Pakistani Family Dissatisfied With Its Brand-New Housing in the UK
Now comes the story of yet more Muslim migrants who displaying their want of gratitude to those Western countries that have taken them in. A Pakistani family has complained that the brand new house — costing 250,000 pounds to build — that the British government has provided them is not to their liking. They want something better, and in a neighborhood they like, preferably less rural. More on their preposterous demand can be found here:
Migrant family handed £250k new-build say house is ‘no good for us’ as they demand to be moved
by Dan McDonald, GB News, July 1, 2026:
A Pakistani asylum seeker family housed in a £250,000 new-build home say they are desperate to leave after claiming they have been left frightened to live in a Shropshire village.
And why they are they frightened? Did anyone threaten them, scrawl anti-Muslim graffiti, yell at the children as they walked to school? Nothing of the sort. Read on.
Muhammad Nadeem, 40, moved to Britain with his wife, Shamaila, and their four children two years ago.
Six Pakistanis, now in the UK, living in rent-free housing — a four-bedroom house. Free medical care for all six. Free education for their four children. A family allowance of 295 pounds a week. Not bad for people who contribute the absolute minimum to the economy (how much can an Uber driver contribute to the economy, after all, in goods and services?) and nothing to the wellbeing of the non-Muslims among whom they now live.
The family had been living in Stockport, where Mr Nadeem worked as an Uber driver after qualifying for a work visa.
After his visa expired, the family claimed asylum and were initially housed in a hotel before being moved into a four-bedroom property in Stoke Heath a fortnight ago.
“We are scared to stay in this house. We hate it here,” Shamaila said.
Have you considered going home?
Mr Nadeem claimed the problems began almost immediately after they arrived.
“My wife and our kids were outside the house when three people came towards us. We quickly went inside and I locked the door,” he said.
My god. This is paranoia. There was nothing that those “three people” said or did to have fed such fears. No words were uttered, no angry looks. Given the layout of he housing development, each house shares two outer walls with houses on both sides, save for the two houses at either end that share only one such wall. These three were likely doing nothing more threatening than walking to their own houses.
He alleged that hours later, two more people approached the property, one wearing a mask, and began filming him on a mobile phone after he answered the door.
“They walked away and they started shouting what sounded like abuse,” he added….
The filming of the father could constitute intimidation — that is, if it happened at all. It’s clear that Muhammad Nadeem and his wife Shamaila “hate it here,” as she said, and were determined to be moved to still better housing. What better way to achieve that than to claim that white neighbors harassed them?
But if the “intimidation” by neighbors claim isn’t enough to get them moved, they are quick to supply other reasons:
“This is no good for us this place. It’s too rural. I have diabetes and back pain,” he said.
Diabetes and back pain? Both are apparently the sudden result of living in a rural area? C’mon, Muhammad, you can do better than that.
The nearest supermarket requires a £20 return taxi journey, which he said consumes much of the £295 weekly allowance the Home Office provides for the family of six.
But Muhammad Nadeem is an Uber driver, and has the use of a car. Why wouldn’t he use that to get to and from a supermarket? And how many trips to the supermarket would he need to make weekly? Surely a big shopping once-a-week is what many people do.
“If my bread goes out of date, what do I do? Most of our money goes on taxis,” he said….
The claim that “most of our money goes on taxis” is false. Along with free housing, free medical care, and free housing, the family of Muhammad Nadeem receives almost 1200 pounds each month. Even if he did not have the use of the car he uses as an Uber driver to take one trip a week to the supermarket, that would hardly mean that “most” of the family’s money would “go on taxis.” One trip to the supermarket each week would cost 80 euros a month; 80 euros is not “most” of the 1200 pounds the family is receiving. This absurd exaggeration is being used to convince the authorities to move them to a still better house, in a less rural neighborhood, possibly to one that fellow Pakistanis inhabit.
UK police must give up ‘woke culture wars’ and fight crime – report
Published 6 Jul, 2026 13:58 | Updated 6 Jul, 2026 15:00
British police chiefs need to stop taking sides in “woke… culture wars” and focus entirely on the “prevention and detection of crime,” according to a government-backed report that recommends a “fundamental overhaul” of policing in the UK.
Co-authored by former Labour Party Home Secretary Lord Blunkett and published on Monday, the report found that Britain’s police departments are plagued by corrupt leadership, nepotism, abuse of power, and low morale among officers.
The report also highlighted concerns that police leaders are “preferencing certain groups,” with some “woke” chiefs “taking sides in the so-called ‘culture wars.’”
“Police leaders should be resolute in refusing to take sides, or to be diverted from the course of focusing entirely on the prevention, detection and prosecution of crime,” the report recommends, adding that “the background or identity of any perpetrator or victim of crime should have absolutely no bearing” on their treatment by the police service.
The murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak last year triggered a national debate about so-called ‘two-tier’ policing in the UK. Nowak was stabbed with a ceremonial dagger by a Sikh man as he made his way home from a night out in Southampton, and bodycam footage released in May showed officers arresting and handcuffing Nowak and watching him bleed to death after his attacker falsely accused him of racism.
Official anti-racism guidance from the National Police Chiefs’ Council explicitly instructs officers not to be “color blind.” Equality, it states, “does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’.” Although the document is now under review, other arms of the British justice system have doubled down on apparently two-tier policies. Last week, the Crown Prosecution Service in England and Wales ordered its own prosecutors last week to question their own “unconscious bias” when deciding whether to charge suspects from ethnic minorities.
Speaking to the BBC on Sunday, Blunkett admitted that “there is a perception” of two-tier policing in the UK. “We’ve moved the pendulum,” he said. “It swung from the [1999] Macpherson report about outright racism in the force… all the way through to people saying, ‘oh, it’s woke’, and we make it clear in the report that there’s no room for culture wars or woke.”
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has described the UK as “a two-tier state against white people,” and portrayed the death of Nowak as a direct consequence of decades of policing “guidelines that led them to treat different ethnic groups in different ways.”
Two days before Blunkett’s report was published, Farage shared a video showing Birmingham police officers arresting a white youth after he was attacked by a group of black men. “This young man was attacked by ethnic minority men and instead of arresting them, the police arrested the victim,” he wrote on X, describing the video as “more evidence of two-tier policing against white people in Britain.”
========================================================================
