"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Climate Change > MT Greene intros new bill to outlaw weather modification techniques; Amazon deforestration increasing again

 

US lawmaker calls for ban on ‘deadly weather modification’

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has announced a bill that would make the release of “weather-altering chemicals” a felony offense
US lawmaker calls for ban on ‘deadly weather modification’











US House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who once claimed that the Democrats can “control the weather,” has announced a federal bill aimed at banning what she called the “deadly practice” of geoengineering.

The move follows devastating rainstorms and flash flooding in Texas that killed at least 50 people, including 15 children, with dozens still missing as of Saturday evening.

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,” Greene wrote on X.

“I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months, writing this bill,” she added.

Greene said her proposal mirrors Florida’s Senate Bill 56, signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis on June 20. The Florida law bans geoengineering activities and carries penalties of up to five years in prison and $100,000 in fines. It also requires reporting from public airports and allows residents to file complaints through a state-run portal.

“We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,” Greene said. She named Representative Tim Burchett as a co-sponsor and urged support from both parties.

Greene made headlines last year when she claimed that the Democrats can “control the weather,” following Hurricane Helene, a Category 4 storm that left at least 227 dead and forced more than 5 million people to evacuate. Then-President Joe Biden condemned the remarks as “beyond ridiculous” and “stupid,” calling them a “reckless, irresponsible, and relentless promotion of disinformation and outright lies.”

Since then, a number of states have advanced legislation targeting weather modification. Louisiana is the latest to pass a measure such as this, joining Tennessee and Florida, while more than a dozen others – including New York and Arizona – have introduced similar bills.

Lawmakers backing the bans have cited limited research on the long-term impacts of practices like cloud seeding and emerging solar radiation modification techniques. Some critics have even raised concerns about ‘chemtrails’ – a conspiracy theory that aircraft release chemicals for weather control and other nefarious purposes.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has denied the existence of any government-led weather manipulation programs, insisting in a debunking fact sheet last year that no current technology available to humans can influence large-scale weather events.

================================================================================================


Amazon deforestation worsens in Brazil, Peru, data show

By Macarena Hermosilla
   
Activists protest in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in October in front of a mural painted with ashes from the fires ravaging the country. The mural, by Brazilian artist Mundano, was unveiled with a demand that agricultural companies stop deforestation in the Amazon. File photo by Isaac Fontana/EPA
Activists protest in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in October in front of a mural painted with ashes from the fires ravaging the country. The mural, by Brazilian artist Mundano, was unveiled with a demand that agricultural companies stop deforestation in the Amazon. File photo by Isaac Fontana/EPA

July 15 (UPI) -- The Amazon rainforest -- considered one of the world's most important climate regulators -- continues to face serious threats in 2025.

New data show that pressure on the ecosystem has intensified in Brazil and Peru during the first half of the year, while Colombia reports progress in curbing deforestation.

In Brazil, the National Institute for Space Research reported that 807 square miles of forest were lost between January and June -- a 27% increase compared to the same period in 2024.

The spike was especially pronounced between April and June, coinciding with the dry season and a rise in illegal activities, such as large-scale cattle ranching. In May, the deforested area increased by a record 51% compared to the same month last year.

"The loss of forest in May 2025 was largely due to wildfires. ... We are beginning to see a shift that confirms the warnings ... that the rainforest is being severely impacted by climate change," said João Paulo Capobianco, executive secretary of Brazil's Ministry of Environment and Climate Change.

The trend threatens to reverse the gains made in 2023 and 2024, when deforestation fell to its lowest level in nearly a decade, driven by stronger enforcement and improved monitoring.

In Peru, while official figures for the first half of 2025 have not yet been released, the Monitoring of the Andean Amazon Project warns of ongoing primary forest loss in regions such as Ucayali and Madre de Dios, where illegal mining and wildfires have caused significant damage.

Peru lost more than 140,000 hectares, or 346,000 acres, of forest in 2024, and active hot spots detected in early 2025 suggest the trend is continuing.

According to the country's Ministry of Environment, deforestation in the first quarter of the year totaled 27,000 hectares, or about 67,000 acres -- a 33% decrease compared to the same period in 2024. The drop was even more pronounced in Amazonian national parks, where forest clearing fell by 54%.

The reduction was driven by a government-led multisector strategy that combined satellite monitoring, community agreements and joint operations that involve the military, environmental agencies and prosecutors.

However, a separate report by the Office of the Inspector General warned that forest clearing continues in remote areas, with more than 88,000 hectares, or 217,000 acres, affected between October 2024 and March.

The upcoming COP30 summit, scheduled for November 2025 in Belém do Pará, Brazil, could be critical for setting commitments and securing concrete funding to protect the Amazon, which is essential for maintaining climate stability, not only for South America, but for the entire planet.



Monday, February 12, 2024

Is there Free Speech in America? Not so much!

 

Biden Regime Pressured Amazon to

Suppress Books It Didn’t Like

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

What’s the difference between books and any other kind of speech? Books have an emotional quality to them.

Delete someone’s post and it can be called enforcing community guidelines, but burn a book and suddenly you’re a Nazi. Speech is still speech, but the idea of going after books in particular summons all sorts of historical references from the Muslim destruction of the Library of Alexandria to book-burning rallies in Berlin.

It’s why the Left was able to mobilize so much opposition by accusing school boards and parents of trying to “ban books” by keeping pornographic books out of schools.

Still every prior form of political censorship was defended by leftists, why not go after books on Amazon?

Tyler O’Neil at the Daily Signal reports that the Biden team saw no apparent difference between targeting books on Amazon and any other forms of social media censorship that it was pushing.

Andrew Slavitt, then a senior adviser on Biden’s COVID-19 response team, had previously asked, “Who can we talk to about the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation [on] Amazon?”

And by “talk to”, they meant get rid of.

In one email produced through a House Judiciary Committee subopena had an Amazon employee asking, “Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

After the March 9 meeting at the White House, Amazon staff strategized how to respond to a negative story that Buzzfeed would publish discussing “COVID-19 related books for sale on Amazon.” Staff noted that they were “feeling pressure from the White House Taskforce” on the issue of books “related to vaccine misinformation.”

Which means, the Whitehouse was feeling pressure from Big Pharma to prevent any books that might leak the truth about mRNA vaccines, from getting out.


The resulting compromise instead settled for shadowbanning the books.

In this discussion, a staffer noted that “we did enable Do Not Promote for anti-vax books whose primary purpose is to persuade readers vaccines are unsafe or ineffective on 3/9, and will review additional handling options for these books with you, [redacted], and [redacted] on 3/19.”

That March 9 decision to change Amazon’s algorithm to avoid promoting “anti-vax books” appears to have happened after the meeting with White House staff.

The media will predictably support this or ignore it: thus crossing another line. And at some point we’ll run out of lines. Liberals used to love Heinrich Heine’s line, “where they burn books, they will, in the end, burn human beings too.” There’s some truth to it. At least insofar as the sorts of regimes that burned people tended to have also burnt books beforehand.

The pattern here is similar to what we saw before with the #TwitterFiles. While externally Dot Coms defend censorship, internally we’ve seen a good deal of discomfort from top execs with what they’re being asked to do.

That discomfort is key. A judicial decision banning the government from pushing companies to censor materials was protested on the grounds that the government was persuading, not ordering. Liberals pretended that there was such a distinction. But the more of these cases are aired, the more that distinction collapses.

Justice Clarence Thomas had warned that government agencies pressuring social media companies to censor might not be considered “private action.” And without that, it’s just government censorship.


=================================================================================


Tuesday, September 26, 2023

Corruption is Everywhere > NJ Senator and wife hit with federal corruption charges; Feds + 17 States Sue Amazon

..

NJ Sen. Bob Menendez hit with federal corruption charges for

second time; allegedly took bribes — including $150K in gold bars


By Kyle Schnitzer, Priscilla DeGregory and Ben Kochman
Published Sep. 22, 2023, 9:59 a.m. ET
NYPost

New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez has been hit with federal corruption charges related to a years-long scheme in which he allegedly accepted bribes — including more than $150,000 in gold bars — in exchange for helping the government of Egypt and protecting the interests of three wealthy businessmen.

The Democrat, 69 — and his wife, Nadine Menendez, 56 — were charged with taking hundreds of thousands in bribes in the form of cash, gold bars, a Mercedes-Benz convertible and even exercise machines and an air purifier from 2018 through 2022, according to a Manhattan federal indictment unsealed Friday.

Manhattan US Attorney Damian Williams, at a news conference announcing the charges, said Menendez used his “power and influence” – including his position as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – to benefit the Egyptian regime.

He also allegedly tried to meddle in the criminal prosecution of one of the businessmen by pushing President Biden to nominate Philip R. Sellinger as the US Attorney for New Jersey, because he believed Sellinger could influence the case, according to the indictment.

This is Menendez’ second time facing federal corruption charges. The prior criminal case against Menendez in New Jersey ended with a hung jury in 2017.

The bombshell new indictment alleges Menendez, a New Jersey senator since 2006, stuffed stacks of alleged ill-gotten cash in the pockets of official government jackets emblazoned with his name – and Googled “kilo of gold price.

The feds raided Menendez’s Englewood Cliffs home in June 2022 and found “the fruits” of his “corrupt bribery agreement” — including the 2019 Mercedes C-Class, at least 13 gold bars and $486,461 in cash, the indictment states.


Piles of cash were found in envelopes in Menendez’s closet.
US District Court

The money was “stuffed in envelopes” and “hidden in clothing, closets, and a safe,” including in the jackets, pictures of which were included in the court papers.

Another $70,000 in cash was found in Nadine’s safe deposit box, the indictment claims.

In exchange, Menendez used his office to help and shield three Garden State businessmen, co-defendants Wael Hana, 40, Jose Uribe, 56, and Fred Daibes, 66, the court papers claim.

Nadine Arslanian and Bob Menendez at the White House.
Getty Images

Damian Williams, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announces the indictment of
NJ Senator Robert Menendez and his wife on corruption charges.
Steven Hirsch


Through a “corrupt relationship” with the three men, Menendez and his wife “accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars of bribes in exchange for Senator Menendez using his power and influence to protect and to enrich those businessmen and to benefit the government of Egypt,” Williams told reporters.

Menendez allegedly provided “substantial military aid to Egypt” including by:

Handing over sensitive information from the US government to Egyptian officials through a middleman, Hana, of Edgewater NJ., a longtime friend of Nadine’s who founded a halal food certification company.
Ghost writing a letter to other senators urging them to release a hold on $300 million in aid to Egypt.
Lobbying then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in April 2020 to increase US engagement in stalled negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia, and the Sudan over the building a dam on the Nile River, a key foreign policy issue for Egypt.


The senator also allegedly tried to interfere in criminal probes involving Uribe, a former insurance agent from Union City, NJ., and Daibes, a New Jersey real estate developer and Menendez fundraiser.

Uribe, who runs a trucking and insurance business, and Hana allegedly agreed to buy Menendez and his wife the Mercedes-Benz C-300 convertible, worth $60,000, in April 2019, the indictment claims.

On April 4, 2019, Uribe met with Nadine in a parking lot, handing her $15,000 in cash, which she used toward a down payment on the car. He also made monthly payments on the car from 2019 until June 2022.

Nadine sent a text to her politician husband with a photo of the Mercedes and the message: “Congratulations mon amour de la vie, we are the proud owners of a 2019 Mercedes” with a heart emoji, the indictment alleges.


Stacks of cash were found in Menendez’s closet with his government outerwear.
US District Court

In exchange, Menendez allegedly tried to get a prosecutor in the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office to offer a favorable outcome in the case against one of Uribe’s associates and in another investigation against one of his employees, court papers say.

The prosecutor found the meetings with Menendez inappropriate and didn’t succumb to pressure, but Uribe’s associate still got a no-jail plea agreement and his employee was never charged, according to the indictment.

Similarly, Menendez allegedly sought to help Daibes – who court papers say bribed the couple with gold bars and cash for a series of favors – in a federal case he faced by recommending Sellinger for the post of New Jersey US Attorney.

Prosecutors allege Daibes in March 2022 gave Nadine two gold bars that were a kilogram each – when at the time gold went for $60,000 per kilogram. And Daibes’ driver’s fingerprints were later discovered on an envelope containing thousands of dollars in cash and recovered from the couple’s home, according to the indictment.

While Sellinger – who was not accused of wrongdoing and who is named only as “official 3” in the indictment – wound up recusing himself from the case, Daibes still received a no-jail plea deal in April 2022, the indictment notes.

Williams pointed out a message on Menendez’s official Senate website, which states, in part, that “he cannot compel an agency to act in someone’s favor … he cannot influence matters involving a private business. It says he cannot get involved in criminal matters, or cases, period.”

“But we allege behind the scenes, Senator Menendez was doing those things for certain people, the people who were bribing him and his wife,” Williams charged.

Menendez met Hana, an Egyptian immigrant, through Nadine — who had been friends with Hana for years prior to her starting to date Menendez in 2018.

The couple went out with Hana and dined on his dime on several occasions — so that prosecutors say the businessman and Nadine could convince Menendez to use his post on the Foreign Relations Committee to help get military aid to Egypt. 

Egypt was at the time one of the top recipients of US aid — despite reservations from some politicians that the funds should be held until the country improved its human rights record.

In May 2018, Menendez, through his wife and Hana, provided an Egyptian official with “sensitive nonpublic” information about the number and nationality of people working in the US Embassy in Cairo, the feds allege. 

That same month, he gave Hana non-public information about US military aid to Egypt, the indictment states.

Menendez and his wife would meet with five Egyptian officials in the US including one that Nadine referred to as “the general.” And the couple, who wed in 2020, took a trip to Egypt in October 2021, meeting with a slew of officials there too, the court papers allege.

After one meeting between Menendez and an Egyptian official, Hana on June 23, 2021, purchased 22 one-ounce gold bars — two of which were later found at the senator’s house, the indictment states.

Hana and his company IS EG Halal in 2019 were given a monopoly by Egypt as the sole company to certify foods as Halal, despite having no prior experience in the field.

The businessman then allegedly paid Nadine, a former marketer for a medical company, with three $10,000 checks for a no-show job at IS EG Halal. She used the money to help bring her mortgage payments up to date after foreclosure was initiated on her Bergen County property, the indictment states.

Williams noted that the investigation was “very much ongoing.”

For more on this article go to NYPost: “We’re not done,”

Personally, I think Nadine is inordinately involved here. Could it be she is an Egyptian plant?

=============================================================================================



U.S. government, 17 states sue Amazon for abusing monopoly power


Amazon.com accused by FTC of deceptive practices, favouritism and 'unlawful coercion'


Thomson Reuters · Posted: Sep 26, 2023 10:10 AM PDT | 

The Amazon logo is photographed at the Vivatech trade show in Paris on June 15.
(Michel Euler/The Associated Press)


The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a long-awaited antitrust lawsuit against Amazon.com on Tuesday, charging the online retailer with harming consumers through higher prices in the latest U.S. government legal action aimed at breaking Big Tech's dominance of the internet.

The lawsuit, which was joined by 17 state attorneys general, follows a four-year investigation and federal lawsuits filed against Alphabet's Google and Meta Platforms' Facebook.

"The FTC and its state partners say Amazon's actions allow it to stop rivals and sellers from lowering prices, degrade quality for shoppers, overcharge sellers, stifle innovation and prevent rivals from fairly competing against Amazon," the agency said in a statement.

The FTC said that it was asking the court to issue a permanent injunction, ordering Amazon.com to stop its unlawful conduct.

Amazon said that the FTC lawsuit was wrong-headed and would hurt consumers by leading to higher prices and slower deliveries.

"The practices the FTC is challenging have helped to spur competition and innovation across the retail industry, and have produced greater selection, lower prices and faster delivery speeds for Amazon customers, and greater opportunity for the many businesses that sell in Amazon's store," said David Zapolsky, Amazon's general counsel.

The federal complaint follows other actions the FTC has taken against Amazon recently. In June, the agency sued the company, alleging it was using deceptive practices to enrol consumers into Amazon Prime and making it challenging for them to cancel their subscriptions.

In late May, the company agreed to pay a $25-million US civil penalty to settle allegations that it violated a child privacy law and misled parents about data deletion practices on its popular voice assistant Alexa.

Booksellers and authors have also been urging the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate what they've called Amazon's "monopoly power over the market for books and ideas."

Unnecessary fees, pressure to use


The FTC said that Amazon, founded in 1994 by Jeff Bezos and worth more than $1 trillion US, punished sellers that sought to offer prices that were lower than Amazon's by making it difficult for consumers to find the seller on Amazon's platform.

Other allegations include:

Amazon gave preference to its own products in search results over competitors.
Charging costly monthly and advertising fees to sellers it says have no choice but to rely on Amazon.
Engaging in "unlawful coercion" to pressure sellers to join Amazon's Prime fulfilment service.

FTC chair Lina Khan said that Amazon had used illegal tactics to fend off companies that would have risen to challenge its monopoly.

"Amazon is now exploiting that monopoly power to harm its customers, both the tens of millions of families that shop on Amazon's platform and the hundreds of thousands of sellers that use Amazon to reach them," she said.

Khan, while a law student, wrote about Amazon.com's dominance in online retailing for The Yale Law Journal and was on the staff of the House committee that wrote a report issued in 2020 that advocated reining in four tech giants: Amazon.com, Apple, Google and Facebook.

Many analysts had wondered whether the agency would seek a forced breakup of the retail giant, which is also dominant in cloud computing through Amazon Web Services and has a growing presence in other sectors, like groceries and health care. In a briefing with reporters, Khan dodged questions of whether that will happen.

"At this stage, the focus is more on liability," she said.

Some estimates show Amazon controls about 40 per cent of the e-commerce market. A majority of the sales on its platform are facilitated by independent sellers consisting of small- and medium-sized businesses and individuals. In return for the access it provides to its platform, Amazon rakes in billions through referral fees and other services like advertising, which makes products sold by sellers more visible on the platform.

The vast majority of third-party merchants also use the company's fulfilment service to store inventory and ship items to customers. Amazon has been consistently raising fees for those reliant on the program and more recently imposed, and then abandoned, another fee on some who don't — a move that was blasted by the company's critics.

Amazon critic welcomes suit


Last quarter, Amazon reported $32.3 billion US in revenue from third-party services. According to the anti-monopoly organization Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR), the fees cost U.S. sellers 45 per cent of their revenue in the first half of this year — up from 35 per cent in 2020 and 19 per cent in 2014.

The ILSR, long critical of Amazon's power, welcomed the agency's lawsuit.

"No corporation has ever centralized this much power across so many crucial sectors. Left unchecked, Amazon's power to dictate and control threatens the rule of law and our ability to maintain open, democratically governed markets," said Stacy Mitchell, the group's co-executive director.

The need to take action against Big Tech has been one of the few ideas that Democrats and Republicans have agreed on. During the Trump administration, which ended in 2021, the Justice Department and FTC opened probes into Google, Facebook, Apple and Amazon.

But in terms of the current lawsuit, the large majority of states joining were solid Democratic jurisdictions, with no states in the south.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Seattle, where Amazon is based.

With files from CBC News and The Associated Press



Friday, September 17, 2021

A Glimpse of the Future > Forward to the Past? Company Towns the "future of a large segment of the working class.”

..

Social media recoils as Bloomberg praises Amazon’s warehouse-

based exurban ‘factory towns’ as ‘the future of working class’


The future according to Bezos, looks a lot like company towns from 100 years ago


17 Sep, 2021 23:40

The future of the working class? © Reuters / Clodagh Kilcoyne


Amazon’s massive new distribution centers, soon to be surrounded by infrastructure built to serve workers, are being compared to Gilded Age company towns. While many are aghast at the idea, fellow billionaires are praising it.

The e-commerce empire founded by Jeff Bezos will offer the American working class a better option than scraping to get by in increasingly expensive cities, investment adviser Conor Sen wrote in a Friday oped for Bloomberg, the financial news outlet whose namesake is billionaire former New York mayor and failed presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg.

“Let’s call them ‘factory towns,’” Sen suggests, apparently in an effort to avoid the baggage that accompanies the concept of “company towns.” Popular in the late 19th century among the new breed of mega-corporations – railroads, steel mills, and the like – many of these dormitory communities held workers as veritable prisoners, paying them in scrip that was only redeemable at the company-run store and retaining groups of thuggish Pinkerton “detectives” to stamp out any attempts to unionize.

Amazon’s “factory towns,” however – Sen writes – are supposedly marked by rising wages, massive job creation and the potential for a “higher likelihood of success” in “solving inequality” than “high-cost metropolitan areas.” He believes that those should be encouraged, at one point even calling these ‘Bezosvilles’ the "future of a large segment of the working class.”

The writer waits until the conclusion to acknowledge the “new issues” that will “need addressing,” little details like “adequate amounts of housing, schools and healthcare facilities.”

Sen is known for his ruling-class-friendly takes, which recently included a call for Americans to embrace the idea of “build-to-rent” communities rather than strive to attain the once-commonplace ideal of homeownership. However, many on social media couldn’t help but notice that it took a financier writing for a news outlet belonging to a fellow billionaire to say anything nice at all about Amazon’s silent conquest of the sprawling spaces between American cities – and the populations that call those spaces home.

“Two out of two billionaires agree…” cracked one tweeter.

Others had to control their gag reflex at the idea that Amazon, which made billions of dollars off the Covid-19 pandemic that saw millions lose their livelihoods and is legendary for tight schedules forcing workers to relieve themselves in plastic bottles, was capable of being a friend to the working class.

Some saw the company inching ever closer to ‘The Warehouse,’ a dystopian yet increasingly realistic send-up of modern American mega-capitalism as practiced by an Amazonesque firm called “Cloud,” while others drew their cultural references from the era of the original “company towns.”

Amazon has trumpeted a recent starting wage increase – from $17 per hour to about $18 per hour – in an effort to attract workers who sat out the pandemic collecting unemployment and now need jobs. The company reportedly plans to hire another 125,000 workers in the US and is deploying unusually generous benefits, like hefty sign-on bonuses and tuition assistance, to convince job-searchers it’s a better bet than Wal-Mart or other megaretailers.

However, Amazon's reputation for union-busting – which in one memorable case reportedly extended to changing the timing of traffic lights outside a warehouse in order to prevent workers from discussing organization efforts – along with eerie micromanaging of employees’ appearance and sloppy attempts to refute workers’ stories of ‘peeing in bottles’ have made it a decidedly unsympathetic character in the class war.

=============================================================================================

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Corruption is Everywhere - Apparently, All Over EU in Amazon; Big Pharma in Mexico; Pfizer, Moderna, Hike Prices; Complicated Corruption in Russian Investment Market

..

Amazon hit with whopping $887 million fine by

European privacy regulators

30 Jul, 2021 13:57

The Amazon app is seen on a smartphone in this illustration taken July 13, 2021 © Reuters / Dado Ruvic


Amazon has been handed an $888 million fine by European Union regulators for breaching the bloc’s data protection laws. The fine is the largest issued by the EU, but is still less than one percent of the firm’s annual revenue.

The Luxembourg National Commission for Data Protection (CNPD) issued the fine earlier this month, and Amazon reported it on Friday in a filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The CNPD issued the fine claiming that Amazon had processed customer data in violation of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a tough privacy law that took effect in 2018. Amazon disputed the fine, calling it “without merit,” and stating that the firm would “defend ourselves vigorously in this matter.”

“There has been no data breach, and no customer data has been exposed to any third party,” Amazon added in a statement. “These facts are undisputed. We strongly disagree with the CNPD’s ruling.”

The fine is the largest penalty to date issued for a GDPR violation. The largest fine issued beforehand was a $57 million ruling against Google by French regulators in 2018. Nevertheless, while $887 million would be a staggering amount of money for most companies, for Amazon it represents a tiny slice of the firm’s annual takings. With sales buoyed by the closure of brick and mortar outlets during the coronavirus pandemic, Amazon recorded more than $383 billion in sales last year, enough to pay the EU fine 431 times over.

Under the GDPR, watchdogs like the CNPD can fine companies up to 4% of their annual global sales.

Amazon will appeal the fine, but even if the company loses, it can afford to shrug off nearly a billion dollars. However, the EU is also investigating Amazon for potentially breaking antitrust rules over its alleged use of data from third-party sellers to more strategically price its own products. Similar probes have been brought by Germany and the UK, and in the US, lawmakers from both parties have proposed using antitrust legislation to break up tech monopolies like Amazon and Google.




Mexico won’t be ‘hostage’ to Big Pharma, president says, as internet

predicts trouble after country rejects Covid jabs for kids

31 Jul, 2021 10:46

FILE PHOTO: Mexico's President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador ©  REUTERS/Edgard Garrido

Social media users have theorized that President Andres Manuel López Obrador could face severe repercussions after he refused to purchase Covid vaccines for children, vowing that Mexico wouldn’t bow to pressure from drugs firms.

In remarks made earlier this week, the Mexican leader said his government was still waiting for the scientific community to demonstrate the benefits of vaccinating minors. Until conclusive evidence was provided, Mexico would refuse to purchase jabs for children, Obrador announced, adding that...

pharmaceutical firms seemed to be focused more on making profits than on
ensuring medical necessity as they rake in record sales from Covid-19 vaccines.

Mexico will not be held hostage by pharmaceutical companies that only want to do business and scare children with the idea that it is necessary to vaccinate against Covid-19.

He was similarly critical of plans by drugs companies to introduce third- or even fourth-dose booster shots, opining that the jabs could be “superfluous.”

Speaking on the same topic, Undersecretary for Health Hugo López-Gatell claimed there was “no scientific evidence” showing the jab was “essential” for minors, given the high rate of inoculation among the adult population, Excélsior, Mexico City’s second-oldest daily, reported. 

Mexico has approved a range of Covid vaccines for emergency use, including shots developed by Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and Sinovac, as well as Russia’s Sputnik V. 

The country’s Health Ministry recently revealed that a minimum of 48% of Mexicans have received at least one vaccine dose. 

Like many other countries, Mexico rolled out its inoculation program in phases, giving high-risk groups first priority. Currently, those under 18 are not included in the vaccine drive.

Largely ignored by international media, Obrador’s provocative remarks went viral after an English-subtitled video of his speech was shared across social media. 

Several comments hailed the Mexican president’s “cajones” for calling out Big Pharma greed. Pfizer, for example, has boasted record profits and recently raised full-year sales estimates for its vaccine to $45 billion.

Others shared more conspiratorial reactions to Obrador’s comments. Numerous observers theorized that the Mexican president was exposing himself to potential harm or an “accident” by criticizing Big Pharma firms in such a blunt and direct manner. 

With 45 billion dollars a year on the line, one life lost seems like a good deal. It's just my humble opinion, but I think JFK, RFK, MLK, and Pope John Paul (In God's Name - David Yallop) were murdered for a lot less. 

While Mexico doesn’t feel comfortable administering the shot to youngsters, many other countries have begun to offer the vaccine to minors, both in clinical trials and as part of inoculation drives. According to the Mayo Clinic, around 14% of Americans under 18 have received at least one Covid shot. 




Pfizer, Moderna, hike prices for their Covid jabs by up to a quarter for the EU

1 Aug, 2021 19:04

©  REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration


Pfizer has reportedly raised the price of its Covid vaccine dose by a quarter, with Moderna also ramping up the price in its latest deal with the European Union. The two are making tens of billions of dollars in pandemic profits.

According to the Financial Times, which has seen contracts between the two pharmaceutical companies and the EU, Pfizer's latest price for one vaccine dose was €19.50, or around $23 – up by four euro from the previous unit price of €15.50 euro.

Meanwhile, Moderna's latest price is around €21.50 ($25.50) per dose, up from the previous price of €19 ($22.60). Despite this, the Moderna price is still lower than previously expected – $28.50 – because of the EU purchasing more doses.

Pfizer and Moderna – which earn a profit from the vaccines, unlike AstraZeneca, which is sold at cost – have pulled in tens of billions of dollars from the vaccines, with Pfizer forecasting $33.5 billion in revenue from its doses in this year alone. The forecast is up $7.5 billion from its previous prediction in the last quarter.

The previous story used the forecast number of $45 billion.

Moderna, though behind Pfizer in sales, is forecasting $19.2 billion in Covid-19 vaccine revenue for 2021.

Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine still hasn’t been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) despite having been registered in 69 of the world's countries to date, including EU members Hungary and Slovakia.

And yet, nobody is doing double-blind studies on Ivermectin which is almost free. Why?

=========================================================================================



How Michael Calvey went from billion-dollar Moscow investor

to facing years behind bars in a Russian jail

1 Aug, 2021 10:24
By Gabriel Gavin, in Moscow



One morning in February, back in 2019, Michael Calvey got a knock on the door of his Moscow apartment. The American financier may have been an influential poster-boy for foreign investment in Russia, but the police didn’t care.

Accused of dodgy dealing, the businessman was locked up in the notorious Matrosskaya Tishina prison, on the outskirts of the Russian capital, within days. After months of appeals he was released, first to house arrest in his upmarket residential building and, later, he was allowed to go out subject to curfew rules. Despite that, Calvey’s life has gone from business meetings and investment opportunities to legal proceedings and the ever-looming threat of jail time. Now, that two-and-a-half-year-long battle might be coming to a head, and his team expects to hear a verdict on Monday.

Along with three other executives from Baring Vostok, the $3.7-billion investment firm he founded, Calvey is facing charges of embezzlement and fraud. Prosecutors claim he was at the center of a scheme to pocket 2.5 billion rubles (US$34.3 million) from Russia’s Vostochny Bank as part of a high-stakes transaction, with officials claiming Calvey and his associates had overestimated the value of an asset as part of a loan scheme. The authorities are seeking a six-year suspended prison sentence, while the businessmen insist that they are innocent and the charges have been trumped up by corporate rivals.

In his final remarks in court last month, Calvey said that “the evidence that the prosecution presented to the court and that was examined during the trial not only does not incriminate me in any crime, but confirms my innocence and the innocence of my colleagues.” According to him and his lawyers, official appraisals show that there was no fudging of the figures and that they’ve only ever been honest and transparent in their multi-billion dollar transactions. 

Honest and transparent in Moscow! Whoever heard of that?

The trouble started, they said, when their firm became embroiled in a legal dispute with Vostochny Bank, owned by high-powered businessman Artem Avetisyan. The tycoon had previously been appointed head of the new business division at the Agency for Strategic Initatives, chaired by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Baring Vostok brought the case against the investment fund in a British court, claiming hundreds of million dollars in damages over the alleged stripping of assets from a jointly-owned company. The arrests, Calvey and his fellow executives say, were designed to prevent them from effectively trying the case in London.

After a Russian court ruled in favor of Avetisyan and Vostochny Bank over a separate dispute in 2019, the firm said it would no longer be pressing criminal charges against the leadership of Baring Vostok. However, prosecutors have continued unabated and, according to Calvey’s team, have taken an apparent absence of evidence for embezzlement as a sign that there was a coverup.

What makes the case remarkable is that Calvey was a clear success story for foreign investment in Russia. Passionate about the country as a burgeoning marketplace, he largely steered clear of domestic politics in a country that was not his own and appeared frequently to tout its financial prospects at major events like the annual St Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF).

In addition, under his leadership, Baring Vostok has plowed cash into Russia’s star businesses, such as tech giant Yandex. Moscow business daily Vedomosti described the financial firm as “the symbol of direct investment in Russia” and, according to the company’s figures, it has invested more than $2.5 billion in mid-sized Russian firms and startups, many of which have plans to go global if they can attract enough capital.

A number of prominent officials and business executives have since rallied around Calvey and his colleagues, while the American has sought to portray the dispute as an existential issue for investment in the country. According to Calvey, a ruling in his favor would be a sign that the country is a safe destination for business. “It would not be an exaggeration to say that such a positive decision by the court could bring Russia billions of dollars in new investments, adding thousands of jobs,” he said in a statement, and has insisted he wants to remain in Russia and continue his work after the case is settled.

While Calvey and his advisers have consistently portrayed him as an apolitical figure, solely interested in opportunities in Russia as an emerging market, the financier has also served on the Board of Directors of The Atlantic Council, viewed in Moscow as a rabidly anti-Russian, NATO-aligned lobby group. He was invited to join in 2009, when relations between Russia and the West were far better than they are today. 

In 2019, the Russian Ministry of Justice designated The Atlantic Council as an “undesirable organization,” effectively banning it from operating in the country. He has, however, reportedly had no involvement since 2016. While sources say he was intent on balancing the Atlantic Council’s strongly anti-Moscow standpoint, this would have been an ill-fated task, given the body relies on that posture for its funding.

I wonder from whom their funding comes?

For Calvey’s team, even being found criminally liable for a lesser sentence – even one without jail time – would be considered a defeat, given such a verdict would be a black mark against the names of Baring Vostok executives when it comes to corporate affairs. For the prosecutors, a long-lasting and controversial case ending without a conviction, even of an administrative offense, would draw into question the basis of the charges and the decision to pursue them. In short, there is a tough standoff that will be difficult to resolve and leave at least one side feeling poorly served by the courts.

What is clear is that, while the fate of Calvey and his colleagues hangs in the balance, far broader debates around foreign investment in Russia and the rule of law are only just beginning.