"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label integrity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label integrity. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

The Islamization of Sweden > And its complete lack of regard for truth and integrity

 

Miss Jo
@therealmissjo

Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden. You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues. As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18. You tell the Swedish Migration Agency and they advise you to put it in writing. When you send exact details, with examples of specific patients you are suspended, investigated and fired for disclosing private information relating to patients. This happened to Bernt Herlitz in 2017. When he appealed the unfair dismissal he ultimately lost and was fined about $50,000. He and his family faced financial hardship and almost lost their home, until some generous benefactors raised money for him. Bernt remains unemployed today, despite staff shortages for dentists in his area in Gotland. At the time, Sweden scoffed at the tests and claimed they were “discriminatory” but since then they have quietly brought in mass dental testing, for those whose age is in doubt, by the National Board of Forensic Medicine. Bernt deserves a medal. Not vilification and unemployment.

Image
1.6M
Views

According to Grok: This is  true story. Herlitz is still unemployed even though Sweden has adopted his method of determining the age of migrants.





Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Canadian Convulsions - Elections > Is Mark Carney a Chronic liar? The Polls and Reality make no sense for Poilievre


 Is Mark Carney a Chronic liar like Trudeau?



Satan is the father of lies, and of chronic liars!

=============================================================================================


Most polls in Canada show the Liberal's Art Carney, whoops, I mean Mark Carney, with a growing lead in the majority government range. Yet, at the same time, Carney's political rallies draw hundreds at most, if not mere dozens of people. Poilievre's rallies have been drawing thousands of people not just in Alberta, but in Ontario, Montreal, Halifax, and British Columbia. 


How there can be no relationship between the crowds and the polls makes a conspiracy theorist like me very suspicious. It's pretty easy to rig a poll, as Diefenbaker famously said, "polls are for dogs".  But it's not so easy to draw thousands of people to fill a stadium and line up around the block to hear someone speak.

We will soon find out if Canada's election polls are good for canine target practice or have some accuracy. If they don't, then you can rest assured that they have been rigged and paid for by someone, someone higher up than Carney, someone who ordered Carney to parachute into Ottawa and keep Trudeau's globalization madness running, to the complete and utter destruction of what was once the greatest country in the world.

Logo

Dear Gary,

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre packed the house in Nisku, Alberta, on Monday — and I was there to witness it all.

This was the largest political rally I’ve ever attended. An estimated 15,000 people showed up — enough to fill an NHL arena. The crowd was so massive that it caused cell service in the venue to crash completely.

I arrived early and saw a line of supporters wrapping around the entire building. It felt more like a tailgate party than a political event. There were people from all walks of life — young, old, families — all representing the heart of Alberta’s conservative base. And they were all eager to speak with Rebel News.

Watch my full report right here:

WOW! 15,000 People Show Up For Poilievre In Edmonton

The enthusiasm was off the charts with the crowd at one point erupting into chants of “Bring it home!”

The rally featured ringing endorsements from Canadian country star Brett Kissel, the Boilermakers Union, and former Prime Minister Stephen Harper (click here to watch his speech).

The top concerns among attendees? Taxes, the rising cost of living, and defending Alberta’s energy industry. Several people told me that if Mark Carney were to become Prime Minister, Alberta may have no choice but to separate.

If Alberta’s rallying cry in Nisku is any indication, change is coming. The only question is: who’s coming with them?

Yours truly,
Sheila Gunn Reid





Another 
anomaly between what is being reported on Canada's national news networks, most of them. Negative concepts are never (almost never) introduced when MSM talks about Carney, but are invariably introduced whenever Poilievre is talked about, without fail.


How reporters can sleep at night when they know they are dishonestly influencing voters is beyond me. I keep hoping Canadian news readers and reporters will reveal some integrity in their reporting, and I keep getting disappointed.


==============================================================================================

Thursday, February 10, 2022

Are the wheels beginning to fall off Trudeau's magic bus? Another Liberal speaks out!

..

Second Liberal MP Publicly Questions COVID Policies


By Noé Chartier
February 9, 2022 

Liberal MP Yves Robillard (C) attends the House Committee on National Defence in Ottawa on May 16, 2019.
(The Canadian Press/Justin Tang)


Liberal MP Yves Robillard is following his colleague Joël Lightbound in publicly criticizing his government’s COVID-19 policies, a day after Lightbound accused his party of politicizing the pandemic and using the issue of vaccination as a wedge to divide Canadians.

Robillard, who represents the riding of Marc-Aurèle-Fortin in Québec, told The Hill Times in an interview that Lightbound “said exactly what a lot of us think” and that he agrees with everything he said.

Lightbound had called a press conference on Feb. 8 in which he listed the harms caused by COVID-19 restrictions and proposed several solutions, such as creating a roadmap for the lifting of all restrictions under the federal government’s purview, such as vaccine mandates.

Robillard told The Hill Times he spoke with Lightbound on Feb. 9 and expressed his support. He said the two would be working together on the issue.

Lightbound, who represents the Louis-Hébert riding in Québec, resigned as chair of the Québec caucus on Feb. 8. Chief Government Whip Steven MacKinnon said Lightbound would remain a member of the Liberal caucus.

Robillard told The Hill Times he is not worried about being expelled from caucus, saying there are other MPs “who’ve just had enough” and “are not going to pass the rest of our mandate like that.”

The MP, who was first elected in 2015, recently ruffled feathers within his party for travelling during the holidays. As the current wave of the Omicron variant was ramping up in December, Canadians and Liberal caucus members were told to avoid non-essential travel.

Robillard told The Hill Times he had already made plans to visit family in Costa Rica and he informed MacKinnon about it. MacKinnon expressed disapproval, but Robillard still went ahead.

MacKinnon subsequently stripped Robillard of his House National Defence Committee assignment.

“He’s [MacKinnon] cutting my wings, and he’s going to regret it, I tell you,” Robillard told The Hill Times. “He does that not only with me. So, no, I didn’t need that. And it troubles me because it’s my mental health that’s taking the shock. That’s why I want to see my doctor.”

Robillard defended his decision to travel.

“We all have our authority, we all have our conscience,” he said. “I have family over there and I’m so happy that I went. And you know what, I came back with two tests, one from over there and one at my arrival, and I didn’t have COVID. So those who are going to tell me that I was in danger, no.”





Wednesday, February 9, 2022

How dare a Canadian Liberal MP speak with truth and integrity!

..

Brilliant man speaks truth with integrity - has no place in the Liberal Party of Canada



Liberal MP Joël Lightbound’s full remarks:

‘It's time to choose positive, not coercive methods’


Here is a full transcript of the Quebec MP's remarks after he broke ranks

with the Liberal party


Author of the article:National Post Staff
Publishing date:Feb 08, 2022  •  1 day ago  •  9 minute read  • 


PHOTO BY THE CANADIAN PRESS/ADRIAN WYLD


On Tuesday morning on Parliament Hill, Quebec MP Joël Lightbound spoke to reporters, and broke ranks with the Liberal party.

Below is a lightly edited transcript of Lightbound’s English remarks, which he made following remarks in French.


To begin with, I wish to come back on the events that have been unfolding these last two weeks in Ottawa.

First off, I, like my colleagues, wholeheartedly condemn the kind of hideous acts and symbols that we’ve seen on display by some demonstrators. Nazi flags and Confederate flags have no place in Canada. They are symbols of hate and intolerance. And we must always reject these symbols passionately.

And I want to thank all of those who have denounced these acts, these symbols and these individuals clearly and loudly. I also wish to denounce the far-right groups that we have seen in these protests. I’ve myself received over the years my fair share of threats from far-right extremists, and I have absolutely, absolutely no sympathy for them.

I profoundly despise what they stand for. With regards to the occupation of Ottawa’s downtown core, it’s time it stops. It’s time for truckers to leave and let the local population get their neighbourhood back and get their quality of life back, free of fear and free of harassment.

No one wants this to escalate and protesters should now show some goodwill, like we’ve seen this Saturday in my hometown of Quebec City. I suggest they relocate somewhere else, somewhere appropriate for the residents and for the City of Ottawa. They could organize shuttles should they wish to come demonstrate peacefully before Parliament Hill, such as their right.

But downtown residents also have the right to peace and order and it has lasted long enough already. That being said, when it comes to the broader demonstrations we’ve seen in Ottawa, and Quebec City and all across the country, I will abstain from the kind of generalizations that we’ve heard these last few days.

Seen on Radio Canada, an interview with what seemed to be a very kind grandmother who demonstrated for her grandkids, she looked and sounded nothing like a white supremacist. Nor did the black, Sikh and Indigenous Canadians I saw demonstrating on my way to Parliament these last two weeks or in Quebec City this last Saturday. I have enough respect for my fellow Canadians, not to engage in these easy and absurd labels.

Now looking beyond the demonstrations, I’ve heard from hundreds of constituents and citizens who took the time to reach out to me these past weeks, folks who have nothing to do with these demonstrations, who are for the most part vaccinated, who have done everything as they should these last few years. People who have shared with me legitimate concerns about where we are heading collectively.

I think we must hear these concerns, and I think we must respond to them.

I’ve heard from parents worried to see their kids sink into depression and slowly lose their joy of living. I’ve heard from pediatricians in tears telling me about their young patients’ despair, anxiety, isolation, as well as the stunning increase in school dropouts they are observing. I’ve heard from artists are on the brink of mental and financial collapse after two years, barely enough work to get by. I’ve heard from social workers answering suicide hotlines who are overwhelmed by the number of calls they’re receiving. I’ve heard from entrepreneurs and restaurant owners who are contemplating losing but they’ve spent their whole lives building — that’s when it hasn’t happened already.

Stay at a downtown Seattle hotel in February and get 50% off museum prices for one-of-a-kind art, history, and more.

I’ve heard from fellow Quebecers who are rightfully appalled that in our province 2022 we’re locking up triple vaxxed seniors for days on end. I’ve heard from fellow Quebecers appalled that in Quebec, January 2022, we have locked up kids aged six to 10 years old for up to 10 days in windowless rooms. Kids who tested negative who had no symptoms, who had been in contact with someone, though, who had the virus.

So let me repeat in Quebec in 2022 we locked up kids aged six to 10 for up to 10 days in windowless rooms.

Let that sink in. This was a public-health measure that had been drafted, approved and applied. I’ve heard from people worried that we seem collectively to have forgotten the population’s health is kind of like a pie, and Omicron is but a slice of that pie. Economic health, social health, mental health must be accounted for.

I’ve heard from people worried that those making the decisions seem at times to have been blind to the fact that we’re not all equal for lockdowns that not everyone can earn a living on a Macbook at the cottage. I’ve heard people worried that a few might have lost sight of the quiet and discreet suffering of the many.

I’ve heard people in great pain to see some of their friends whom they love and respect but who’ve decided, for whatever reason, we might very well disagree with, who’ve decided not to get vaccinated and as a consequence, are jobless, selling what they have and moving to the United States, away from their communities, away from their friends and from their families.

I’ve heard from teachers worried to see kids reenacting in the schoolyard the kind of discrimination and segregation we see in our society between vaccinated and unvaccinated. I’ve heard from people worried to see those they care about fighting each other on this issue, tearing some families and some friends apart.

I’ve heard from a lot of people wondering why just a year ago, we were all united, in this together. And now that we have one of the most vaccinated population in the world, we’ve never been so divided. Now these people are increasingly confused, when on the other hand, they hear experts like Dr. Karl Weiss, a renowned Quebec epidemiologist, say last week and I quote “that COVID-19 is here to stay that those at risk will have to be monitored closely when symptoms appear; that we will have to protect our health-care systems; but then we will also have to live with the virus like we do with influenza; that we can’t go back to lockdowns and restrictions not supported by science.”

They’re confused when they hear Dr. (Theresa) Tam (Canada’s chief public health officer) state last week that all existing public-health policies, including vaccine passports, need to be re examined, and that we need to have longer-term sustained approaches and capacity building so we’re not in crisis mode all the time as we fight this virus.

They’re confused when they see the undeniable trend around the world whereby, for instance, the World Health Organization recently recommended dropping or alleviating many border measures, including vaccine requirements, as they’ve proven to be ineffective in fighting the propagation of the Omicron variant. That’s the World Health Organization.

They’re confused when they see countries around the world like Ireland, Sweden, Norway, (inaudible), the Czech Republic, Brazil, Denmark, Spain and the U.K., who have either dropped almost all restrictions or fast moving in that direction. All countries, I note, with lower vaccination rates than us.

Now while folks are hearing and seeing all of this, they’re left rightfully wondering, ‘where the hell are we heading here in Canada?’

I think there lies the frustration. They feel there is no appetite from our government to adapt so as to reflect the changing data and the changing reality of the pandemic of the world. They’re worried that measures which ought to be exceptional and limited in time are being normalized with no end in sight, like vaccine passports, mandates and requirements for travellers.

They’re worried because they feel it is becoming harder and harder to know where public health stops and where politics begins.

Now, I firmly believe governments would do well not to dismiss these legitimate concerns, not to demonize those who voice them. To the contrary, I believe these concerns need to be addressed head on. And here are some ways I humbly submit we could go about it.

First, I believe the government should provide quickly a roadmap with clear and measurable targets (to) lift all restrictions within its purview. To be clear, I do not necessarily believe that all measures should be lifted immediately. But I do believe that we must have a clear and measurable benchmark for when measures will be lifted. For instance, at what point can we lift restrictions while respecting the capacity of the provinces’ health-care systems?

Second, I believe that if more and more Canadians find it hard to comply with the restrictions, it’s not because they lack solidarity. It’s because increasingly Canadians don’t understand the measures. And they don’t understand them because governments no longer care to explain them. It’s a lot easier to comply when you understand, particularly when these restrictions impact your day-to-day life.

The vaccine requirement for truckers to me is a good example. And if we forget about the demonstrations, and we forget about the convoy for just a second, and look at that policy for what it is. This is a policy that now goes against the World Health Organization’s recommendation and for which no epidemiological studies and projections have been provided.

While the industry is clear, when this measure took effect, the price of transport for fresh products from the United States went up by 15 to 20 per cent on average. Now I understand there are many factors contributing to inflation, but inflation happens over time, not overnight. This is not a small consequence, given that Canadians are already facing the highest inflation in 30 years. And unfortunately, it affects more of the most vulnerable amongst us.

The impact is not the same if you make 200 or 300,000 a year versus if you make 15 to 20 bucks an hour. At least if the benefits were clearly explained with data and projections, not with talking points, it could make the burden more bearable.

I’ve been looking for this data for weeks, but to no avail. This leads me to humbly suggest that the government should systematically publish the epidemiological projections and the scientific analysis underpinning the measures it imposes going forward.

Third, to echo the comments I quoted earlier, by Dr. Tam, to be building our capacity right now to face the next waves. As such, I believe the government should start negotiating the Canada Health Transfers with provinces without delays. The government’s position is quite frankly, hard to understand.

On the one hand, we say that we will not be negotiating the transfer before the pandemic ends, on the other hand, say that the pandemic will last for years. If you want to be able to truly live with the virus without resorting to the violence of lockdowns, these discussions cannot wait.

There is no doubt that provinces have a lot to do to improve their health-care systems and to gain in efficiency, but the federal government also has its role to play.

Last, I think it’s time to stop dividing Canadians, to stop pitting one part of the population against another. I can’t help but notice with regret that both tone and the policies of my government changed drastically on the eve and during the last election campaign.

From a positive and unifying approach, a decision was made to wedge to divide and to stigmatize. I fear that this politicization (of) the pandemic risks undermining the public’s trust in public-health institutions. This is not a risk we ought to be taking lightly.

And this last year, Canada has reached one of the highest levels of vaccination in the world, something we should be proud of. It is something we should be celebrating. Yet here we are more divided than ever.

Time to stop with the division and the distractions. It’s time to choose positive, not coercive methods. It’s time to unite. Finally, why am I alone voicing these concerns publicly today? I can tell you that I’m not the only one who feels varying degrees as I do within our ranks.

I remain hopeful this call for more humanism, for more reason, for more hope will be heard. Thank you all for your attention.

Lightbound was removed as the chair of the Quebec caucus of the Liberal Party of Canada. Beyond that, Trudeau seems to have decided to let the fire burn itself out. Canada's legacy media will assist him with that as the CBC has already forgotten about it.

Lightbound is the 3rd Liberal MP to act and speak with integrity in the past 6 years. The other two are no longer Liberals. There's something about truth and integrity that is foreign, if not offensive, to the Liberal Party of Canada.



Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Liberal Doctor Breaks Ranks to Vote Against Gov't Assisted, Instant Death Bill; Trudeau's Absurd "Balanced" Cabinet

..
Liberal MP and doctor says he'll vote against assisted death bill

Kathleen Harris · CBC News · 
Posted: Dec 09, 2020 4:00 AM ET

Liberal MP Marcus Powlowski, who has worked for decades as a medical doctor and has law degrees, says he will vote against Bill C-7 unless there are changes to it. (Jeff Walters / CBC)


A Liberal MP and medical doctor says he will vote against his government's contentious medical assistance in dying (MAID) bill, warning that it could allow people suffering from deep but temporary despair to end their lives.

Marcus Powlowski, who represents the Ontario riding of Thunder Bay-Rainy River, already voted against Bill C-7 at the report stage in the legislative process — the only member of the government caucus to do so. He told CBC News he will "regrettably" do so again unless it's amended.

"I don't like voting against my party, but as someone with a medical background and somebody who has dealt with this issue over the years a lot, I think morally it's incumbent upon me to stand up when it comes to issues of health and life and death," he said.

Powlowski has practised medicine in Canada, Africa and the South Pacific. He has two law degrees and a master's degree in health policy and has helped develop health law and policy for the World Health Organization and several governments.

So, why isn't this remarkable man Canada's Minister of Health? See below.

Powlowski — who insisted he is not opposed to MAID in principle — said a Quebec court ruling required the Liberal government to craft "very difficult legislation" to strike a balance between two starkly different views of MAID.

My biggest concern ... is that we don't end up using MAID
for people who don't really want to die

- Liberal MP Marcus Powlowski

He said he worries the resulting legislation may not address people who are "transient" in their wish to terminate their lives, such as someone who has a permanent disability or who now needs chronic care. Those feelings of anguish can fade over time as they adjust to a changed reality, he said.

"My biggest concern, as someone who has spent my whole life trying to avoid accidentally killing people, is that we don't end up using MAID for people who don't really want to die," he said.

"I think, with a bit of time, people may come around to the fact that there are reasons they want to live."

The government introduced C-7 in February in response to a September 2019 Superior Court of Quebec ruling which found that the law's precondition for obtaining a physician-assisted death — that the individual seeking it must face a "reasonably foreseeable" natural death — was unconstitutional.

The bill proposes to remove that requirement. It also disqualifies those whose sole underlying condition is a mental illness from obtaining an assisted death.

Lametti urges swift passage of bill

Justice Minister David Lametti is urging MPs to pass the bill "expeditiously" in order to meet a court-imposed Dec. 18 deadline.

The government already has received two extensions on the new legislation due to disruptions caused by the global pandemic. While it could request a third extension, the government says its priority now is getting the legislation passed.

After all, it's more important that it gets done quickly than it gets done properly - Liberal philosophy

The Conservative opposition and groups advocating on behalf of Canadians with disabilities say the bill removes safeguards, but Lametti has maintained the legislation strikes the right balance between protecting the vulnerable and giving Canadians the right to end needless suffering.

Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole has said that, instead of giving people a "tool" for assisted death, the government should develop a stronger framework to help people live better lives with better supports, housing and care. He also has accused the government of trying to rush a fundamentally important bill after wasting time by proroguing Parliament.




At the report stage, 16 Conservative MPs voted in support of C-7, including Conservative House Leader Gerard Deltell.

The current law requires that a patient seeking assisted death wait 10 days before obtaining it in cases where the death is "reasonably forseeable." The proposed new legislation omits that waiting period, although it maintains a 90-day waiting period for patients whose deaths are not considered reasonably foreseeable.

Senate pre-studying C-7

Conservatives had proposed amendments to keep the 10-day waiting period and to extend the 90-day period to 120 days. Both amendments were rejected in the House of Commons.

The bill has been undergoing a pre-study in the Senate.

Conservative Sen. Denise Batters, vice-chair of the Senate's legal and constitutional affairs committee, said the committee heard from 81 witnesses and most did not support the Liberal government's approach.

She called C-7 "deeply flawed, poorly considered and likely unconstitutional."

Quebec Sen. Chantal Peticlerc will sponsor C-7 when it reaches the Red Chamber.

If the bill doesn't clear the Senate by next Friday's deadline, and if the government does not seek (or is refused) another extension by the courts, that would leave a disconnect between the law in Quebec and elsewhere. People in Quebec would have a legal right to assisted death without foreseeable death being a requirement, while the rest of Canadians would not have access to the broader eligibility.

If the Senate decides to propose amendments, the bill would return to the House of Commons.

While sharing concerns about the legislation's swift pace, the NDP and Bloc Quebecois are expected to support C-7.

The NDP says it supports the right of Canadians to obtain medically assisted death to avoid unnecessary suffering at the end of life — but the party is also calling on the government to introduce a new national income support program to address concerns raised by disability advocates.

A July report from Health Canada on medical assistance in dying in Canada showed that nearly 14,000 Canadians had received MAID since 2016. In 2019, MAID accounted for 2 per cent of deaths in Canada.

A planned parliamentary review of the regime was delayed due to COVID-19, but is expected to begin next year.

===========================================================================================

Why is Dr. Powlowski not Health Minister for Canada. With that extraordinary resume, he should be an easy choice. 

Powlowski has practised medicine in Canada, Africa and the South Pacific. He has two law degrees and a master's degree in health policy and has helped develop health law and policy for the World Health Organization and several governments.

But Trudeau wanted a balanced cabinet - not talent, or ability-wise, but appearance-wise. He chose his cabinet based on sex, sexual preference, colour, and religion (as long as it wasn't Christianity). 

So, Dr. Powlowski was never in the running for a cabinet position because he has that heinous attribute of being a white male. Consequently, Patty Hajdu, was named Health Minister. Patty's only listed training is in graphic arts. That more than qualifies her since Trudeau's only real work experience was as a drama teacher. I'm inclined to think he is still practicing that calling.

Now, to be fair, Patty has a B of A, and a Masters in Public Admin. No medical background whatsoever! Astonishing, isn't it. Talk about absurdly wasted talent. The good Doctor will probably be chastised for voting against this bill.

Another disgraceful decision, back in 2015, was the appointment of the Minister of Defence. The highly qualified LtGen Andrew Leslie, another unfortunate white male, was passed over for a Lieutenant Colonel, Harjit Sajjan. Sajjan is brown and Sikh! 

Sajjan was a highly praised intelligence gatherer who contributed greatly to NATO's Operation Medusa in Afghanistan. However, in 2017 he twice claimed to be the architect of Medusa. He was a Major and such operations were planned by those with higher ranks, though he contributed greatly. Taking credit, whether it is due or not, is not the sign of a leader.

His expertise in intelligence gathering should have been the focus of his career, but Trudeau made him Minister and ignored the much more qualified Leslie.

Leslie didn't bother running in the 2019 election. The writing was on the wall. Another talented man wasted.

Don't forget the ministers and MPs who have had to step down because of sexual indiscretions. Chosen for their appearance, not their character or talents.

Nor should we forget the three women who displayed excellent character; two of whom were very talented ministers. All were forced to resign because of their integrity. Trudeau doesn't want character, talent or ability in his cabinet. He just wants them to look colourful and do what they are told. Most do. 

I applaud you, Dr. Powlowski, for standing up for your principles. It was nice knowing you.


Thursday, December 19, 2019

After Year of Political Turmoil, SNC-Lavalin Gets Off Easy in Plea Deal

Corruption is Everywhere - Everywhere SNC-Lavalin works

'The rest of the company will be able to continue to have access to public contracts,' says François Legault

Peter Zimonjic · CBC News 

The bust-up between Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and former minister of justice and attorney general of Canada
Jody Wilson-Raybould came close to ending Trudeau's government - and it may have accomplished nothing.
(Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

After Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's failed efforts to see SNC-Lavalin avoid prosecution led to him losing two key ministers, his edge in the polls and (almost) his party's hold on government, the Quebec engineering firm at the centre of the controversy walked away today with a plea deal that looks a lot like what it asked the government for in the first place.

A judge on Thursday accepted the plea deal that a division of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. struck with the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). Under the agreement, the company pleaded guilty to one charge of fraud over $5,000 in relation to the company's activities in Libya.

All other charges have been dropped.

"We are happy. The company is happy," said SNC-Lavalin lawyer François Fontaine. "The fact that the charges are no longer pending over the head of the company is good. The uncertainty around that kind of proceeding is bad for business, is bad for the company.

"So we're very happy that it's now over. We are free to bid as normal. This guilty plea does not prevent construction, or any other entity of the group, to bid on public contracts."

After SNC-Lavalin was hit with fraud and corruption charges over its actions in Libya between 2001 and 2011, officials from the Prime Minister's Office spoke with then justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould, asking her to reconsider offering the firm a deferred prosecution agreement.

Under newly passed legislation, a deferred prosecution agreement would allow the company to avoid trial providing it paid hefty fines and continued to adhere to a number of conditions for a period of time.

CBC, ever in Trudeau's court, neglect to mention here that SNC-Lavalin lobbied Trudeau furiously to pass that law, specifically for them. Trudeau snuck the law into the back pages of a very long and complex omnibus budget bill, without the opposition noticing. A bill passed by the previous government required companies guilty of corruption to be suspended from bidding on federal government contracts for a period of years. Many of the high level managers at SNC live in Trudeau's riding in Montreal.

Had the company been convicted in court of bribing Libyan officials — including Saadi Gadhafi, son of the late dictator Moammar Gadhafi — to get lucrative government contracts, it could have been blocked from competing for federal government contracts in Canada for a decade.

"I have long believed in the essential necessity of our judicial system operating as it should — based on the rule of law and prosecutorial independence, and without political interference or pressure," Wilson-Raybould said today on Twitter. 

"Ultimately, that system was able to do its work — as democracy and good governance requires — and an outcome was reached today. Accountability was achieved. The justice system did its work."

Trudeau violated the Conflict of Interest Act

Former health minister Jane Philpott and former attorney general of Canada Jody Wilson-Raybould
both resigned from cabinet over the SNC-Lavalin affair. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

In early 2019, media reports said that Wilson-Raybould felt she was being improperly pressured by Trudeau's senior adviser and the clerk of the Privy Council to ask the DPP to consider offering SNC-Lavalin a deferred prosecution agreement.

Wilson-Raybould refused, saying she believed the prosecution service should be free from political influence in its decisions. Trudeau later said he did not direct the attorney general to reverse a decision — that he just wanted her to reconsider the deferred prosecution agreement option.

Months of political controversy followed, resulting in Wilson-Raybould resigning from cabinet before being tossed out of the Liberal caucus along with her ally in the public debate that ensued: former health and Indigenous services minister Jane Philpott.

Mario Dion, the conflict of interest and ethics commissioner, released a report in August that found Trudeau had violated the Conflict of Interest Act.

'You don't get do-overs in politics'

The allegation that Trudeau improperly tried to influence the attorney general significantly depressed the prime minister's voter support.

Trudeau defended his actions by saying that he was trying to prevent the loss of jobs in Quebec, but the damage to the prime minister's reputation had been done — just as federal political parties were readying themselves for a fall election.

Primarily, he was trying to prevent the loss of his own job.

In its year-end interview with the prime minister, the Canadian Press asked Trudeau if his actions on the SNC-Lavalin file were worth the political cost.

"As we look back over the past year on this issue, there are things that we could have, should have, would have done differently had we known," he said.

"You don't get do-overs in politics. You only do the best you can to protect jobs, to respect the independence of the judiciary, and that's exactly what we did every step of the way."

No, that's not what you did! You did not respect the independence of the Judiciary or you wouldn't have lost two of your most capable ministers, nor would you have been found guilty of violating the Conflict of Interest Act. Or did you forget your Principal Secretary and top Public Servant were both forced to resign for their excessive pressure on JWR.

The deal SNC-Lavalin struck to avoid trial may not have been a deferred prosecution agreement, but it resulted in almost the same outcome for the company.

All other charges were dropped in exchange for a guilty plea on one charge of fraud over $5,000, plus an agreement to pay $280 million in fines and comply with a probation order for three years.

"So far I'm happy, because that's what we were asking for," said Quebec Premier François Legault. "SNC-Lavalin's paying $280 million, but it's only for a part of the company. The rest of the company will be able to continue to have access to public contracts."

Wilson-Raybould's successor, Justice Minister David Lametti, said he had no part in the deal.

"Yesterday, I became aware that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada and counsel for SNC-Lavalin had reached an agreement to resolve the ongoing criminal proceedings against the company and its affiliates," a statement from Lametti's office said.

"This decision was made independently by the PPSC, as part of their responsibility to continually assess and determine the appropriate path for cases under their jurisdiction. Canadians can have confidence that our judicial and legal systems are working as they should."

Right, it's our political system that is thoroughly screwed up! When you cause the two ministers with the most integrity to resign from cabinet and from the party, that says all you need to know about Justin Trudeau.

Yesterday, Jodie Wilson-Raybould was named Canada's Newsmaker of the Year. She and Jane Philpott have both left the very Liberal Party; JWR was re-elected in October as an independent MP; Jane Philpott failed in her attempt to do the same.