“Allahu akbar” does not mean “God is the greatest,” as the worst paper in the Western world, the Daily Mail, says below. It means “Allah is greater,” that is, the god of Islam is greater than your god or whatever you worship. It is a declaration of the victory, superiority and supremacy of Islam, which is why jihadis scream it so often as they murder infidels or attempt to do so: the killing of the infidels is the execution of Allah’s wrath upon them. The Qur’an tells Muslims that Allah will punish the unbelievers through the hands of the believers (9:14-5).
Afghan man ‘rammed car into German crowd, killing girl, two, and her mother and injuring dozens more’: Driver ‘with ‘religious motivation’ muttered ‘Allahu Akbar’ afterwards’, murder trial hears
by Perkin Amalaraj, Daily Mail, January 16, 2026:
An Afghan man went on trial in Germany on Friday accused of ramming a car into a crowd in Munich last year, killing a two-year-old girl and her mother and injuring dozens.
The suspect, partially identified as Farhad N., 25, faces two charges of murder and 44 of attempted murder, with prosecutors saying he acted out of a ‘religious motivation’ and expected to die in the attack.
The vehicle rampage in February 2025 was one of several deadly attacks linked to migrants which inflamed a heated debate on immigration ahead of a general election that month.
Farhad N. is accused of deliberately steering his car into a 1,400-strong trade union street rally in Munich on February 13.
The vehicle came to a halt after 75 feet ‘because its front wheels lost contact with the ground due to people lying in front of and underneath the car’, according to the charge sheet.
A 37-year-old woman and her young daughter were both hurled through the air for 10 metres and sustained severe head injuries, of which they died several days later.
Prosecutors have said Kabul-born Farhad N. ‘committed the act out of excessive religious motivation’, and that he had uttered the words ‘Allahu Akbar’, meaning ‘God is the greatest’, after the car rampage.
‘He believed he was obliged to attack and kill randomly selected people in Germany in response to the suffering of Muslims in Islamic countries,’ they said when he was charged in August….
We already know about the massive fraud by Muslim Somali migrants in Minneapolis, that investigators think may have led to a $9 billion loss to the state’ s taxpayers. And we have lately learned about a similar fraud, involving tens of millions of dollars paid for welfare services that were never furnished, by Somali migrants in Lewiston, Maine. Now another massive Muslim fraud, not in America but in Berlin, has been in the news. It involved not fraudulent claims for delivery of welfare services that never actually took place, but instead, fraudulent tax refunds made to companies that never paid taxes in the first place, involving a Muslim civil servant well-placed at the Charottenburg-Wilmersdorf tax office. More on this Muslim fraud can be found here:
The Berlin civil servant and the alleged multi-million dollar fraud
by Alexander Dinger, Welt, January 21, 2026 (thanks to Medforth):
Investigators in Berlin are investigating an organised tax fraud case. At the centre of the allegations is a civil servant. Details from investigative sources now reveal the alleged extent of the scheme.
The investigation focuses on Mohamed B.*, a former civil servant at the Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf tax office. He is alleged to have approved input tax refunds over a period of years, even though the companies did not actually exist or engage in any real business activity. Investigators say that this case is one of the largest of its kind in recent history and that it is alarming how easily the allegedly criminal network is said to have operated.
According to investigators, the gang made 366 unauthorised input tax claims between June 2018 and January 2022. Investigators list a number of companies that are believed to have been part of the fraud, including several with almost identical names. These companies had neither staff nor significant turnover, yet large amounts of input tax were regularly claimed and paid out by the tax office.
The choice of names for many of the companies is also striking. According to information obtained by this editorial team, investigators do not believe this to be a coincidence, but rather a deliberate strategy: the companies are said to have been named with the initial letter S so that they fell within the area of responsibility of Mohamed B. As the responsible clerk, he is said to have checked and approved the input tax returns. According to investigators, he did so even when no supporting documents were available or the information was obviously implausible. Internal control mechanisms therefore failed to work.
The Berlin tax authorities reject the allegations but have not commented on the specific case. A spokesperson for the Senate Department of Finance told the newspaper WELT AM SONNTAG that they do not comment on individual cases or ongoing investigations, citing tax secrecy laws. Regardless of this, the tax authorities have a large number of organisational, professional and technical audit and control mechanisms at their disposal. These are reviewed on an ongoing basis. However, despite extensive preventive measures, absolute protection against criminal behaviour cannot always be guaranteed, especially in cases involving a high level of criminal energy.
Any breaches of duty by civil servants would be thoroughly investigated and prosecuted, with criminal investigations being conducted by the law enforcement authorities, the spokesperson continued. However, the investigators’ findings contradict this claim by the administration. According to them, no thorough investigation took place. The investigators suspect that the Berlin case is not an isolated one.
The investigations paint a picture of a structure based on the division of labour. Several defendants are said to have acted as formal managing directors, often people with no knowledge of German language. Others are said to have organised accounts, obtained powers of attorney and made cash withdrawals.
The gang is said to have withdrawn a total of more than €587,000 from the accounts of two alleged hotel companies alone. The investigation has been ongoing since 2022. According to information from WELT AM SONNTAG, searches were carried out on suspects in several federal states. The gang was even monitored and wiretapped at times. According to information from security circles, searches were even carried out at two Berlin notaries in the course of the proceedings….
That 587,000 euros is just what the fraudsters stole from two hotel accounts, but investigators believe the total amount may run into many millions.
Why was there no “thorough investigation” of Mohamed B. and his partners in crime for such a long time? Could it have been prompted by the desire of law enforcement authorities not to be accused of “racism” and “Islamophobia”? That, after all, is what led the police in the U.K. for so long to avoid bringing charges against the Pakistani grooming gangs. Why would the German police be any different? And what will the police, not only in Minneapolis and Lewiston and Berlin, but all over the Western world, now do about dealing with these Muslim welfare and tax refund fraudsters, now living in their midst?
