.

It has now suspended cooperation with the Palestine Media Production (PMP) company after working with the organization for decades, the ZDF said.

“The ZDF welcomes the fact that the Israeli army has complied with the request to clarify the identity of the killed employee of the production company PMP in Gaza,” the broadcaster said.

Mutair was killed less than two weeks ago in Deir el-Balah along with an eight-year-old son of a coworker, according to the ZDF.

A source told Bild that Mutair had been the target.

“A corresponding document was presented as evidence. Based on the document, the ZDF assumes that the engineer was a member of the Izzadin al-Qassam Brigades,” the network said in a statement.

“In response, the ZDF has suspended cooperation until further notice. The document does not provide any information on when or how the engineer worked for Hamas, or on the tasks he undertook,” it further said.

“According to current information, however, the ZDF has no indications that other PMP employees might be members of Hamas. The IDF has also not provided the ZDF with any such information,” it continued.

Responding to the news, Israel’s Foreign Ministry said that Hamas’s narratives were ubiquitous in the media….

How often does the international media report, as fact, Hamas’ statistics on the wounded and dead in Gaza, and does not question Hamas’ claims as to how many of those casualties were women and children? How many in the media repeatedly report tall tales about Israeli snipers wantonly killing civilians — dozens, hundreds — as they stood in line up for food? How many report that there is “famine” in Gaza, despite a lack of evidence, merely because Hamas claims it?

Good, however, has come of this. ZDF has now suspended its longstanding reliance on the Palestine Media Production. The PMP will have to find some other media outlet in the West to take its reports as reliable. But that won’t be easy. Now that the ZDF has exposed ties between Hamas and the PMP, what Western media company would willingly look gullible by trusting PMP to supply it with material?

=================================================================================

The Media is the Message > After ABC's $15 million Trump settlement, it's CNN's turn to pay up for fake news

 

So Trump Was Right All Along: Court Finds That

CNN Is Fake News

Jan 18, 2025 6:00 am By Robert Spencer

New in PJ Media:

The establishment media is finally being exposed for what it really is — the propaganda arm for the hard left — and it’s a glorious thing to see. Two flagship media outlets, pillars of the “journalistic” establishment, have now lost defamation cases and must pony up millions as a result. This is extremely good news for those who value the truth and are tired of these moneyed, undeservedly respected propaganda outlets manipulating the American people.

A month ago, ABC and its far-left propagandist George Stephanopoulos reached a settlement with Donald Trump, who had sued them for defamation. The settlement involved the network forking over $15 million to Trump; it also precluded Trump’s suit from going to trial. which showed that ABC’s top dogs understood how weak their case really was: they were happy to pony up $15 million to make this thing go away rather than have a trial reveal just how far from actual journalism they had allowed themselves to stray.

On Friday, it was CNN’s turn. Fox News reported that “a jury found that CNN committed defamation against U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young and is responsible for punitive damages on Friday after more than eight hours of deliberation. The jury ruled Young is awarded $4 million in lost earnings, $1 million in personal damages such as pain and suffering and said that punitive damages are warranted against CNN.”

That’s $20 million and counting in judgments against establishment who were caught manipulating and spinning the news while loudly and repeatedly insisting that they were telling nothing but the straight truth. CNN’s chest-thumping proclamation that it is the “most trusted name in news” has been a joke for years, but now it has been confirmed in court that anyone who trusts CNN probably also thinks that Old Joe Biden has been a capable, competent president and that Hamas is a valiant army of freedom fighters engaged in “resistance” against an “occupier.”

The rulings against ABC and CNN are sweet victory for those who have been insisting for years that the media was biased, only for far-left “fact checkers” and those same media outlets to dismiss any concern about their agenda, perspective, or accuracy as right-wing conspiracy theorizing.

After all, the news media has been a leftist mouthpiece for decades, but only since Donald Trump became a presidential candidate and then president of the United States did that become too obvious to deny. As far back as 1962, when Richard Nixon lost his race for governor of California, he excoriated the press for its leftist bias and famously declared: “You won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference.”

There is more. Read the rest here.

===============================================================================

A Deafening Media Silence on the Obama-Hezbollah Scandal

By David Harsanyi, AP, New York Times

Politico published a jaw-dropping, meticulously sourced investigative piece this week detailing how the Obama administration had secretly undermined US law enforcement agency efforts to shut down an international drug-trafficking ring run by the terror group Hezbollah. The effort was part of a wider push by the administration to placate Iran and ensure the signing of the nuclear deal.

Now swap out “Trump” for “Obama” and “Russia” for “Iran” and imagine the eruption these revelations would generate. Because, by any conceivable journalistic standard, this scandal should’ve triggered widespread coverage and been plastered on front pages across the country. By any historic standard, the scandal should elicit outrage regarding the corrosion of governing norms from pundits and editorial boards.

Yet, as it turns out, there’s an exceptionally good chance most of your neighbors and colleagues haven’t heard anything about it.

Days after the news broke, in fact, neither NBC News, ABC News nor CBS News — whose shows can boast a collective 20 million viewers — had been able to find the time to relay the story to its sizeable audiences. Other than Fox News, cable news largely ignored the revelations as well.

Most major newspapers, which have been sanctimoniously patting themselves on the back for the past year, couldn’t shoehorn into their pages a story about potential collusion between the former president and a terror-supporting state.

Perhaps if President Trump had tweeted about the story, outlets would’ve squeezed something in.

Even when outlets did decide to cover the story, they typically framed it as a he-said/she-said. “Politico Reporter Says Obama Administration ‘Derailed’ Hezbollah Investigation,” reads the NPR headline. Did Josh Meyer of Politico say something about Obama or did he publish a 14,000-word, diligently sourced, document-heavy investigative piece? If you get your news from NPR, you’d never know.

Fact is, the Drug Enforcement Agency began its classified investigation (called Project Cassandra) into Hezbollah in 2008. It found that the Iranian proxy had laundered nearly a half a billion dollars and was moving cocaine to the United States. According to Politico, the Obama administration not only threw obstructions in front of investigators but failed to prosecute major players in the enterprise.

What makes the media blackout particularly shameful is that the story isn’t a partisan hit job. It was written by a well-regarded journalist at a major outlet. The story has two on-the-record sources — which is more than we can say for the vast majority of so-called scoops about the Russian “collusion” investigation. One of these sources, David Asher, was an illicit finance expert at the Pentagon who was tapped to run the investigation. There’s no plausible reason to ignore him or the story.

Then again, ignoring or diminishing Obama’s shady dealings with Iran isn’t new. Obama administration officials bragged to the New York Times Magazine last year that they’d created an echo chamber, relying on the ignorance, inexperience and partisan dispositions of reporters to convey their lies to the American people.

We saw this when the Obama administration claimed it was releasing 14 Iranian civilians on humanitarian grounds, when in fact it was releasing spies and weapons dealers. Or when Team Obama claimed diplomacy had won US hostages’ release, when it fact it had sent hundreds of millions of euros, Swiss francs and other currencies on wooden pallets in unmarked planes to Iran. The press was uninterested in those stories, too.

“Journalism is about covering important stories.

With a pillow, until they stop moving.”

Establishment media personalities will often point out that none of us would have any knowledge of these incidents if not for their reporting. This is true. There are intrepid journalists at media institutions who aren’t swayed by partisan considerations.

The preponderance of editors, journalists, pundits and bookers, on the other hand, still coddle Democrats. They may do it on purpose or unconsciously, but it’s destroying their credibility. Because as David Burge once noted, “Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.”

David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist.