Not even Islam wants Rohingyans; Greta adopts Islamic Logic - 22 Arab countries are not enough, One Jewish country is too many

Rohingya are Muslim people. They were driven out of Myanmar, a deeply Buddhist country, and they are being fleeced by Muslim criminals in the deeply Muslim country of Bangladesh. Many have made their way to Indonesia in the hope of a better life, but the locals in Aceh don't want them there. Perhaps they are afraid they will bring the criminal element with them. In any event, nobody seems to want Muslim refugees, not even Muslim countries (Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in the world, population-wise). Nobody except Canada, where Trudeau seems to think we need more Jew-haters from Gaza.

‘We don’t want them here’: Rohingya refugees

face uncertain future in Indonesia

Hundreds of angry locals gathered to protest outside a camp for Rohingya refugees on the Indonesian island of Sabang on Monday, December 18, in the latest sign of growing hostility towards the persecuted Myanmar minority. Indonesia has seen a surge in Rohingya arriving in recent weeks as a growing number seek to escape deteriorating conditions in crowded refugee camps in Bangladesh, but they face an uncertain future in the country, with Jakarta so far offering them only temporary shelter.

Greta Thunberg slams COP28 climate deal

and Israel, waves Palestinian flag

by Maayan Jaffe-Hoffman, Jerusalem Post, December 17, 2023:

“The final outcome of #COP28 is not a ‘historic win,'” Thunberg tweeted. “It is yet another example of extremely vague and watered-down texts full of loopholes” that won’t solve the problem.

The climate problem is not to be “solved.” It is, rather, a situation that can be ameliorated. That is a different thing. It’s like the jihad being conducted by the Palestinians against Israel. That jihad cannot be “solved” as long as Islam exists, but nonetheless, a modus vivendi can be achieved with the Arabs if Israel remains overwhelmingly, and obviously, more powerful militarily than its enemies. That’s called deterrence, and it worked well during the Cold War.

Climate activist Greta Thunberg once again fused the Palestinian cause with the climate change movement as she participated in her weekly “Fridays for Future” protest outside parliament in Stockholm on December 15.

 What do climate hysterics have in common with antisemitism? Godlessness!

During the demonstration, she prominently displayed a Palestinian flag and held a “Free Palestine” sign – a photo of which she uploaded to her personal X account while bashing the Conference of the Parties (COP28) climate deal. She also proclaimed that the world will be “transitioning away from fossil fuels” to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

It’s mix-n’-match in Greta Thunberg’s overheated brain. She’s holding up the latest in vexillogical fashion — the flag of a future Palestinian state that, its supporters around the world fondly believe, will replace the Jewish state “from the river to the sea” with a twenty-third Arab one. At the same time, she continues to deplore the failure, as she sees it, of the meeting in Dubai of COP28.

Greta seems to have adopted Islamic logic which states that 22 Arab states is not enough, and one Jewish state is too much! 

Dr. Sultan al-Jaber was the president of COP28. He is the UAE’s environment minister, and he is also the CEO of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC). Many were up in arms that someone so connected to the oil industry should have been the head of the conference, especially when they discovered that before the conference began he had said in an online event on Nov. 21 that “there is no science out there, or no scenario out there, that says the phase-out of fossil fuel is what’s going to achieve 1.5 [a rise in global temperature of 1.5 degrees].” Furthermore, he added, “it would be impossible to stop burning fossil fuels and sustain economic development, “unless you want to take the world back into caves.”

The Arab oil states were the spoilers at COP28. Just before COP28 began, the Arab oil states had held their own meeting in Doha, Qatar, where they passed a resolution essentially saying that “oil is here to stay.” And when they went to Dubai, they were determined to keep any language calling for an end to fossil fuels out of the final document. It was a battle royal, and in the end the Arabs decided to yield, just a little, so great was the clamor against them, by allowing “fossil fuels” to be mentioned, but making sure that the language about reducing their use was both vague and weak. In the Global Stocktake COP28, the parties agreed to “transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade, so as to achieve net zero by 2050.” There’s plenty of room to maneuver in that call for a “transition…in a just, orderly, and equitable manner.” No binding commitments were made by individual countries to lower their carbon emissions by a set amount.

What Saudi Arabia think is a “just orderly, and equitable manner” of transition away from fossil fuels will be very different from what the U.K., or France, or India might think. The Saudis, Emiratis, and Kuwaitis will do everything they can to throw a spanner in the works, so determined are they to sell every last barrel of oil they have in the ground. No one wants to be left holding billions of barrels in a world that has completely “transitioned” to solar, wind, hydropower, and nuclear energy.