Islam - Europe > Nordic Countries to gang up on rejected asylum seekers; Berlin Police's shameful act; Islamic Hysteria in Germany; Islamic Insanity in France

..

This was unthinkable just a year or two ago. Are Nordic left-wingers waking up to reality?

Nordic countries agree deal to share deportation flights

The Local, October 31, 2023:

Nordic migration and justice ministers on Tuesday announced a deal which will see the five countries share flights to return foreigners who have had asylum claims rejected back to their homelands.

Denmark has spearheaded harder lines on migrants in the Nordics and stepped up initiatives to discourage immigration and put roadblocks for the acquisition of Danish nationality. Tuesday’s deal followed a two-day meeting with ministers from Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland and Denmark in Copenhagen.

Denmark’s immigration ministry said in a statement that the five countries had agreed to co-operate on joint flights from “a Nordic country to a third country, so that people without legal residence in several of the Nordic countries can depart from one Nordic country to a third country”.

This would be done in collaboration with the EU’s border surveillance agency, Frontex, the statement said.

Along with the joint flights, the five countries agreed to increase collaboration between migration attachés responsible for deportation, and also to work jointly on increasing support to migrants before they leave Africa….

 CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS:

The Nordic countries that are planning to deport illegal migrants are Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark and Iceland, all of which have a jihadist problem that is correlated to open-door immigration policies. The most surprising country, however, to be participating in deportation flights to expel illegals is Iceland. Iceland is a distinctly radically Leftist country, in which Robert Spencer was poisoned after making a speech. I myself was fired by the Canadian government for an article I wrote, in which I warned Icelanders about the deceit of Islamic supremacists who pose as “moderates.”

==============================================================================================

Fury as German police are filmed tearing down Israel hostage

posters: Officials are blasted for ‘absurd’ excuse

that officers were protecting ‘social peace'

by Perkin Amalaraj, Daily Mail, November 1, 2023:

Berlin officials were accused of playing ‘bull**** bingo’ after trying to justify several of the city’s officers tearing down posters depicting images of Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

At least three uniformed officers were videoed wordlessly taking down posters that share information about some of the roughly 200 civilians who were taken from Israel into Gaza by Hamas following its deadly October 7 attack.

The posters were stuck to an advertising column, understood to be owned and operated by Ilg-Außenwerbung.

The video, shared to social media, comes after police in London and Manchester were severely criticised for taking down fliers depicting hostages taken into Gaza by Hamas.

Berlin’s chief of police, Barbara Slowik, defended the officers’ actions, and said the officers ‘apparently felt compelled to act’ upon seeing the posters.

The officers reportedly took the posters down without anyone asking them to, a move that has infuriated many

A police spokesperson told German newspaper Tagesspiegel that the officers’ actions were based on ‘their own findings.

The fact that taking down the posters hurt feelings “affects me and I regret that extremely,” she added.

But as chief of the Berlin Police Department, instead of defending the police who pulled down the posters, shouldn’t Barbara Slowik punish the officers who pulled down the posters? And shouldn’t she issue an order that no posters are to be pulled down, whether by the police or anyone else? And will she see to it that anyone who is caught violating that order will be slapped with a stiff fine or even jail time?

It is not currently clear what grounds the police used to justify taking the posters down, with a police spokesperson telling German newspaper Tagesspiegel that the officers’ actions were based on ‘their own findings.’

The spokesperson told the newspaper that there was no complaint that prompted the action, and no criminal charges were filed against the owner of the advertising column.

There had been no complaint about the posters. The police officers involved were acting only on their perception that Muslims would be angry to have the public reminded of Hamas’ atrocities, which might lead to greater sympathy for the hated “Zionist entity.” Better, in their view, to alienate Jews and others concerned with the hostages, by pulling down the posters, rather than risk the wrath of maddened Muslims. Thus do the police end up surrendering to the mere perception of a threat of violence from Muslims.

Berlin’s state minister for the interior, Iris Spranger, tried to justify the force’s move by claiming that the posters were torn down to preserve ‘security and order’, as well as ‘social peace.’

She later admitted that ‘the effect of the action’ was painful for the families of the hostages, and said she regretted it ‘with all my heart.’

But officials were heavily criticised for the way police handled the situation.

A spokesperson for the ‘Independents’ police union, Jörn Badendick, accused Berlin officials of playing ‘bull**** bingo.’

‘An explanation that there was a misjudgment would be sufficient. In the heated mood surrounding the Middle East conflict, someone may have feared that someone would feel provoked by the posters,’ he told Tagesspiegel

Berlin’s governing mayor, Kai Wegner, told BILD: ‘The impression that has been created is extremely regrettable. There is no doubt in my mind: our city and our police stand by the victims of terrorism and their families.’

If the city stands by the “victims of terrorism and their families,” why has Mayor Wegner not charged the police who tore down the posters with acting ultra vires, that is beyond the scope of their authority? No one had ordered them to pull the posters down; they were acting on their own. And why is it that “social peace” must be kept by yielding to the violent bullyboys of Islam? Why must “social peace” be achieved by caving to Muslims, and treating Jewish feelings with such contumely?

Alexander J. Herrmann, a legal policy spokesman for the Christian-Democratic Union party, said: ‘In view of the numerous illegal posters without legal notice in the city and also in view of the existing discretion of the officers, I am not convinced by the Berlin police’s attempt to justify this.’

In other words, there are many “illegal posters” all over Berlin that the police have done nothing about. They have been highly selective in what they chose to remove — so far, it seems, only the hostage posters have been taken down because, the police said, if they were allowed to stay up that would provoke “someone” to violence, and break the “social peace” that is apparently to be achieved by sacrificing the rights of Jews to disseminate their pleas for the freedom of the hostages.

Media figures also attacked Berlin officials, with the political editor of Die Welt, Frederik Schindler, writing shortly after the video circulated: ‘This is an absurd setting of priorities – and a capitulation to those who are bothered by such posters.’

Social media users were furious with Berlin’s police force.

One person wrote on X: ‘The police are simply too cowardly to show civil courage and independence.’

Another said: ‘This is called selective justice.’

“Capitulation” is exactly the right word: the police so fearful of antagonizing Muslims who have repeatedly shown their readiness to engage in violence, know that Muslims will pull down the posters themselves if the police don’t do it for them, so the “cowardly” police have anticipated their desires and done it for them. Unlike Muslims, Jews don’t riot or threaten violence, so there is no need to worry about their reaction to the posters being taken down.

What should now be done by way of remedying this appalling incident? Here’s what: the Berlin city government should order the police to put back up the same posters as those some of their members took down. Furthermore, the police, dispensing with heir previous concern not to anger Muslims, should promptly arrest for “disturbing social peace” anyone who attempts to tear down those posters. That would reestablish a semblance of sanity, and decency, in the Berlin police department.

Syrian stabbed people in gym: ‘Wanted to kill enemies of Islam,'

translated from “Syrer stach in Fitnessstudio zu: “Wollte Feinde des Islams töten”,” 

Exxpress, November 2, 2023

In April, eXXpress reported extensively on a Syrian who carried out knife attacks against passers-by in a fitness studio and on the street in the German city of Duisburg. The 27-year-old Islamist proudly admitted the crimes in court. He wanted to fulfill the demands of the terrorist militia IS and “kill all enemies.”

There is no remorse in the confession, report trial observers. In the knife attacks in April, a man was killed on the street and four people were injured in a gym. For the perpetrator, a Syrian who came to Germany as a “refugee” in 2016, this was revenge for all crimes against Muslims worldwide. He wanted to kill as many people as possible.

The Syrian, charged with murder and attempted murder, also admitted to posting an IS article on Facebook on April 9. It said that the Islamic State would remain and its soldiers would expand the battle fronts “until the entire earth becomes a single jihad,” the newspaper “Welt” quoted the Islamist’s disgusting worldview as saying.

Parts of Duisburg and Berlin were considered No-Go Zones by police way back in 2015:

‘In Berlin or in the north of Duisburg there are neighborhoods where colleagues hardly dare to stop a car — because they know that they’ll be surrounded by 40 or 50 men.’ 

Criminal clans threaten the police in Duisburg-Marxloh

France: Muslim migrant screams in court,

‘Allahu akbar, you are all going to die together!’

Translated from “Amiens : deux avocats et un procureur menacés de mort par un migrant,” 

Courrier Picard, October 31, 2023

How old is Daouda Sangare? 15 years old, as he claims and as the physique of this young man with a choppy flow of speech seems to disprove?…

A minor refugee in an emergency situation or adult waiting for asylum? That is the whole complexity of the case of this Guinean who arrived in France in February. His situation worsens, and he becomes angry….

In Melun, he smashed everything in the Palace of Justice, which will result in him receiving a summons in a few days. 

In Amiens, in a law office in the city centre, the other Monday, October 16, he attacked his lawyer. 

On June 18, he couldn’t stand the fact that the door was closed at lunchtime and insulted and threatened another lawyer who had picked up the phone, saying: “In any case, someone is going to die…I’m going to give you hell, I’m going to f*** you. You are sons of a…, you do nothing for me. You are racists. I’m going to kill someone.” 

He is caught outside the juvenile court, where he confronts the security guards and then has nothing better to say in front of a prosecutor than, “Allahu Akbar, you’re all going to die together” (which brings him a new charge and perhaps a new trial)….

The lawyers, “they know exactly how to screw me in the sh…” The French state, “it’s racist.”

“Does anyone want to die? This is my way of speaking. Eh! It was up to France to tell me what the rules are in this country!”…

Lawyer Hanifa Malik wonders if her client “gets everything he says right.” She recounts the career of the man who lost his mother at a very young age and was abandoned by his father. The man who confided in her that he was “afraid of going crazy after what he saw.” The lawyer said she was “saddened that the words Allahu Akbar, uttered by millions of Muslims at least five times a day, are only associated with terrorism.”

When those words are spoken along with a threat to murder everyone, it's probably safe to assume they are associeted with terrorism.

Daouda Sangare is sentenced to three months in prison without parole and remains in custody in Amiens. He is also obliged to leave French territory. “I have crossed the desert, I have crossed the sea; if I have to, I will go somewhere else,” he assured.

"Obliged to leave French territory". Does that mean they are asking him nicely?

Try going to a Muslim country, I'm sure you will find peace and happiness there.