"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label European Court of Human Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European Court of Human Rights. Show all posts

Monday, March 18, 2019

European Court of Human Rights Protects Terrorists Rather Than Europeans

Al Qaeda chief's wife, 49, wins human rights battle after claiming
UK airport police breached her privacy by stopping her for questioning
(and taxpayers will now foot her legal bills)


By DAVID CHURCHILL, BRUSSELS CORRESPONDENT FOR THE DAILY MAIL

The wife of an Al Qaeda chief had her human rights breached by UK airport police, European judges have ruled.

Sylvie Beghal, 49, was stopped at East Midlands Airport while returning to Leicester after a visit to her husband Djamel Beghal in a French jail.

The mother of three said she was detained without reasonable suspicion – violating her right to private and family life. 


Djamel Beghal was behind bars for plotting to blow up the American embassy in Paris +4
Sylvie Beghal (left), 49, was stopped for questioning after flying to France to visit Djamel Beghal (right), who was behind bars for plotting to blow up the American embassy in Paris

Her claims were rejected by the High Court and Supreme Court but the European Court of Human Rights eventually ruled in her favour.


The Home Office said it was disappointed by the ruling, which it has three months to challenge.


The airport incident in 2011 had led to Mrs Beghal being charged with failing to help officers – an offence under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Lord Carlile of Berriew, who was the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation from 2001 to 2011, said: 'Schedule 7 is absolutely key to the protection of the public in the UK and to national security.

'It has to be used carefully and proportionately, as recognised when the law was amended in 2014. But I'm very surprised that this case has resulted in such a ruling, particularly given the factual background.

'I fear we have to put this down to a questionable decision by the ECHR. In my view the British courts were right and correctly took their decisions in this case.'

Tory MP Andrew Bridgen, whose constituency covers the airport, said: 'It's sickening. These people are big on human rights but not so much on their responsibilities.

'We all have a duty to cooperate with the police with regards to terrorism and anyone who doesn't want to is breaking the bond of loyalty to our country.

The mother-of-three claimed she was stopped at East Midlands Airport (pictured) 'without reasonable suspicion'
and that her right to respect for private and family life was violated

'It's great she can use the law to protect her own right to family life, but she has strong links with a convicted terrorist and Al Qaeda have not shown any regard to human rights in the past with their victims.'

According to court documents lodged at the ECHR, Mrs Beghal was stopped at the airport after visiting her husband with their children. 

Officers said they wanted to talk to her to establish whether she might be 'a person concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism'.

She refused to answer questions until a lawyer was present and after 30 minutes was told she was free to go. But she was later charged under Schedule 7 and pleaded guilty at Leicester Magistrates' Court in December 2011. 

Beghal is said to have radicalised other terrorists while in jail, including Charlie Hebdo killer Cherif Kouachi (pictured)

She then launched a legal action, claiming the powers given to police under Schedule 7 did not have adequate safeguards to be 'in accordance with' the European Convention on Human Rights.

Her case reached the ECHR in January 2016, which last week ruled in her favour. Judges told the Government to foot her £21,531 legal bill.

Mrs Beghal has previously claimed her husband, one of Al Qaeda's top recruiters in Europe, was a victim of French injustice.

He is said to have radicalised other terrorists while in jail, including Charlie Hebdo killer Cherif Kouachi, one of two brothers who murdered 12 during the gun attack on the magazine's Paris offices in January 2015. 

He is also said to have mentored Amedy Coulibaly, who shot a policewoman and four shoppers dead at a kosher supermarket two days after the Hebdo attack.

Algerian-born Beghal settled in France in 1987 and married in 1990. He became a French citizen which allowed the couple to move to Leicester seven years later.

He regularly travelled to London and was allegedly radicalised at the Finsbury Park Mosque under the influence of Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada. He is also said to have flown to Afghanistan to receive orders from Osama Bin Laden.

Beghal was banned from the UK in 2009 after being jailed by the French for a plot to blow up the US embassy in Paris.

His wife is believed to have cost taxpayers more than a quarter of a million pounds in handouts since moving to the UK.

A Home Office spokesman said: 'We will now consider the implications of this judgment carefully.'




Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Burka Outlawed in Swiss State

To Veil or not to Veil

By JENNIFER NEWTON FOR MAILONLINE

Women who wear full face veils in public in a Swiss state could be fined up to £6,500 under new rules imposed by the local government.

Women who wear full face veils in
public in a Swiss state could be
fined up to £6,500
Females Muslims will be banned from wearing the burqa in shops, restaurants or public buildings in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino.

The local government in the southern Swiss state approved the ban after a referendum in September 2013 saw two in three voters backing the move.

According to the Local, the Ticino government had wanted to ban burqas and niqabs as well as masks worn by demonstrators and balaclavas.

However, MPs voted for a law that only applies to veils worn by some Muslim women and makes no exceptions for tourists visiting the area.

The minimum fine is 100 francs (£65) and women can be given a penalty of up to 10,000 francs (£6,500).

The Swiss Parliament says the ban does not violate federal law but it is not yet known when the new rules will come into force.

Visitors coming into Ticino will be informed at airports and by customs officers at the Italian border it is illegal for people to hide their face under a burqa or niqab, while in the state.

The ban on the burqa echoes similar legislation put in place in France, where women can be fined an initial penalty of £35 for wearing the garment, which can be increased to £150.

France's parliament passed the burka ban in 2010, leading to protests from Islamic groups who said it was discriminatory.

France has the biggest Muslim population in western Europe, and many believe that society has an agenda against them.

Which is exactly what feeds the victim mentality ISIS uses to recruit disenchanted Muslims.

An attempt by a British legal team to reverse France's burka ban was
rejected by the European Court of Human Rights, pictured, last year
However, an attempt by a British legal team to reverse France's burka ban was rejected by the European Court of Human Rights last year.

In a test case which will have widespread implications in other countries, judges said that the measure aimed at stopping women covering their faces in public was entirely justified.

They said that the right of ordinary people to 'live together' was a 'legitimate objective', and that Muslim women wearing face coverings threatened it.