"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life"

Father God, thank you for the love of the truth you have given me. Please bless me with the wisdom, knowledge and discernment needed to always present the truth in an attitude of grace and love. Use this blog and Northwoods Ministries for your glory. Help us all to read and to study Your Word without preconceived notions, but rather, let scripture interpret scripture in the presence of the Holy Spirit. All praise to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour
Showing posts with label F-35s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label F-35s. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Politics in Europe > Poland's new President Trump Fan; Spain passes on purchase of F-35s; Another right-leaning politician removed from office

 

Pro-Trump nationalist Karol Nawrocki sworn in as Poland's new president

Europe

Karol Nawrocki was sworn in as Poland's new president on Wednesday, pledging to defend a "sovereign Poland". An ally of US President Donald Trump, Nawrocki's election in June marked a major setback for pro-EU Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s government, raising the prospect of institutional clashes ahead of the 2027 parliamentary elections.

New nationalist President Karol Nawrocki called for a "sovereign Poland" and promised to "fight those who are pushing the nation towards decline" as he was sworn in on Wednesday.

Nawrocki, 42, a supporter of US President Donald Trump, won a June 1 election in a major blow for the pro-EU government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a former European Council president.

"I will be the voice of those who want a sovereign Poland that is in the EU, but a Poland that is not the EU," he told lawmakers after taking his oath of office.

"We must fight those who are pushing the nation towards decline and degradation," he said, citing Ignacy Paderewski, a Polish prime minister from the early 20th century.

Nawrocki, a historian and political novice, has branded Tusk's government as the "worst" in the history of post-communist Poland.

Tusk said he was "prepared, of course" for a "confrontation" with the new president.

He also warned Nawrocki against overstepping his remit.

"If necessary, we will of course stand firm as guardians of the constitution," he said.

Presidents in Poland can initiate as well as veto legislation, but the government is in charge of domestic and foreign policy.

In a more conciliatory message on social media, Tusk said he had already worked with three presidents in the past.

"What will it be like with the fourth? We'll manage," he wrote.

Relations between government and president are likely to be tense, particularly in the run-up to parliamentary elections planned for 2027.

'He doesn't grovel'

Outside the parliament, thousands of people came to show their support for Nawrocki.

Outside the parliament, thousands of people came to show their support for nationalist President Karol Nawrocki.
Outside the parliament, thousands of people came to show their support for nationalist President Karol Nawrocki. © Sergei Gapon, AFP

"He doesn't grovel before Brussels," Jan Smolinski, 75, a retired miner, told AFP, adding: "He's a true Pole, flesh and blood."

Marietta Borcz, a 57-year-old dental assistant, said it was "important" to her that Nawrocki "is Catholic and will uphold Christian values".

During the election campaign, Nawrocki ruled out easing Poland's near total abortion ban or allowing same-sex civil partnerships.

Nawrocki greeted supporters in different parts of Warsaw and attended a mass in the capital's Old Town.

Also outside the parliament, a small group of around 20 protesters held up black roses, saying Nawrocki's inauguration was "a black day for Poland".

Stanislawa Sklodowska, 72, a retired economist said his election "reflects poorly on us Poles".

A small group of around 20 protesters held up black roses.
A small group of around 20 protesters held up black roses. © Sergei Gapon, AFP

Nawrocki, who travelled to Washington to seek Trump's backing during the campaign, won a narrow victory against liberal candidate Rafal Trzaskowski.

The result showed the high degree of political polarisation in the EU and NATO member state, a key supporter of neighbouring Ukraine.

Nawrocki has promised to be "an active president" from the start and has said he wants to "stimulate" the government with various bills.

But the government holds a parliamentary majority and analysts say the two sides may be forced to make some compromises.

"Both parties should realise that engaging in intense confrontation is obviously not the way forward," said Piotr Trudnowski, a member of Klub Jagiellonski, a Christian-Democrat think tank.

'Poland First, Poles First'

Ewa Marciniak, a political scientist at the University of Warsaw, said that Nawrocki would have to work with the government on foreign policy – in which he has "no experience".

During the election campaign, he highlighted the importance of ties with the United States and his close ties with Trump.
During the election campaign, he highlighted the importance of ties with the United States and his close ties with Trump. © Sergei Gapon, AFP

During the election campaign, he highlighted the importance of ties with the United States and his close ties with Trump.

"It is precisely from this that he will build his foreign policy, at least initially," Marciniak said.

One major difference could be relations with Ukraine.

Trudnowski said that Nawrocki would "not be as enthusiastic" as his predecessor Andrzej Duda on Ukraine.

During his campaign, Nawrocki opposed the idea of NATO membership for Ukraine and criticised Kyiv for not having "shown gratitude for what the Poles have done".

Under his slogan "Poland First, Poles First", he was critical of some of the benefits received by the more than one million Ukrainians who have fled to the country.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky congratulated Nawrocki on Wednesday and said he looked forward to "constructive and direct dialogue".

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)





EU nation shelves purchase of 

US F-35 fighter jets – media

Spain’s decision reportedly reflects a broader EU militarization drive aimed at defense sovereignty and reduced reliance on US weapons
EU nation shelves purchase of US F-35 fighter jets – media











Spain has shelved plans to buy US-made F-35 stealth jets. The move is tied to EU defense spending rules and concerns over reliance on American weapons, El Pais has reported, citing government sources.

Preliminary talks had already begun over the fifth-generation fighter – built by aerospace giant Lockheed Martin – and Spain’s 2023 defense budget earmarked over €6 billion ($7 billion) to replace its aging Harrier and F-18 jets.

Although Madrid has committed to raising military spending to 2% of GDP, a new €10.5 billion defense plan allocates 85% of the funds to EU industry. The condition effectively blocked a US deal, according to the report on Wednesday. The move aligns with the EU’s growing militarization push and aims to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers.

An order of around 50 jets had reportedly been under discussion but is now on hold. The decision leaves the Spanish Navy without a fixed-wing successor for its AV-8B fleet, which is due to retire by 2030.

Spain’s Air Force had also reportedly considered the F-35A as a stopgap until the EU’s sixth-generation FCAS fighter becomes operational – not expected before 2040. While Madrid has acquired Eurofighters to replace older F-18s, military leaders warn against relying on a single aircraft type.

Despite the high cost, the F-35 was viewed as the most advanced option. “We’ll have to survive with fourth-generation fighters and hope FCAS arrives,” Spain’s Admiral Teodoro Lopez Calderon said in July.

The shift comes amid friction with Washington over defense spending. Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez clashed with US President Donald Trump at June’s NATO summit after rejecting a 5% military spending target. Trump responded with tariff threats.

Washington has also urged allies to buy American weapons. While Lockheed Martin said Spain’s F-35s would be built in Italy and qualify as ‘European’, concerns remain over US control of the aircraft’s systems and rising maintenance costs. Critics argue that the deal could deepen dependence on Washington.

Spain’s decision follows similar doubts in Germany and a review in Canada, as several NATO members reassess orders over cost, control, and political pressure.



Another right-leaning politician removed from office by leftist, pro Europe government and judiciary.


Bosnian Serb leader blasts decision to oust him

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s election body has revoked Milorad Dodik’s mandate after a court ruled he had violated the constitution
Bosnian Serb leader blasts decision to oust him











Republika Srpska President Milorad Dodik has slammed Bosnia’s election commission for revoking his mandate, calling it “more crap from Sarajevo” in a post on X on Wednesday. The leader of the Serb-majority autonomous region has signaled that he will defy the ruling and not step down.

Bosnia’s Central Election Commission (CEC) earlier annulled Dodik’s mandate after a Sarajevo court sentenced him to one year in prison and banned him from political office for six years over alleged anti-constitutional conduct.

“What if I refuse?.. That’s just more crap from Sarajevo. The last,” Dodik wrote. “Surrender and giving up do not exist. Surrender is not an option.”

He pledged to remain in office, vowing to continue “conscientiously and responsibly” performing his duties and defending the interests of the people while upholding the constitutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska.

Dodik is accused of blocking Constitutional Court rulings in Republika Srpska and defying Christian Schmidt, the international envoy for Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Schmidt, a German national, heads the Office of the High Representative, which oversees the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement that ended the Bosnian War.

Dodik has long accused Schmidt of overreach and infringing on Republika Srpska’s autonomy. In February, a Sarajevo court ruled he acted illegally by signing laws that made Schmidt’s decrees non-binding in the region.

Dodik rejected the verdict, claiming Western powers were behind it, but his appeal was rejected by a Bosnian court last week.

CEC member Suad Arnautovic claimed Dodik’s removal from office follows the law, which applies to elected officials sentenced to more than six months in jail. The decision will take effect after the appeals period. If the appeals fail, early elections are expected within 90 days.

Moscow, which does not recognize Schmidt’s authority without UN Security Council approval, has condemned Dodik’s conviction. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on Tuesday called it “absurd, unjust, and anti-democratic,” describing the case as “fabricated” to remove “an undesirable leader who consistently opposes Western neocolonialism.” She labeled Schmidt a “useful idiot” of the West, which “stubbornly continues to consider Bosnia and Herzegovina their protectorate.”



Monday, February 21, 2022

Military Madness > Russia enters Ukraine; The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan; Finland buys $9.4 bn worth of F-35s

..

Putin recognizes Donetsk & Lugansk then orders troops into them on 'peacekeeping mission'



By RACHAEL BUNYAN and NICK CRAVEN IN KIEV FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 16:58 EST, 21 February 2022 | UPDATED: 17:11 EST, 21 February 2022


Vladimir Putin has ordered his troops to enter Ukraine on a 'peacekeeping mission' after he officially recognised the country's eastern regions as independent states - a move that will pave the way for a long-feared Russian invasion of Kiev.

Mail Online is exaggerating the threat to Kiev here. This appears to be very similar to the takeover of Crimea. I would be surprised if Putin wanted any more than the two breakaway regions. 

The Russian President ordered his defence ministry to despatch Russian peacekeepers to eastern Ukraine's two breakaway regions - the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic and the Lugansk People's Republic - according to a decree signed by Putin recognising their independence.   

Moscow provided no details or date for any deployment, with the order saying only that it 'comes into force from the day it was signed'. 

Recognising the rebel regions' independence effectively shatters the Minsk peace agreements and opens the door for Russia to sign treaties with the 'states' and openly send troops and weapons there to defend them against Ukrainian 'threats'.

The move fuels further tension with the West and narrows the diplomatic options available to avoid war, since it is an explicit rejection of a seven-year-old ceasefire mediated by France and Germany, still touted as the framework for any future negotiations on the wider crisis.  

A framework that Ukraine never proceeded to build upon.

The Kremlin said that upon hearing that Putin will sign the order to recognise the independence of eastern Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk regions, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz had 'expressed disappointment' over the decision in phone calls with the Russian President.  

Mr Johnson said Putin's decision to recognise the two separatist Ukrainian republics was in breach of international law and an 'ill omen' and 'dark sign' that things are moving in the wrong while UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said the move would not go 'unpunished' as she announced new sanctions on Russia. 

The EU's top officials also said they will impose sanctions, while the U.S. has ordered sanctions which will prohibit new investment, trade and financing in the two separatist regions of Ukraine recognised by Putin. 

Nato chief Jens Stoltenberg also condemned Putin, accusing Russia of 'trying to stage a pretext to invade Ukraine yet again'.

Earlier, Putin vowed to decide 'today' whether to recognise Ukraine's eastern regions as independent states. He made the remark at the end of an hours-long security council meeting that was broadcast on Russian TV during which the country's top security officials were called up one by one and asked to lay out the case for war - seemingly aimed at persuading a skeptical public of the need to attack. 

Having spent days staging what are widely believed to be false flag attacks on Ukrainian soil and blaming them on Kiev, ministers presented the 'evidence' to Putin today: Claiming Russians in Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk regions are under threat of 'genocide', that no peace deal can save them, and that he must intervene to save lives. 

But in evidence that the entire spectacle was being staged - with the West warning a decision to invade has already been made - eagle-eyed viewers noticed that defence minister Sergei Shoigu's watch was five hours behind Moscow time, suggesting the hearing was pre-recorded. 

All eyes will now turn to Ukraine's border regions for evidence that Russian troops have crossed, after videos published earlier in the day showed tanks and armoured vehicles in 'battle formations' - some of them less than three miles from the frontier. 

Dymtro Kuleba, Ukraine's defence minister, said after the council meeting that 'the entire world' will watch what Russia does next and that 'everyone realises the consequences' if Putin vows to recognise the breakaway regions. 'We all should calmly focus on de-escalation efforts, [there is] no other way,' he tweeted. 

It comes as two Ukrainian soldiers died on Monday and three were wounded in a shelling attack in Zaitseve, a village 18 miles north of the rebel stronghold Donetsk, Ukraine's national police said. 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who had a phone call with Putin this evening, warned him that recognising the eastern regions would be a 'one-sided' breach of peace negotiations and that he has a 'responsibility' to de-escalate tensions by removing troops from the border. 

Meanwhile Joe Biden called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and convened a meeting of his National Security team after Putin slammed the U.S. for 'colonizing' Ukraine and using it as a 'puppet regime' in televised remarks before signing the decree.  




Pentagon names culprits behind disastrous Afghan withdrawal


US military points finger at President Joe Biden and other top officials for interfering

in evacuation Pentagon names culprits behind disastrous Afghan withdrawal


Taliban fighters guarding their new US-made aircraft after American troops leave
© Getty Images / Marcus Yam


The Pentagon’s exhaustive report on the haphazard US departure from Afghanistan has revealed many on the ground blamed constant meddling by American VIPs for “distracting” them from what needed to be done, creating the chaotic scenes that shocked observers at home.

According to the 2,000 page report, obtained by the Washington Post via the Freedom of Information Act request earlier this week, the senior officers in charge of the evacuation were even forced to change plans because of the nonstop interference from afar. The report includes numerous interviews, including testimony regarding the suicide bombing outside the airport that killed 170 Afghans and 13 Americans just days before they were supposed to leave Afghanistan for good after the longest war in US history.

“You had everyone from the White House down with a new flavor of the day for prioritization,” Rear Admiral Peter Vasely, the senior US figure in Kabul at the time of the evacuation, told the military interviewer. And it wasn’t just President Biden calling in favors, either – First Lady Jill Biden, members of Congress, journalists, and even the Vatican all weighed in on who needed rescuing the most, according to the rear admiral.

Having spent 13.5 years in the military, you would think I would know something about Military Intelligence. Apparently not! For the ranking military officer in Afghanistan was a Rear Admiral. Afghanistan is, of course, a land-locked country, so why they would put a Naval Officer in charge makes no sense to me. 

“I cannot stress enough how these high-profile requests ate up bandwidth and created competition for already-stressed resources,” Vasely continued, noting that he could “only speculate” regarding whether the confusion and chaos that resulted caused some Americans and friendly Afghans to be left behind.

With thousands of phone calls, texts, and emails descending on Kabul during the 17-day evacuation, Vasely said he had no choice but to pull personnel from other operations to form a “coordination cell” able to process all the communications. 

Social media, he said, only made things worse – giving people the ability to campaign for the military to rescue not just specific people, but specific dogs. 

Again, why allow communications from anyone other than your immediate superior to affect your operation is beyond me. They should all have been referred to the Pentagon where they had the personnel to deal with them.

While Biden insisted with less than a week to go before the US had promised to depart that no American who wanted to leave would be left behind, it soon became obvious that getting everyone out by August 31st would not be possible, and the administration reportedly considered extending the deadline into September – only to be met with a “visceral response” from the Taliban, who were effectively in charge of the country by that point.

The initial plan had been to evacuate American citizens, then lawful permanent residents, and finally Afghans who had helped the Americans during the two-decade occupation of their country. Military leaders had urged the White House and State Department to sign off on evacuation preparations weeks in advance, but complained the stateside authorities had “failed to grasp” the Taliban’s rapid progress toward Kabul, believing they had more time than they actually did.

Apparently, they were not aware of the lightning-like ISIS take-over of much of Syria and Iraq.

However, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki has defended the administration’s sluggish response, insisting the National Security Council had been meeting on the topic of withdrawing from Afghanistan for “months,” plotting out responses to various crises – except the one that actually occurred. They couldn’t possibly have foreseen how easily the Afghan security forces would be vanquished by the Taliban, she said. 

They could have, but for their arrogance.

While the exact number of US citizens left behind vacillated between 100 and 450 depending on when one asked the State Department, a White House official who spoke to the Post believes every American who wanted to leave Afghanistan has had a chance to do so.

It’s not clear whether the Pentagon’s report also included statistics on how many of the Afghans who assisted the Americans in the war effort made it out of the country. Many attracted the unwanted attention of the Taliban when the Biden administration handed out a list of their names to the fundamentalist group so that they could be allowed through the perimeter to the airport. A Pentagon official told Politico at the time that the administration had effectively handed the Taliban a “kill list,” noting the group’s reputation for doing away with their countrymen who assisted the Americans.

I am not aware of anyone on that list having been killed. If you are, please inform me.




Finland makes massive military investment with US


Helsinki signs a deal for 64 US-built F-35 stealth jets, at a reported cost of $9.4 billion


Two Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning (FILE PHOTO)
© Photo by Nicolò Campo/LightRocket via Getty Images


Finland has penned a multibillion-dollar deal with the US to purchase 64 American-built F-35 fighter jets, the Finnish Defense Forces announced on Friday. The radar-evading warplanes will reportedly cost the European country, which is traditionally militarily non-aligned, some $9.4 billion.

The aircraft will not enter service for some years, with Finnish officials previously saying deployment of the planes would begin in 2027. The new jets are being brought in to replace Finland’s current Hornet fleet.

In addition to the 64 planes, the deal sees American defense contractor Lockheed Martin providing maintenance equipment, spare parts, and training services, the Finnish Defence Forces said in a statement. 

“The aim is to ensure that Finland’s F-35 system has the best possible performance going into the 2030s,” the statement added.

Mikko Hautala, Finland’s ambassador to the US, said the purchase was not linked to the current tensions between neighboring Russia and the West. “It is part of our long-term planning and has nothing to do with the current situation as such,” Hautala stated.

In selecting the F-35, Finland rejected alternative options from other planemakers including Dassault Rafale of France and Eurofighter Typhoon in the UK. 

The country remained strategically neutral during the Cold War but has strengthened ties with the West in recent years. In January, Prime Minister Sanna Marin said the government had no plans to join NATO, but would retain the right to join if it so wishes.

Finland was forced to cede territory, including parts of Karelia, Salla, and Kuusamo, to the Soviet Union in the so-called Winter War of 1939-40. Lands and cities such as Vyborg, historically claimed by Finland, now sit in Russia.