The Liberal Government is hiding the vast majority of information provided by NSICOP. Consequently, several sitting Members of Parliament, and possibly the Senate, are still functioning under the influence of foreign interests. Is it because the majority of those influenced are Liberals? The names must be released in the next 14 or 15 months before the next federal elections, or the government itself can be accused of colluding with foreign powers to subvert democracy.
Canada’s democracy ‘under attack,’
ex-China envoy warns after NSICOP report
Canada’s former ambassador to China, Guy Saint-Jacques, says Beijing’s meddling in Canada’s democracy is worse than it has ever been.
Earlier this week, a report from the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) alleged that sitting federal politicians are “witting” participants in foreign interference schemes.
The report did not name names, and the Liberal government is resisting revealing their identities, citing concerns about sharing intelligence information.
Saint-Jacques told Global News he isn’t surprised about the bombshell allegations, but he is baffled by the lack of government response.
“What surprises me is that in fact the situation seems to have become worse over time,” Saint-Jacques said. “It’s mind-boggling that not more has been done to counter that.”
When Saint-Jacques was an ambassador 10 years ago, he said he was privy to discussions raising concerns about parliamentarians, senators, provincial politicians and political staffers colluding with China.
The former ambassador says Canada has been “complacent” for nearly a decade when it comes to Beijing, and federal leaders need to take a harder approach.
“We should punish those where we have evidence,” he said.
“In other cases, when we have a good inkling of what’s going on, there’s a need to speak with these people and say, ‘This is behaviour that is not tolerable.’”
The report’s release has raised concerns from security experts that under current Canadian laws, it is difficult to prosecute MPs found to be working with foreign states. The Liberal government has tabled Bill C-70, which is meant to address foreign interference and require those acting on behalf of foreign governments in Canada to list themselves on a registry.
“I think it will make people liable for prosecution,” Saint-Jacques said. “And I think that’s a welcome step.”
It’s not clear whether the legislation will be put in place before the next general election, which must be called no later than October 2025.
But Saint-Jacques says there is more that could be done before the next election. He is advocating for political parties to “clean up” their nomination processes for political candidates and change rules so that only Canadian citizens can vote for candidates.
“(Foreign agents) may have been involved in some processes to select leaders at the federal level, and this is something that will need to be looked at,” Saint-Jacques said. “Our democracy is under attack.”
===========================================================================================
NSICOP report more than a Pandora’s box of
bad news for Canadian democracy
Let the cops deal with the crooks. But dish the facts to Canadians so that they can deal with the unscrupulous.
BY MICHAEL HARRIS | June 10, 2024, The Hill Times
HALIFAX—The more secretive a society gets, the less democratic it becomes.
As The Washington Post’s motto puts it, “Democracy dies in darkness.” Canadian democracy has been weakened this past week by a signal failure of transparency, a dire error of priorities. On an issue of monumental importance, the public was informationally dealt out.
What makes that harder to take is that the Trudeau government never misses an opportunity to take a bow for its openness in governance. The PM talks the talk, but sometimes doesn’t walk the walk.
Thanks to the work of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), Canadians have learned that some Members of Parliament have been helping foreign actors to interfere in this country’s politics and elections.
The NSICOP report released on June 3 said that certain elected officials “began wittingly assisting foreign state actors soon after their election.” The key word is “wittingly.”
The committee members said that they had seen intelligence suggesting that some MPs worked to influence colleagues on behalf of India, and that they had provided confidential information to officials with the Indian government.
In one case cited in the report, that relied on information from CSIS, a then-sitting MP had a relationship with a foreign intelligence officer.
According to the report, the MP even tried to arrange a meeting with a senior foreign intelligence officer in a foreign country.
Other disturbing activities by certain MPs included soliciting support from foreign missions during election campaigns to get the support of community groups; accepting funds or benefits from foreign missions that were disguised to conceal their source; advancing the interest of foreign countries by either influencing their Canadian parliamentary colleagues, or by their actual work in the House; and handing over privileged information on the work or opinions of fellow MPs, allowing foreign actors to pressure them into changing their views.
The NSICOP report also laid out another explosive finding, that China and India interfered in Conservative Party of Canada leadership races. According to the report, there were “two specific instances where [People’s Republic of China] officials allegedly interfered in the leadership races of the Conservative Party of Canada.”
The report also includes an allegation that India interfered in a single Conservative Party leadership contest. Interestingly, India was recently dropped from the International Democracy Union, an organization dedicated to getting right-wing governments elected around the globe. The IDU is run by former Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper.
(For the record, it should be noted that the CPC stated that the party never received any communication from CSIS regarding foreign interference in its leadership races.)
All of the above is not a Pandora’s box of bad news for Canadian democracy. It is a Pandora’s moving van.
If it is true that foreign countries are playing an active role in selecting and directing not only Members of Parliament, but leaders of political parties, this is an all-hands-on-deck moment for the nation. It is not merely “concerning” as Deputy PM and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland put it. It is a five-alarm blaze.
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh had it right when he said that no MP who is doing such things should continue to sit in Parliament. The problem with the report is that it went to the laundry before it was tabled in the House of Commons. All of the crucial detail was redacted.
So Canadians don’t know which MPs may have been compromised by foreign actors.
They don’t know which Conservative leadership races that China and India are alleged to have interfered.
They don’t know how much money, or what benefits might have been involved.
They don’t know the foreign country where one MP is alleged to have tried to meet a senior foreign intelligence officer.
They don’t know the party affiliation of the MPs alleged to have aided foreign actors in meddling in Canadian democracy.
The rationale for redacting the details? It was to prevent the spread of “injurious or privileged information.”
There is some merit in that argument.
If CSIS doesn’t have it right, naming names could ruin innocent individuals. And if there are ongoing police investigations into the allegations contained in the NSICOP report, those investigations could be compromised by revealing further details. And then there is the question of protecting classified information, and the sources and methods of the intelligence community.
But here is the counter-argument. The purpose of a report commissioned by the prime minister on the critical issue of foreign interference in Canada’s politics and elections should be to inform, not to titillate and then leave people in the dark.
That is especially true since the government, as the NSICOP report states, has been so slow to respond to what is a crisis of national security in Canada. This is the third time such a committee has been asked to look into this burning issue.
Justin Trudeau didn’t want a public inquiry into this matter, and he had some valid reasons for that view. But in substituting yet another all-party committee investigation, that committee should at least have had the right to share with Canadians the details of what it actually found.
That didn’t happen.
Instead, the report was fitted with a silencer. It was adapted to protect possibly underhanded MPs and the intelligence service, not Canadians, who don’t have the information to confirm that their MPs are not selling them down the river to foreign actors.
Canadians—not the government of the day—own the democracy. They are entitled to the data gathered by the NSICOP committee. They are entitled to know if foreign corruption has tainted our public life. Freeland says leave it to the police, and it will all be Hakuna Matata.
But she misses the point—or at least, severely minimizes it. The police can, indeed, take care of the criminal issues that may be at play here. But what about the stuff that stinks, but isn’t criminal? Last word to the committee: “Regardless, all the behaviours are deeply unethical, and, the committee would submit, contrary to the oaths and affirmations parliamentarians make to conduct themselves in the best interest of Canada.”
Let the cops deal with the crooks. But dish the facts to Canadians so that they can deal with the unscrupulous.
Michael Harris is an award-winning author and journalist.
The Hill Times
============================================================================================
