Military Madness > Ukraine can use most UK-donated weapons invading Russia

 

Britain: Ukraine permitted to use U.K.-donated weapons

in Russia ground offensive

By Paul Godfrey

Russian servicemen fire a Giatsint-S self-propelled gun toward Ukrainian positions on Wednesday as fighting entered an eighth day in a counter-offensive in which Ukraine claims it has penetrated more than 20 miles into Russian territory. Britain has clarified that Ukraine can use weapons it has supplied to it on Russian soil. Photo courtesy Russian Defense Ministry/EPA-EFE

Aug. 15 (UPI) -- Ukrainian forces are authorized to use British-supplied weapons in their ground offensive on western Russia, London indicated on Thursday.

The Ministry of Defense said its policy was that Ukraine had the right to use the weapons to defend itself, including on Russian territory, provided it does not breach international law.

The waiver did not, however, apply to Anglo-French-made Storm Shadow cruise missiles -- a caveat the new Labor government reiterated within days of taking office July 5.

"There has been no change in U.K. Government policy, under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter Ukraine has a clear right of self-defense against Russia's illegal attacks, that does not preclude operations inside Russia," an MoD spokesman said.

So, Russia illegally attacked Ukraine inside Russia? Does that make any sense at all?

"We make clear during the gifting process that equipment is to be used in line with international law," he added.

Battles between Russian forces and invading Ukrainian mechanized units pushing into Russia's Kursk region after crossing the border on Aug. 6 could now be fought with anti-tank missiles, artillery, armored vehicles and other weapons gifted by Britain.

Britain's war industry just popped another case of champaigne.

The BBC reported that some of the 13 surviving Challenger-2 main battle tanks donated to Kyiv by Britain have already seen action in Ukraine's ground incursion which Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrsky said had penetrated 22 miles into Russian territory and controlled 82 settlements over a 444-square-mile area.

Syrsky said "a military commandant's office" led by a senior military leader had been established to fill a power vacuum in the areas of Russia now occupied by Ukraine.

"To maintain law and order and meet the immediate needs of the population, a military commandant's office has been created on the territories controlled. Maj. Gen. [Eduard] Moskalyov has been appointed to lead it," Syrskyi said in a video update to a military staff meeting posted on President Volodymyr Zelensky's X account.

"The situation is under control in general," he told the president.

Moscow claimed the opposite, saying its forces had inflicted signifcant losses on Ukrainian forces and were gaining the upper hand.

The state-run news agency TASS reported that the Russian Armed Forces' North battlegroup had pushed back an assault near Kremyanoye on Wednesday, retaken the village of Krupets and rained heavy fire on Ukrainian units deployed to the west of Russkaya.

The report also claimed the Russian army blocked efforts by AFU mobile units to break through deeper into Russian territory in six other areas including Varvarovka and Alekseevsky in neighboring Belgorod province where the governor declared a state of emergency Wednesday.

It also struck Ukrainian forces in Olgovka, Snagosti, Pogrebki, Mirny, Zaoleshenka, Uspenovka and Yuzhny and used a short-range, tactical ballistic missile to take out a military convoy and 15 fuel tankers in a cross-border attack near Lubny in Sumy province.

"Kyiv lost up to 340 servicemen and 19 armored vehicles, including five Bradley infantry fighting vehicles and 14 armored combat vehicles, as well as eight vehicles, five field artillery guns, a multiple rocket launcher and two electronic warfare stations," according to the report.

Britain is the third largest military backer of Ukraine after the United States and Germany, contributing $9.76 billion of hardware, equipment and munitions in the two-and-half-years to June 30.

But that $10 bn dollars in hardware, etc., was paid for by the British government directly to British arms merchants either to purchase the goods or to replace the goods taken from military stockpiles. $10 bn! That is about $270 per taxpayer, or $540 for a home with two taxpayers. For a city with 100,000 taxpayers, it's a loss of $27 mn.

Britain could have done something useful with that money. British taxpayers could have benefitted greatly from having that money in their pockets instead of in the pockets of war industry oligarchs. This is all part of the global wealth transfer conspiracy to impoverish the middle class and increase the wealth and power of the oligarchs.

==================================================================