In Austria, Muslimah Thief Claims Stealing from Non-Muslims Is Permitted
Muslims can justify their taking the property of non-Muslims — that is, stealing — as licit, a kind of jizyah that otherwise cannot be imposed in countries where non-Muslims still prevail. A young Muslimah in Austria recently made clear to the police that she had a right to steal from Infidels. More on her outburst at the police station where she was being interviewed can be found here:
15-year-old ISIS sympathizer threatens police with bomb
translated from “15-jährige IS-Sympathisantin droht Polizei mit Bombe,” Exxpress, December 4, 2025 (thanks to Medforth):
A young Syrian woman was brought before the regional court on Thursday for threatening the Vienna police with a bomb attack.
The then 15-year-old had been caught shoplifting in Lugner City and taken to a police station for questioning. She was found guilty of making a dangerous threat and sentenced to two months’ probation, with a possible sentence of up to six months. The incident itself occurred on November 29, 2024.
During her police questioning, the young Muslim woman initially irritated the officers by stating that it was “permissible to steal from Kuffar (unbelievers).” A police officer pointed out the Austrian legal system to her, to which she replied that she did not want to “be in a room with Kuffar.” She then went on to say that she would “throw a bomb in an officer’s face.” She also claimed to have a knife with her. “The bomb will destroy you all,” the 15-year-old said, “I’ll start with this police station.”
Of course she believes that it is permissible not just for her, but for all Muslims, to take the property of non-Muslims. This is how the jizyah, a capitation tax on non-Muslims living in Muslim domains, can be informally exacted in countries where non-Muslims still prevail.
During the subsequent search, no knife was found. However, two framed pictures with ISIS flags were discovered in the young Syrian woman’s backpack. As further investigations revealed, the suspected sympathizer of the radical Islamic terrorist militia “Islamic State” (ISIS), together with a friend, had posed with these pictures in front of prominent locations in Vienna and had themselves photographed. These photos are said to have been circulated on social media.
The public prosecutor’s office apparently did not consider this to be ISIS propaganda, and the framed pictures were not a topic of discussion during the main trial. The defendant was not accused of actually having planned an attack. “She is not charged with planning an attack. That charge has been dropped,” the public prosecutor stated.
The now 16-year-old, who appeared in court wearing a hijab covering her hair and neck, admitted to making the incriminating statements. “It came out of provocation and anger,” said the teenager, who was represented by defense attorney David Jodlbauer. One of the two police officers, whom the defendant addressed by his first name, had “said a few words that I felt were provocative. I won’t let any man tell me to go back to my country.” Therefore, she “wanted to scare them (the two police officers) a little.”
“She said she would blow us all up because we were so disrespectful. And to me personally, she said that she would throw the bomb at me and that the bomb would be the last thing I would see in my life,” one of the two officers reported. The then 15-year-old had been “very upset.” When asked if he had been afraid, the 27-year-old replied: “Personally, I didn’t take it that seriously. I didn’t feel threatened.”
His colleague, also 27, felt differently. “I took it seriously. I was filled with fear and anxiety,” the police officer described.
The defendant found this incomprehensible. “People who are more mature should not believe something like that from a 15-year-old,” she said. When asked if she wanted to apologize to the police officers, she answered with a clear “No.” She also did not change her legal opinion that it is permissible to take valuables from non-Muslims: “I want to stick with that. Because that’s how it is.” The judge then remarked, “It will happen more often in Austria that you will have to be in a room with non-believers. Will you be able to handle that?” The girl, now 16 years old, answered this question with silence.
Although ISIS itself was not the subject of the trial, Judge Daniel Potmesil still wanted to know: “What are your views on ISIS?” – “I have no opinion on them.” – “What are your views on terrorist attacks?” – “I have no comment.” – “What are your views on non-believers?” – “I have no contact with them.”
This teenage Muslima was caught red-handed as a shoplifter at the Lugner mall. She refused to show any remorse for her theft, but declared it to be permissible for Muslims to take the property of non-Muslims — “that’s how it is,” she claimed, according to the laws of Islam. She even made death threats to the police, telling them that she would “blow them all up” because they were “disrespectful,” and told one officer she would throw a bomb in his face. She declared her sympathy for the Islamic State.
And her punishment? There was none, really. She was given a two-month suspended sentence. No jail time, no fine, nothing. Not even a slap on the wrist. There is not the slightest reason to believe that she won’t carry on with her stealing from non-Muslims unless, and until, some Austrian judge finally has the good sense to give her jail time. And even then, so convinced is she of the rightness of her own Islamically mandated behavior in stealing from Infidels, she might not be dissuaded.
She needs to be deported along with anyone else who puts Sharia Law above the laws of the country they live in.
No comments:
Post a Comment